I'm someone that is very interested in the mechanics of social networking and things of that nature. I don't want to argue if bitcointalk.org is or is not a social netowork/media with this post.
From what I understand, bitcoin culture revolves around heavily the phrase "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Like, there are always proposed changes or additions to bitcoin software itself that are simply deemed not necessary or too overcomplicated by a higher council. In this case, the high council consists of those with a high stake in the network, the core developers of the software, a few hundred forum users, and satoshi.
And I'm someone hellbent on explaining to the world that bitcointalk.org or any place that is the central public place to talk about bitcoin deemed by the community, is vital to bitcoin itself and mass adoption. bitcointalk.org = bitcoin
So basically, to start that process, I'm curious on proposed changes to the forum itself that people have brought up over the years. One of the most valuable use cases of the forum itself, is the people that use it every day, and the knowledge in their nice little heads.
For example:
One day I was like "Yo, why can't I have a bitcoin wallet in my bitcointalk.org acc?".
Legendary forum users: "Why? Just use electrum xd."?
So I ask all of you guys here,
What are some of the most famous proposed changes that got accepted?
What are some of the most famous proposed changes that still are up for debate?
What are some of the worst propose changes?
Porque?