Not even close. They are testing the new algo to make sure it has a smooth transition once it hits the mainnet at the moment.

I did read it properly?

“5% of total coins (1.05 billion) have been premined in block 1.”

Etnc came at the right time? Yeah, the right time for the devs maybe. They have made so little effort and added nothing, just a copy paste etn code. They even copy pasted their name. Lol.

If you want to mine something that is similar, at least mine Stellite which forked electronium but actually have proper devs and are making an effort



Why do you think?

When it eventually does go up, it will no doubt be a copy paste template with little to no information about the team running it.

Lol. Another scam coin looking to make a quick buck. A lot of what is said in the first post maybe true, but what is it exactly Electronium Classic offering apart from copy paste, nice premine for devs?

The website does not even work, no indication of who the devs are, roadmap is embarrassing etc = another copy paste shitcoin.

If you wanted to be taken a bit more seriously, you should have announced the project, set a date for launch and done a much better job with the ANN.

This is all just growing pains. You have to remember that this field is still relatively new.

Just imagine if they are doing as well as they are now, how well they will be doing when they get the tech fixed and star marketing full force?

They have not even started marketing properly spending the ico money. Once they do, people who panic sold will be sorry.

They just need to get the tech side fixed before they take marketing to the next stage.

As soon as whitepaper and new website comes out the price is going to moon. I have been filling my bags and mining this for a while now

Thanks. Any plans of integrating something a bit easier on the eyes into SRBMiner?

Exactly right. They went to all the effort to make a nice website and post here and did not even get the basics like this right.

Thanks for the response dev. As mentioned, I like the project. I am just comparing it to something like say Loki which only had around 150 blocks mined before release and they managed mine regarding checkpoints etc.

Also when I read the part mentioning Electroneum and then on launch the wallets did not even work it frustrated me and made me roll my eyes. As these are things that should have been rigorously tested before release. I hope you can understand where I am coming from.

Looking forward to see Github working soon.

I never said it was. Relative to what a new coin should have however, it is.

Are you also saying it is not a big deal that the mining did not begin today over a week ago before it was announced? Not to mention wallets and links to github not working on launch? I like what I see of the project, but they lose credibility doing these things in my opinion.

Looking further into this and it shows Block Height: 1981 and that the first block was mined on 5/2/2018, 3:05:04 AM.

Maybe the dev would care to explain how something that launched today has such a high block height? Seems greedy and dodgy, but I will give the dev a chance to explain before I jump to a conclusion about this coin.

Looks nice and all. But having a pop at Electroneum and then not getting your wallets working and the link to Github working is a bit embarrassing... Here is the link on your website which goes to an error page:

https://github.com/furiousteam/BLOC



Where is the git hub link dev? Link to CLI wallet?

Lets see how long it takes for a reply and we will see if this project is what it claims to be

Good job doktor. Lots of updates.

One of the things that has stopped me from using it over xmr-stak is the web interface when checking for hashrates via browser. In xmr-stak it is very easy to read, it shows errors in detail, like which gpu caused the error or if it was a network error etc. All in a pleasant to the eye interface.

Do this for your and you will have another user

Oooooh nice. But what I want to know is...

When whitepaper...

When Lambo?

100% this. Once whitepaper is out if it is good, I will be buying this for sure. Come on dev, get the whitepaper out. You can always make a 2.0 edition of the whitepaper later on.

How much voltage on memory and on core please?

Yea

Just need that whitepaper now. When whitepaper dev?

Hi dev. Can you please provide a cli wallet instead of a simple wallet pleases. Cli wallet has a lot more options.

I have a weird situation. I have a 6 GPU Vega 56 rig and 3 use GPU Core Voltage (VDDC) at 0.981 and the other 3 at 0.863

All I can think about is they are on separate PSU's but those PSU's are identical. They all use the same power tabel and clocks speeds for the most part so it is not that. What else can it be?

Thanks.

Looking forward to a response from the dev.

Seems decent. Need more information about the team though.

So how do we mine this then? I see no CLI Wallet? Step by step how to get mining would be nice dev. Thanks