Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 175 results by SaiyanSS3
MOVED: Do you think real satoshi might look resemble to vitalik, czbinance, charles hot
Do you think real satoshi might look resemble to vitalik, czbinance, charles hot
Do you think satoshi in real life might look resemble to vitalik, czbinance, charles hotkinson, and more of those legit altcoin founder?
I don’t think it’s would be look like csw, jihanwu, mcafee, elon, and many those shady personality
I think not too fat, not too skinny, not too tall, neets, politely speaking gentlemen, may be a real life Harry Potter
I don’t think it’s would be look like csw, jihanwu, mcafee, elon, and many those shady personality
I think not too fat, not too skinny, not too tall, neets, politely speaking gentlemen, may be a real life Harry Potter
Re: The houses always win, are you the house or the gambler?
I hate to be sexist but I need to make it to reveal the true colour of human
I decide to swap the keyword from house to wife, and give a new meaning to the same phrases.
Remember only idiot husband take high risk to get high reward. The wife do not take risk but telling all of you to take high risk. Whether it’s bear market or bull market, the wife always win. The wife do not care whether some of you wageslave plebs hubby actually make a lot of money from the high risk high reward. The wife need some of you plebs to make a good example to a get rich quick marriage, to educate all other wageslaves hubby to not give up the hopes of winning the marriage. Are you the wife or the husband?
I decide to swap the keyword from house to wife, and give a new meaning to the same phrases.
Remember only idiot husband take high risk to get high reward. The wife do not take risk but telling all of you to take high risk. Whether it’s bear market or bull market, the wife always win. The wife do not care whether some of you wageslave plebs hubby actually make a lot of money from the high risk high reward. The wife need some of you plebs to make a good example to a get rich quick marriage, to educate all other wageslaves hubby to not give up the hopes of winning the marriage. Are you the wife or the husband?
Re: Only young and naive guy believe in high risk high return
Women always win, only guy need to take high risk venture
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350717.msg57556628#msg57556628
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350717.msg57556628#msg57556628
Re: The houses always win, are you the house or the gambler?
The houses always win, are you the house or the gambler?
...
In a marriage
The house is: wife, women, family court, feminist, parent to the spouse, baby who gave birth, mother to the baby, Melinda gates.
The gambler is: the husband, men in general, beta cuck wageslave plebs, bill gates, elon.
...
...
In a marriage
The house is: wife, women, family court, feminist, parent to the spouse, baby who gave birth, mother to the baby, Melinda gates.
The gambler is: the husband, men in general, beta cuck wageslave plebs, bill gates, elon.
...
I cannot believe that I am reading this. How is "the wife" the house? Firstly, not all marriages are wife and husband, secondly, not only men can be entrepreneurs and take risk, thirdly, and this is what you really got wrong and may cause a problem in you life: your partner is not your adversary, it is part of your team and the most valuable life resource. It is never about who wins and who does not because the team cannot be happy if one of the members is not happy - which means that everyone has to look after the other or eventually they will either part ways or be unhappy together.
I take it you come from a culture in which women are not treated as equals and you seem to have a resentment on the role you have imposed on yourself. Your loss.
As for the rest of the analysis... most of it shows the general lack of knowledge about crypto that can be expected from a Jr.
I accept this challenge.
Women always win.
In the school, women always win, girls always win boys by academic achievement, boys need sheer luck to win girls generally in the school.
In the job market, women always win, girls generally easier to get the job, boys generally failed to get the job, the job market is sexist. Banker are usually hiring girls, hot girls, no boys strictly, boys do not allowed to be banker, sales and marketing, women strictly, the list goes on. Programming and block chain some of these very neets occupation, even girl find it unattractive to work for, it’s the job for boys generally.
In the social media, women always win, women get likes and views create effortless content, even get millions to billions views for something very simple. Boy need to create very strong content, and also sheer luck to win over the audience.
In dating market, women always win. Girls get laid as easy as swipe left or right. Boys, however constantly ask about how to get laid, because they dunno how to get laid, they can work so hard, try so many tricks, spend so much money, no luck can help you sorry pal, please pray for your next life is a woman.
In sport too, women always win.
Wife always win.
Boy always lose, it’s what they’re designed to live on this planet, they’re loser by default, for the rest of life, boy can never be the house since they always lose.
Conclusion? Women is the house, wife is the house, they always win, they keep winning, they never lose.
Re: Only young and naive guy believe in high risk high return
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351180.0
When the rent money stop, pay check stop, income stop, women become hyper panic and super realistic!!
When the rent money stop, pay check stop, income stop, women become hyper panic and super realistic!!
When the rent money stop, pay check stop, income stop, women become hyper panic
When the rent money stop, pay check stop, income stop, women become hyper panic and super realistic!!
Despite the rent money have been good for the last 9 years, when the rent stop for just three months, women began to act funny, they become hyper panic, they won’t stop calling to ask about rent, they also start making drama to threaten war!
When income stop for just a few months, despite it has been good for the last 9 years, women start to panic and threaten a divorce, they become hyper realistic, hyper panic!
When pay check stop for a few months, despite it has been good for the last 9 years! Women threaten to send employer to justice, become super realistic, become hyper panic.
If you think it’s okey, it probably is not okey for your other half, they’re never ok when the money stop, money run out it’s a full out war waiting for you!
If money is not war then what is money? If running out of money is not a dead or alive moment, then what is it?
If you run out of money, the dead is not waiting for you then what else is it waiting for you?
Despite the rent money have been good for the last 9 years, when the rent stop for just three months, women began to act funny, they become hyper panic, they won’t stop calling to ask about rent, they also start making drama to threaten war!
When income stop for just a few months, despite it has been good for the last 9 years, women start to panic and threaten a divorce, they become hyper realistic, hyper panic!
When pay check stop for a few months, despite it has been good for the last 9 years! Women threaten to send employer to justice, become super realistic, become hyper panic.
If you think it’s okey, it probably is not okey for your other half, they’re never ok when the money stop, money run out it’s a full out war waiting for you!
If money is not war then what is money? If running out of money is not a dead or alive moment, then what is it?
If you run out of money, the dead is not waiting for you then what else is it waiting for you?
Re: The houses always win, are you the house or the gambler?
The houses always win, are you the house or the gambler?
Remember only idiot take high risk to get high reward. The houses do not take risk but telling all of you to take high risk. Whether it’s bear market or bull market, the houses always win. The houses do not care whether some of you wageslave plebs actually make a lot of money from the high risk high reward. The houses need some of you plebs to make a good example to a get rich quick scheme, to educate all other wageslaves to not give up the hopes of beating the house. Are you the house or the gambler?
In crypto
The house is: miner, dev, whale holder.
The gambler is: wageslave trader, wageslave investor, wageslave plebs, all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In stock market
The house is: bourse, exchange, broker, banker, loan shark, billionaire, millionaire, the major shareholder, the director of the company that own many shares.
The gambler is: all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In casino
The houses is: the kingpin, the broker, the banker, the loan provider
The gambler is: all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In crypto airdrop
The houses is: airdrop participants, devs, the host coin used underlying the airdropped slave token.
The gambler: the banks, the government (El Salvador), the plebs, the billionaire (elon), the millionaire(?), the central bank, all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In a marriage
The house is: wife, women, family court, feminist, parent to the spouse, baby who gave birth, mother to the baby, Melinda gates.
The gambler is: the husband, men in general, beta cuck wageslave plebs, bill gates, elon.
In real estate market
The house is: landlord, banker, broker, billionaire, millionaire, government
The gambler is: tenant, wageslave plebs, plebs student in college, plebs student in school, basement dwellers.
Add more of your example below, and make the thread fun to read, don’t spam
Remember only idiot take high risk to get high reward. The houses do not take risk but telling all of you to take high risk. Whether it’s bear market or bull market, the houses always win. The houses do not care whether some of you wageslave plebs actually make a lot of money from the high risk high reward. The houses need some of you plebs to make a good example to a get rich quick scheme, to educate all other wageslaves to not give up the hopes of beating the house. Are you the house or the gambler?
In crypto
The house is: miner, dev, whale holder.
The gambler is: wageslave trader, wageslave investor, wageslave plebs, all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In stock market
The house is: bourse, exchange, broker, banker, loan shark, billionaire, millionaire, the major shareholder, the director of the company that own many shares.
The gambler is: all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In casino
The houses is: the kingpin, the broker, the banker, the loan provider
The gambler is: all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In crypto airdrop
The houses is: airdrop participants, devs, the host coin used underlying the airdropped slave token.
The gambler: the banks, the government (El Salvador), the plebs, the billionaire (elon), the millionaire(?), the central bank, all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In a marriage
The house is: wife, women, family court, feminist, parent to the spouse, baby who gave birth, mother to the baby, Melinda gates.
The gambler is: the husband, men in general, beta cuck wageslave plebs, bill gates, elon.
In real estate market
The house is: landlord, banker, broker, billionaire, millionaire, government
The gambler is: tenant, wageslave plebs, plebs student in college, plebs student in school, basement dwellers.
Add more of your example below, and make the thread fun to read, don’t spam
Now I am reading a series of novels by Roger Zelazny about the princes of Amber.
Prince Amber is a powerful creature capable of traveling across parallel universes (shadows). Compared to ordinary people, the princes of Amber seem to be superhumans. But there are also stronger forces - Logrus, the Fiery Path, etc.
So it is in life. The manipulator whale, in turn, is a simple player for a stronger and more powerful manipulator (actor).
Within the framework of the system, I can be a lord sovereign. However, at the supersystem level, I am a worthless player.
Taking online casinos as an example, yes, casinos are more powerful than ordinary players.
However, regulators and legislators are more powerful than online casinos.
Re: The houses always win, are you the house or the gambler?
In globalisation:
The house is: the first world strong government who have nuclear weapon
The gambler is: the third world weak government, the corrupted government, the small and helpless government.
The house is: the first world strong government who have nuclear weapon
The gambler is: the third world weak government, the corrupted government, the small and helpless government.
Re: The houses always win, are you the house or the gambler?
>>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350717.msg57524344#msg57524344
That's pretty much explanatory. Business owners wouldn't start their business if it weren't profitable in the long run. Sure, casinos give out tons of prizes but does that amount surmount the total amount of people trying to win that prize? I don't think so. It's always the house, and you can be the house if you have enough capital.
Glad to be explanatory enough to every plebs
>I don't think telling everyone here that you could either be a house or a gambler helps them win. There's nothing much you can do with that. Gambling should be for entertainment only, not a source of income.
house is the big deal, gambler do not.
>>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350717.msg57524423#msg57524423
>For me, it's not always that house will always win. It's just become a famous saying, but if you do research,
as usual, big and small house, big house would take over smaller house and form an alliance.
>there are some houses that go bankrupts, so I think it's much better we can say that it's just very rare that there is a casino that will go bankrupt.
Tbh, some house are weak house. We once thought every house is equal. Nope, I would give government as a example, government is the house, for first world government, they’re the house while the third world government is the gambler. Thing has since progress a little, in the crypto, third world government or first world government both of them shall be the gamblers under the bitcoin the strong house. Government do not always entitled be the house.
>How often do casinos go bankrupt? What are the most common reasons why one would go under? - You can find here there are some companies goes bankrupt last 2014 year. "The house always wins", is like some people always telling if you gamble, you will lose.
big house devour the small house, survival of the fittest.
That's pretty much explanatory. Business owners wouldn't start their business if it weren't profitable in the long run. Sure, casinos give out tons of prizes but does that amount surmount the total amount of people trying to win that prize? I don't think so. It's always the house, and you can be the house if you have enough capital.
Glad to be explanatory enough to every plebs
>I don't think telling everyone here that you could either be a house or a gambler helps them win. There's nothing much you can do with that. Gambling should be for entertainment only, not a source of income.
house is the big deal, gambler do not.
>>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350717.msg57524423#msg57524423
>For me, it's not always that house will always win. It's just become a famous saying, but if you do research,
as usual, big and small house, big house would take over smaller house and form an alliance.
>there are some houses that go bankrupts, so I think it's much better we can say that it's just very rare that there is a casino that will go bankrupt.
Tbh, some house are weak house. We once thought every house is equal. Nope, I would give government as a example, government is the house, for first world government, they’re the house while the third world government is the gambler. Thing has since progress a little, in the crypto, third world government or first world government both of them shall be the gamblers under the bitcoin the strong house. Government do not always entitled be the house.
>How often do casinos go bankrupt? What are the most common reasons why one would go under? - You can find here there are some companies goes bankrupt last 2014 year. "The house always wins", is like some people always telling if you gamble, you will lose.
big house devour the small house, survival of the fittest.
Re: The houses always win, are you the house or the gambler?
I think this is appropriate to be on the Gambling Discussion board, go to the lower left of this thread OP and click on move topic and choose the Gambling Discussion board. Also, the house doesn't always win, remember that there's a lot of things that can happen plus you make it look like things are just one sided.
Okey. Moved.Re: Only young and naive guy believe in high risk high return
MOVED: The houses always win, are you the house or the gambler?
This topic has been moved to Gambling discussion.
It’s a discussion to gambling, move to gambling subforum.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350717.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350717.0
It’s a discussion to gambling, move to gambling subforum.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350717.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350717.0
The houses always win, are you the house or the gambler?
Remember only idiot take high risk to get high reward. The houses do not take risk but telling all of you to take high risk. Whether it’s bear market or bull market, the houses always win. The houses do not care whether some of you wageslave plebs actually make a lot of money from the high risk high reward. The houses need some of you plebs to make a good example to a get rich quick scheme, to educate all other wageslaves to not give up the hopes of beating the house. Are you the house or the gambler?
In crypto
The house is: miner, dev, whale holder.
The gambler is: wageslave trader, wageslave investor, wageslave plebs, all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In stock market
The house is: bourse, exchange, broker, banker, loan shark, billionaire, millionaire.
The gambler is: all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In casino
The houses is: the kingpin, the broker, the banker, the loan provider
The gambler is: all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In crypto airdrop
The houses is: airdrop participants, devs, the host coin used underlying the airdropped slave token.
The gambler: the banks, the government (El Salvador), the plebs, the billionaire (elon), the millionaire(?), the central bank, all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In a marriage
The house is: wife, women, family court, feminist, parent to the spouse, baby who gave birth, mother to the baby, Melinda gates.
The gambler is: the husband, men in general, beta cuck wageslave plebs, bill gates, elon.
In real estate market
The house is: landlord, banker, broker, billionaire, millionaire
The gambler is: tenant, wageslave plebs, plebs student in college, plebs student in school, basement dwellers.
Add more of your example below, and make the thread fun to read, don’t spam
Remember only idiot take high risk to get high reward. The houses do not take risk but telling all of you to take high risk. Whether it’s bear market or bull market, the houses always win. The houses do not care whether some of you wageslave plebs actually make a lot of money from the high risk high reward. The houses need some of you plebs to make a good example to a get rich quick scheme, to educate all other wageslaves to not give up the hopes of beating the house. Are you the house or the gambler?
In crypto
The house is: miner, dev, whale holder.
The gambler is: wageslave trader, wageslave investor, wageslave plebs, all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In stock market
The house is: bourse, exchange, broker, banker, loan shark, billionaire, millionaire.
The gambler is: all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In casino
The houses is: the kingpin, the broker, the banker, the loan provider
The gambler is: all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In crypto airdrop
The houses is: airdrop participants, devs, the host coin used underlying the airdropped slave token.
The gambler: the banks, the government (El Salvador), the plebs, the billionaire (elon), the millionaire(?), the central bank, all of you suicidal wageslave high risk high reward taker.
In a marriage
The house is: wife, women, family court, feminist, parent to the spouse, baby who gave birth, mother to the baby, Melinda gates.
The gambler is: the husband, men in general, beta cuck wageslave plebs, bill gates, elon.
In real estate market
The house is: landlord, banker, broker, billionaire, millionaire
The gambler is: tenant, wageslave plebs, plebs student in college, plebs student in school, basement dwellers.
Add more of your example below, and make the thread fun to read, don’t spam
Re: Only young and naive guy believe in high risk high return
>>
Time = Money
>The world of finance follows the same rule! So whoever has longer time in hand, is more willing or capable to take risk. Because that person knows that if anything goes wrong, he/she has time to recover.
for peasant like you all, you’re just a live stock to bank and government, they would never stop taking money off you even in extreme difficulty moment, pandemic is no exception, anything with loan with the bank and government would never stop rolling in debt.
>On the other hand, an old person doesn't have a lot of time in hand. So they are not much willing to take risk. It's as simple!
bullshit, everybody once have their youth too, they didn’t just magically doesn’t have a lot of time.
>However, millionaires are less prone to all this because they make their own rules! Let's not complicate this!
to make it simple, government and bank are pushing you all to make a living by gambling on high risk high return, even a toddler can get this point easily.
>>
I don't understand the comparison of war and investments but I agree to some point about high risk and high return logic.
you don’t need to understand anything. It’s too easy nobody should have confused to such idea.
>And for those elite, yeah, they won't be the ones that will be on the floor battling their enemies and have their lives at risk but instead they hire someone to fight for them
government officials is the most typical elite in this space, why would the government need to take risk? They never need to take risk, they could get their hand on bitcoin by just confiscating from all you plebs, you all can take risk with your money for all they care since you would take loan from the government that come with interest too, government love all of you taking loan to gambling on high risk high reward venture. They would have more than happy if you all take all the money and invested into bitcoin!
>>
>What I believe your post is trying to talk about is some countries who make weapon of war always like to instigate wars so that they can sell their machine and war materials
Generally every nation share some common belief. This being their bank would operate in the same manner, the government intercept into every bank operation, eventually driving inflation higher, it’s very clear inflation is man made and clearly it’s the bank and government interaction that’s the main culprit.
because for them it is business and making money and whether young people die or not isn't their business. They make agreement with some government to trade in troublesome environment so that issues of conflict will keep arising
whether you want to gambling into making high reward from high risk, bank and government would hardly care. But bitcoin and crypto has raised the eyebrow of the banker and government, they are panic to see the price keep soaring and it’s intriguing because bank and government rarely give a damn to you peasant who take risk to gamble, it’s unprecedented they’re threatened by the gamblers who are in the crypto. Is the high risk high return work just as usual to a point the bank and government decide to clamp down on bitcoin?
Time = Money
>The world of finance follows the same rule! So whoever has longer time in hand, is more willing or capable to take risk. Because that person knows that if anything goes wrong, he/she has time to recover.
for peasant like you all, you’re just a live stock to bank and government, they would never stop taking money off you even in extreme difficulty moment, pandemic is no exception, anything with loan with the bank and government would never stop rolling in debt.
>On the other hand, an old person doesn't have a lot of time in hand. So they are not much willing to take risk. It's as simple!
bullshit, everybody once have their youth too, they didn’t just magically doesn’t have a lot of time.
>However, millionaires are less prone to all this because they make their own rules! Let's not complicate this!
to make it simple, government and bank are pushing you all to make a living by gambling on high risk high return, even a toddler can get this point easily.
>>
I don't understand the comparison of war and investments but I agree to some point about high risk and high return logic.
you don’t need to understand anything. It’s too easy nobody should have confused to such idea.
>And for those elite, yeah, they won't be the ones that will be on the floor battling their enemies and have their lives at risk but instead they hire someone to fight for them
government officials is the most typical elite in this space, why would the government need to take risk? They never need to take risk, they could get their hand on bitcoin by just confiscating from all you plebs, you all can take risk with your money for all they care since you would take loan from the government that come with interest too, government love all of you taking loan to gambling on high risk high reward venture. They would have more than happy if you all take all the money and invested into bitcoin!
>>
>What I believe your post is trying to talk about is some countries who make weapon of war always like to instigate wars so that they can sell their machine and war materials
Generally every nation share some common belief. This being their bank would operate in the same manner, the government intercept into every bank operation, eventually driving inflation higher, it’s very clear inflation is man made and clearly it’s the bank and government interaction that’s the main culprit.
because for them it is business and making money and whether young people die or not isn't their business. They make agreement with some government to trade in troublesome environment so that issues of conflict will keep arising
whether you want to gambling into making high reward from high risk, bank and government would hardly care. But bitcoin and crypto has raised the eyebrow of the banker and government, they are panic to see the price keep soaring and it’s intriguing because bank and government rarely give a damn to you peasant who take risk to gamble, it’s unprecedented they’re threatened by the gamblers who are in the crypto. Is the high risk high return work just as usual to a point the bank and government decide to clamp down on bitcoin?
Re: Only young and naive guy believe in high risk high return
>>
>Quite a bold claim, knowing that using the war analogy is actually nonsensical because you're pretty much risking not only money, but your life. You can re-earn money, but you can't re-buy your life.
Executive Order 6102 is an executive order signed on April 5, 1933, by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt "forbidding the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States." Would you mind to explain the logic behind someone would goes extra miles just to stop you to get money (gold coin), would you care to explain?
>There's literally nothing wrong with having high risk high reward investments as long as you practice proper bank roll management(obviously going all-in is a bad idea), and that you actually know that the investment you're making is high risk high reward in the first place.
It is obviously very wrong no matter how you argue, go ahead and gambling on the Las Vegas with all your very best practice management.
>>
>Between why must the risk only related to war? What about investment risk and similar risk as well?
Executive Order 6102 is an executive order signed on April 5, 1933, if it’s not a war declaration then what is it?
>People took a high risk believing in btc and they were handsomely rewarded, I for once will not take any unnecessary risk except it has to do with earning something in return or a positive benefit, to me, not all type of risk that is worth taking,
Is it not obvious enough nobody would want to take risk when they know very well?
>especially the type that has to do with war should be highly considered before doing anything that could lead to regrets. In any situation there are always certain people who will benefit from it reason why it is very important to think before acting.
Wars is a lot of risk taking too, do you blindly believe they don’t make risk management before going to a war?
>>
>Soldiers are trained before they are deployed to a battlefield. They are equipped - physically, mentally, and emotionally strong enough to do their tasks and duties for the country. In simpler terms, they are fit for their job because, in the first place, that kind of job position requires certain qualifications to be able to secure a spot.
this is just a risk assessment in my humble opinion, they are making sure they can successfully execute the war. If the wars failed they couldn’t make profit.
>But this is totally unrelated to cryptocurrency. World war doesn't equate to crypto. You are making the wrong analogy here.
Executive Order 6102 is an executive order signed on April 5, 1933, by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt "forbidding the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States." Is it not slightly related?
>In cryptocurrency, you only risk what you can afford to lose. You should know that the moment you entered the crypto world.
what do you know? the coin?
>High risk, high return is applicable only if you know what you are doing and you analyzed and studied your move before doing so. Risking a high amount will be nonsense if you'll invest it in the wrong coins. Hence, you should do your own technical analysis first and make sure you'll regret nothing once things go wrong.
Do you know Las Vegas casino? High risk high return? You can beat them into net loss?
>>
If you compared between war and investing, they are totally different. It's not comparable, war is a risk that is very visible in its impact. Investing is a step to financial freedom, so the risks cannot be seen with simple logic. You must learn risk management to measure the risk of investing. War and investment is not an apple to apple comparison. Your logic is slightly wrong comparing the two.
explain this if you think the logic is wrong, why they goes extra miles just to stop gold? Executive Order 6102 is an executive order signed on April 5, 1933, by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt "forbidding the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States."
>Quite a bold claim, knowing that using the war analogy is actually nonsensical because you're pretty much risking not only money, but your life. You can re-earn money, but you can't re-buy your life.
Executive Order 6102 is an executive order signed on April 5, 1933, by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt "forbidding the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States." Would you mind to explain the logic behind someone would goes extra miles just to stop you to get money (gold coin), would you care to explain?
>There's literally nothing wrong with having high risk high reward investments as long as you practice proper bank roll management(obviously going all-in is a bad idea), and that you actually know that the investment you're making is high risk high reward in the first place.
It is obviously very wrong no matter how you argue, go ahead and gambling on the Las Vegas with all your very best practice management.
>>
>Between why must the risk only related to war? What about investment risk and similar risk as well?
Executive Order 6102 is an executive order signed on April 5, 1933, if it’s not a war declaration then what is it?
>People took a high risk believing in btc and they were handsomely rewarded, I for once will not take any unnecessary risk except it has to do with earning something in return or a positive benefit, to me, not all type of risk that is worth taking,
Is it not obvious enough nobody would want to take risk when they know very well?
>especially the type that has to do with war should be highly considered before doing anything that could lead to regrets. In any situation there are always certain people who will benefit from it reason why it is very important to think before acting.
Wars is a lot of risk taking too, do you blindly believe they don’t make risk management before going to a war?
>>
>Soldiers are trained before they are deployed to a battlefield. They are equipped - physically, mentally, and emotionally strong enough to do their tasks and duties for the country. In simpler terms, they are fit for their job because, in the first place, that kind of job position requires certain qualifications to be able to secure a spot.
this is just a risk assessment in my humble opinion, they are making sure they can successfully execute the war. If the wars failed they couldn’t make profit.
>But this is totally unrelated to cryptocurrency. World war doesn't equate to crypto. You are making the wrong analogy here.
Executive Order 6102 is an executive order signed on April 5, 1933, by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt "forbidding the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States." Is it not slightly related?
>In cryptocurrency, you only risk what you can afford to lose. You should know that the moment you entered the crypto world.
what do you know? the coin?
>High risk, high return is applicable only if you know what you are doing and you analyzed and studied your move before doing so. Risking a high amount will be nonsense if you'll invest it in the wrong coins. Hence, you should do your own technical analysis first and make sure you'll regret nothing once things go wrong.
Do you know Las Vegas casino? High risk high return? You can beat them into net loss?
>>
If you compared between war and investing, they are totally different. It's not comparable, war is a risk that is very visible in its impact. Investing is a step to financial freedom, so the risks cannot be seen with simple logic. You must learn risk management to measure the risk of investing. War and investment is not an apple to apple comparison. Your logic is slightly wrong comparing the two.
explain this if you think the logic is wrong, why they goes extra miles just to stop gold? Executive Order 6102 is an executive order signed on April 5, 1933, by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt "forbidding the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States."
Re: Only young and naive guy believe in high risk high return
>>
>Your post not very consistent. Is high risk the problem or taking risk at all?
do you think it’s plausible to take risk under current circumstances? Let’s say you have just one credit left to beat an arcade game from level one, take all risk, and only make the risky moves, or stay safe, keep defending and wait for opening to make your moves?
>I can guarantee you that most adult regularly take risk in their businesses but the responsible/experienced ones try to minimize risk as much as possible while working to be profitable.
they take risk in their business and goes broke? Or they take risk to circumvent the martial laws?
>So, both young and old should be well prepared to avoid taking big risk.
now you think it’s not good to take risk, so how about taking risk in business again?
>>
>I don't really understand what you mean by making this post...
I think even toddler can get the idea, you need to read again and again to fully get the point.
>high risk is good when you know what you are doing, cryptocurrency is an example of high-risk high return, and you see what is happening in the market that many people are also successful from high-risk investments like cryptocurrency.
are you blinded by just the reward from the high return but not considering the high risk they went through? Do you ignore the 98% chance of high risk failure rate?
>basically, you have to know how much risk the asset you invest in, never invest in things you don't know.
I think it’s the same guy who tell you to invest in stock market, they also tell you fundamental... invest in blue chip... invest in stock market... don’t sell you haven’t loss if you didn’t sell.
>>
>It is understandable that when you are 20 years old, you could put in 50-100 bucks and try to go for that 100x profit, or read the 100 dollar startup and try to make the same thing, or hope that you will one day work for yourself and have your own business and hire people and get rich.
delusional, making 100x profit requires to scam a lot more people than making 2x profit.
>Those type of big dreams usually happen when you are younger, because when you become 30+ years old like me, all you want is stability in life, for example I have a great job right now, and I am willing to work like this for 30 more years and then retire as an old man and just relax, that is a valid thing for me, I am not after huge sums of money anymore like I used to.
that is ambitious to think of simply settle down for one purpose for the rest of life, thing always change, and life purpose always change too.
>Nowadays my "get rich" dreams usually involve a lot smaller stuff that requires me not working, for example get enough money to retire now and go to a sea side place and simply read, watch netflix, swim and repeat that until I die, not own a billion dollar worth business.
that won’t be possible without putting some effort to make it, it’s also probably what many people want to achieve, which is why it’s more challenging since everybody want to go to the sea resort and retire, very soon you have so much people all in the same place, the place become plagued with unrest.
>>
>Sometimes young people are the most lucky ones, they still have their chance of loosing. So, why not?
what is the “they have chance” are you blabbing? Do you think they have more credit in their arcade games than everybody else? How many coin they have and how many coin everybody else have? They have more coins?
>>
>Nope you are wrong, you probably failed in taking risk that's why you are saying this stuff regarding high risk, high reward is a bad thing.
you think it’s wrong?
>I don't see how you are right about it, of course you compare elite to plebians like us which is the right thing to do,
Now it is right? What give??
>they don't take risk because they already have the money and if they park it at the safest place, it will eventually go up.
So, don’t take risk?
>Your post not very consistent. Is high risk the problem or taking risk at all?
do you think it’s plausible to take risk under current circumstances? Let’s say you have just one credit left to beat an arcade game from level one, take all risk, and only make the risky moves, or stay safe, keep defending and wait for opening to make your moves?
>I can guarantee you that most adult regularly take risk in their businesses but the responsible/experienced ones try to minimize risk as much as possible while working to be profitable.
they take risk in their business and goes broke? Or they take risk to circumvent the martial laws?
>So, both young and old should be well prepared to avoid taking big risk.
now you think it’s not good to take risk, so how about taking risk in business again?
>>
>I don't really understand what you mean by making this post...
I think even toddler can get the idea, you need to read again and again to fully get the point.
>high risk is good when you know what you are doing, cryptocurrency is an example of high-risk high return, and you see what is happening in the market that many people are also successful from high-risk investments like cryptocurrency.
are you blinded by just the reward from the high return but not considering the high risk they went through? Do you ignore the 98% chance of high risk failure rate?
>basically, you have to know how much risk the asset you invest in, never invest in things you don't know.
I think it’s the same guy who tell you to invest in stock market, they also tell you fundamental... invest in blue chip... invest in stock market... don’t sell you haven’t loss if you didn’t sell.
>>
>It is understandable that when you are 20 years old, you could put in 50-100 bucks and try to go for that 100x profit, or read the 100 dollar startup and try to make the same thing, or hope that you will one day work for yourself and have your own business and hire people and get rich.
delusional, making 100x profit requires to scam a lot more people than making 2x profit.
>Those type of big dreams usually happen when you are younger, because when you become 30+ years old like me, all you want is stability in life, for example I have a great job right now, and I am willing to work like this for 30 more years and then retire as an old man and just relax, that is a valid thing for me, I am not after huge sums of money anymore like I used to.
that is ambitious to think of simply settle down for one purpose for the rest of life, thing always change, and life purpose always change too.
>Nowadays my "get rich" dreams usually involve a lot smaller stuff that requires me not working, for example get enough money to retire now and go to a sea side place and simply read, watch netflix, swim and repeat that until I die, not own a billion dollar worth business.
that won’t be possible without putting some effort to make it, it’s also probably what many people want to achieve, which is why it’s more challenging since everybody want to go to the sea resort and retire, very soon you have so much people all in the same place, the place become plagued with unrest.
>>
>Sometimes young people are the most lucky ones, they still have their chance of loosing. So, why not?
what is the “they have chance” are you blabbing? Do you think they have more credit in their arcade games than everybody else? How many coin they have and how many coin everybody else have? They have more coins?
>>
>Nope you are wrong, you probably failed in taking risk that's why you are saying this stuff regarding high risk, high reward is a bad thing.
you think it’s wrong?
>I don't see how you are right about it, of course you compare elite to plebians like us which is the right thing to do,
Now it is right? What give??
>they don't take risk because they already have the money and if they park it at the safest place, it will eventually go up.
So, don’t take risk?
Re: Only young and naive guy believe in high risk high return
>>
>OP, other than pharmacist suggestion above, I think you also need to realize that calling people idiots multiple times won't be enough to convince people. It might even cause them to turn around instead of reading your argument.
that’s perfectly how to manipulate people into doing something into their favour. In the casino, whether you bet it in BIG or SMALL, casino is the winner. In the world war, no matter what is the outcome of the wars, whether the Japan win or the Nazi win, the elite still profit from the wars, many people still died in the wars. You think the elites never aware of plan b? They have total control of the outcome, plan A and plan B, both of them are a total success.
>Btw, you don't really need to believe in HR/HR opportunity, it's just a category of investment. Whether you believe it or not, there are various cases where people profit from doing risky maneuvers.
gambling in Las Vegas is classic form of high risk high return, name me a guy who beat the Las Vegas into NET LOSS, there isn’t any to date?
>>
>Elites and the financially stable manage their risk and that's the difference between them and everyone else. Elites are financially stable people who were able to take an extremely low risk-reward opportunity normally.
Exactly, countless of real life proof suggesting clowns are getting rewarded handsomely for being clowns, is printing money not a risk free approaches to make money? Are people too dumb to take risk today?
>Amazon started as an online book store in a garage, why? Was it maybe the lack of financial burdon? Also selling books and having a $250k investment from your parents is a pretty stable deal - the books are still going to be worth how much you can recycle them for and would probably be worth at least 80% of what they were bought for.
It’s baffling amazon might not be able to survive today if not for the massive stimulus given to keep them going, they haven’t been making profit enough to pay for their employees.
>
I'm thinking (especially from the US) that a lot of the $10M+ entrepreneurs had fairly middle class parents (at least) who were able to invest in them - this obviously makes it look extremely hard to end up in that category, but perhaps not impossible.
Keep that going, billionaire all get rich from stock market, doesn’t it make sense to invest in stock market? They’re too calling bitcoin is a scam, and you shouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole.
>
People normally have backups for things too so the risk will probably reduce that way - most people financially stable or elite have some sort of hedge/diversification options available to them.
It is always the same, printing money is the obvious form of risk free/hedging/plan b, it’s too easy, even a kid can understand this very simple concept yet there is many young and naive guy who want to refute.
>>
>The name calling came of somehow offensive!
make love don’t make war?
>Seriously, you don't call people names for not having the same view on a point as you do or buying into some other persons idea just as your expecting us to buy your ideas and accept it as absolute about that point!
or course when some point is blatant lies, you should have make noise. Are you the guy who are pro vaccinated or anti vaccine??
>NO, that's not how life works or the society is set-up. Variations does exist amongst everything and that's the beauty of life. Air your views and give people a chance to air theirs because in a way, anyone with a contrary opinion just feels stupid or like an idiot as you put it to air it out. As such, they become really ashamed.
btw many people told you to quit crypto since it’s illegal, it’s scam, it’s high risk, why did you quit? Why are you not invested stock market when trump tell you to do so?
>Well, this isn't an armed force discussion board, its a bitcointalk forum and an economy board @OP and should I talk about the 'high risk high return' policy, its practically true but not in all aspect. I'll explain. Scenario;
sure, financial wars is not discussing about armed force, do you want to believe currency is not a form of war? Do you want to believe we should make peace and have only one currency for the entire globe? When we have only one currency peace is inevitable.
>1. There are those who would invest in altcoins or some package of some sort with their spare cash, not knowing what the future of the coin or token is but then, they take this risk and in a few years, the coin pumps and they profit a lot from so little.
yup, don’t get too happy they have 98% chance of the coin going south too.
>2. In this case, with every ROI being a multiple of your investment, investing more or having high stakes in a carefully examined project would mean, having high returns as well.
when the coin going south, your high stake go to very low price, and you suffer heavy loss.
>Using these Scenario, the stakes to reward factor can be proven in Scenario 2.
Embrace variation mate and be cool with people for choosing the side they choose. They have them reasons and you ain't in ther shoes.
when the point is too obvious even toddlers can understand, we would still have countless young and naive guy who simply choose to be bad actors, you would always have two polarising group of people, far left or far right, they’re stubborn and won’t listen.
>OP, other than pharmacist suggestion above, I think you also need to realize that calling people idiots multiple times won't be enough to convince people. It might even cause them to turn around instead of reading your argument.
that’s perfectly how to manipulate people into doing something into their favour. In the casino, whether you bet it in BIG or SMALL, casino is the winner. In the world war, no matter what is the outcome of the wars, whether the Japan win or the Nazi win, the elite still profit from the wars, many people still died in the wars. You think the elites never aware of plan b? They have total control of the outcome, plan A and plan B, both of them are a total success.
>Btw, you don't really need to believe in HR/HR opportunity, it's just a category of investment. Whether you believe it or not, there are various cases where people profit from doing risky maneuvers.
gambling in Las Vegas is classic form of high risk high return, name me a guy who beat the Las Vegas into NET LOSS, there isn’t any to date?
>>
>Elites and the financially stable manage their risk and that's the difference between them and everyone else. Elites are financially stable people who were able to take an extremely low risk-reward opportunity normally.
Exactly, countless of real life proof suggesting clowns are getting rewarded handsomely for being clowns, is printing money not a risk free approaches to make money? Are people too dumb to take risk today?
>Amazon started as an online book store in a garage, why? Was it maybe the lack of financial burdon? Also selling books and having a $250k investment from your parents is a pretty stable deal - the books are still going to be worth how much you can recycle them for and would probably be worth at least 80% of what they were bought for.
It’s baffling amazon might not be able to survive today if not for the massive stimulus given to keep them going, they haven’t been making profit enough to pay for their employees.
>
I'm thinking (especially from the US) that a lot of the $10M+ entrepreneurs had fairly middle class parents (at least) who were able to invest in them - this obviously makes it look extremely hard to end up in that category, but perhaps not impossible.
Keep that going, billionaire all get rich from stock market, doesn’t it make sense to invest in stock market? They’re too calling bitcoin is a scam, and you shouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole.
>
People normally have backups for things too so the risk will probably reduce that way - most people financially stable or elite have some sort of hedge/diversification options available to them.
It is always the same, printing money is the obvious form of risk free/hedging/plan b, it’s too easy, even a kid can understand this very simple concept yet there is many young and naive guy who want to refute.
>>
>The name calling came of somehow offensive!
make love don’t make war?
>Seriously, you don't call people names for not having the same view on a point as you do or buying into some other persons idea just as your expecting us to buy your ideas and accept it as absolute about that point!
or course when some point is blatant lies, you should have make noise. Are you the guy who are pro vaccinated or anti vaccine??
>NO, that's not how life works or the society is set-up. Variations does exist amongst everything and that's the beauty of life. Air your views and give people a chance to air theirs because in a way, anyone with a contrary opinion just feels stupid or like an idiot as you put it to air it out. As such, they become really ashamed.
btw many people told you to quit crypto since it’s illegal, it’s scam, it’s high risk, why did you quit? Why are you not invested stock market when trump tell you to do so?
>Well, this isn't an armed force discussion board, its a bitcointalk forum and an economy board @OP and should I talk about the 'high risk high return' policy, its practically true but not in all aspect. I'll explain. Scenario;
sure, financial wars is not discussing about armed force, do you want to believe currency is not a form of war? Do you want to believe we should make peace and have only one currency for the entire globe? When we have only one currency peace is inevitable.
>1. There are those who would invest in altcoins or some package of some sort with their spare cash, not knowing what the future of the coin or token is but then, they take this risk and in a few years, the coin pumps and they profit a lot from so little.
yup, don’t get too happy they have 98% chance of the coin going south too.
>2. In this case, with every ROI being a multiple of your investment, investing more or having high stakes in a carefully examined project would mean, having high returns as well.
when the coin going south, your high stake go to very low price, and you suffer heavy loss.
>Using these Scenario, the stakes to reward factor can be proven in Scenario 2.
Embrace variation mate and be cool with people for choosing the side they choose. They have them reasons and you ain't in ther shoes.
when the point is too obvious even toddlers can understand, we would still have countless young and naive guy who simply choose to be bad actors, you would always have two polarising group of people, far left or far right, they’re stubborn and won’t listen.
Re: Only young and naive guy believe in high risk high return
>>
>Comparing investors with the soldiers seems stupid idea,
Compare investment to war
Compare investor to soldier
Compare invested asset to ammunition/gun/weapon
>Let's talk about the soldier's high risk, you are saying that the soldiers are not getting any returns for their risk
the return solider get from war is victory, it’s a very sweet return, think of all the sweat and blood that pave the way for peace, isn’t it well worth it?
>but the actual return is you are sitting in your home and talking about this because of someone is taking risk to save their borders. If no one is ready to become soldier then imagine how you are life is going to be!
Here we goes again, yup, security is at risk too, fortunately someone else is taking the risk, no doubt without soldier there won’t be peace.
>>
>Your opinion is the same as someone who has never enjoyed a decent return,
someone who has never enjoyed a decent return! Well said, under current circumstances, no one can think of get rich quick, I don’t think there is anyone who actually become rich following the investing rules, remember all the billionaires teach you a bunch of rules to follow? I doubt you have forgotten all of them! I think they tell you to invest into stock market to get rich, why aren’t you invested in stock? Why aren’t you quit crypto?
>either because you have not tried at all or have experienced major failures.
it definitely got the vibes of a financial ruin.
>Therefore, in business all individuals must be soldiers for themselves with all their intelligence and responsibility.
I’m intrigued by someone who actually believe business is about taking huge risk. Btw most successful business starts from nothing to build into conglomerate today. Doesn’t bitcoin start off from zero? Don’t be the soldier, they’re risky.
>>
>do not understand about the risk you mean, do you mean millions of dollars of wealth invested is not a risk at all?
Want to define risk in plain text??
Covid virus is very high risk and need to resort to martial laws, bitcoin is risk to some people, gold is risk to some people, chemicals inside talcum is carcinogenic risk, Monsanto is gmo risk... what is risk? It’s everything!
Someone get hurt, hence it’s risk, yup, even a drawn character that resemble a criminal can be risk, gta v is a risk too, it’s risky to children, and someone get hurt or killed in that risk...!
>Then, who are the elites in investment/trading that rule you? You enter, you are the sole controller and in full charge of your assets. If you think of popes as elite and retailers with a thousand different minds are warriors, it's impossible for popes to rule retailers all at once.
A casino has total control of their win/loss rate, gamblers who take risk in the casino, can never stand a chance to beat the casino into total loss. The elite, being the casino king pin, has absolute total control to every plebs who place their bet in their casino, it’s not a fairy tale, the casino theory has been proven over and over again, casino can’t never lose no matter how genius competent the gamblers are, all of them, even in a huge team would loss to the casino.
>>
OP, did you realize your post was super repetitive? This is what I'd call a bloated shitpost that's long but basically says nothing.
Yup, you want to get rid of risk? Everybody want to get rid of risk in their life? Can you get rid of risk? Is it even possible to get rid of risk? Risk is probably the highly bloated shitpost ever yet nobody can get rid of risk! Funny?
>I was going to write something about the topic itself, but it's blatantly false on its face that high risk is only for the young--and you didn't even define "young".
Young is not age specified. For animal, their young age are much deviated. For a turtle, 200 year old can be a young turtle. For whales, 100 year old is a young whale. For human? Young human? When we construct a sentence, “the morning is young.” We do not specify the age, what we are trying to describe is, “it’s early in the morning.” Young and naive guy refer to the people who get into investment without any basic knowledge, they’re as young as apprentice, as young as a toddler in the investment, they have no idea of the entire corrupted practices in the investing industries. Indeed as young as clueless newbie who are readily to be slaughtered in the stock trading.
>To you it could mean people in their teens or 20s, but to me it could be anyone up to 45 years old. And aside from all that, there are big risk takers of all age categories....so I'm not sure why you started this thread, but my guess is it's a merit-grab attempt.
Young and naive, all of you.
>Big fail.
not sure if it’s satire.
>Comparing investors with the soldiers seems stupid idea,
Compare investment to war
Compare investor to soldier
Compare invested asset to ammunition/gun/weapon
>Let's talk about the soldier's high risk, you are saying that the soldiers are not getting any returns for their risk
the return solider get from war is victory, it’s a very sweet return, think of all the sweat and blood that pave the way for peace, isn’t it well worth it?
>but the actual return is you are sitting in your home and talking about this because of someone is taking risk to save their borders. If no one is ready to become soldier then imagine how you are life is going to be!
Here we goes again, yup, security is at risk too, fortunately someone else is taking the risk, no doubt without soldier there won’t be peace.
>>
>Your opinion is the same as someone who has never enjoyed a decent return,
someone who has never enjoyed a decent return! Well said, under current circumstances, no one can think of get rich quick, I don’t think there is anyone who actually become rich following the investing rules, remember all the billionaires teach you a bunch of rules to follow? I doubt you have forgotten all of them! I think they tell you to invest into stock market to get rich, why aren’t you invested in stock? Why aren’t you quit crypto?
>either because you have not tried at all or have experienced major failures.
it definitely got the vibes of a financial ruin.
>Therefore, in business all individuals must be soldiers for themselves with all their intelligence and responsibility.
I’m intrigued by someone who actually believe business is about taking huge risk. Btw most successful business starts from nothing to build into conglomerate today. Doesn’t bitcoin start off from zero? Don’t be the soldier, they’re risky.
>>
>do not understand about the risk you mean, do you mean millions of dollars of wealth invested is not a risk at all?
Want to define risk in plain text??
Covid virus is very high risk and need to resort to martial laws, bitcoin is risk to some people, gold is risk to some people, chemicals inside talcum is carcinogenic risk, Monsanto is gmo risk... what is risk? It’s everything!
Someone get hurt, hence it’s risk, yup, even a drawn character that resemble a criminal can be risk, gta v is a risk too, it’s risky to children, and someone get hurt or killed in that risk...!
>Then, who are the elites in investment/trading that rule you? You enter, you are the sole controller and in full charge of your assets. If you think of popes as elite and retailers with a thousand different minds are warriors, it's impossible for popes to rule retailers all at once.
A casino has total control of their win/loss rate, gamblers who take risk in the casino, can never stand a chance to beat the casino into total loss. The elite, being the casino king pin, has absolute total control to every plebs who place their bet in their casino, it’s not a fairy tale, the casino theory has been proven over and over again, casino can’t never lose no matter how genius competent the gamblers are, all of them, even in a huge team would loss to the casino.
>>
OP, did you realize your post was super repetitive? This is what I'd call a bloated shitpost that's long but basically says nothing.
Yup, you want to get rid of risk? Everybody want to get rid of risk in their life? Can you get rid of risk? Is it even possible to get rid of risk? Risk is probably the highly bloated shitpost ever yet nobody can get rid of risk! Funny?
>I was going to write something about the topic itself, but it's blatantly false on its face that high risk is only for the young--and you didn't even define "young".
Young is not age specified. For animal, their young age are much deviated. For a turtle, 200 year old can be a young turtle. For whales, 100 year old is a young whale. For human? Young human? When we construct a sentence, “the morning is young.” We do not specify the age, what we are trying to describe is, “it’s early in the morning.” Young and naive guy refer to the people who get into investment without any basic knowledge, they’re as young as apprentice, as young as a toddler in the investment, they have no idea of the entire corrupted practices in the investing industries. Indeed as young as clueless newbie who are readily to be slaughtered in the stock trading.
>To you it could mean people in their teens or 20s, but to me it could be anyone up to 45 years old. And aside from all that, there are big risk takers of all age categories....so I'm not sure why you started this thread, but my guess is it's a merit-grab attempt.
Young and naive, all of you.
>Big fail.
not sure if it’s satire.
Re: Only young and naive guy believe in high risk high return
>>
>This is not related to economy, or what are you driving at?
I’m always wondering, some guy call economics is a science, they think it’s a know how and know why. Let’s break down economics into parts, ecology + taxonomy = economy, eco + nomy, is it obvious economy is a study of the interaction living organism in a community or in a kingdom? I’m not entirely sure how do you think of economy, you may have equal it to pure investment only, I had no idea because there isn’t an investment chapter in the economy textbook.
>You mean no soldier or useful people should be involved during war? I yet do not see the point you are making.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t dislike soldier, I’m very clear to only attack the elite for their evil plan on mind controlling soldier to do their risky work.
>People will always face high risk business because of the return if that is what you mean, if you regarded them as fools, some people do not have option because it is the way they are surviving.
Whatever you think, this is what you belief, high risk high return, you would always associate everything with risk, because it’s already part of your flesh and your mindset, I don’t blame you, you can have your own way, I wouldn’t force you to change btw.
>>
>Soldiers don't go to war just because they can win or not, they did that to safe their families and friends, they crave for peace and better future,
Preciously, they’re taking risk to get the high return, the return is PEACE, although peace is just a mental state of feeling secured, but this mental state is of very HIGH value, it’s definitely worth every risk to fight for peace!
> if there aren't soldiers in your country you won't have peace and time to come on here, are you the type of man that condemned the sacrifice of soldiers?
Nope, they’re great guy, I would thank them for debunking the ugly of the wars, without them nobody would learn and the war wouldn’t stop.
>They are better than you and I mate, think deeply, also this has nothing to do with crypto investment and economy if you aren't ready to take risks or probably lose you won't be able to win if you invest in crypto, with the will of taking risks and the will of learning from your mistakes you will eventually win.
I’m always happy with people who want to take risk, want to take high risk, or they preaching high risk high return, they have every rights to defend their point on taking risk, blindly following what other people told is not something I would accept and happily with whatever they do.
>>
>Certainly, war is no high-risk high-return, is high-risk low-return, and is not an investment - not for the individuals that take part on in directly at least.
Some people would regard PEACE as the highest form of return one can imagine, you would never appreciate until you have no more PEACE. Is war high risk high return? There is little to doubt about it. Those guy who are evilly genius know very well PEACE is just a worthless feeling and worth nothing, it’s just a feeling of secure, but PEACE mean a lot to very poor people who are constantly in troubles.
>It is not as much as being fooled because of age, it has a lot to do with the culture and the knowledge and the beliefs.
Age is very reliable factor, knowledge is accumulated through ages, nobody can be instant knowledgeable especially when you’re being indoctrinated with false knowledge for ages, you can’t never see the light.
>Most of those who want you to fight for them or given them your money will speak of "country", "god", "freedom", "patriotism",... but they will only be thinking of power, money, land,... They will use your goodwill and your love for their purposes. Those who only take news from one side or do not want to listen to other´s points of view, and think that only certain party o leader or book has the absolute truth and all else is wrong are the ones most at risk of being manipulated into a wrongful conflict.
Very impressive briefing, I would happily advocate such knowledge to all young and naive guy.
>However, in business, high risk high return exists and sometimes there are low risk high return opportunities. Is no longer a question of elites, anyone can choose to learn how to take advantage.
War is always profitable, high risk high return existed during wars, you have a lot of wars, world wars, currency wars... YUP you’re not dumb to think currency as a form of wars!! In the end wars is mostly mental state, the actual killing in wars is only consist of a very small part of the entire world wars, we all spend huge amount of time in the workload that’s outside of the killing, we spend most time in politics negotiations during the wars, we spend most time on mental gymnastics during the world wars, the killing is the last moment that would only last for a few weeks.
>Re "elites" actually, they do invest in risky ventures - if they loose they still have plenty, whereas if you loose it will mean something for your.
What if I tell you the elite are not young and naive guy? They’re all smart and also very old guy??
>This is not related to economy, or what are you driving at?
I’m always wondering, some guy call economics is a science, they think it’s a know how and know why. Let’s break down economics into parts, ecology + taxonomy = economy, eco + nomy, is it obvious economy is a study of the interaction living organism in a community or in a kingdom? I’m not entirely sure how do you think of economy, you may have equal it to pure investment only, I had no idea because there isn’t an investment chapter in the economy textbook.
>You mean no soldier or useful people should be involved during war? I yet do not see the point you are making.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t dislike soldier, I’m very clear to only attack the elite for their evil plan on mind controlling soldier to do their risky work.
>People will always face high risk business because of the return if that is what you mean, if you regarded them as fools, some people do not have option because it is the way they are surviving.
Whatever you think, this is what you belief, high risk high return, you would always associate everything with risk, because it’s already part of your flesh and your mindset, I don’t blame you, you can have your own way, I wouldn’t force you to change btw.
>>
>Soldiers don't go to war just because they can win or not, they did that to safe their families and friends, they crave for peace and better future,
Preciously, they’re taking risk to get the high return, the return is PEACE, although peace is just a mental state of feeling secured, but this mental state is of very HIGH value, it’s definitely worth every risk to fight for peace!
> if there aren't soldiers in your country you won't have peace and time to come on here, are you the type of man that condemned the sacrifice of soldiers?
Nope, they’re great guy, I would thank them for debunking the ugly of the wars, without them nobody would learn and the war wouldn’t stop.
>They are better than you and I mate, think deeply, also this has nothing to do with crypto investment and economy if you aren't ready to take risks or probably lose you won't be able to win if you invest in crypto, with the will of taking risks and the will of learning from your mistakes you will eventually win.
I’m always happy with people who want to take risk, want to take high risk, or they preaching high risk high return, they have every rights to defend their point on taking risk, blindly following what other people told is not something I would accept and happily with whatever they do.
>>
>Certainly, war is no high-risk high-return, is high-risk low-return, and is not an investment - not for the individuals that take part on in directly at least.
Some people would regard PEACE as the highest form of return one can imagine, you would never appreciate until you have no more PEACE. Is war high risk high return? There is little to doubt about it. Those guy who are evilly genius know very well PEACE is just a worthless feeling and worth nothing, it’s just a feeling of secure, but PEACE mean a lot to very poor people who are constantly in troubles.
>It is not as much as being fooled because of age, it has a lot to do with the culture and the knowledge and the beliefs.
Age is very reliable factor, knowledge is accumulated through ages, nobody can be instant knowledgeable especially when you’re being indoctrinated with false knowledge for ages, you can’t never see the light.
>Most of those who want you to fight for them or given them your money will speak of "country", "god", "freedom", "patriotism",... but they will only be thinking of power, money, land,... They will use your goodwill and your love for their purposes. Those who only take news from one side or do not want to listen to other´s points of view, and think that only certain party o leader or book has the absolute truth and all else is wrong are the ones most at risk of being manipulated into a wrongful conflict.
Very impressive briefing, I would happily advocate such knowledge to all young and naive guy.
>However, in business, high risk high return exists and sometimes there are low risk high return opportunities. Is no longer a question of elites, anyone can choose to learn how to take advantage.
War is always profitable, high risk high return existed during wars, you have a lot of wars, world wars, currency wars... YUP you’re not dumb to think currency as a form of wars!! In the end wars is mostly mental state, the actual killing in wars is only consist of a very small part of the entire world wars, we all spend huge amount of time in the workload that’s outside of the killing, we spend most time in politics negotiations during the wars, we spend most time on mental gymnastics during the world wars, the killing is the last moment that would only last for a few weeks.
>Re "elites" actually, they do invest in risky ventures - if they loose they still have plenty, whereas if you loose it will mean something for your.
What if I tell you the elite are not young and naive guy? They’re all smart and also very old guy??