Whoa this is awesome! I rarely have the time to browse the forum and this would really help determine which bounty to join. I also noticed that COINECT and XEONFRAME are proven scam thanks to you and these sites. Would it be too much if i'd ask you to check KONIOS as well? It's also a Wapinter managed campaign and i'm really scared considering how much time i've been here.
 
Thanks! Much appreciated!

By number 2, do you mean forex? Ain't that much harder compared to ordinary trading with cryptos and stocks? I mean i can say that i have few to little amount of knowledge when it comes to stocks and cryptonbut not forex...

Although i agree to divide everything into three. It's truly wise to gain little by little instead of going all out, that's a huge gamble.

Youtube and google always has the answer. You just gotta be thorough.

Also, i think if i'm not mistaken hitBTC has somewhat like a trading simulation, i've read it before but i can't seem to recall the exact details. I don't even know if it's really HitBTC but from what i thought on that certain time, it would be great to test my trading skills with those.

Signal groups are so obvious when they're trying to convince people to dump their coins, it really is. And besides, you gotta learn for yourself for there's no other else to help you but you. having a mentor will be great but it's not advisable to always rely on him, you should learn. Do everything to learn but not signal groups.

Man how long are you spending time here on the forum to actually find stuffs like these?

I mean how well do you know that "that account is an alt" then do a background check on them?

Damn. I thought the title was a death threat, "he should be down." <- it's like a line from an action movie.

Anyways back to the main concern. OP, what you did was wrong and unforgivable, plagiarism alone is. And now you're evading the ban. You're not working hard if you're plagiarising a content, that's stealing.

If this's true, DT members that'd be proven to be an accomplice should also receive punishments. Also, shame on them. But we can't just easily accuse them on doing so, false accusation can also bring shame to you if they proved you wrong.

I think it's an obsolete rule? well correct me if i'm wrong. But airdrops are blatant on bounties section, and I think it's equal to telegram campaign. Does this mean they're going on a loophole? By making airdrops = campaign?

I only understood that we should limit the account creation per month to a hypothetical number.

But with this, the problem is: possible new members that may be quality posters would be eaten by the sheer number of people making alts everyday. Account farmers would be rushing to compete to make accounts since they'd know that there's a limit now.

Also, I think we should resolve the problem internally first before doing anything like this.

Regardless of you not knowing this, as a literate and an english-speaker, you should've encountered the word "Merit" by now. Have you not wondered about the definition of it?

"""
merit
[mer-it]
noun
claim to respect and praise; excellence; worth.
something that deserves or justifies a reward or commendation; a commendable quality, act, etc.:
"""

highlighted the word "respect" since merits, just like respect, should be earned and not given.

It's highly probable that these accounts are alts made by the devs, teams, or cm. And Either way, they're contributing much to the crappy posts lying around the forum, covering all possible healthy discussions.

I for one can say that members who read the rules and give their best for getting merit doesn't need this. Why? Cause they use the search button and they work independently.


Mods are doing their best to address these kind of matters. If you encountered one then report it immediately by clicking the report to moderator button.

I think it all depends on how fitted the thread it is for the beginners. If the thread's like a common knowledge for the members, then beginners. But if it's new or it concerns the welfare of old and new members then meta would be the right place to go.

Edit:
I'm ignoring posters who start threads with all caps titles this is the thread isn't it?

Sorry but i do agree for it to be moved from meta>reputation since it doesn't really concern the forum per se. But more like a personal public announcement from you that would affect other members reputation to you.

Well you can say that. But it's not entirely a scam if the team really had the vision for it but the people and the idea didn't really connect. Also, ICO stands for initial coin offer and you can think of it as a pre-sale for tokens that are possibly have higher values in the future. Therefore, you can consider it as a failed ico but not scam.

Just like what he said. Accusing someone as a scam hunter and trying to provide justification to make things easier, would result to little to non concerns from the DTs. Also, you may report his thread (translated one) by clicking the report to moderator button on the bottom right of the post if you think the OP just used google translate or any other third party translator and stating it there.

Or if you really want to, you may pm the campaign manager, and hint him that someone's scamming his translation campaign so he may remove him.

How does this work, like a game? I mean, everything's provided and everything virtual? Can you provide links to this, i would like to try it, if you may.

How does demo account let's you trade? You're provided with coins/tokens but can't cash out? Am i right?

It's already deleted, good for you! We're you the one who reported it to the moderator? Cause there's no point posting it here if you already reported it. Mods are really active and eager to respond asap to any report concerns.

Crypto is here and now, but i don't think it will be the "future of money". By saying "future of money" you're implying that money as it is now would become obsolete and would all be replaced by cryptocurrency. That's where my opinion comes in, i don't think it will be the future, but it'll be there hand in hand with fiat just like what's happening now.

Well, i'm still open for the possibilities to come.

Mods aren't linked with any campaign. Therefore, they don't have power over it. Well maybe, if the mod's managing it well he could possibly do so. Or the mod can remove the thread if it got too out of hand.

They are concerned about all these crappy post, really and they can address that matter, that's why Merit system was introduced in the first place.

Is posting 15+ post a day really that bad? No.

What's bad is, within those 15+ posts there are few to none quality post.

Well, i suppose you can pm a bounty manager and suggest these to them. There's no post ranting here in meta.

If all these was done, there'd still be tons of crappy post in the forum. Reporting it to mod would be another way to counter those spam, but this would be a lot of work for the staffs, we need to find a way to nuke those.

Isn't people that are merit abusing and begging being tagged already? I'm confused, all of the sudden there's no clear rules on how to proceed with merit abuse and begging.

If people being tagged without a "clear rule" for these instances, then DTs are abusing their power, right?