Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 45 results by ReckLess.6
Re: GetBlock.io – fast & easy connection to major blockchain nodes!
Good project. A small suggestion here. Your process to provide API Key should not be manual, like through email comunication. One should sign up and generate his/her API Key automatically. Also, it is good if you allow to test your features without any API key in the first place. That would of course be within limit and you can apply those limit through IP restriction.
At least 870,000 bitcoins are associated with illegal activities. This is about $ 10 billion.
https://markets.chainalysis.com/#risk-illicit-placement
One day, all these bitcoins will somehow hit the market.
Chainalysis seems to have put up some arbitrary figure backed by no evidence whatsoever. Where do I check the addresses. they believe, belong to Darknet marketplaces/Stolen bitcoins/Scam project organizers/Other illegal activities?- Darknet marketplaces - 585,000 BTC.
- Stolen bitcoins - 204,000 BTC.
- Scam project organizers - 98,000 BTC.
- Other illegal activities 3,000 BTC.
https://markets.chainalysis.com/#risk-illicit-placement
One day, all these bitcoins will somehow hit the market.
Is there any way to sort or filter threads in a sub-forum as per merit yet?
Requested a feature like this around a year ago - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5038566.0.
Re: Can we call a lightning node with JSON-RPC like we can do for a Bitcoin node?
API documentation for Lightning Network Daemon (LND) - https://api.lightning.community/
Do you mean total merit across all posts in the topic, or just for the OP?
You may try both and see which one works better. Though, merit spammers will try to game this as well. But with active policing like trust system, they can be identified and punished.
As a starter, here is the technical suggestion I made in the other thread...
Here is a technical suggestion for theymos. You have already created this page for Merit Stats, i.e. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats. How about just adding a board-wise filter to it?
For example, Top-merited topics, all-time of Beginners & Help section should be found with this link - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=toptopicsat;board=39.0
All it requires is just another INNER JOIN, which should not be costly.
For example, Top-merited topics, all-time of Beginners & Help section should be found with this link - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=toptopicsat;board=39.0
All it requires is just another INNER JOIN, which should not be costly.
Re: Can we please have a way to sort threads in a sub-forum as per merit?
Here is a technical suggestion for theymos. You have already created this page for Merit Stats, i.e. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats. How about just adding a board-wise filter to it?
For example, Top-merited topics, all-time of Beginners & Help section should be found with this link - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=toptopicsat;board=39.0
All it requires is just another INNER JOIN, which should not be costly.
For example, Top-merited topics, all-time of Beginners & Help section should be found with this link - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=toptopicsat;board=39.0
All it requires is just another INNER JOIN, which should not be costly.
Can we please have a way to sort threads in a sub-forum as per merit?
It is especially required for the following subs IMHO...
1. Bitcoin Discussion
2. Development & Technical Discussion
3. Beginners & Help
1. Bitcoin Discussion
2. Development & Technical Discussion
3. Beginners & Help
Archived Profile: http://archive.is/6lKdP
Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Username: ReckLess.6
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=517462
Date of Sign: March 11, 2018
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
159SqAjTvmWS9URxXwZZR14fDobdavz5ki
H8/os0Wed50K/tOE5f5RnkYj+x9biFJRYWXupWDwxDZgQ+Xgte2Nhidk/8MaWPMjXZDB6BOlHD2brehrIoFxY3I=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Username: ReckLess.6
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=517462
Date of Sign: March 11, 2018
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
159SqAjTvmWS9URxXwZZR14fDobdavz5ki
H8/os0Wed50K/tOE5f5RnkYj+x9biFJRYWXupWDwxDZgQ+Xgte2Nhidk/8MaWPMjXZDB6BOlHD2brehrIoFxY3I=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Why does the amount of bitcoin keep changing???
Because, that is how it was designed. Please read the whitepaper - https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Well to be honest, by law they did nothing wrong. And this is a simply fact. For EU laws what they did is legal.
Also I can't understand why their topic is still active...
Also I can't understand why their topic is still active...
No idea what EU laws are exactly but I am pretty sure they have a law against trademarks.
If I open up a store called "Applee" and try to sell cell phone and computers, you don't think I am breaking any laws?
If it was just a clone website that would be a minor issue. The bigger issue is imagine if "Applee" sold you computers that stole money from you. :\
Now-a-days, clone is the first step of a scam. In another instance, block-bet.info (which is allegedly run by known scammer girlbtc.com) has outright copied the long standing blockchain based gambling game chain-bet.com and now falsely claiming 1% house edge on their title.
This majority hash power supporting them may do rogue things to core chain and the only option left at that time will be to change the algo.
They can surely attempt that. Good luck explaining this behavior to anyone looking to join their chain (investment, development and any other kind of form of interaction). "Remember that time when we played dictators and attacked anyone who didn't obey our rules?" 
It started with Core...
Quote
Confession time: I lobbed the RAM grenades earlier. Core nodes were sufficiently armored to repel the shrapnel. All's fair in cryptoanarchy.
https://twitter.com/lopp/status/856498402951090176
Will be nice to see BU fork away forever.
If they do, that might not be a sweet story for Core chain as well. Because BU will fork only when they have above 50% hash power. This majority hash power supporting them may do rogue things to core chain and the only option left at that time will be to change the algo.
i have never heard of it, i ll take a look rigth now
If u have, please do let us know. I'm interested in playing at 0% house edge as well.
I just check the board of https://www.chain-bet.com.
So, a 0% house edge game has only 2 wins out of 20, i.e 10%!
HoW?
So, a 0% house edge game has only 2 wins out of 20, i.e 10%!
HoW?
Lol,
Random?
0% HE means they don't earn on it.
Doesn't mean you won't lose...
0% HE DOES NOT mean they don't earn on it. House Edge is NOT House Commission. Just like 1% HE sites do not earn exact 1% of the total wagered amount, 0% HE sites does not earn 0 either.
Right now, there are 4 wins out of 20, i.e. 20%.
Right now, there are 0 wins out of 20, i.e. 0%. How do u justify this?
Right now, luck is favoring house. Does not mean, it always will. It is pure probability.
I just check the board of https://www.chain-bet.com.
So, a 0% house edge game has only 2 wins out of 20, i.e 10%!
HoW?
So, a 0% house edge game has only 2 wins out of 20, i.e 10%!
HoW?
Lol,
Random?
0% HE means they don't earn on it.
Doesn't mean you won't lose...
0% HE DOES NOT mean they don't earn on it. House Edge is NOT House Commission. Just like 1% HE sites do not earn exact 1% of the total wagered amount, 0% HE sites does not earn 0 either.
Right now, there are 4 wins out of 20, i.e. 20%.