Hey guys

I have been charged BTC on my card by this website anyone know the origin https://calmnirvana.co/about-us/ its a website for Yoga

man why the fuck are you tagging my account for this?I have the Get eth token in my wallet address and wanted to know if it was genuine or not

Good evening all

I have been doing some transactions and got a reward to redeem from the site get-eth.com, has anyone ever seen this type of token

Hey guys

I dont know if you guys are still looking for something like this but i think you can use _   kjshdjfasdf.vip.   _as well BTC

how much did this man lose?

I can completely relate to this post, I lost 100k in a few trades chasing my losses not realizing, you actual are losing even more , so what I do now is trade If i lose or win step away think about what your doing and if you feel like trading again sit on it for a few hours or days depending how you feel

Would you advise using this code for larger transactions  looks great to me honestly, would you make any tweeks?

I have checked the TXID and its correct and same address so then it would be the exchange itself?but why would a large exchange like bybit do that?

I will forward you the card details on message you take the 25 on whatever you want and forward the btc after easily and I will give you the authorization code

I can give you the prepaid if you want it first Message me and Ill forward the details 

Does anyone want to swap FIAT for BTC, I have a prepaid with some funds on it

We have made a smaller deposit using the same cold wallet to the address and the tokens have arrived after about 45 to 1 hour wait. and it was not a copy paste mistake as its scanning a QR code to confirm address any ideas? the exchange is turning him away and telling him the amount was not deposited to his account

Yes im sorry, my english is not the best. He has deposited on Bybit and I have checked and checked but cant locate the amount he has sent to the address however we have made the same deposit to the same address and the funds have been deposited after about 45 minutes to an hour

Good evening,

I have a friend that has had a cold wallet he has been holding for some time, and has gone to remove some of the funds from the wallet to deposit on chain to sell the tokens he has, A few BTC tokens. however after completing the deposit the amount deposited has not arrived on chain but the funds on the wallet have been removed. he has shared the hash with the support on chain and has let me know its been on going since the start of january.

He has initially reported this after 3 hours when he noticed the funds did not arrive on chain. and shared the hash with the chain.the chain has not been able to locate the funds and are referring that he has not deposited them on chain however prior to him making a large deposit he has made several small deposits on chain to test.

I have advised him since the time it would look impossible to recover the funds. as the chain is turing him away with this comment

the address he has deposited with was confirmed with the QR code provided on chain for the transaction so I cant see any reason for an error as it was not copy paste. 

well dipshit, im not trying to know how it came about. i want to know other peoples opinion about the code 

Disclaimer: I haven't actually tested this. So there is a chance I'm
understanding the code entirely wrong. If so, feel free to make fun of
me for being too lazy to actually test this.


In BTCitcoin Core, mempool expiration is done by:

   int CTxMemPool::Expire(std::chrono::seconds time)
   {
       AssertLockHeld(cs);
       indexed_transaction_set::index<entry_time>::type::iterator it = mapTx.get<entry_time>().begin();
       setEntries toremove;
       while (it != mapTx.get<entry_time>().end() && it->GetTime() < time) {
      toremove.insert(mapTx.project<0>(it));
      it++;
       }   
       setEntries stage;
       for (txiter removeit : toremove) {
      CalculateDescendants(removeit, stage);
       }   
       RemoveStaged(stage, false, MemPoolRemovalReason::EXPIRY);
       return stage.size();
   }

This function is expiring transactions based on their entry time into
the mempool, a value that is set once and never changed. Transactions
are removed unconditionally on expiration, whether or not they have
descendents. That means that if you broadcast A, wait just prior to A's
expiration, and broadcast B, a transaction spending an output of A, B
will be evicted immediately when A's expiration time is reached.

There's at least three problems with this:

1) It's dumb. If I do a CPFP on an old transaction, I want that
  transaction to get mined and am willing to pay money. It's silly to make
  me jump through the hoop of rebroadcasting it again when it expires.

2) It's a free-relay DoS attack: just prior to A expiring, I could
  broadcast B, a very large transaction, and use up bandwidth for "free".
  Frankly, I'm not very concerned about this. But if you care, you
  should fix this.

3) Expiration could maybe be leveraged in transaction cycling attacks:
  https://stacker.news/items/866680

Personally, I'm not convinced that transaction expiration is actually a
good idea. The best argument for it IMO is in the case of some
soft-fork-style screwup where you're allowing stuff into your mempool
that will never get mined. But that means something is seriously wrong
to begin with - you probably should fix that. Otherwise, it's not
uncommon for transactions that are months old to eventually get mined.
Do we really need to waste bandwidth re-relaying them in the meantime?

Ill just smoke my herbs, and let the time go until I get a better title

  I love you too

  You surprise me, why so aggressive. Its fine in the case no one wants to borrow the 1.5 btc I will just go for the standard P2P on chain