And how to generate an RPC user login in Windows? Because I can't run Python programs in Windows 7 (can I?).

Also, is that user ID generated randomly or is it derived from something in my system?

O Mercado Bitcoin cobra sobre os saques as tarifas de R$ 2,90 mais 1,99% do valor do saque. Assim, considerando um saque baixo de, digamos, R$ 200, o cliente pagaria em tarifas R$ 6,88. O custo de um DOC está entre R$ 8 e R$ 8,50, dependendo do banco. Não vejo como arcar com esta despesa "quebraria a empresa" - neste exemplo, o custo dos DOC's menos as tarifas cobradas pelo MB seria inferior a R$ 2. Além disso, nenhuma pessoa física ou jurídica com boa movimentação em um banco paga estas tarifas para emitir DOC's, sempre há descontos bem significativos.

Quanto ao cliente, se a satisfação dele não é importante o bastante, o direito dele enquanto consumidor é, e se a empresa tiver que arcar com os custos de advogados para se defender em cada eventual ação judicial (que é gratuita para o cliente em um Juizado Especial Cível), aí sim a despesa seria significativa. Além do que, segundo a legislação vigente, independentemente do que conste em quaisquer contratos com quaisquer empresas, o foro para a demanda é sempre o do domicílio do consumidor, ou em outras palavras, a empresa teria que enviar representantes legais para as comarcas onde cada consumidor propôs a sua ação ou estas serão julgadas à revelia da empresa - imagine o custo disso.

Quanto aos comentários sobre o MB ser "ruim", não vejo como elemento positivo para a bitcoin no Brasil haver menos exchanges. Quanto mais opções, melhor. Quem é que pode garantir que o mesmo que ocorreu no MB não possa vir a acontecer com outras exchanges brasileiras? Quem diria que iria acontecer um dia com a toda poderosa Mt.Gox, entre outras exchanges grandes que deram mega calotes?

Dito isso, as perdas de bitcoins sofridas pelos clientes do Mercado Bitcoin são indesculpáveis, assim como a falta de comunicação da exchange aqui, no maior fórum sobe criptomoedas do mundo. No entanto, com todo o respeito, não acho que as pessoas que postam aqui contando sobre a perda de quantidades enormes como 100, 200 bitcoins, tenham sido bem aconselhadas legalmente. Advogados existem aos montes (e de capacidades e qualificações díspares), e se você consultar 10 advogados diferentes, provavelmente receberá 10 respostas/opiniões diferentes. Parece-me que estas pessoas desistiram muito facilmente de recuperar valores altíssimos. Não faltam bons advogados criminais que, mediante valores como estes, sem contar a eventual reparação por danos morais, concordariam em trabalhar em troca de um percentual dos valores obtidos em caso de vitória na ação. Aliás, é assim que a maioria dos advogados trabalha quando há a perspectiva de ganhos monetários em uma ação judicial.

https://www.facebook.com/mbitcoin/posts/780234302114210

O que eu não entendo é por que eles não usam o dinheiro das contas em outros bancos e creditam nas contas dos clientes que (como eu) solicitaram saques para contas da Caixa na semana passada. E, enquanto estão com problemas com a Caixa, por que permitir pedidos de saques para esse banco? O dinheiro está preso lá e não podemos nem cancelar os pedidos de saque pendentes para fazer as retiradas para outros bancos.

Now why the need for another thread on the same subject? You're clearly being paid to promote this.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1209239.0

And I thought I was doing something wrong! I even verified a credit card and my bank account with them. Maybe we should let Coinbase know about this, I don't think they would allow it.

Thanks for replying. So if I have a backup of my wallet.dat file I need to make a new backup every time I send coins, because there's always the possibility that the change will be moved to a newly generated address (if it runs out of pregenerated addresses or something) that doesn't exist in the backup file, right?

Let me see if I got this right. So if you have a certain amount at an address and send out part of that amount, EVERYTHING you had at that address is moved out and the change is deposited at a new address? Why isn't the change kept at the original address?

The word pedophilia is very commonly and mistakenly used to refer to people who have sex with individuals below what the law determines as the "age of consent" in a given place. However, pedophilia is not a legal term, it's a medical (psychiatric) term. You're either a pedophile or you're not, and that doesn't change depending on what the age of consent laws are where you live.

That being said, I'll quote the Comprehensive Textbook Of Psychiatry, vol.1, by Harold I. Kaplan, MD, and Benjamin J. Sadock, MD:

" Pedophilia involves preferential sexual activity with children, either in fantasy or actuality.  Adult sexual activities or fantasies involving prepubertal children, the essential behavior in pedophilia, may be exclusively homosexual or heterosexual, or a mixture of both, and may occur within the family, among acquaintance groups, or between strangers.

Diagnostic criteria for pedophilia:

A - Over a period of at least six months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviours involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger).

B - The fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviours cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

C - The person is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A.  Note: do not include an individual in late adolescence involved in an ongoing sexual relationship with a 12- or 13-year-old. "

So, no, you couldn't possibly be a pedophile for dating a 16 y.o., although you might be breaking the law in some US States if you had sex with her. I'm guessing that's where you're from, since teenage sexuality is a big taboo in the US, while in Europe ages of consent vary between 14 and 16, the sole exception being Ireland where the age of consent is 17.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_the_United_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_South_America

Recommended reading:

Adolescent Sexual Health in Europe and the US

My guess is he was dumped by his boyfriend and went nuts.

Now seriously, in most western countries I know something like this would be considered hate speech or incitation to violence and he would be getting jail time for apology for murder.

So every time a new official version of Bitcoin Core is released I try to connect to it to check if solo mining is working with a GPU like in the old days. For that I use the latest version of CGMiner which supported GPU's (v3.7.2) and GUIMiner. This worked fine with all versions up to 0.9.3 with the bitcoin.conf below:

rpcuser=XXX
rpcpassword=XXX
rpcallowip=*
rpcport=8332
daemon=1

From a command prompt, I run Bitcoin-Qt.exe with the -server parameter or bitcoind.exe and can connect and solo mine with no problems.

After upgrading to Core 0.10.0 and reading that it had changed the rpcallowip behavior and wildcards won't work anymore, I made these changes to bitcoin.conf (one at a time) to accept connections from ANY IP (I'm not concerned about security in this particular case):

rpcallowip=::/0

rpcallowip=0.0.0.0/0

I tried those on my local machine and also on a VPS, and neither CGMiner nor GUIMiner could connect to the server. For the local machine I also tried rpcallowip=127.0.0.1, and on the VPS I tried rpcallowip=mycurrentIP with no success either.

CGMiner says "Pool 0 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid" and GUIMiner says "[Errno 10061] No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it".

Reverting to Core 0.9.3 with rpcallowip=* I can connect to the server and solo mine with no problems. I'm connected to the internet via ADSL with the modem on bridge mode, so port forwarding is not the issue. It would seem that I'm setting rpcallowip wrong, so any help would be appreciated.

From the article, it seems they used to have equipment that was able to detect if people were watching TV, which could only be live TV at the time (the 70s):

"There has always been some uncertainty (or outright suspicion) about the competence of television licence detection vans, made famous in the 1970s, with adverts showing what may, at the time, have appeared to be state-of-the-art equipment, allowing inspectors to drive around with whirring green radar displays alerting them to the presence of unlicensed homes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tq7luWzbouo
"

That's simply ridiculous. If, for example, you subscribe to a cable TV service and you don't pay your bill, the company will just interrupt the service. I'm sure the people from these countries pay enough taxes already. Do people even get a vote on what they want to watch on the TV channels they are forced to pay a licence for?

That looks like a chat box ban only. Didn't you say in the OP that you were able to withdraw?

Anyways, I can't even begin to understand why you people insist on trusting your money with a company run by anonymous Russians. Who are you gonna sue if something goes wrong, Putin?

OK, newbie here but please bear with me because I'm sure many people reading this thread would like to ask this same question but are afraid to look noob. You keep saying not to reuse addresses and keep balances on new addresses. Now as I understand it, in order to send coins to any address the network needs to be made aware of it by means of a transaction which will be forever recorded on the blockchain with the public keys of the addresses. So what's the point in tranferring the coins to a new address if its public key is going to be made public by the transaction anyway, even if the address owner only made that single transaction using that address?

Thanks, that's exactly what I wanted to know.

Should people interested in the presale already start depositing BTC on Moolah?