Set up magi.conf as follows:

# You must set rpcuser and rpcpassword to secure the JSON-RPC api
rpcuser=*user*
rpcpassword=*pass*

# Listen for RPC connections on this TCP port:
rpcport=8232

# server=1 to accept JSON-RPC commands
server=1

# listen=1 to accept connections from outside
listen=0

# RPC connection from localhost allowed
# set this to your LAN address range to allow other local machines to connect. * means 0-255 IOW any machine on LAN
rpcallowip=192.168.0.*

# Add nodes to connect to specific peers
#connect=104.128.225.215

# Add nodes to connect to specific peers
addnode=104.128.225.215
addnode=45.35.251.73

# posii=1 to enable PoS staking; default = 0
posii=1

# Transaction under stake with a value greater than the threshold is being splitted
stakesplitthreshold=1000

# Transactions with values less than the threshold will combine into one
stakecombinethreshold=500


Launch your miner with:

C:\XMGpoolminerWin64\m-minerd.exe -a m7mhash -o http://192.168.0.141:8232 -u *user* -p *pass* --threads 12

this breaks down as follows:
"C:\XMGpoolminerWin64\m-minerd.exe"  *** adjust to path of miner
                                            
-a m7mhash *** for magi mining

-o http://192.168.0.141:8232 *** address and port of wallet server

*user* *** user from magi.conf  don't use any *

*pass* *** pass from magi.conf

--threads 12 *** number of threads you want, no more than 1 per core

Don't forget to open your firewall for incoming connections to your wallet.

No yay or boo when mining solo, what you'll see if all is well is this:

C:\XMGpoolminerWin64>C:\XMGpoolminerWin64\m-minerd.exe -a m7mhash -o http://192.168.0.141:8232 -u ***** -p ***** --threads 12
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 6 to cpu 6
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 7 to cpu 7
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 8 to cpu 8
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 9 to cpu 9
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 10 to cpu 10
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] 12 miner threads started, using 'm7mhash' algorithm.
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] Binding thread 11 to cpu 11
[2018-05-05 02:06:23] No payout address provided, switching to getwork
[2018-05-05 02:06:52] thread 6: 262144 hashes, 9.29 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:52] thread 9: 262144 hashes, 9.26 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:52] thread 11: 262144 hashes, 9.25 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:52] thread 8: 262144 hashes, 9.20 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:52] thread 0: 262144 hashes, 9.20 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:52] thread 4: 262144 hashes, 9.16 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:52] thread 1: 262144 hashes, 9.10 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:52] thread 7: 262144 hashes, 9.10 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:52] thread 3: 262144 hashes, 9.07 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:53] thread 2: 262144 hashes, 8.97 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:53] thread 10: 262144 hashes, 8.82 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:53] thread 5: 262144 hashes, 8.72 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:56] thread 2: 35872 hashes, 9.22 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 9: 46314 hashes, 9.35 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 6: 46457 hashes, 9.18 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 0: 45994 hashes, 9.27 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 11: 46261 hashes, 8.99 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 8: 45994 hashes, 9.23 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 4: 45778 hashes, 9.26 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 1: 45507 hashes, 9.21 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 7: 45497 hashes, 9.26 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 10: 35265 hashes, 8.72 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 3: 45349 hashes, 9.29 khash/s
[2018-05-05 02:06:57] thread 5: 34876 hashes, 9.29 khash/s

If you get message about connect error, make sure wallet is running, check wallet address & port, user & pass, etc.
Also, try running a miner on same machine as wallet by using 127.0.0.1:port , this shoulg get around firewall problems.
Wallet must be in sync for mining to work.

He was insulted by you calling his project a quasi-hoax. It was a full-blown scam, and he wants all the credit that he deserves.

Seriously, read the last 50 pages or so of the thread at https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=2702 . We've got nothing from him but lies and empty promises. And now he will no longer be bothered even giving us that much. Whatever you do, do not trust this man or any project he is involved in in any way whatsoever.

I can't believe they didn't close down a long time ago, either by legal action or because they were the scene of a mass shooting. Their actions were certainly deserving of both of those possible outcomes.

You're kidding, aren't you? All 3 of those companies have 1, 2, and 3. I'd say it's an uncertain market, that's definitely 1 reason the majors don't get involved. Also market size. AMD and nVidia might have a little interest, if they were sure the market would last a few years. Intel would consider the market way too small, even if they could have 100% of both sha256 & sCrypt sales. They probably make way more on just their LAN chipsets.

ASICs will be the realm of small, fly-by-night companies for quite some time. Notice how quick the prices drop? What successful company wants that?

A chunk of aluminum is much cheaper, and I've got a CNC mill

Never! Any machinist with even half a brain will not wear gloves. Gloves are very tough, they get caught in the cutter your fucked.

The idea of water cooling an antminer may be a good one, but only if you put the radiator outside, or use well water and discharge it back into the ground. You could also use water from a stream or pond on your property. Just to get the heat out of the building, especially if you're running a few KW of mining equipment.

I would use 6063 aluminum alloy or similar, failure from corrosion would take much longer than an antminer will be worth running, unless your pumping saltwater through it.

A shibe with a badly chosen nick. Should be "The Vet"

If you're still accepting testers, I would love to try it on a few 7950s. I do believe you said it may work on older cards.

I think what he means is that at $1 you will probably never ROI.

I still say it's pronounced doggy.

I think it's because people get sick of having religion imposed on them, and enjoy pushing their views instead. I've been an atheist most of my life, always left the bible beaters alone. But as I see more and more of their anti-science BS being pushed on all of us, I've got to admit I'm starting to enjoy pointing out the fact that their religion is nothing but a fairy tale, and not even a good one at that.

If you consider things carefully, you will quickly realize that ASICs do not make the network any more secure. Yes, it's quite true that they do allow the "good guys" to have a much higher hash rate by purchasing them. On the surface, this probably seems like it makes the network more secure. But there is a problem. The "bad guys" are able to purchase the same ASICs as the "good guys". They would be attacking with weapons of the same strength, security is not affected by whether we use ASICs, CPUs, or GPU's. Everybody has the ability to purchase the same devices, therefore the relative numbers don't really change, only the absolutes.

Let me give you a small analogy. You'll just formed a small country, and you have to defend it from intruders. No weapons have been invented yet, all you have to fight with is your fists, this is also the only weapon your enemy has. Okay, so now clubs get invented, you get all your people armed with clubs now so that your nation will be more secure. Here comes your enemy to invade, seems they've got some nice clubs too. Well, it seems like your security is not much better than it was before, doesn't it. Well, you just heard some encouraging news. Somebody is just invented a much more powerful weapon called a gun, get a few of these and those club wielding invaders won't have a chance. So you get yourself armed with these new guns, you feel very safe. Then the enemy invader show up again, they don't seem to have any clubs with them, what do you suppose they are carrying?

You understand the point of this little story? As long as the same technology is available to all sides, nobody gets an advantage. This is exactly how ASICs "improve" network security.

To some, ANYTHING related to DOGE is automatically evil. It's kinda like how a Klansman views a black man. 100% prejudice and 0% intelligence. Sadly the world of crypto is not entirely an enlightened one.


Ed

Bitcoin is good. Scrypt is good. Bitcoin scrypt is bullshit. Bitcoin does not use scrypt.

I've got no problem with alts in general (check the sig), but this just seems wrong. It's clearly trying to pass itself off as some kind of bitcoin 2.0, instead of the unrelated alt that it is.

Why?

The extremely rapid ramp is my biggest concern for DOGEs survival. Miners will leave with each halving, leaving DOGE open for a 51% attack. And there are plenty of haters to do the attack. Also I'm sure at least a few real scumbags out there who would do it for financial gain. The weak development(?) team doesn't really help.

Still I wish the dog much success. Nobody has created brilliance out of stupidity this well since Monty Python.


Ed

I'm waiting for MAX on gox, it'll be a good match

Ed

Maybe those people are getting paid to mine


Ed

So you know this is what DOGE did? Show us your evidence. Otherwise I'll just regard you the same way I regard 9/11 conspiracy types, as a headcase off your meds.

Seriously, why are DOGE haters such a rabid bunch.

Such insane. Much mental. Very need thorazine. Wow!

I'm happy he's here. He makes DOGE more fun


Ed