Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 84 results by SeanPiknick
Post
Topic
Board Идеи
Re: ICO Tracker
by
SeanPiknick
on 23/09/2017, 20:36:39 UTC
Good evening! Your project seems to be quite ambitious, interesting and useful for thousands of people, wishing to invest through ICO. It seems to be unique even. Neveretheless, are there any competitors in your industry? Particulary, there exists serious enough project DolphinBi. Don't you think that you have quite enough in common?
Thanks in advance.

Competitors of course there is )) And the first of them we see http://icorating.com and https://icodrops.com/
But in fact, competitors are much more! )) ...services that contribute to the formation of a civilized market
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][NTRY] Notary Platform
by
SeanPiknick
on 29/06/2017, 16:02:42 UTC
https://icotracker.net/project/ntry_platform

You might want to take a look at this.  Your project is marked as Scam Alert.

Also why do you use gmail instead of email with your domain name?  Looks very amateurish.

Thanks for your opinion,

Wow, no question asked, just marked as scam. I`ve contacted the writer and waiting for explanation.

Regarding the mail. We all have our mails with the domain name, I just prefer gmail, its the fastest way the people can reach me (+ I am using google docs of this address to calculate the bounties,...).

If anyone feels better they can write us on info@notary-platform.com

regards,
saso


Hello

I'm the founder of the Tracker and one of the Curators.

Your project has been flagged as an alert. SCAM projects are marked for example so https://icotracker.net/project/declouds

Next a few thoughts on why an Alert is set.

If you decide to appeal to the community for financial help in realizing your idea, the goodwill is so kind and open your faces in a broad sense. Give people irrefutable proof of your experience. Provide a technical proof of the concept.  Justify your decision about such large bonuses for early birds... is not it easier to write 10% instead of 5? This is all a game of words often used by scammers. Show real development progress. During all this time, you wrote at least a couple of lines of code? So just show it on GitHub ) etc.

Do not misunderstand me. All these thoughts are based on a real 3-year experience of investing in ICO. I look at your website, which is made "on the knee" under the WordPress (on probation), and I catch déjà vu from the scamers for 3 years and I can not understand how the people who created this site can realize the notarial platform.

I hope I managed to convey the main idea.

Hi SeanPiknick,

I could go on and on on the same level of debate you started. Fortunately, some members of btt sugest us to calm down and not to reply to different provocations. However, your post and rating on your website is beyond just a simple one-man-band estimate of our project and Notary team (by the way, we started with Pre-ICO or presale, ICO is planed for September). I was always wondering what kind of people judge the others (with the high possibility of destroying their bussines, credibility, lives etc., if they are wrong) based on quick estimate of the available information, but at the same time, they were not able to even correctly rewrite few simple informations (you were not able to find a link to my LinkedIn account, but you were able to do that for many others; you gave us 50 points rating, but still we were given scam alert –  yes, I noticed that you corrected the rating after my message to your curator who resets it to zero). Any suggestion, how should I judge your professionalism and objectivity of your post and ratings based on mistakes you did?

I do not argue about your rating. But on your website is stated: »Now it still in prototype phase. It’s means what ICO Tracker and his rating is only an idea and no more! You should not make any decisions on this rating because it’s completely subjective!« As I wrote above, such »subjective« ratings have consequences. I hope you can cope with that.

Our investors can get refunded after unsuccesful Pre-ICO which ended a few days ago (those who decided so, already got). Everything till now was transparent and it will remain so. We will continue with the project with the remaining funds or without them, only deliveries will be at different times. We made some mistakes and most likely, we will make more in the future. But we did and we will do our best to fix them. We have only one small request – please, let us allow to work and to focus on the project you estimated we do not have knowledge and competence for it. Let as allow to surprise you, whoever you are.

Last, but not least, I would like to thank our community, who support us. Kind words are welcome. It's true that harsh and unpleasant things/words make us stronger, but as humans, we can stand only a certain dose of them.

With this post I conclude the debate about our team and Notary Platform rating on https://icotracker.net/project/ntry_platform .

Sean, I wish you the best.

Regards,
      Iztok


Thanks for reply!

I sincerely hope that this situation will only benefit all participants of this event, and I will gladly change my mind if I see the changes.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][NTRY] Notary Platform
by
SeanPiknick
on 29/06/2017, 12:07:13 UTC
https://icotracker.net/project/ntry_platform

You might want to take a look at this.  Your project is marked as Scam Alert.

Also why do you use gmail instead of email with your domain name?  Looks very amateurish.

Thanks for your opinion,

Wow, no question asked, just marked as scam. I`ve contacted the writer and waiting for explanation.

Regarding the mail. We all have our mails with the domain name, I just prefer gmail, its the fastest way the people can reach me (+ I am using google docs of this address to calculate the bounties,...).

If anyone feels better they can write us on info@notary-platform.com

regards,
saso


Hello

I'm the founder of the Tracker and one of the Curators.

Your project has been flagged as an alert. SCAM projects are marked for example so https://icotracker.net/project/declouds

Next a few thoughts on why an Alert is set.

If you decide to appeal to the community for financial help in realizing your idea, the goodwill is so kind and open your faces in a broad sense. Give people irrefutable proof of your experience. Provide a technical proof of the concept.  Justify your decision about such large bonuses for early birds... is not it easier to write 10% instead of 5? This is all a game of words often used by scammers. Show real development progress. During all this time, you wrote at least a couple of lines of code? So just show it on GitHub ) etc.

Do not misunderstand me. All these thoughts are based on a real 3-year experience of investing in ICO. I look at your website, which is made "on the knee" under the WordPress (on probation), and I catch déjà vu from the scamers for 3 years and I can not understand how the people who created this site can realize the notarial platform.

I hope I managed to convey the main idea.

Though I do appreciate your purpose "to make more informed investment decisions through the ICO and want to give the opportunity for all", I believe if you demand more transparency to others, then you should be as much transparent on your side. On your website I read "Who we are? We are distributed team of enthusiasts." That tells very little about yourself...
Who are the Curators? How many are there? What kind of experience and technical expertise can they show, in order to prove their ability to assess the validity of a project?
How can you ensure your judgement is free from any conflict of interest? Etc. Etc.

I know it may look like I'm playing the devil's advocate here, but I'd like to point out those considerations above are not specifically related to this Notary project, rather to your ICO Tracker in a broader sense.

I understand you, but I do not think so.

To me, as an investor does not need to be public, but I invest only in projects whose team is either open, or proved their experience. Through the Tracker, I simply broadcast my choice. And no more. If someone distrusts me... let him pass by. I do not take money from him or listed projects. The best proof of my competence is participation in the ICO and my portfolio indicators for the expired period. But when, or if, I decide to ask the community to help me with money for the realize some idea, I will open, or I will provide proof of my solvency.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][NTRY] Notary Platform
by
SeanPiknick
on 29/06/2017, 11:03:55 UTC
https://icotracker.net/project/ntry_platform

You might want to take a look at this.  Your project is marked as Scam Alert.

Also why do you use gmail instead of email with your domain name?  Looks very amateurish.

Thanks for your opinion,

Wow, no question asked, just marked as scam. I`ve contacted the writer and waiting for explanation.

Regarding the mail. We all have our mails with the domain name, I just prefer gmail, its the fastest way the people can reach me (+ I am using google docs of this address to calculate the bounties,...).

If anyone feels better they can write us on info@notary-platform.com

regards,
saso


Hello

I'm the founder of the Tracker and one of the Curators.

Your project has been flagged as an alert. SCAM projects are marked for example so https://icotracker.net/project/declouds

Next a few thoughts on why an Alert is set.

If you decide to appeal to the community for financial help in realizing your idea, the goodwill is so kind and open your faces in a broad sense. Give people irrefutable proof of your experience. Provide a technical proof of the concept.  Justify your decision about such large bonuses for early birds... is not it easier to write 10% instead of 5? This is all a game of words often used by scammers. Show real development progress. During all this time, you wrote at least a couple of lines of code? So just show it on GitHub ) etc.

Do not misunderstand me. All these thoughts are based on a real 3-year experience of investing in ICO. I look at your website, which is made "on the knee" under the WordPress (on probation), and I catch déjà vu from the scamers for 3 years and I can not understand how the people who created this site can realize the notarial platform.

I hope I managed to convey the main idea.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ethbits Local and Ethbits iTrade Token Crowdsale (ICO)
by
SeanPiknick
on 09/04/2017, 08:44:07 UTC
I can understand users who attend on coinfest don't want photos to reveal themselves. If coinfest are just help nearby I could be attending to this events to mingle with users from bitcointalk.

I dont understand why in the ICOtracker, it says that escrow in ethbits is 0. Can someone please explain it?
Thanks.

0 means that the escrow is not rated. This means that the Curator did not find information about specific people and could not contact them, to confirm their participation as an escrow

Fran from bravenewcoin who is the principle escrow agent came on the old thread an announced it. You can contact them at the following sites www.bravenewcoin.com and www.tokenmarket.net to confirm if you wish. If there are concerns we can ask a representative from token market to also confirm it.

All information about the Escrow must be published on the project website with all the details... a schedule and conditions for the funds release, participants names/nicknames, addresses, etc.

You might wanna check this article http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ethbits-launches-token-crowd-sale-113000272.html It has some important information about them.

Quote
"LocalBitcoins allows users to buy bitcoins without a bank account, but we are moving into alternative currencies to cater for the growing movement into crypto."

- Pravjit Singh, Ethbits.com Director, Founder & CEO

It's probably a typo... and not a word about Escrow
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ethbits Local and Ethbits iTrade Token Crowdsale (ICO)
by
SeanPiknick
on 08/04/2017, 15:19:21 UTC
I dont understand why in the ICOtracker, it says that escrow in ethbits is 0. Can someone please explain it?
Thanks.

0 means that the escrow is not rated. This means that the Curator did not find information about specific people and could not contact them, to confirm their participation as an escrow

Fran from bravenewcoin who is the principle escrow agent came on the old thread an announced it. You can contact them at the following sites www.bravenewcoin.com and www.tokenmarket.net to confirm if you wish. If there are concerns we can ask a representative from token market to also confirm it.

All information about the Escrow must be published on the project website with all the details... a schedule and conditions for the funds release, participants names/nicknames, addresses, etc.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ethbits Local and Ethbits iTrade Token Crowdsale (ICO)
by
SeanPiknick
on 08/04/2017, 12:55:36 UTC
I dont understand why in the ICOtracker, it says that escrow in ethbits is 0. Can someone please explain it?
Thanks.

0 means that the escrow is not rated. This means that the Curator did not find information about specific people and could not contact them, to confirm their participation as an escrow
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] MOBILEGO Crowdfund - Decentralized Solutions on Gamecredits Mobile Store
by
SeanPiknick
on 07/03/2017, 22:22:34 UTC
Let's be correct in your statements, reduce aggression and let's me know where is my "fundamental misunderstandings", "false assumptions" etc. exactly. I understand that you are worried about the project and believe in it... well, I'm happy for you and I wish you to achieve your goals, while leaving me the right to have my own point of view.

In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.

You're allowed to have your opinion, and Jon wasn't telling you not to. What concerns people is that you aren't providing a reasoning for your scores. Like, for instance we have a 0 in escrow. We signed an Escrow deal and will be having vetted third party professionals handle investors finances. After speaking with Sergey, I find it hard to believe he didn't mention this fact to you. However, you said that even after the interview your opinion hadn't changed. That's pretty strange.

Second of all, our roadmap is quite clear, and our main product where MobileGo will launch is completed. Our Mobile Store will launch before the end of the Crowdfund (like Jon said), meaning for perhaps the first time in crypto history investors don't have to wait months or even a year till after funding to see a product. They will be investing in something that has hit the market, so there's less speculation and concerns about failing to develop.

It's great that you're taking the time to review projects like MobileGo, but saying you have a team that makes decisions doesn't provide any clarity. For all anyone knows you could be making that up and you decide based on arbitrary information.

I get the impression that my "Russian English" is so bad that does not reflect the essence of what was said.

Ok. We will raise the issue of the correctness of MobileGo evaluation at our next team meeting. Thank you for your criticism.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] MOBILEGO Crowdfund - Decentralized Solutions on Gamecredits Mobile Store
by
SeanPiknick
on 07/03/2017, 21:35:26 UTC
Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.

After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?

We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.

Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.

I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.

About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about
I understand where you're coming from, but I think there is some merit to Jon's argument. It did seem you published a review of MobileGo without any real basis of what was going on. Perhaps you really do have great reasoning for the score you gave, but without providing reasons why it could be entirely based on opinion. I think we can both see a problem with that. You can't really dish out scores to projects without giving your detailed reasoning. Maybe now you're a bit annoyed with Jon because of his comments, so you're biased and just give the project bad marks. Without defining your individual process for each project, you don't  give your website integrity, and you don't help projects improve/defend themselves.

Exactly. Back up your opinion with facts. Because right now you haven't offered one fact to back up your opinion. All we know is that you had fundamental misunderstandings about the project when you did the score. If you haven't changed your opinion after having your false assumptions corrected, then that just undermines your own credibility and the credibility of your site.

For instance, you score the roadmap as a 2. This is a joke honestly. I have invested in over 15 ICOs and MobileGo has the best roadmap of any I have ever seen. The core products have been in development already for 2 years and are going to be released BEFORE the ICO ends.  Give me one example of another ICO currently coming out in the next 3 months that can say the same thing?

At this point, you probably have your feelings hurt, but your review says much more about your project than it does MobileGo.

Let's be correct in your statements, reduce aggression and let's me know where is my "fundamental misunderstandings", "false assumptions" etc. exactly. I understand that you are worried about the project and believe in it... well, I'm happy for you and I wish you to achieve your goals, while leaving me the right to have my own point of view.

In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] MOBILEGO Crowdfund - Decentralized Solutions on Gamecredits Mobile Store
by
SeanPiknick
on 07/03/2017, 04:48:51 UTC
Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.

After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?

We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.

Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.

I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.

About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN » ICO] [CREA] CREATIVECOIN - The cryptocurrency of the creative world
by
SeanPiknick
on 07/03/2017, 04:15:51 UTC
I confirm that I'll be one of the escrow for this ICO.

Good luck to everyone Smiley

Hi

I am the third signature and team member creativechain.org Smiley

This is my signature
xpub661MyMwAqRbcGNVeKjh4ZNbFivPryHCXuLBcEoZ6AnxqPRzysmnUQi89YaVFfCDyHWHqrR92Ynr 5f7MgoccD89FCQjYL1j2Ks5kpfYqMyHv

Multi-signature addres for ICO:
3DxW7NDrpkyK3N71vtoKyVNGW8oYqnWuH2

Escrow will be responsible for verifying compliance with all milestones. Once it is confirmed, will be delivered and percentage payments will be made to creativechain.org’s team.

Milestone 1
Final TESTNET, launch MAINNET, distribution of CREAs to investors.
Media Explorer CREA 1.0 Platform, Block Explorer.
Wallet version 1.0 MAC / WIN / LINUX and Android, (Lite SPV wallet), Full API documentation.

60% Payment

Milestone 2
Platform Creativechain / Android / IOS / LINUX / MAC / WIND
Streaming and downloading of contents.
Registration of copyright licenses (copyleft /copyleft /creative commons)
Smart contracts: Smart actions, creative chains, management and design of new contracts and package licenses.
Sale and distribution of contents: Direct purchase, Creative Commons, Royalty Free, equity crowdfunding, donations.
Social network: Channels of distribution, rating systems, encrypted chat between users, public statistics, virtual wallet.
Creativecoin cash in cash out, Buy in ATMs

 http://creativechain.org/ico/


Very good news!
Please reflect these milestones on the roadmap... with dates )
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN » ICO] [CREA] CREATIVECOIN - The cryptocurrency of the creative world
by
SeanPiknick
on 06/03/2017, 09:13:21 UTC
I confirm that I'll be one of the escrow for this ICO.

Good luck to everyone Smiley

When and in what proportion the collected funds will be released to the project team?

ICO ends on May 1st. The funds will be distributed on May 2nd. The proportion is 2% Escrow 98% Creativechain Project http://creativechain.org/ico/. We will add it in the post, thanks. 

What are the benefits of such escrow for investors? In this case, it's just a check mark that the escrow is.
"Real" escrow release funds in parts, according to the roadmap, but yours roadmap don't show development progress accuracy.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN » ICO] [CREA] CREATIVECOIN - The cryptocurrency of the creative world
by
SeanPiknick
on 05/03/2017, 07:41:56 UTC
I confirm that I'll be one of the escrow for this ICO.

Good luck to everyone Smiley

When and in what proportion the collected funds will be released to the project team?
Post
Topic
Board Альтернативные криптовалюты
Re: [АНО] Ascendancy: модульный децентрализованный фре
by
SeanPiknick
on 06/02/2017, 07:44:26 UTC
Из общения можно сделать вывод, что все трое эскроу и вместе с ними sparkit, искренне были намерены выполнить взятые на себя обязательства.

Я общался с SparkIt, точнее он сам мне начал писать по-поводу переводов, причём я ему просто не отвечал, но он продолжал периодически мне слать уговоры, чтобы я заново перевёл тему в соответствии с новой их темой. Так он мне 8 сообщений прислал. После чего я его вежливо послал и он успокоился.

Я посмотрел его историю сообщений на форуме (его год не было и внезапно появился), учёл его рвение как пиар-менеджера и я уверен, что он часть "бригады".

Возможно имеющегося у меня опыта все еще не хватает, что бы раскусить подобных личностей )) Однако учитывая, что у человека с которым я общался в слаке, напрочь отсутствовал мотив к оправданию, все же склоняюсь к версии что его тупо "развели" )
Post
Topic
Board Альтернативные криптовалюты
Re: [АНО] Ascendancy: модульный децентрализованный фре
by
SeanPiknick
on 05/02/2017, 06:18:54 UTC
                                 Ютуб канал про ИКО стартапы: "ICO startups mining" https://goo.gl/TWNzbO
29.01.2017 - https://youtu.be/YFNvUIArcwQ  Ascendancy IPO Осторожно! Возможен очередной СКАМ deCLOUDs! Проходим мимо 2-й обзор!
23.01.2017 - https://youtu.be/PFVBnsiOwwc  Ascendancy IPO Coming Soon Осторожно!Стартап не вызывает доверия ICOTRACKER_NET
А кто интервью-то давал, его ник на нашем форуме? Я наверняка его знаю по форуму )
Проясните в общих чертах - гаранты в крипте уже/больше не гаранты? Или просто условия гарантирования были плохо оговорены, что кидалы сразу денежку получили?
Или гаранты были в сговоре. Как минимум Яхе я не доверяю. Ленивый товарищ, я от таких по своему опыту хорошего не жду.
Общение проходило с представителем Ascendancy в Slacke, сами DEV на связь не выходили!!! придумывали разные отговорки!
Это понятно Smiley Но вопрос был про тех, чьи голоса вещали интересную историю. Некоторые слова были чуть ли не прямые цитаты с форума, явно люди тут в темах общаются. Могли бы и поздороваться/представиться.

Конкретно Ascendancy разбирал я, и общался в слаке с человеком, который представился как "Axel Karlsson aka sparkit, Project Manager of Ascendancy"

Из общения можно сделать вывод, что все трое эскроу и вместе с ними sparkit, искренне были намерены выполнить взятые на себя обязательства. Другое дело, что же это за гаранты, у которых в глазах только битки, которые они хотят получить за свою работу, и ни грамма критического мышления, что бы сделать хотя бы предположение, что "основатели" играют песню разводилова буквально по нотам. У хорошего гаранта должен быть критический склад ума, а с опытом выработаться нюх на подобные вещи. Я склоняюсь к мнению, что у них просто нет этого опыта... и не более того. Т.к. они еще перед тем, как дать согласие на гаранта, должны были задать команде стандартный набор вопросов, и только на основании ответов поставить жирный восклицательный знак - осторожно!

Что касается вопроса, как битки оказались у мошенника, то я не исключаю варианта, что имеет место банальное надувательство с помощью сайта, когда на эскроу адрес отправляются только каждая 20-я транзакция, к примеру. Во всей этой схеме с "форумными эскроу" нужно прорабатывать кучу контролирующих моментов, и один из таких - предоставление проектом ссылки на каждую транзакцию сразу по ее совершению, что бы переводы "мимо кассы" вычислять на самом раннем этапе, а в теме анонса большими буквами предупреждать инвесторов о необходимости проверки адреса назначения сразу после инвеста. Я не знаю, делалось так в данном случае или нет, но по разговору со sparkit, вроде как не делалось.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo ICO - Zcash Zero Knowledge Privacy Secured by Bitcoin
by
SeanPiknick
on 01/02/2017, 14:06:26 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo ICO - Zcash Zero Knowledge Privacy Secured by Bitcoin
by
SeanPiknick
on 27/01/2017, 01:41:17 UTC
Get your KMD with the new "Request Payout" feature! Deadline is 31.01 or else you'll miss the first payout!

Done! Happy to see Komodo composed of well dedicated and super active team.
Post
Topic
Board Идеи
Re: ICO Tracker
by
SeanPiknick
on 24/01/2017, 19:22:37 UTC
А есть ли возможность с Вами проконсультироваться по теме ICO? Интересуют рекоммендации по поводу того как лучше и правильнее подготовиться к ICO.

Свяжитесь со мной в скайпе
Post
Topic
Board Идеи
Re: ICO Tracker
by
SeanPiknick
on 12/12/2016, 18:16:52 UTC
SeanPiknick, спасибо за ссылки! Подскажите, пожалуйста, по статусу вашего сервиса, насколько там сейчас актуальная информация(все ли ico представлены)? И правильно ли указана сумма сколько собрано денег?

Наполнением и корректировкой данных занимаются Кураторы проектов. Они обычные люди ) Да, мы стараемся мониторить проекты ежедневно и вносить актуальную информацию 2 раза в день, но получается не всегда.

По составу ICO. На Трекере представлены далеко не все проекты! Сделано это осознанно. Мы публикуем только те проекты, которые после изучения, мы сочли перспективными с точки зрения инвестиций в них. Так же на Трекере вы не найдете проектов сильно смахивающих на СКАМ. Если вам необходим полный список стартующих ICO - лучше воспользоваться https://www.ico-list.com/ например. Но в этом случае вам придется самостоятельно инспектировать их на предмет СКАМа

Я заметил одну особенность, что в проектах, которые собирают деньги не только в биткоинах, а еще в другой валюте, у вас указывается только сумма в биткоинах, но по факту проект собрал больше. Пример Incent.

Да, такая особенность присуща прототипу - только BTC. В рабочей версии уже реализована полная статистика по сборам во время проведения ICO. В данный момент ведутся работы по внедрению нового дизайна Трекера. Очень надеемся что успеем запустить рабочую версию до НГ

Напишите как часто вы обновляете суммы? Не думали это как-то автоматизировать чтобы все в live режиме?

Примерно 1 раз в день. На данный момент, автоматический сбор данных по результатам ICO, технически возможен не для всех проектов, к сожалению, но мы так или иначе придем к полному автомату

Будет ли какая-то сводная статистика по всем ICO, что-то типа https://blockchain.info/ru/charts ?

Я реализовал статистику в тестовом режиме, и результаты меня очень порадовали - позволяет сделать несколько очень важных выводов ) Так что да! Сводной статистике быть! ) ...но только после запуска основного функционала и инструмента Порфолио
Post
Topic
Board Идеи
Re: ICO Tracker
by
SeanPiknick
on 04/12/2016, 22:18:08 UTC
Очень жду запуска вашего проекта в полную силу. А пока поделитесь, пожалуста, аналогами, где видно все проходящие ICO с актуальным статусом

Это список проектов, которые я изучал перед тем как принять решение о реализации прототипа

http://www.icocountdown.com/
https://cyber.fund/radar
https://bnktothefuture.com/search/pitches
http://icotimeline.com/
https://www.ico-list.com/
http://www.smithandcrown.com/icos/
http://btc12.com/
http://www.hongico.com