Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 28 results by Siddhartha7
Re: Where to find any good CRYPTO copy trading platforms?
I'd say you can check out Bitget Exchange: https://www.bitget.com/en/, they claim to be the world's largest crypto copy trading platform.
I have tried it before and even manage to earn some profits from their copy trading and they have a lot of good traders to choose to copy trade from. They also recently launched their recruitment of copy traders program: https://bitgetglobal.medium.com/bitget-is-officially-recruiting-copy-traders-worldwide-341e25af13b5
I have tried it before and even manage to earn some profits from their copy trading and they have a lot of good traders to choose to copy trade from. They also recently launched their recruitment of copy traders program: https://bitgetglobal.medium.com/bitget-is-officially-recruiting-copy-traders-worldwide-341e25af13b5
Re: [ANN] [NEXT] NEXT: A Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Ecosystem
Just wondering, what assets will be tradable right after IEO has finished?
Great question, this will be announced and cannot be disclosed as of now. I hope you understand!
What assets would you love to see?
Kind regards,
Sieger
If there's a chance, well, there is one thing I would have liked to see- either TRX or XRP (adding em both would also be a great idea)
Though people do have a bad habit of, once they get in their head that something is a bad choice, not consider at all reasons it might actually not be. Utility season is rapidly approaching, good times ahead for these two
Lovely, the recommendation is highly appreciated!
Kind regards,
Sieger
Re: [ANN] [NEXT] NEXT: A Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Ecosystem
Just wondering, what assets will be tradable right after IEO has finished?
Great question, this will be announced and cannot be disclosed as of now. I hope you understand!
What assets would you love to see?
Kind regards,
Sieger
Re: [ANN] [NEXT] NEXT: A Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Ecosystem
In how many stages will the exchange v2.0 be released during the IEO?
This will depend on the process of our developments and cannot be said of now.
Stick with us! Follow our social media, join our telegram: https://t.me/next_exchange
and you will know every step we take. More questions always welcome!
Kind regards,
Sieger
Re: [ANN] [NEXT] NEXT: A Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Ecosystem
Curious to see what a hybrid exchange can bring to the table
Best of both worlds!
Easy to use and good looking + fast, while decentralized and registered fully transparent on our blockchain
After DEX and CEX, Hybrid is the future
Kind regards,
Sid
Re: [ANN] [NEXT] NEXT: A Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Ecosystem
Who do you consider to be or become a worthy competitor long term?
Any other company that is an exchange for digital assets, probably. But we like to approach the crypto market as one unity, one movement, and we shouldn't treat each other as competitors but rather as partners in a decentralized financial and economic evolution.
Kind regards,
Sid
Re: [ANN] [NEXT] NEXT: A Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Ecosystem
What is the order of priority the funds raised by the IEO are going to be used for?
Hi there! Thank you for your question
It's exactly in the order as we stated it. First, we will expand our development team, then acquire and EMI if possible.
Expanding our offices, for example, will also be in the same order; first Russia, then USA, then Middle East, and eventually Asia.
Kind regards,
Sid
Re: [ANN] [NEXT] NEXT: A Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Ecosystem
You already did an ICO, why do an IEO now?
All our motivations are stated in our post and in our light paper + whitepaper! I'd invite you to look into it and give it a read.
Doing more than 1 fundraising is not uncommon for businesses (when it comes to financial services: see Revolut and Curve that both did 3 rounds over the years).
Acquiring proper licenses, for example, takes a big-budget (over half a million), which is hard to cover as a startup.
If you have more questions after reading into our motivations of the IEO above, feel free to ask them!
Kind regards,
Sid
Re: [ANN] [NEXT] NEXT.exchange - regulatory compliant hybrid exchange
Hello
Are you saying we can participate fully in the platform without KYC? like it is a decentralized exchange platform. kindly explain on how the mining works? i am a bit confused.
Are you saying we can participate fully in the platform without KYC? like it is a decentralized exchange platform. kindly explain on how the mining works? i am a bit confused.
KYC will be mandatory ONLY for
- Masternode owners
- Withdrawals of fiat on our platform (bank transfers/PayPal)
Besides that, everything is possible without KYC.
When it comes to mining, NEXT is based on the SHA256 algorithm which makes it possible to be mined aligned with BTC.
We provide and rent HASH power for mining NEXT, but also we have a mining pool which anyone can connect to.
If you have more questions, feel free to ask!
Regards,
Sid
Re: [ANN] [NEXT] NEXT.exchange - regulatory compliant hybrid exchange
One of the privilege earned by holding your native token is the ability of early bidding for new tokens, how many token does one need to be able to enjoy this privilege? And how does the other community or the projects' team will think about this? Most exchange will not disclose the date and list of new token listing, and this feature propose a "violation" to the unwritten rule.
It will be listed and then locked for trading unless you have the required amount of tokens, 100, but subject to change in favor of users based on market conditions.
Just to make it straight, the owner of 100 NEXT (subjected to change) will earn a privilege to buy and sell newly listed tokens up to 14 days prior to public listing? Or will it be listed and then locked from public?
Let's say, an ABC token is to be listed on January 15th, will the owner of 100 NEXT be able to start trade them from January 1st or will they still only be able to trade from 15th (whereas the other will be able to trade on 29th)?
You have it correct in the last part. Once it is listed on the 15th, holders will have access on the 15th while everyone else will gain it on the 29th.
I honestly wonder if the feature will be beneficial, without being sceptic. Let's assume there are 100 people holding the privilege of this early trade, while the rest 500 were content with waiting for the public trade, the initial pump that usually follows a listing, or the excitement that bring volume, will not happen because most of the token owners (or, to stick with the example we use earlier, the ABC owners) still can't trade them. So, the main excitement, pumps, and volumes, will still happen on 29th.
I think it'll be not too different from a case where projects releasing their tokens 14 days before exchange listing, people can trade on DEX, but only small numbers of holders interested to do so, resulting a small to no volume, whereas the main trading activities happen 14 days after.
It's an assumption. We can assume that there will be more than 100 people holding privileges to trade early.
It would also show true demand to get on board a project and hold its token/coin.
Also, 100 NEXT for early access is not hardcoded, it can be adjusted based on market conditions in order to benefit users and the project.
Regardless, we will see how it goes with this feature.
Regarding it not being a benefit if many people try to utilize it... Why? It creates buying pressure. Sure, we have utility to provide through the use of NEXT.
Greater demand to trade a project early bird promotes greater demand for NEXT. "So the benefit is no longer a benefit as everyone entitled to it" it sure is a benefit for existing holders who will see their NEXT holdings appreciate in value.
Hope this makes sense.
(replying to paragraph 2)
Price-wise, yes I can understand that it'll make very much sense, that the more people trying to get hold of the token to be entitled to early bird feature, the more it will be beneficial to the existing holders as their token value increases, thus benefit (or rather, profit).
But feature-wise, will it be beneficial? Let's assume that the entire members of your exchange are 100 users. Due to the interests on the feature, 80 of the 100 users are possessing the NEXT token, this means majority of your community are entitled to this early trade, which lead us to a situation where the early trade is almost equal to an ordinary trade, there were no early bird anymore, only the night-owl... or late-worm.
Thus, your feature is no longer a feature, isn't it?
It's an interesting point you make, but we can easily assume that less than 80% of users on the platform will be holding 100 NEXT. Anyways it's all assumptions and "if's", so time will only tell how this all plays out in detail.
Just another note: NEXT will also launch IEOs and has a blockchain which can launch any kind of currency on top of it. This means that projects (even STOs) launched on NEXT specifically will not be traded on another DEX first, since it's not an ERC20.
I think this subject rather gets vague. It's a feature, unless proven otherwise by facts - which time will tell!
Regards,
Sid
Re: [ANN] [Mainnet Launch] LEVERJ Futures DEX - Fast, Secure, Liquid
Interesting. A fast and easy to use DEX sounds almost unreal... Is it possible to get an idea of what the exchange can carry without drawbacks?
If the paper on the Gluon Plasma is explaining this then my apologies, it goes way over my head.
Is it possible to use the exchange without MetaMask?
Today you need to use MetaMask, in the future you will be able to use MyEtherWallet and hard wallets.If the paper on the Gluon Plasma is explaining this then my apologies, it goes way over my head.
Is it possible to use the exchange without MetaMask?
Not sure what you mean by "what the exchange can carry without drawbacks".
I wonder if there is any way to see what volume the system can handle, but I guess that might be very hard to actually predict. So what I meant is "what load is the system able to carry" without that a user starts to notice it.
wonder how customized plasma technology will do to a crypto exchange?
btw your gluon plasma paper is well-written in a technical manner, as expected.
but can you publish your team members on your website?
this kind of innovation needs faces so we know who are we dealing with...
Bharath Rao is the team CEO, there is a lot of youtube videos with the team if you go to the LeverJ youtube channel. Here you can see his face https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMq8KtxidyU btw your gluon plasma paper is well-written in a technical manner, as expected.
but can you publish your team members on your website?
this kind of innovation needs faces so we know who are we dealing with...
but it would be nice if they can publish the team members on their official website, right?
that is like their forefront where everybody is checking them out.
not all people want to watch a video at first look of the project. they will do that if they become interested to see more about the project.
I personally don't think adding the team is of any importance at all. IDEX, for example, doesn't mention any names or face either yet it's a fully operational and high volume DEX. Leave the team alone, they work on the platform and that's all you need as a user. My 2 satoshi's!
Re: [ANN] [Mainnet Launch] LEVERJ Futures DEX - Fast, Secure, Liquid
Interesting. A fast and easy to use DEX sounds almost unreal... Is it possible to get an idea of what the exchange can carry without drawbacks?
If the paper on the Gluon Plasma is explaining this then my apologies, it goes way over my head.
Is it possible to use the exchange without MetaMask?
If the paper on the Gluon Plasma is explaining this then my apologies, it goes way over my head.
Is it possible to use the exchange without MetaMask?
Re: [NEW] HuliBot Platform - Whitelabel Telegram Community Management Bots
I don't advice anybody to use those anonymous services started by brand new accounts. Before all, telegram is the worst place to start with, for both lunchers and users, especially with those confirmed bot use.
The service has no known reputation so it's not trustworthy until proving the opposite.
The service has no known reputation so it's not trustworthy until proving the opposite.
Totally understand your concern, but it's totally misplaced in this case. I'm community manager of NEXT.exchange and we have about 6000 people in our chatroom. What Hulibot does is exactly the opposite of what you are giving a warning for, the bot blocks all the viruses going around these days. It blocks spam, unwanted links, you name it. And the best of all, it has a 'bot check' upon entry. This means that we are 100% certain every user that enters is not a bot! It gives a safe environment for all our users without spam or anything.
So yes for me this bot has fully proven "the opposite", and is the only bot I'll trust in telegram. It has all the functions you'd want managing a community.
Peace!
My personal opinion is in the long term, blockchain technology has far reaching implications and ultimately enslave us to an immutable decentralised ledger, which also destroys sovereignty of nations if we go down the route of a world decentralised currency. I think immutable information maintains the status quo of the rich always being rich and the poor always being poor and the blockchain facilitates a way to snapshot that monetary construct in a way which we can never take back. Just think of how we forced the kings to sign the Magna Carta, this won't be possible once we have people in power with technology which is immutable. BTW I'm a Ted Kaczynski supporter who believes he was ahead of his time. It's just his methods of how he went about his actions hurt a lot of people. There is a reason why books like The Technological Society by Jacques Ellul are banned books, or put you on a government watchlist if you purchase them on Amazon.
Interesting on the banned books, I wasn't aware of this. No doubt that this disrupting technology will make a change. But to counter you, do you think that crypto is really breaking the system of Rich always being rich and Poor always being poor? If so, how?
Appreciate your response and thinking!
Unfortunately I don't think crypto will break the existing situation of the rich being rich and the poor being poor. its only my opinion but I fear that although we need to move towards trust-less, immutable ledgers. As this technology matures and combines with other forms of technology AI / Deep Learning we will see lot of middle class jobs accountants, office clerks, project managers, lawyers (smart legally binding contracts will replace them) logistic specialists, will all disappear. The ruling class will be the people who have the financial power and clout to integrate such systems and this will bring an even bigger divide between the rich and the poor. I think there will be a dark future in the implementation of blockchain. Unfortunately.
That's an interesting point you make. Technology will, inevitably, replace middle class jobs. Blockchain or decentralization might not be able to prevent that sadly enough.
I believe in the benefits (as mentioned) in the area of charity, elections, general monetary and data-related transactions/communication and preventing inflation. The downside of the automatization needs to be handled by us, not by technologies. A reduction in working hours or an unconditional income is inevitable, since many jobs will be replaced by technology and robots. I hope that the people engineering future systems (such as whole governments over blockchain), remain true to themselves and design solutions, which fight greed, injustice and inequality and give back the power to the people.
I think the authoritarian system isn't one that just "gives" to the people. I'm glad to see blockchain is actually something which they couldn't avoid from growing and it's something which forces them to see power being taken by "the people".
My personal opinion is in the long term, blockchain technology has far reaching implications and ultimately enslave us to an immutable decentralised ledger, which also destroys sovereignty of nations if we go down the route of a world decentralised currency. I think immutable information maintains the status quo of the rich always being rich and the poor always being poor and the blockchain facilitates a way to snapshot that monetary construct in a way which we can never take back. Just think of how we forced the kings to sign the Magna Carta, this won't be possible once we have people in power with technology which is immutable. BTW I'm a Ted Kaczynski supporter who believes he was ahead of his time. It's just his methods of how he went about his actions hurt a lot of people. There is a reason why books like The Technological Society by Jacques Ellul are banned books, or put you on a government watchlist if you purchase them on Amazon.
Interesting on the banned books, I wasn't aware of this. No doubt that this disrupting technology will make a change. But to counter you, do you think that crypto is really breaking the system of Rich always being rich and Poor always being poor? If so, how?
Appreciate your response and thinking!
Unfortunately I don't think crypto will break the existing situation of the rich being rich and the poor being poor. its only my opinion but I fear that although we need to move towards trust-less, immutable ledgers. As this technology matures and combines with other forms of technology AI / Deep Learning we will see lot of middle class jobs accountants, office clerks, project managers, lawyers (smart legally binding contracts will replace them) logistic specialists, will all disappear. The ruling class will be the people who have the financial power and clout to integrate such systems and this will bring an even bigger divide between the rich and the poor. I think there will be a dark future in the implementation of blockchain. Unfortunately.
That's an interesting point you make. Technology will, inevitably, replace middle class jobs. Blockchain or decentralization might not be able to prevent that sadly enough.
If we agree that society needs development/improvement in many ways. And we agree that technology is an unavoidable part of the future.
Then how do you see blockchain/decentralization improve life for human beings and society?
I'm curious to hear opinions here. I have my opinions and I work for several projects, but I want to keep my question pure and simple and see what comes up!
Let's build towards a better world
Then how do you see blockchain/decentralization improve life for human beings and society?
I'm curious to hear opinions here. I have my opinions and I work for several projects, but I want to keep my question pure and simple and see what comes up!
Let's build towards a better world
the problem is that you will get more than enough so called "good guys" or "good people" that want to do "good" while "controlling the financial system" and marketing for trust.
the issue then will be how efficient are they? and they will be to many
regards
But true decentralization should prevent the possibility of that and thus your argument is not valid. Everybody, with good or bad intentions should, in true decentralization, be equal
My personal opinion is in the long term, blockchain technology has far reaching implications and ultimately enslave us to an immutable decentralised ledger, which also destroys sovereignty of nations if we go down the route of a world decentralised currency. I think immutable information maintains the status quo of the rich always being rich and the poor always being poor and the blockchain facilitates a way to snapshot that monetary construct in a way which we can never take back. Just think of how we forced the kings to sign the Magna Carta, this won't be possible once we have people in power with technology which is immutable. BTW I'm a Ted Kaczynski supporter who believes he was ahead of his time. It's just his methods of how he went about his actions hurt a lot of people. There is a reason why books like The Technological Society by Jacques Ellul are banned books, or put you on a government watchlist if you purchase them on Amazon.
Interesting on the banned books, I wasn't aware of this. No doubt that this disrupting technology will make a change. But to counter you, do you think that crypto is really breaking the system of Rich always being rich and Poor always being poor? If so, how?
Appreciate your response and thinking!
If we agree that society needs development/improvement in many ways. And we agree that technology is an unavoidable part of the future.
Then how do you see blockchain/decentralization improve life for human beings and society?
I'm curious to hear opinions here. I have my opinions and I work for several projects, but I want to keep my question pure and simple and see what comes up!
Let's build towards a better world
Then how do you see blockchain/decentralization improve life for human beings and society?
I'm curious to hear opinions here. I have my opinions and I work for several projects, but I want to keep my question pure and simple and see what comes up!
Let's build towards a better world
The market is in a weird place at the moment for ICO investments, but I do think the market is in a perfect place to buy up the coins which dipped below their ICO price to have a big guarantee on being profitable once the bulls come back
It will all come down to if Bitcoin can become "Digital Gold" indeed. As written by Satoshi, it's only use is actually as a payment system. This is something which every other crypto currency can do, obviously. So it will all depend on how much value people give BTC in the long run. Will other altcoins break free from Bitcoin, ofr example? Will Bitcoin become an asset which is values as the old-timer, or mother of blockchain technology?