Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 67 results by ProfX
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos
by
ProfX
on 21/11/2014, 01:57:14 UTC
is arlyn doing the daily updates anymore?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos
by
ProfX
on 18/11/2014, 00:55:55 UTC
I strongly suggest that Arlyn brings back the DAILY UPDATES, it would be much appreciated by the community and myself if we could keep up-to-date with all the new developments in XC. The FUD hasn't helped XC one bit, but I think we need to restore some order and go back to the way things used to be. Lets start with bringing back the daily updates
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos
by
ProfX
on 16/11/2014, 23:57:53 UTC
Quote
It's actually illegal to do that with things like stocks on investment discussion forums.

So if GM spends all their money without accounting for it and I have invested in Ford (or I'm just a "troll") and I start bringing the subject up with an Internet account (and I have several) the SEC will be more concerned with me than GM not accounting for their funds?

Yeah no.  Not how it works.  Free speech and all ... law is concerned about people who take other people's money ... not "trolls" (I'm still waiting on evidence that I am one)


you know no one here is going to take you seriously, based off everything you were saying during the BlockNET fudstorm of October. I literally skip past your's and McHammer's post instantly. You bring no substance to XC discussion and others should ignore you as well. You are not an investor, just someone still butthurt they lost out on Jasin's ASIC miner project.


PS. Im pretty sure you're banned from the XC thread, why are you still posting. Reported to forum mods.

Also reporting rdnjk this as is your double account on these forums.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos
by
ProfX
on 11/11/2014, 22:50:11 UTC
best choice is to reopen this thread. I dont know why another thread was created on the mainboard
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
by
ProfX
on 11/11/2014, 07:44:45 UTC
You all just gave 800+ btc to a panel of over promising, under delivering, shitcoin devs gj.
okay there shadowshit

youre just mad that blocknet will severely undercut any kind of pump u planned to make with your zero knowledge bullshit
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Darkcoin : InstantX Demonstration (still in Test Phase)
by
ProfX
on 09/11/2014, 04:32:12 UTC
I'm glad cryptos are heading in this direction, it will be great for the future. But this isn't groundbreaking tech, Bitshares has this already...
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: The full truth behind ShadowCash/Coin trolls and their attacks on other coins.
by
ProfX
on 08/11/2014, 08:42:14 UTC
I am sure they will force the SDC dev to redact or delete his post on the whales pull thread so I will preserve it here. It's sad that he is forced to do or not do things he wants with his own coin.


I don't really have a problem with whales, but I definitely think that they shouldn't be able to dictate the priority of development, the development requirements or the future of the coin..

The first few months of shadow I was completely oblivious to the fact that whales.. The more things progressed, the more people were offering funds to hire extra developers, managers, technical writers, journalists, etc.

The team has obviously grown, and it took me a while to realise I'm no longer able to make decisions on my own, but it seems to be moving forward. I really don't like the delayed open source thing, but I guess you need to protect investments for a bit.

The whales also tend to know allot about other whales, and obviously they've been in the game allot longer than late adopters, so they have very valuable input most of the time.

I would definitely enjoy developing allot more if there wasn't a direct monetary value, and if people didn't care about the price.

Some day people will realise that this is all epic research and experimentation, and that the monetary value is actually curbing the innovation, because they constantly asking are we there yet, and if you miss a deadline or there's a bug or a hack that the developers weren't in control of, the whales can put a massive dent in an entire communities investment.

whats even more sad is that SDC could probably be worth more now if it wasnt for their community. New investors will continue to see the name SDC being brought up and it will not paint a good picture for their coin. I will also try to preserve this thread, for what has happened over the last few weeks is disgusting and a large portion of it originates from SDC. I also see a few members attacking Zerovert now as well. People should know who these scumbags are before they invest in the coin. I dont care if they have tech given to them from God himself, their community is full of bagholders, pumpers, trolls and scammers. You're getting involved with the sleaziest and scummiest individuals in the alt community.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
by
ProfX
on 08/11/2014, 08:36:12 UTC
congratulations to everyone involved in this project. Now watch the magic happen! Dan is a magician coder and will shock everyone here.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ZeroVert - First Zerocoin Implementation | New gold standard for privacy
by
ProfX
on 08/11/2014, 08:23:53 UTC

We can change that pretty easily by trading heavily there. Volume problem is easily solved.
Don't buy zer, otherwise you will lose your money.

looks at sig, lols at shadowcoin references.


fuck off faggot

Note to devs: If you read this, the Shadowcoin community will do whatever they can to try and hurt your coin. You are now part of their 'kill' agenda and a direct competitor for their technology. I would advise the Zerovert devs to immediately ban any SDC trolls on sight if they are not going by community protocol and participating in peaceful discussion. You have been warned. These guys have attacked 5 coins so far, it will NOT be their last one. You guys look like the perfect target because you are new, a competitor and easy to FUD.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
by
ProfX
on 07/11/2014, 22:59:06 UTC
At this point there is no reason to sell on bittrex unless somebody wants to hurt the project on purpose.
Those who bought at bittrex cannot lose anything no matter what the numbers will be at the end.

I don't follow your logic here. If the price drops then they lose money.

this whole project and the drama makes people wanting to just dump the coins at ICO price while they have the opportunity

that is exactly what FUD is intended to do, and if they choose to do so, then so be it. We already have a large base of supporters and are still well above the ICO minimum. After the ICO, i couldn't give a single fuck what the different fudders think about BlockNET, XC or the rest of the coins involved. They can cry scam until the cows come home and it wont make a difference. BlockNET is almost there, and we should all be excited for this new project that is about to take place
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: The full truth behind ShadowCash/Coin trolls and their attacks on other coins.
by
ProfX
on 07/11/2014, 21:02:44 UTC
You idiots just don't know what organic good projects with real features and real innovation look like. You go after xc, xst, lxc, and the new zerovert. You have no clue, you support crims and questionable individuals for the most part. Because its what you understand, from the slave society you live in.

 You guys are mostly winging it here to begin with. You never came for the tech at all, just the money and you think you know what real money looks like but you don't. You only buy high and sell low.
You support the wrong stuff and by default you will get pushed right out of this space! Take a lesson and start supporting good people and good projects (its called risk management).. It's time to get over your short term losses and start on building your future instead of leeching from your childrens' children who may not even be born yet!!

http://img.fark.net/images/cache/s/sX/fark_sXFxlpRU1YbTA8qfAN1DsXvhXEw.jpg?t=HjGi9dljYiMi2H6ZGvsqMw&f=1415595600
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: XCurrency (XC) BlockNet community thread
by
ProfX
on 07/11/2014, 20:32:20 UTC
I dont like the validation process on xctalk. It has taken me over a week to sign up there. My application request seem to be filtered out or something.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Dear synechist, xc, blocknet, and dan metcalf
by
ProfX
on 07/11/2014, 20:16:26 UTC
Everything that was posted is very concerning, but to me stops short of scamming. Rather, i'd like to use the word scummy instead since Dan associates with prom.

Thanks for you input.  I'm curious, would you consider Dan doing a "code review" of Hal's anon code while giving the impression that he was an unbiased third party scammy or scummy?

As references, here is the skype screenshot (http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#2) and here is the code review (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=741728.msg8723167;topicseen#msg8723167)



Are you serious with this? Is there some sort of "XC community guide to not addressing the actual issues and deflecting arguments" written by Synechist? Why do you pick out only parts of statements and address them as if none of the other text exists?

And you sidestep every single point on the list there. Congrats. Maybe XC should hire you as Synechist's assistant in the propaganda department.

Or if you're trolling though, then hats off I guess. At this point it's getting a bit ridiculous. You keep saying there's no evidence despite the fact that I just posted evidence which you conveniently left out of your reply.

Yeah, adhitthana also conveniently ignored the part of my post in which I posted the specific skype screenshot where Prom said that Dan "was the anon dev for HAL". (http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#2)

And this is after he kept saying that some of the things Prom says can be interpreted different ways.  I think saying "He was the anon dev for HAL" is quite clear.

I agree with you, at this point I think adhitthana might just be trolling all over the place.



My conclusions after trying to converse and reason with some XC/Blocknet supporters are:
1.  They refuse to look at the details because they are afraid of what it may mean for their investment
2.  They are really that naive and do not understand the implications of the information that have come to light
3.  They are knowingly supporting the scam and do not care that the people behind it are unethical


Lol, so you're on the side that thinks Dan is the super coder HAL dev as well as the XC dev? Hold on one second, let me find for you a troll that thinks Dan can't code. It would make for such an interesting debate. It would be like two retards fighting. And I find it ironic that you are calling us naive, chances are 99% of you haven't followed XC's development at all and are just regurgitating the same bullshit that other trolls began to speculate about. Not only that but going forward with the XC FUD would also seem to better your investment in SuperNET right. It's always a good thing to make your only major competitor look like a scam, deceiful, shaddy, that way you can capitalize. It's not surprising that the 3 major groups that are trolling XC are Super, SDC and DRK.

Super is a direct competitor and anything said to hurt block is useful for your sake. I even recall the BTCD dev tried to make a persuasive post claiming that BlockNET was in fact a scam and that SuperNET was not. Good job at marketing your project fuckface.
SDC has a terrible track record for trolling other coins that may appear to offer better technology or that will hurt profits for the few bagholders, this makes it the 5th time with XC. There is a 35 page thread that proves this as well on the main page.
DRK has always had a hateful relationship with XC. It was so bad that Evan and Dan had to make a joint statement to call off the FUD wars. It is not the least bit surprising to see some DRK fanboys taking shots at XC during this smear campaign.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: The full truth behind ShadowCash/Coin trolls and their attacks on other coins.
by
ProfX
on 07/11/2014, 18:38:44 UTC
Whale play on SDC now. 1.5 btc volume one day 150 btc volume another. Whales playing. Mainly SDC whales like TrollsRoyce aka coolstoryteller. Just remember every pump has a dump.  Tongue

like i stated before, SDC is run by a few people, when you see high volumes, its their whales. Even if you look in their thread, there are maybe like 5-10 people outside of the whale bagholders that post.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
by
ProfX
on 07/11/2014, 06:31:17 UTC
I think we're going to see the FUD reduce drastically after Friday, once the BTC's are locked in, they're locked in. They are not going to be going to SDC or any of the other coins that were fudding the BlockNET. The trolls might do one final push, but I think we are safe girls and boys. Here's to a future of prosperity
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Dear synechist, xc, blocknet, and dan metcalf
by
ProfX
on 07/11/2014, 05:54:30 UTC
So here are my thoughts from an outsiders point of view (I have no involvement, or even really knowledge of what had happened, hell before this all blew up I had no idea who prom was until multiple people/sources state he is a P&Der, which is pretty scummy if you ask me).


Everything that was posted is very concerning, but to me stops short of scamming. Rather, i'd like to use the word scummy instead since Dan associates with prom.



I will say this however, and one more person to add to the list of people XC should have never been involved with was Jasin from Fibonacci. This one I can talk to at length considering I was the one who tried one last attempt to smooth things over between Jasin and his investors. Instead of helping, he completely stopped posting here and Litecointalk, along with delete his website. So he walked away with a cool mil or two of money.


The XC team defended him pretty hard, at first as a dev and then as a contributor, and that along with all of this recent information makes XC seem very shady to me. Again just an outsiders perspective.

if you recall in the summer, Jasin was actually active in XC threads for some time, and even posted in the XC thread regarding the ASICS. He assured the team and some community members that everything would get resolved. People shut up after this point and that is ultimately why XC defended him for the time being. As the summer went on, someone else brought up that fact about Jasin and Fibonacci again (months later) and it was at that time that XC reassessed the situation. It was also at this time that the team realized that this might be a much bigger issue than they anticipated, seeing as how no progress was really made with the situation. They dumped him right at the end of summer and released a general statement to the public. It may seem shady to some people what took place, but just realize that the team did correct the situation as it was hurting XC. AFAIK, Jasin did not contribute anything to XC other than offering his coding services, which he never fulfilled. It was a no brainer to cut ties with him if he was causing XC more harm than good. Its just sad that people somehow still think XC is related to Jasin and his ASIC project. People cannot get into contact to talk with Jasin, so they just go to the closest thing Jasin was associated with in XC, and start spamming the boards with speculation about XC being part of the issue. That has never been the case as Jasin's project was completely separate and irrelevant to XC. XC will also not go out of its way to talk with Jasin regarding the issue as it is none of their business and does not pertain to their coin at all. I dont understand why this issue keeps being brought up every now and then like people think the teaam is magically going to help them get their money back from Jasin.

Crap like this happens all the time in the real world, you might unknowingly hire employees who dont have the best reputations arounde  whether they are work or personal matters. Teams dont really do in depth screening processes. It generally works by someone offering their services, a negotiation takes place, then they are on the team. As a coder in crypto, it wouldn't take long to join a team if you are offering your skills because every coin is looking for that extra bit of human capital. It just so happens that XC brought on board somebody that was offering their services, who also had some discrepancies with their personal life project. XC however did do the right thing and removed him seeing as how the issue had not been resolved over several months.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
by
ProfX
on 07/11/2014, 05:41:14 UTC
dan forgot fiber and xcash.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: RyanPumper is a scammer.
by
ProfX
on 07/11/2014, 03:43:37 UTC
i thought there were real members in his group?
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: In response to Spoetnik's GET OUT thread
by
ProfX
on 07/11/2014, 03:09:16 UTC
Glad Spot is being banned or leaving, he is one who starting confusing and condracting FUD topics, most of it looks like a big clusterfuck ATM because you got some that think Dan is Prom, Some think Dan cant code, and some think Dan is a super coder managing both XC and Hal. Part of this was brought on by your idiotic speculative threads Spot, you will not be missed here.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Dear synechist, xc, blocknet, and dan metcalf
by
ProfX
on 06/11/2014, 22:34:45 UTC
Alot of the questions being asked by dare i say, you trolls, have been answered already, but for some reason you choose to keep ignoring this. Marlo is trying to persuade people into thinking XC has been shady from the start, but investors that have been there since the beginning know this is far from the truth. Not only is this FUD, but alot of it is disorganized and contradictory, half of you think Dan cant code, the other half think he's XC and HAL dev. Seriously which one is it? The fact that there is this contradictory FUD, rules out dozens of troll posts that have already been made, because its either one or the other right? I've seen enough people arguing both sides of the story, and you know what, you are all idiots that don't know XC. You think you know XC, but the truth is, alot of these posts by trolls clearly show a lack of understand and knowledge about XC from its emergence to where it is today.