If you deposited coins directly connected to eXch to FixedFloat now, I think there is a 70% probability (at least) that this service will confiscate your money and try to get as much personal information from you as possible.

---

I don't know how these scumbags from FixedFloat market themselves, but I can guess. Their website and documentation probably boast how they are non-custodial, KYC free, quick, no hidden fees, and absolutely trusted. Did I get it right?

Anytime you see something like that, go directly to their T&Cs, Privacy Policy, and other docs they may have. Search for keywords like "KYC", "AML", "identity", "verify", "verification", "document", "ID", "passport", etc. If you can't find these, still read the docs. Look for the context of where those terms are mentioned and you will probably find out that you agree with the service being able to freeze you out of your money and having to submit all sorts of personal information if you want to get it back.

This can be both good and bad, depending on how you approach it. If you look at it as just a game and a fun time but with a clear idea about how much money you will spend on that game, then you might be able to enjoy yourself for a while without going through stress when you don't win. But games can be addictive and make us spend more time having fun than we initially wanted to or more than we can afford to. Digital money on a screen isn't like physical cash in your hands. The experience of spending them isn't the same. With cash, you notice that your stash is smaller and your wallet is lighter. With crypto and digital money, it's just numbers on a screen that don't affect you in the same way. And because you are having fun, you might not be paying attention to what those numbers are displaying.

Za neutralne gledaoce i ljubitelje nogometa je ono sinoć bila vrhunska zabava. Teško da se nešto više može poželjeti. Vodstva jedne ekipe pa preokreti pa nesigurnost. Par minuta te dijeli od pobjede pa primiš izjednačujući gol i onda opet preokret u produžetcima. Ali za istinske navijače i jedne i druge ekipe je ova utakmica uvod u srčani udar.
Obe ekipe su zašlužile da prođu dalje kako su igrale u ovom dvomeču. Da ima neki buzzer da se pritisne da i Inter i Barcelona odu u finale, to je sinoć trebalo biti pritisnuto.

The thing is, most people don't want to to stop regardless if their first experience was good or bad. If it was good, they want to repeat it, thinking luck was on my side last time, perhaps it will be so again today. If the gambling experience was negative, they will try to recover their previous losses and land on top the second time. 

I am not sure what they mean when they say that they deactivated the domain. Both xchange(.)cx and stealthex(.)co are still online. The latter is redirecting to the official domain. Only the first one is a phishing site.

1. Kolkata Knight Riders
2. Over
3. Punjab Kings
4. Under
5. Royal Challengers Bengaluru
6. Over
7. Kolkata Knight Riders
8. Over
9. Punjab Kings
10. Under
11. Delhi Capitals
12. Over

Trezor is currently running a giveaway on their X page where you can win a Trezor T hardware wallet.

You need to do two things to participate in this competition:
1. Follow Trezor Talks podcast on Spotify
2. Share a link in the comments to your favorite Trezor Talks podcast episode.

The winner will be announced on 9 May.

Link to Trezor Talks podcasts:
https://open.spotify.com/show/4PsdDlCO4k1mDT6x6jHTy5

It's irrelevant what you think of me personally and I don't really care. I am not expressing any opinions on you as a person either. I am pointing out what CCE.Cash as an exchange is and what it's not. If you don't want to accept that, then it's totally on you.

This is now off-topic, but it's an example from a different swap platform that referred to itself as being anonymous and not requiring KYC. Then this happened: Godex locked my coins.

Good. Thank you. Not advertising yourself as something you aren't would be a good start.

Fair or unfair, wagering requirements for bonuses exist almost on all online casinos. You have wagering requirements on your deposits even if you don't claim a welcome bonus. Usually it's 1x of the deposit. Some betting sites allow a 0.5x playthrough before you are allowed to withdraw but I have also seen wagering requirements of 2-3x on sports betting, for example.

Ja sam čuo da SirJohnVonSlotty voli da padne pod žene. Ne znam koliko često pada na catfishing prevare. Opće pravilo je da ako ti se javi lijepa žena sa perfektnim slikama na društvenim mrežama i traži nešto od tebe, ne vjeruj mu.

Pa ta Solana je postala sinonim za greške, prekide u radu i meme rug pull-ove. Jedan od razloga što toliki broj ljudi kad čuje kripto pomisli na prevaru.

24 - Pmalek
Thanks

Do others agree? Should the new approach be to include complaints to take down the phishing sites xchange(.)cx and stealthex(.)co as well?
These scammers from monero(.)forex and darketblible (intentionally misspelled) will then surely replace them with other phishing domains for the same exchanges.

I have only heard of CoinPoker from the three casinos whose welcome bonuses were mentioned in the OP. I can picture their red logo in my head.
Generally speaking, welcome bonuses aren't there to give away free money. If that was the case, casinos would be out of business quickly. The rules aren't in your favor and it's made so that the big majority of new players will lose the bonus funds given to them. The casinos don't lose much if some players manage to meet the wagering requirements and players are under the impression that they are filling their pockets with free money.

Wrong. Fully custodial and centralized instant exchange. If you want, you can add no-account in that explanation.

Are you using AI for your posts or what/who writes these? CCECash and intermediaries have absolute custody and control of the funds. Users have zero control of the funds during the swap process.

CCECash, like all instant swap platforms, is completely centralized.

This exchange is centralized and can ask users to undergo KYC if they want to. Read their terms, it's all explained there. It's not based on my judgement. The terms explain how the KYC process works if it comes to that.

My statements are true. I don't need to use the exchange for my statements to be true. I will only use a centralized exchange that I believe I can trust. At this point, CCECash doesn't meet these conditions. 

If you calmed down and started thinking logically, it would be easier for you to understand what I am talking about. How do you think that easybit took your funds and have been holding them for 7 months? What made that possible? Custody made it possible. When you deposited money into easybit, they gained custody and absolute control of your money. If that wasn't the case, you could have made a transaction any day and moved your coins away from the exchange. But you can't do that, can you? What prevents you from doing it? The answer is again custody. More precisely, the lack of it. You don't hold the keys that would allow you to control your money. easybit does. You are now at their mercy and have to fulfill their requests if you want your money back. Are you starting to understand now?

That's why the custodial vs non-custodial argument is important. You can't claim to be non-custodial if you aren't and expect that people won't correct you. It gives the readers a false sense of security and control.
Any centralized exchange, be it easybit, FixedFloat, Binance, eXch or CCECash, can at any moment freeze your money. Whether or not they will do that is a different question. But they have the means to do it. If that wasn't the case, you wouldn't be waiting for 7 months for easybit to release your money, would you?

Teško da će neko sa našeg lokala pasti na tako nešto. Ne znam o kakvoj šemi je riječ. Možda je baš ovo što je btcltcdigger objasnio.

Svakakvih ponuda se moglo vidjeti na ovom forumu pa čak do toga da traže od tebe da na svoje ime otvoriš bankovni račun, PayPal ili nešto slično pa će oni da ti šalju neku lovu, ti od toga kupiš kripto, njima ga vraćaš a dobijaš neki procenat. Ti koji se na to zakače ne razmišljaju da se radi o ukradenom novcu ili ukradenim kreditnim/debitnim karticama i da se sve bilježi na njihovo ime.

It is a no account exchange and that's fine. That's the standard way that instant exchanges operate. What I don't think is fine is claiming to be non-custodial and decentralized. CCE.Cash still claims that and it's written in their correspondence here with the community.

Can we stop beating around the bush please and call things the way they are. You went from claiming you are non custodial to calling yourself semi-custodial, and a temporary user-funds-holder. You are custodial. That's it. You and your intermediaries have custody of the coins until they get deposited into user wallets. The users don't have control of their money until the exchange is over. That's how a custodial service operates. It's based on trust. Trust that the custodian will do the right thing and exchange the funds and give up custody of them. 

I see no problem in an exchange being custodial as long as they are honest about it. You haven't been honest. You are neither decentralized nor non custodial and the question is how long are you going to claim that you are? You are new on the forum. Be honest with your potential customers to be able to build trust. Personally, I would never try a service that isn't telling me the truth. Everyone else can make up their own minds.

Additionally, if you were non custodial, you and your intermediaries wouldn't be able to freeze coins and request KYC. Your users could simply import their keys into a real non custodial wallet and forget about you and the KYC requirements. But they can't do that because they don't have custody of the coins. You have. 

darknetbible was initially suspended but the site is back online. Feel free to check it yourself. There is no reason to speculate.

Ne mora uvijek biti u pitanju veliki novac. Siguran sam da ukoliko pošaljem bitcoin kojeg sam zaradio u eXch kampanji da bi bilo manjih ili većih problema. Isto bi bilo sa bitcoinom koji potiče sa miksera. Od kako se pojavila informacija da su hakeri iz Lazarus grupe koristili eXch da zamjene dio svog plijena, novac koji se vezuje sa tom mjenačnicom je postao 'high-risk' u očima kompanija koje analiziraju blockchain transakcije. Svaka razumna osoba će se složiti da Lazarusovo korištenje te mjenačnice ne bi trebalo stvarati probleme drugim ljudima koji s tim nemaju ništa. Ali u takvom svjetu mi ne živimo.

Bybit pravi probleme sigurno. eXch je na svojoj stranici imao listu mjenačnica koje ne prave probleme korisnicima čija lova je došla sa eXch. Takva je situacija bila sa bitcoinom ali to se je promjenilo nakon Bybit hacka i sa njihovom ETH adresom.

Sa Wayback Machine arhive možeš naći sljedeće:

https://web.archive.org/web/20250314134755/https://exch.cx/faq

ETH adresa od eXch mjenačnice je jedno vrijeme imala jedan community note u kojem je pisalo da postoje sumnje da je mjenačnicu koristila Lazarus grupa kako bi oprala lovu poslje Bybit hacka. To je poslje uklonjeno kako je examplens već napisao.

It wouldn't hurt to report those phishing websites that monero(.)forex and darknetbible direct users to. That way if they replace them with other links, it's a clear sign that they are only doing that to point people to new phishing sites.

I am sure we would all like to hear something new from the eXch team as they have been quiet for quite some time now.

You don't see that every day but multiple citizenship aren't unusual. Your VPN usage complicates things and makes it difficult for the casino to know where you were at the moment of playing. If the IP logs don't show you played from New Zealand, the casino won't be able to know it. If you were aware that Australia was a banned territory, why access the casino through an Australian VPN server? It's also possible that you only found out about the restriction after the casino told you. The next thing that doesn't go in your favor is you entering an Australian address and submitting an Australian PoA.   

I am curious what decision CasinoGuru will make and in whose favor the verdict will be.