Search content
Sort by
Showing 8 of 8 results by Piranha771
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | Anonymous (alpha) | KGW | No Premine | ASIC Resistant
could someone give me an example of their bat file command line? is the look-up gap 2 needed btw? what's that for
okay i'm getting "calc compile failed" "creating kernel search error"
okay i'm getting "calc compile failed" "creating kernel search error"
Have you tried this version? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;all
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | Anonymous (alpha) | KGW | No Premine | ASIC Resistant
First, those look a lot like the digibyte logo, second, the digibyte logo is terrible, third.. well you get where I'm going with this
No problem, it was just a suggestion and nothing more. Thanks for your feedback
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | Anonymous (alpha) | KGW | No Premine | ASIC Resistant
Please stop this nonsense! Here is why https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=408268.0
Uhm... both currencies start with D, thats right. So should we rename this coin or just put the letter 'A' on the logo even when it has nothing to do with 'A' just to maintain 100% differency from the DigiCoin?
I can't see the risk of confusion in my coin design sorry.
Darkcoin already has great logo.
It's okay, but it dosen work as alogo its a virtual coin picture at the moment. For example go to http://coinmarketcap.com/ and compare the BTC and the DRK logo? While the DRK is a blurry mess because of the size, the BTC logo is still perfectly noticeable.
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | Anonymous (alpha) | KGW | No Premine | ASIC Resistant
If you can play around and provide say 5-10 variations it would be nice
http://abload.de/img/cex19uqn4.png http://abload.de/img/cex244pdw.png http://abload.de/img/cex3mspqa.png http://abload.de/img/cex4hfqqj.pnghttp://abload.de/img/cex5rxoep.png http://abload.de/img/cex60kqy7.png http://abload.de/img/cex7njqlh.png http://abload.de/img/cex8xxrl2.pnghttp://abload.de/img/cex9naryu.png http://abload.de/img/cex10v1phb.png http://abload.de/img/cex11umqvg.png http://abload.de/img/cex12sargm.pnghttp://abload.de/img/cex13llqt1.png http://abload.de/img/cex1415q2v.png http://abload.de/img/cex15zyote.png http://abload.de/img/cex16enqiw.pnghttp://abload.de/img/cex175bq38.png http://abload.de/img/cex18hho5v.png
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | Anonymous (alpha) | KGW | No Premine | ASIC Resistant
I have thought about a logo design too.
This is just an example of the D style and ring proportions, so no fix on coloring.
What was important for me, is the fact that it needs to be scaleable so that when you need a very small icon (e.g. windows taskbar icon or exchange sites) it should stay readable and recognizable.
512x512, 64x64 and 32x32 resolution
http://abload.de/img/drk_logo_raw_51269bgu.png http://abload.de/img/drk_logo_raw_6452lmo.png http://abload.de/img/drk_logo_raw_32sxlwj.png
This is just an example of the D style and ring proportions, so no fix on coloring.
What was important for me, is the fact that it needs to be scaleable so that when you need a very small icon (e.g. windows taskbar icon or exchange sites) it should stay readable and recognizable.
512x512, 64x64 and 32x32 resolution
http://abload.de/img/drk_logo_raw_51269bgu.png http://abload.de/img/drk_logo_raw_6452lmo.png http://abload.de/img/drk_logo_raw_32sxlwj.png
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | Anonymous (alpha) | KGW | No Premine | ASIC Resistant
Hey, I just started my Miner and getting 1.7mh/s from my GPU, but it dosen't commit any shares.
This is what the log looks like.
I detects when there are new block, but it dosen't seem to do anything.
Can somebody tell me whats wrong here?
Nevermind. The SPH-sgminer version is working for me
This is what the log looks like.
Code:
[21:02:36] Probing for an alive pool
[21:02:36] No servers were found that could be used to get work from.
[21:02:36] Please check the details from the list below of the servers you have
input
[21:02:36] Most likely you have input the wrong URL, forgotten to add a port, or
have not set up workers
[21:02:36] Pool: 0 URL: stratum+tcp://m.drk.yobapool.net:3333 User: xxxxx
.w1 Password: xxxxx
[21:02:36] Press any key to exit, or sgminer will try again in 15s.
[21:02:36] (null) difficulty changed to 0.003906
[21:02:46] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[21:02:51] Network diff set to 225
[21:02:51] Work available from pools, resuming.
[21:02:36] No servers were found that could be used to get work from.
[21:02:36] Please check the details from the list below of the servers you have
input
[21:02:36] Most likely you have input the wrong URL, forgotten to add a port, or
have not set up workers
[21:02:36] Pool: 0 URL: stratum+tcp://m.drk.yobapool.net:3333 User: xxxxx
.w1 Password: xxxxx
[21:02:36] Press any key to exit, or sgminer will try again in 15s.
[21:02:36] (null) difficulty changed to 0.003906
[21:02:46] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[21:02:51] Network diff set to 225
[21:02:51] Work available from pools, resuming.
I detects when there are new block, but it dosen't seem to do anything.
Can somebody tell me whats wrong here?
Nevermind. The SPH-sgminer version is working for me
Re: Messenger-App Threema akzeptiert auch Bitcoin (nur für Android ab 4.0)
Naja, eine Verschlüsselung bei solchen Nachrichtenprogrammen bringt nur etwas, wenn nicht nur die verschlüsselung selbst sicher ist, sondern dein gerät auch nicht beim eintippen, also vor den verschlüsseln, abgehört werden kann. Das ist bei Smartphones üblicherweise nicht der Fall, weshalb einem hier meiner Meinung nach nur falsche Sicherheit vorgegaukelt wird.
Es geht nicht darum deine Kommunikation vom Eintippen, bis zum Auge des lesenden unsichtbar zu machen. Das geht auch garnicht (was würde bei dem Anspruch dann ein Super-Sicher-Phone bringen, wenn jeder in der Ubahn immer noch sehen kann was du da eintippst).
Es geht darum das nicht jede Hanswurst, die für die Vermittlung der Daten (von Handy zu Handy) zuständig ist, mitlesen kann was du Schreibst. So wie bei WhatsApp & Co. das der Fall ist. Um bei Threema dich abhören zu können, muss entweder speziell dein Handy infiziert werden, oder jemand auf dich angesetzt werden. Beides stellt eine ziemlich hohe Aufwandshürde da. Im Gegensatz zu WhatsApp, dort kann NSA & Co. alles ohne einen Aufwand mitschneiden, da sie sowieso schon an jedem Unterseekabel hängen.
Das Prinzip was Threema verfolgt is schon ziemlich gut. Denn wie viele Andere schon gesagt haben ist die Bequemlichkeit die größte Hürde für Sicherheit. Threema verbirgt das meiste vor dem Benutzer und stellt die Sicherheit mit einem Ampelsystem da. Sicher nicht perfekt, aber besser als Plaintext alle mal.
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | Anonymous (alpha) | KGW | No Premine | ASIC Resistant
I have some concerns about this.
First if this is intedendet to be the official DRK logo: A Logo should always be highly stylized. The more stylised the logo is the more can it be used on all scenarios.
What we got here is a artificial Photo of a coin. It has a texture, lens flare and shadowing on it.
Therefore it is not stylized and will cause problems.
First problem is that it cant be vectorized. This means you will loose detail on small scales as of small "DRK accepted here"-Buttons and will lead in less recognizability. In the need of a big scale the coin gets coarse, because the source texture will lack in detail.
Second problem is you cant use it for any material layer. For example making a real coin out of it. What you basically do is putting a metal texture image on a metal textured real coin. This will result in an ugly coin.
The same goes for the lens flare on the top of the 'D' and all kinds of shadowing in the image.
Dont get me wrong, the Coin is looking cool in the image, you did a good job there. But its hardly usable as a logo or as raw data for further production.
My second concern is the "stabilizer" (I dont know what they are called, but often they are described as making the currency logo "more stable" looking e.g. $BTC) on the D. It goes down. Down. Why down? Is the implication of this that the currency is going down soon? Better make that thing going up
