Hi.

could you please help me, why i get this error

ETH: Stratum - connecting to `eu1.ethermine.org`<172.65.207.106> port 4444
cannot connect to eu1.ethermine.org
server : listen failed with error 10013

Thank you in advance.

Well, is nothing wrong in keeping on that if is running without problems and keep it cool, after sometime he will have to lower those clocks anyway. Funny though, this is the reason there are so people complain about their hashrate, so many invalid shares due to that. I have a rx 480 here which was 2155 for 4 years then for some reason it does not keep like that anymore, I had to lower to 2000mhz for it to be stable few weeks ago, but it has run for 4 years at 2155 without problems.

2175 is pretty damn high for the memory clock 24/7. Remember, these memory chips were designed to run at 16Ghz (2000 clock), the ones that made the cut went into the 16ghz GPU's (like the Rx 580 8Gb, the Rx 590 ) and the ones that didnt were slapped onto boffins at 14Ghz ( 1750 clock) and even lower end 12Ghz (1500 clock). While you CAN oc them to speeds over 2000, its generally recommended to keep the speeds as low as possible and achieving higher hashrate with tighter timings ( better straps ) - keeps the chips from burning out. You NEED to undervolt the memory for 24/7 use and not use it at stock volts. So a 1500 strap running at say 1925 is preferable to a 1625 strap running at 2125 for a similar hashrate.

after using ONE CLICK TIMING PATCH  of PolarisBiosEditor I got this result:https://i.ibb.co/tsFpqGs/Capture.png

Are you bitching in his thread that he's abandoned for almost a year that he's not supporting the software? Several people have already mentioned his last post date.  He's still raking in thousands of dollars every day so "poor excuse of a miner" when over 50% of casual miners were using it at times seems like sour grapes.

The miner works fine when a 6 or 8GB card is placed in GPU0 position. Anything card that doesn't work past that, well that's the whole point of a DAG loaded into memory or Dagger Hashimoto would have been dead way back in 2017 with ASICs.

Go try Phoenix miner.

I FOUND SOLUTION 4gb cards

I have 5 460 cards in rig no onboard vga clay more no do solution. I use Nanominer  no need onboard vga Claymore Make 149mh  nanominer make 145mh I u can see monitor in 3333 port any software
one handicap is no fan control. I use fan control with Msi Afterburner and done continue to mining with 4gb cards.

if u want download Link here

https://drive.google.com/file/d/10svcuZdPFnx6L2cULMH9xkX6MTFCCZMY/view?usp=sharing

So ... umm ... dont use it?

The point is not to disable the first GPU.  The point is that have the first GPU have enough extra memory for the OS overhead and still be able to load the DAG.  Then the rest of the cards will run fine at 4GB.  Disabling the first GPU does not solve the problem and misses the point entirely.

The answer to your question has been posted 3 times in the last 50 posts. But to sum it up for you, GPU has overhead loaded into it. Either put a 6 or 8GB card as GPU0 or use on-cpu video.

I do not understand why people say do not trust any website and do not import private key or seed. mybtgwallet was on the official bitcoingold website, that is why people trusted this.

I do trust myetherwallet.com and put my private key there, I do trust neowallet.cn and put my private key there, I do trust waveswallet.io and put my seed there, I do trust mymonero.com and put my private key there. These are official or supported wallets by the coins themselves. I thought mybtgwallet is also one of them.

This should be a really bad reputation for bitcoin gold, but as I see most people do not think so and blame users. This is not right.

Note, they did come out with this yesterday:

https://bitcoingold.org/safety-is-critical/

However, I don't know that I can buy the "Man in the Middle" attack theory. How many people in crypto, having already gone to jail or going to jail for stealing people's money, have tried this explaination?

Also, the site in question has had two forms: one that was complete, and had footer credits that linked to the repositories the code came from, along with three options for creating a wallet, transferring BTC to BTG (which was disabled until the mainnet launched), and a tab for checking your BTG balance with your private keys (which is when we input our private keys); and the second one was the one that looked broken and "hacked" (which happened just the evening before most of our coins were stolen, and is its current state). The first version of the site had to be the version that stored and transmitted the keys, because for us, that's the only time we submitted them. Changing the site later to look like it's been "hacked" is super suspect to me. Why would the hacker change *anything* after stealing the money? You're done dude; no need to make the site look *more* jenky. And you mean to tell me that the site owner didn't notice this for five days? Or that his site was jenky looking for all days since? And hasn't bothered to lock it down, or fix it? I call shenanigans.

For us, the timeline wouldn't work out. We submitted the keys on the 11th, when the site looked normal, and just after it was listed on the BTG official site and just before the launch of the mainnet. We waited for several days before just transferring it instead to a Coinomi wallet, since the date of last update (which was then 11/10/2017) hadn't changed. Even as recently as the 13th, when you clicked on the second tab to "transfer your BTC to BTG", you'd get a popup that said that this was disabled until the mainnet launch. It was clear that something might be wrong, but there was still little cause for alarm, because the site was still listed on the official BTG site, as far as we were concerned. This is when we started talking about moving the money (which we were actually planning to do).

On 11/14, I checked one last time in the evening, and that's when the site suddenly looked "hacked". But again, our keys shouldn't have been stored anywhere, right? So being "hacked" later shouldn't have affected us. And, if they were "hacked" before, why would a hacker then go out of their way, the day before their big heist, to make the site look horrible to dissuade others from losing their money?

And on 11/15, our money, both our BTC and our BTG, were gone (by about 1:30pm our time, MDT).

The timeline just doesn't work out.