Of course you have free will, it’s just you’re feeding me with a lot more info about the group - that I previously thought possible.



No. But I often jerk off, it’s good for the prostate.



Big ooopppsss you brazen lying cunt. This is not a link, it’s a screenshot - only you know from where.

Just checked PlanB’s tweet’s all the way to June 20. He has two tweets on that day, and your screenshot is not one of them.
Adjacent on the 21st he has a poll, and on the 19th a “death cross” tweet.

Anyone can check for himself. I can’t be bothered with your cunt. Fucking pussy.

Yep, I don't uderstand the fear with this. If the sell the premium goes further negative, so what. Hell, some of the dollars from those sales may go back into BTC, and if the were playing the premium maybe they have shorts to close at the same time.

I'm not saying its bullish, especially with market sentiment right now, but it certainly isn't some kind of massive bearish event.

Is that you jonoiv?

... you're not actually refuting anything Hal talked about, all you are doing is stating he is wrong, on a specific point that's been pulled out of context from a different argument, without backing up that claim.

... and he's actually not that far off for a rough order-of-magnitude estimate, the total float of all the monetary goods in the world, includes fiat M0-M3, gold/silver acting as money-equivalent, real-estate, bonds and other financial assets that are presently being 'monetised', used as stores-of-value, (since fiat money is being inflated) would be quite close to the total worldwide household wealth ... this is the addressable market for a liquid global reserve money

It is not because something is being expressed in a unit, that that unit needs to expand to whatever is being measured.  For example, let's say I measure the length of my furniture by comparing to the length of my thumb.  Why would there then need to be as many of my thumbs as there is furniture in the world?  If that sounds strange or weird, that is because it is weird and nonsensical.
Money is just an asset class on its own, which takes up a certain portion of total wealth in the world.

... you've pulled the piece of Hal's comment out of context. The full comment was about the asymmetric upside bet. To estimate the asymmetry he needed a ballpark figure for an upside value of btc, at the time it was worthless, so to get an order of magnitude estimate Hal used total global wealth which for a ballpark order of magnitude estimate is fine.

... then he compared the upside value potential of bitcoin with the odds of bitcoin achieving monetary dominance, which he then estimated only needed to be less than 100 million to 1 for to make sense to acquire/hodl some bitcoin, which at the time were worthless remember. He was resoundingly right and the statement still stands, the asymmetric bet was worth it.

Edit; relevant portion of Hal's comment

Well no economics was involved.. he just did the math and it's correct.

Then I would rather believe his faulty economic reasoning.

Just don't forget these words by Hal and you all will be good.

"With 20 million coins, that gives each coin a value of about $10 million."

I've been following the actions of this whale for several years. He is a legend, making $100-200mil by leverage trading on BFX and other derivate exchanges. Since he is well known to the owners of exchanges, he can't openly manipulate the market. My observations show that he is working alone and he is a fair player. In that sense his shorts can't harm the price. Also, he was not always right. It's just that his successful trades are more important than the unsuccessful ones. For example, after 12 March 2020, when the price recovered to 6K, he was confident there will be a pull back to 3K. He failed miserably then, losing a big portion of his wealth. After that, he announced he is retiring. But clearly, he changed his mind recently, when he saw the 12+ consecutive red hours, repeating each Friday. He closed his shorts just before the price fell to 28K last week, fearing a strong rebound. He was right. Now he thinks the price will fall to 30K and is waiting with $800m+ shorts. I don't know what is the leverage, but by a pure speculation it is between 5x and 20x, probably 10x. I've noticed that he added his short positions after the price fell to 33K area yesterday, which clearly shows he is not involved in the regular dumps. Moreover, even if he dumps on BFX, it won't affect the price on the other exchanges. Nowadays Binance is forming the price and the huge volume there makes it harder for a single whale to manipulate the price. But there are other futures exchanges, so this is a valid possibility, of course. Especially, if we have a group of whales making coordinated dumps simultaneously on several exchanges.

... fuck Musk, who exactly did he speak with? All the NA miners? Can any of them verify these conversations?

... he's just full of shit and blow most of the time. In fact why doesn't he run for President? fucktard.

... he's gonna get spat out the back of Bitcoin faster than Mike Hearn, Roger Verr, Jihan Wu and anyone else who tries to coordinate centralised decision making regards mining, I guarantee it.

Ferret frozen for 30 years cloned.

https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-20/first-cloned-endangered-black-footed-ferret-made-in-us/13174872

The real question ... is Hobbes buying in?

Did you get in on the ground floor of Howeycoin?

Spiffcoin is similar you must hit the buy button.

https://spiffcoin.net/

What's to stop GME from just issuing a billion new stock?

@JJG you are a man of many words, I'll drink to that.



This is gentlemen.

With shitbanks that will end up more ruined, if not, I don't understand the 16%

edit

https://twitter.com/asiahodl/status/1344537222091927553
Verified,shitbanks(JPM)

It connects to the security narrative.  1 to 2 dimensional thinkers can't see why POW is so damn efficient and such a GOOD use of energy, that will actually transform the entire power industry in 50 years.  But there is ZERO chance for a distributed system, much less a decentralized one without it.