Search content
Sort by

Showing 14 of 14 results by SeymourT
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 26/06/2024, 18:30:53 UTC
[...]

Two points that can be inferred from your teaching so far, one, minor league and the potential fixing within it didn't get investigated by the authorities of the league, and two, due to above, the bookmakers are the one who made the final call.

Wow, people should change their mind, apparently you go to a length to paint fairlay as a bad actor here, because not only fairlay is not a bookmakers, the other actual bookmakers actually go with a decision to stick with the official result instead of voiding it. And from fairlay's own statement, the market maker on that bet wouldn't need to be compensated if the arbitrator decides to say so.

[...]
The market maker / counterparty in this bet  has actually hedged the bet we learnt, so he does not have to be compensated if arbitrator decides so. It would also be acceptable for us and the market maker, if we donated the 799mBTC to charity.  Just giving it back to the alleged criminal involved in match-fixing would be the wrong thing to do.[...]

Thus, if you try to teach us that Fairlay is allowed to make their own call for this match...

You don't understand it. If Fairlay allows this when Pinnacle matches bets Pinnacle will be taking the loss. Every cheater out there will come out paying off ping pong players and tennis players. Fairlay has to take a stand on cheaters or Pinny will never match bets. Fairlay wants to stop this gang from cheating.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 26/06/2024, 08:01:59 UTC
No one can prove that match is fixed except the official league administration. All of us can have only their own opinion. And the casino decided that it was fixed match. I don`t think that it is fair decision - it is their own opinion too.
At least the casino must return the bet to gambler, but it would be better to pay his prize.
PS. I never heard about casino, who return lost bets in the fixed matches.

How does an official ruling on match fixing make any difference in the payout? There are three suspicious matches every day and the bookmaker can't withhold money for a year on three matches every day waiting for some type of league administration to rule. The investigations may not even start for a month and most don't start. We have to stay in the real world instead of making stuff up on how it should be done. The bookmaker makes the decision since no one has any idea if an investigation will be started. The bookmakers marked the match as suspicious even the ones that paid.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 25/06/2024, 17:37:30 UTC
Quote
The red cards, own goals & particularly goalkeeping performances certainly point towards the potential of likely match fixing.

that three posters with activity over 3000 say the match was fixed.

thats VERY nice MANIPULATION from your side, CONGRATS. You should ask fairlay to double your fee, to manipulate others words like this is a very hard work  Grin Grin Grin Grin

other thing - those 3 quotes were made based only on the fairlay words, before the bettor had any chance to speak up. I think the bettor even pointed out some lies in the fairlays original post.

This shows your stupidity. Fairlay stopped posting a month ago. They aren't going to pay someone with a burner account to continue this crap show where you twist their words. It's just as stupid as thinking a bookmaker waits for authorities to determine fixed matches. It's the bookmakers opinion that counts.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 25/06/2024, 14:33:51 UTC
<snip>
Is this match between Liverpool and Manchester City obviously fixed?
https://youtu.be/j_6iRCcfYu8?si=CYrwBsPAyXOkGMqb
Focus from 00:50

How about this between Liverpool and Real Madrid (2018 final)
https://youtu.be/rtFGpfrdlMI?si=Qoh0lYjh63tpvSsD

This should tell you that personal opinion means nothing when it comes to determining incidence of crime like match fixing. A match can be suspicious to different people, but needs an authority to determine that.

Bookmakers would be withholding money for years if they had to wait to see how an authority would rule. Tiny markets don't get investigated. The bookmaker makes the decision in tiny markets on their opinion and it's never going to change. It's been done that way forever. You are trying to make up your own rules.
<snip>
Is this match between Liverpool and Manchester City obviously fixed?
https://youtu.be/j_6iRCcfYu8?si=CYrwBsPAyXOkGMqb
Focus from 00:50

How about this between Liverpool and Real Madrid (2018 final)
https://youtu.be/rtFGpfrdlMI?si=Qoh0lYjh63tpvSsD

This should tell you that personal opinion means nothing when it comes to determining incidence of crime like match fixing. A match can be suspicious to different people, but needs an authority to determine that.

What you indeed are forgetting, not only does fairlay accuse the player to having made bets on fixed games, they also say he is the fixer because he is Ukranian and some of the players are from the Ukraine as well.
Well, maybe not the fixer but he supposedly is involved. That's hilariou.

The banned his account, a normal bookie would void a game and refund the wager amounts, yet fairlay tends to keep the whole bill for whatever reason.

But hey, you got our opinion straight anyway with your burner account, congratulations. The 3 3000k activity accounts that said this game was 100% fixed have yet to be spotted by the way.



Haunbu, LFC Bitcoin, Rating Place

Quote
Interesting. That's a lot of evidence against op and I feel like your team did the right thing here since he clearly took advantage of fixed matches in a pretty transparent manner and expected to get away since your site is a betting exchange.

Quote
The red cards, own goals & particularly goalkeeping performances certainly point towards the potential of likely match fixing.

Quote
We agree the games were rigged

Don't try and change the normal procedure. The bookmaker has always made the decision on their opinion. The mediator should do the same.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 25/06/2024, 14:17:51 UTC
<snip>
Is this match between Liverpool and Manchester City obviously fixed?
https://youtu.be/j_6iRCcfYu8?si=CYrwBsPAyXOkGMqb
Focus from 00:50

How about this between Liverpool and Real Madrid (2018 final)
https://youtu.be/rtFGpfrdlMI?si=Qoh0lYjh63tpvSsD

This should tell you that personal opinion means nothing when it comes to determining incidence of crime like match fixing. A match can be suspicious to different people, but needs an authority to determine that.

Bookmakers would be withholding money for years if they had to wait to see how an authority would rule. Tiny markets don't get investigated. The bookmaker makes the decision in tiny markets on their opinion and it's never going to change. It's been done that way forever. You are trying to make up your own rules.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 25/06/2024, 05:49:42 UTC
It can even take a year for major leagues to start being investigated. Brazils Serie A and Serie B
https://editi[Suspicious link removed]/2023/05/11/football/brazil-soccer-match-fixing-investigation-spt-intl/index.html#:~:text=Brazilian%20soccer%20has%20become%20embroiled%20in%20a%20match%2Dfixing%20scandal.&text=Brazilian%20authorities%20have%20launched%20a,in%20a%20statement%20on%20Wednesday.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 25/06/2024, 05:01:27 UTC
i am 100% sure that the members you mentioned are not 100% sure that the match was fixed.

additionally, it does not really matter what some people on an internet forum think. It does not matter how much activity those people have.

UNLESS, those members actually work for FBI or something  Grin Grin Grin Grin

What matters is what police of those different countries think.



How many times do I have to say it. THE POLICE DON"T INVESTIGATE MOST FIXES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quote
For criminal gangs, match-fixing remains an almost perfect and investigation-free crime to commit.
Now look at this game. No one will investigate and close to no one watched.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4rC7403Dc4
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 25/06/2024, 01:26:32 UTC
its VERY curious that one Fairlay defender stops posting and then another account is created and starts to pitch a different defense idea trying to TEACH the users different things.

Let me teach you something also.

The article you linked mentions FRIENDLY games, meaning there were UNOFFICIAL games. The federation in question even said they did  not take place.

In this thread the matches in questions are OFFICIAL matches easily provable by the many federations in questions even MONTHS after they took place.

See the difference? OFFICIAL versus UNOFFICIAL.

Second thing, the bookies DO NOT HAVE the right to decide a match was fixed or not. If a crime was committed, only police or the local courts can decide that.

See the difference? POLICE versus a bookie that lost money on a game and want to make it like it was fixed.
What's interesting is that three posters with activity over 3000 say the match was fixed. Most with less say it wasn't fixed. See the difference. If no other major bookmakers took large wagers than no one is going to look in to this fixed match. Hundreds of matches are fixed in football, tennis, ping pong. Even if it is investigated it can take a year and the bookmaker has to make a quick decision.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 24/06/2024, 18:59:13 UTC
Not only an expert, that answer should come from the authorities investigating the case thoroughly, questioning every party involved and draw their conclusion from those findings.

This is the issue being discussed and repetitively pointed out here, one can easily say the match is rigged according to their opinion, be it through educated guess, a comprehensive study of the match pattern frame by frame, a random rambling, or whatever, they have the capability to draw that conclusion, but no one other than the authorities appointed by the officials of that league has the capacity to draw it.

I believe this is also the reason why AG refuses to mediate. They have experts who are fluent in mediating as well as finding and validating evidences, but they are well aware that they have no capacity to rule a game as fixed.

For someone who goes to a length to make a --by your own words-- teaching post to correct everybody here, because no one seemed right in the thread, you seem failed to read that issue being pointed out through several replies.

I'm trying to teach you that that it's common for very low level football matches to be fixed and no investigations are done and the bookmaker makes the decision.

Oh, how generous of you. And what gave you the impression that that idea didn't cross any of our mind? That you need to bother to create an account to state the obvious; that low level football matches are easy to manipulate?
Crossing your mind is different than stating the obvious that the match was fixed. I'll sum it up hoping the thread gets closed. Fairlay doesn't always act as an exchange. If Fairlay or Pinnacle allows cheating then this group will start paying off ping pong players and others looking for fast money. Fairlay or Pinnacle decided to go with high limits and not pay cheaters instead of small limits.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 24/06/2024, 16:39:53 UTC
Then this will fall under the same category of this issue. Who classifies the game as fixed match and why it’s not under investigation until now?

[...]

We need an expert to answer that but [...].

Not only an expert, that answer should come from the authorities investigating the case thoroughly, questioning every party involved and draw their conclusion from those findings.

This is the issue being discussed and repetitively pointed out here, one can easily say the match is rigged according to their opinion, be it through educated guess, a comprehensive study of the match pattern frame by frame, a random rambling, or whatever, they have the capability to draw that conclusion, but no one other than the authorities appointed by the officials of that league has the capacity to draw it.

I believe this is also the reason why AG refuses to mediate. They have experts who are fluent in mediating as well as finding and validating evidences, but they are well aware that they have no capacity to rule a game as fixed.

For someone who goes to a length to make a --by your own words-- teaching post to correct everybody here, because no one seemed right in the thread, you seem failed to read that issue being pointed out through several replies.

I'm trying to teach you that that it's common for very low level football matches to be fixed and no investigations are done and the bookmaker makes the decision.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 24/06/2024, 14:04:56 UTC
It was a reply to AHOYBRAUSE. Lower level football matches are fixed with no investigation many times and the year doesn't matter. Even you said "the user took advantage of fixed matches in a pretty transparent manner and expected to get away since your site is a betting exchange." It doesn't matter if the bettor was Ukranian and also Fairlay never waivered on mediation since they kept asking for applicants and no one was agreeing to be the sole mediator. No one seemed right in the thread and I made corrections. No one can signup for Fairlay so it really doesn't matter what people try to do with their reputation. I'm a very large player there and got in just before they stopped taking signups.  Grin

I'm editing to say that this post is a reply to a few posts above since I didn't multiquote.

Then this will fall under the same category of this issue. Who classifies the game as fixed match and why it’s not under investigation until now?

The source of the article should file the complaint to the league for a fixed match if they have evidence because the article sound like same story with Fairlay which they are the only one claiming for a fixed match yet didn’t manage to prove their accusations or else this matches should be investigated.

We need an expert to answer that but I, Haunebu, LFC Bitcoin, Rating Place have all said it's most likely fixed.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 24/06/2024, 07:21:27 UTC
Quote
For criminal gangs, match-fixing remains an almost perfect and investigation-free crime to commit.
https://www.insideworldfootball.com/2020/03/31/ukraine-ghost-games-fool-bookies-punters-data-firm-criminals-pull-off-perfect-crime/
The article that you shared is from 2020 and it's 2024 now implying that this isn't really helpful in this particular case as @un_rank already pointed out. Weird that you are trying to link that article with this particular case.

Anyway, I find it odd that Fairlay didn't lock this thread yet after announcing their own verdict without really caring about our opinions.
It was a reply to AHOYBRAUSE. Lower level football matches are fixed with no investigation many times and the year doesn't matter. Even you said "the user took advantage of fixed matches in a pretty transparent manner and expected to get away since your site is a betting exchange." It doesn't matter if the bettor was Ukranian and also Fairlay never waivered on mediation since they kept asking for applicants and no one was agreeing to be the sole mediator. No one seemed right in the thread and I made corrections. No one can signup for Fairlay so it really doesn't matter what people try to do with their reputation. I'm a very large player there and got in just before they stopped taking signups.  Grin
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 24/06/2024, 05:57:17 UTC
Quote
For criminal gangs, match-fixing remains an almost perfect and investigation-free crime to commit.
https://www.insideworldfootball.com/2020/03/31/ukraine-ghost-games-fool-bookies-punters-data-firm-criminals-pull-off-perfect-crime/
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
by
SeymourT
on 23/06/2024, 03:50:32 UTC
Everyone got this wrong so this is a teaching post. The bettor doesn't need to be doxed. A stooge is used to bet. The bookmaker makes the decision on fixed matches in small leagues. Only one or two bookmakers will take the hit on large wagers in small league fixed matches. No one else is going to care about these wagers so they aren't going to be looked at and they aren't going to be published anywhere as fixed matches. The evidence is overwhelming that these matches are fixed. Fairlay shouldn't have even asked for mediation. Fairlay asked for one mediator. Gosu and Holydarkness didn't accept being the sole mediator. Fairlay then asked for applications so that one mediator could be properly vetted. Fairlay never backed out or wavered on mediation. No one applied here or wanted to be the sole mediator. Fairlay wasn't going to agree to a panel or other suggestions. Not even Gosu and Holydarkness were qualified to mediate. Fairlay got their mediator three weeks ago and this thread should have been locked. I've never had contact with Fairlay so don't go that route. I'm using a burner account because I don't want to be involved in the same character assassination given to Fairlay.