Everything that was posted is very concerning, but to me stops short of scamming. Rather, i'd like to use the word scummy instead since Dan associates with prom.
Thanks for you input. I'm curious, would you consider Dan doing a "code review" of Hal's anon code while giving the impression that he was an unbiased third party scammy or scummy?
As references, here is the skype screenshot (
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#2) and here is the code review (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=741728.msg8723167;topicseen#msg8723167)
Are you serious with this? Is there some sort of "XC community guide to not addressing the actual issues and deflecting arguments" written by Synechist? Why do you pick out only parts of statements and address them as if none of the other text exists?
And you sidestep every single point on the list there. Congrats. Maybe XC should hire you as Synechist's assistant in the propaganda department.
Or if you're trolling though, then hats off I guess. At this point it's getting a bit ridiculous. You keep saying there's no evidence despite the fact that I just posted evidence which you conveniently left out of your reply.
Yeah, adhitthana also conveniently ignored the part of my post in which I posted the specific skype screenshot where Prom said that Dan "was the anon dev for HAL". (
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#2)
And this is after he kept saying that some of the things Prom says can be interpreted different ways. I think saying "He was the anon dev for HAL" is quite clear.
I agree with you, at this point I think adhitthana might just be trolling all over the place.
My conclusions after trying to converse and reason with some XC/Blocknet supporters are:
1. They refuse to look at the details because they are afraid of what it may mean for their investment
2. They are really that naive and do not understand the implications of the information that have come to light
3. They are knowingly supporting the scam and do not care that the people behind it are unethical
Lol, so you're on the side that thinks Dan is the super coder HAL dev as well as the XC dev? Hold on one second, let me find for you a troll that thinks Dan can't code. It would make for such an interesting debate. It would be like two retards fighting. And I find it ironic that you are calling us naive, chances are 99% of you haven't followed XC's development at all and are just regurgitating the same bullshit that other trolls began to speculate about. Not only that but going forward with the XC FUD would also seem to better your investment in SuperNET right. It's always a good thing to make your only major competitor look like a scam, deceiful, shaddy, that way you can capitalize. It's not surprising that the 3 major groups that are trolling XC are Super, SDC and DRK.
Super is a direct competitor and anything said to hurt block is useful for your sake. I even recall the BTCD dev tried to make a persuasive post claiming that BlockNET was in fact a scam and that SuperNET was not. Good job at marketing your project fuckface.
SDC has a terrible track record for trolling other coins that may appear to offer better technology or that will hurt profits for the few bagholders, this makes it the 5th time with XC. There is a 35 page thread that proves this as well on the main page.
DRK has always had a hateful relationship with XC. It was so bad that Evan and Dan had to make a joint statement to call off the FUD wars. It is not the least bit surprising to see some DRK fanboys taking shots at XC during this smear campaign.