Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 45 results by Scam Exposer
The snapshot will probably be made between Feb 1 and 10, it wil not be announced. Make sure your coins are in a dedicated wallet then and not on an exchange. With last dividend payout, many people reported issues/delays moving their coins away from Liqui close to the snapshot date.
ICO price, some mention $0.80 per token but I remember having paid $1
Currently price of TaaS is drop. It is are best time to bought some a tokens then keep that for future snapshoot. lately there are many issues about withdrawal token has not been in processed, so not only forTaaS . But for all those who've interest can use other alternative market, there is still have Livecoin and HitBTC. you right price in ICO are equal 1usd. ICO price, some mention $0.80 per token but I remember having paid $1
I'm also dumping my taas at 50% price of exchange.
All of this mess of bounty is due to the miscoordination betwwen taas and Jamalazaz.
I don't think anyone would be given bounty now.
Whoever wasn't paid better find some other ICO Bounty.
I don't think anyone would be given bounty now.
Whoever wasn't paid better find some other ICO Bounty.
Hi LightSameul,
What would you like to say about the fraud your campaign manager is trying to do.
See this- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1922777.msg19470158#msg19470158
Another thing that caught my sight. In the final bounty spreadsheet, he allotted 400 TaaS to Mr. Lee Trader for counting and calculation. Most probably it would be himself only.
So he is taking around $1200 for counting and calculation. Which aren't correct and have lots of mistakes.
If it's not him. And he has paid someone else for counting and calculation, he is an idiot. I would have done such calculations for $100 only.
What would you like to say about the fraud your campaign manager is trying to do.
See this- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1922777.msg19470158#msg19470158
Quote
They have found another way to scam users.
They are paying less than required. And saying it to be a totaling mistake.
Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1792938.msg19464309#msg19464309
You can also see there are more such mistakes like that in case of 'ether19' . His total comes out to be 132.45+20.71+59+42.01+10 = 264.17
but he is getting only 224.73 Taas according to final sheet
There may be more victims that may not even have noticed how they got scammed.
Archived pages-
Final total- http://archive.is/sARoF
They are paying less than required. And saying it to be a totaling mistake.
Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1792938.msg19464309#msg19464309
You can also see there are more such mistakes like that in case of 'ether19' . His total comes out to be 132.45+20.71+59+42.01+10 = 264.17
but he is getting only 224.73 Taas according to final sheet
There may be more victims that may not even have noticed how they got scammed.
Archived pages-
Final total- http://archive.is/sARoF
Another thing that caught my sight. In the final bounty spreadsheet, he allotted 400 TaaS to Mr. Lee Trader for counting and calculation. Most probably it would be himself only.
So he is taking around $1200 for counting and calculation. Which aren't correct and have lots of mistakes.
If it's not him. And he has paid someone else for counting and calculation, he is an idiot. I would have done such calculations for $100 only.
Re: TaaS: Token As Service Bounty Thread - Support Us and Earn Reward
Jamal is a professional cheater.
He is intentionally doing lots of calculation mistakes to give lesser bounties.
Check this- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1792938.msg19464309#msg19464309
You can also see there are more such mistakes like that in case of 'ether19' . His total comes out to be 132.45+20.71+59+42.01+10 = 264.17
but he is getting only 224.73 Taas according to final sheet
He is intentionally doing lots of calculation mistakes to give lesser bounties.
Check this- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1792938.msg19464309#msg19464309
You can also see there are more such mistakes like that in case of 'ether19' . His total comes out to be 132.45+20.71+59+42.01+10 = 264.17
but he is getting only 224.73 Taas according to final sheet
They have found another way to scam users.
They are paying less than required. And saying it to be a totaling mistake.
Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1792938.msg19464309#msg19464309
You can also see there are more such mistakes like that in case of 'ether19' . His total comes out to be 132.45+20.71+59+42.01+10 = 264.17
but he is getting only 224.73 Taas according to final sheet
There may be more victims that may not even have noticed how they got scammed.
Archived pages-
Final total- http://archive.is/sARoF
They are paying less than required. And saying it to be a totaling mistake.
Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1792938.msg19464309#msg19464309
You can also see there are more such mistakes like that in case of 'ether19' . His total comes out to be 132.45+20.71+59+42.01+10 = 264.17
but he is getting only 224.73 Taas according to final sheet
There may be more victims that may not even have noticed how they got scammed.
Archived pages-
Final total- http://archive.is/sARoF
Re: TaaS: Token As Service Signature and Avatar, Personal Text Campaign
Root cause of all the problems here is Jamal. He is not a good manager. Just to earn few hundred dollars, he promotes scam. And later says I wasn't associated with them. He should check first that project is legit.
Since he was the campaign manager, we only have right to ask increase in bounty from him. It is his responsibility to extract those funds. If he is unable to do so. He should pay from his own pocket.
He should have made terms of bounty clear with their team. I think he too should be given negative trust.
Earlier I wasn't in favour of giving him negative trust, but after I saw his previous bounty campaigns, it is clear that either, he only chooses scam projects or scam projects only choose him.
I would request everyone who has suffered due to this, to put a negative trust on Taas profile and Jamal profile until they pay the promised amount.
Jamal,I give you two options,
1: pay me the right amount of bounty
2: don't pay me anything and I along with some others will give you negative trust
Since he was the campaign manager, we only have right to ask increase in bounty from him. It is his responsibility to extract those funds. If he is unable to do so. He should pay from his own pocket.
He should have made terms of bounty clear with their team. I think he too should be given negative trust.
Earlier I wasn't in favour of giving him negative trust, but after I saw his previous bounty campaigns, it is clear that either, he only chooses scam projects or scam projects only choose him.
I would request everyone who has suffered due to this, to put a negative trust on Taas profile and Jamal profile until they pay the promised amount.
Jamal,I give you two options,
1: pay me the right amount of bounty
2: don't pay me anything and I along with some others will give you negative trust
use your own account to talk shit Mr. Minorman.. you've partcipated in signature campaign and you are already earning 236 TaaS tokens for your 50 shit posts. you should be thankful for that. more than 200 Dollars for 50 shit posts is more than what people like you deserve, so tell me now do you want these 200 dollars or I simply blacklist you (you deserve to be blacklisted)
don't try to scare me by your shitty negative trust, I've got lots of negatives from people like you. If TaaS decide to pay only 100K tokens. it is not my fault ... I already shared the chat logs between me and Dimitri with you where you see that I tried to convince him to pay 160K tokens. but he didn't agree.
Edit: the payment terms was clear from day one.. that was stated from first day and Everyone knew that the payment will be done directly from the project owners. and I do not have control to any funds, more than 2000 members participated, now blaming me for what?
my job was only to manage the bounties and I am doing my part of work very well.
May I know why I am being pulled over here in this? I never talked any shit about this project nor I said you scammer or the team? I am in no way related to the person you are speaking.Please check before accusing someone.
I do not denounce anyone, however, I feel very curious. This forum has no notification feature when it comes to the name of someone, and it's weird when I have not seen any of your previous comments on this thread, but after he mentioned you, you're here, is this a coincidence?
There may be something like that. Because I have seen it many times. Like when someone takes name of some DT member , they soon come there.
And what is the reason of protecting? You're the reason why his name mentioned here in the first place, he just arrived here suddenly then you team up with him just like that, I think you lose, there's no way you can get your bounty in here after the horrible mistake you have done. If you still get your bounty then I will praise TaaS team then, they still give you what you deserve despite the things you've done.
And I'm not Minorman. I don't want someone else published for what I did.
There's no thing that can stop my bounty. I wasted my time on this. I must be paid.
You can check my ip , most probably it will be different from Minor man. If by chance my ip is same as minorman because I use VPN.
I did everything as per rules of bounty. Not only that, I subscribed your newsletter from accounts of all in my house.
I am quite disappointed with it. I thought they would give the most satisfactory explanation. No explanation.
Indeed. Maybe it would be better to wait till they pay out the existing bounties and then tag them. What do you think @Zepher?
I have been away for the last day and was hoping to come back to find this resolved. Guess that hasn't happened.
So the bounty payments (100k/2%/w/e) were supposed to be paid on the 18th, and have yet to be paid. This is starting to scream SCAM.
To the devs: I know you are refusing to post here, but that really isn't doing you any good. To not realise how the trust system works here will also be to your detriment.
I suggest that you pay out what is owed to get this over with. It's quite easy really - pay, and this all goes away. Don't pay - and you are putting your whole development on the line when it comes to its' reputation for keeping to its' word. Your call.
I think you might not be informed about bounty programmes of other ico going on. That's the way they work. Only a few distribute on decided dates.
Some even pay months later than the decided dates and I'm talking about legit projects. For example Chronobank paid 2-3 months after ICO end (initial plan was 1 week bounty distribution one week after ico ends).
Though there are some that follow the schedules and maintain good communication with investors.
As of now i don't think any bounties have been paid and this thread may have cost everyone who participated. Hope that is not the case.
This thread can only benefit bounty hunters.Why wouldn't they pay bounties because of this? Only reason could be if they are big scam (unlikely). And if they were completely scam then taas tokens would not have any value.
As they told me, they would be making a blog post soon to answer all this. Though, I don't think they will increase the bounty. Or they may partially increase. Like we were supposed to get +60% they may pay +30%. Because it was surely a mistake on their part.
Minorman is right. I'm not him. I used his name.
Please don't take any action against Minorman. He was always playing with the rules.
Sorry minorman for this.
Jamal, I have no association with Minor man. I am someone else you don't even know.
Please don't take any action against Minorman. He was always playing with the rules.
Sorry minorman for this.
Jamal, I have no association with Minor man. I am someone else you don't even know.
This is no way a joke now
http://i.imgur.com/vfqmcly.png
1.First, you try to abuse the TAAS project.
2.Then you pull me in and say I abuse the project
3.Then you try to steal my bounty and give you details
4.You another account to do the same.
Why dont you come up with your real account which you used in TAAS bounty?
1. Never abused . just raising voice
2. Sorry. But I never said that
3. Never tried to steal. You can ask jamal. Just after I sent that pm I sent another pm saying sorry.
4. I have only two accounts on Bitcointalk. This one and another from which I participated Facebook twitter and signature campaign.
I had more sensible posts from my real account than yours. Even I had more posts then you. And I have more total activity than you. So I'm much more experienced than you.
Cannot disclose my identity. Risk of losing bounty.
And it was clear that jamal would remove anyone saying against him and it happened when I used your name.
You make me laugh when I read everything here, the action of a despicable man, it is you. A scamer trying to denounce their campaign. Unbelievable, you are a villain, you pretend to be kind and condemn others while you are always looking for way to cheat others. I think you are not worthy to continue here and denounce anyone else.
Shabby!
You are right. I'm leaving this now. My such activities may even affect lauda action on this. So leaving and hope for best.
Minorman Is the best person I have seen. He should be given some extra bounty for it.
Re: TaaS: Token As Service Signature and Avatar, Personal Text Campaign
Root cause of all the problems here is Jamal. He is not a good manager. Just to earn few hundred dollars, he promotes scam. And later says I wasn't associated with them. He should check first that project is legit.
Since he was the campaign manager, we only have right to ask increase in bounty from him. It is his responsibility to extract those funds. If he is unable to do so. He should pay from his own pocket.
He should have made terms of bounty clear with their team. I think he too should be given negative trust.
Earlier I wasn't in favour of giving him negative trust, but after I saw his previous bounty campaigns, it is clear that either, he only chooses scam projects or scam projects only choose him.
I would request everyone who has suffered due to this, to put a negative trust on Taas profile and Jamal profile until they pay the promised amount.
Jamal,I give you two options,
1: pay me the right amount of bounty
2: don't pay me anything and I along with some others will give you negative trust
Since he was the campaign manager, we only have right to ask increase in bounty from him. It is his responsibility to extract those funds. If he is unable to do so. He should pay from his own pocket.
He should have made terms of bounty clear with their team. I think he too should be given negative trust.
Earlier I wasn't in favour of giving him negative trust, but after I saw his previous bounty campaigns, it is clear that either, he only chooses scam projects or scam projects only choose him.
I would request everyone who has suffered due to this, to put a negative trust on Taas profile and Jamal profile until they pay the promised amount.
Jamal,I give you two options,
1: pay me the right amount of bounty
2: don't pay me anything and I along with some others will give you negative trust
use your own account to talk shit Mr. Minorman.. you've partcipated in signature campaign and you are already earning 236 TaaS tokens for your 50 shit posts. you should be thankful for that. more than 200 Dollars for 50 shit posts is more than what people like you deserve, so tell me now do you want these 200 dollars or I simply blacklist you (you deserve to be blacklisted)
don't try to scare me by your shitty negative trust, I've got lots of negatives from people like you. If TaaS decide to pay only 100K tokens. it is not my fault ... I already shared the chat logs between me and Dimitri with you where you see that I tried to convince him to pay 160K tokens. but he didn't agree.
Edit: the payment terms was clear from day one.. that was stated from first day and Everyone knew that the payment will be done directly from the project owners. and I do not have control to any funds, more than 2000 members participated, now blaming me for what?
my job was only to manage the bounties and I am doing my part of work very well.
May I know why I am being pulled over here in this? I never talked any shit about this project nor I said you scammer or the team? I am in no way related to the person you are speaking.Please check before accusing someone.
I do not denounce anyone, however, I feel very curious. This forum has no notification feature when it comes to the name of someone, and it's weird when I have not seen any of your previous comments on this thread, but after he mentioned you, you're here, is this a coincidence?
There may be something like that. Because I have seen it many times. Like when someone takes name of some DT member , they soon come there.
Minorman is right. I'm not him. I used his name.
Please don't take any action against Minorman. He was always playing with the rules.
Sorry minorman for this.
Jamal, I have no association with Minor man. I am someone else you don't even know.
Please don't take any action against Minorman. He was always playing with the rules.
Sorry minorman for this.
Jamal, I have no association with Minor man. I am someone else you don't even know.
This is no way a joke now
http://i.imgur.com/vfqmcly.png
1.First, you try to abuse the TAAS project.
2.Then you pull me in and say I abuse the project
3.Then you try to steal my bounty and give you details
4.You another account to do the same.
Why dont you come up with your real account which you used in TAAS bounty?
1. Never abused . just raising voice
2. Sorry. But I never said that
3. Never tried to steal. You can ask jamal. Just after I sent that pm I sent another pm saying sorry.
4. I have only two accounts on Bitcointalk. This one and another from which I participated Facebook twitter and signature campaign.
I had more sensible posts from my real account than yours. Even I had more posts then you. And I have more total activity than you. So I'm much more experienced than you.
Cannot disclose my identity. Risk of losing bounty.
And it was clear that jamal would remove anyone saying against him and it happened when I used your name.
Minorman is right. I'm not him. I used his name.
Please don't take any action against Minorman. He was always playing with the rules.
Sorry minorman for this.
Jamal, I have no association with Minor man. I am someone else you don't even know.
Please don't take any action against Minorman. He was always playing with the rules.
Sorry minorman for this.
Jamal, I have no association with Minor man. I am someone else you don't even know.
Re: TaaS: Token As Service Signature and Avatar, Personal Text Campaign
Root cause of all the problems here is Jamal. He is not a good manager. Just to earn few hundred dollars, he promotes scam. And later says I wasn't associated with them. He should check first that project is legit.
Since he was the campaign manager, we only have right to ask increase in bounty from him. It is his responsibility to extract those funds. If he is unable to do so. He should pay from his own pocket.
He should have made terms of bounty clear with their team. I think he too should be given negative trust.
Earlier I wasn't in favour of giving him negative trust, but after I saw his previous bounty campaigns, it is clear that either, he only chooses scam projects or scam projects only choose him.
I would request everyone who has suffered due to this, to put a negative trust on Taas profile and Jamal profile until they pay the promised amount.
Jamal,I give you two options,
1: pay me the right amount of bounty
2: don't pay me anything and I along with some others will give you negative trust
Since he was the campaign manager, we only have right to ask increase in bounty from him. It is his responsibility to extract those funds. If he is unable to do so. He should pay from his own pocket.
He should have made terms of bounty clear with their team. I think he too should be given negative trust.
Earlier I wasn't in favour of giving him negative trust, but after I saw his previous bounty campaigns, it is clear that either, he only chooses scam projects or scam projects only choose him.
I would request everyone who has suffered due to this, to put a negative trust on Taas profile and Jamal profile until they pay the promised amount.
Jamal,I give you two options,
1: pay me the right amount of bounty
2: don't pay me anything and I along with some others will give you negative trust
use your own account to talk shit Mr. Minorman.. you've partcipated in signature campaign and you are already earning 236 TaaS tokens for your 50 shit posts. you should be thankful for that. more than 200 Dollars for 50 shit posts is more than what people like you deserve, so tell me now do you want these 200 dollars or I simply blacklist you (you deserve to be blacklisted)
don't try to scare me by your shitty negative trust, I've got lots of negatives from people like you. If TaaS decide to pay only 100K tokens. it is not my fault ... I already shared the chat logs between me and Dimitri with you where you see that I tried to convince him to pay 160K tokens. but he didn't agree.
If you don't pay me you'll surely get negative ratings from Lauda and other DT members.
You have the responsibility to manage bounties. And to pay deserving.
And I can see clearly how you have paid to those who hadn't even made a post about taas in Facebook bounty. I'm much more deserving then them.
If you are removing me from this campaign, first remove those other cheaters.
There wasn't any rule that I must not make shitty posts. I'm free to write anything. You have to pay me full bounty. You can use money from your own pocket to pay me.
Next time don't run any bounty campaign without knowing its specifications.
My time is more important that those 200 dollars. So get lost.
Scam is a big word guys, you cannot just use this word for everything you don't like. This is definitely not a scam, it's more like a miscommunication.
Yeah. Scam is a big word. It can consist of many things- completely scam (fake project) , partially scam (doing something wrong or changing terms that would harm investors/supporters).Please advice a better title.
seriously this thread looks pretty bad for TAAS but why? the reason is every bounty hunter is spreading bad words in this thread because they want more TAAS .. however i'ts pretty clear that they said minimum 100k and UP TO 2% .. however ppl don't relaise that bitcointalk isnt the only platform a project can do bounties on .. do you really think bitcointalk represents the whole crypto community?!
also think about that when you guys spread bad infos and "scam" around the price will result in a decrease which means your bounty has less worth ..
also only becasue they do not answer to each of your OMG SCAM EXPLAIN posts that doesn't mean that they are hiding .. but since they are a big enterprise already backed by millions they cannot just answer fast they have to properly think about their statement and try to explain everything clear .. would you really be happy with a 1 sentece answer? so give them time
Did you read their bounty post?
They haven't mentioned that there would be any secret bounties or giveaways in conferences.
If you think like that, I'll open an ICO one day and write in bounties,
"Up to 50% of the tokens are reserved for bounties. There will only be a Social media bounty"
And in the end I'll distribute only 1% of tokens in bounty. And I'll say the other tokens are given to my family members and friends who promoted our project.