Thank you for your interest. But I can't buy this wallet The balance comes out as zero on the blockchain I know. I'm sorry that I couldn't disclose the blockchain address that I can check. Good luck...
It's pretty obvious you want to buy an empty bitcoin wallets private key so you can steal the coins from forks based on BTC where there is still a balance left. Update your buying criteria to reflect that instead of asking for something and hiding what you really want!
Post
Topic
BoardDigital goods
Re: I want to purchase an empty Bitcoin private key after sending the funds
by
TheArchaeologist
on 05/04/2024, 10:06:47 UTC
I can get you the private key to: 1HZwkjkeaoZfTSaJxDw6aKkxp45agDiEzN First funded: 9/15/2012 Last used: 4/1/2024 Total sent/received: 59.99993601 BTC
Code:
Address: 1HZwkjkeaoZfTSaJxDw6aKkxp45agDiEzN Message: This private key is known by TheArchaeologist on April 5th, 2024 Signature: G7l1o0On63Audwv8ZbFTrc2F2ooEzTOx12s2kel4zafQFi9gyufUX9DnAw7wIbTM8HLIWj4L5EN3plypBtNRpT4=
Post
Topic
BoardGoods
Re: I want to purchase an empty Bitcoin private key after sending the funds.
Please message me if you have an empty wallet that you deposited bitcoin after 2011 and recently transferred You don't need any btc.bch, bcv, btg balance at all. I need a private key because of the new hardpog coin. 1btc = $10
sample address 1DDYt8kJE1JBa2kQN1R921weJGbCnWcgG4 200bit ==> i want buy $2000
I can get you the private key to: 1HZwkjkeaoZfTSaJxDw6aKkxp45agDiEzN First funded: 9/15/2012 Last used: 4/1/2024 Total sent/received: 59.99993601 BTC
Post
Topic
BoardDevelopment & Technical Discussion
Merits1 from 1 user
Re: Collection of 18.509 found and used Brainwallets
i know [:-1] this method use remove the last digit,but i need mathematically steps like + - * /
why i am post this topic mathbehind crack ecdsa
example input: 9cbdfb599ed0100 ce5efdaccf68080 1cbdfb599ed0100 397bf6b33da0200
i need output: 9cbdfb599ed010 ce5efdaccf6808 1cbdfb599ed010 397bf6b33da020 solve the math write here... :Note only last digits remove #mybadandgoodenglish
Just divide by 10: 9cbdfb599ed0100 / 10 = 9cbdfb599ed010 ce5efdaccf68080 / 10 = ce5efdaccf6808 etc.
But then again, all I posted was info publicly available. The only way to prove I actually have the Privatekey was to sign a message with the corresponding address. Just like the reply from mamuu, he/she is just feeding you public info. You posted a public key and all the info in reply could be deducted from that key alone, that has nothing to do with "calculating the private key". But then again, you want to believe so I probably can't convince you otherwise
yes of course you know:) that something you cannot do, it doesn't means other people can't do.
And you are right, better think " If I don't know how to do -> it means NO ONE KNOWS", this is great mistake in your imagine of the world. /quote]
Ok, so prove me wrong:
Code:
Address : 17A16QmavnUfCW11DAApiJxp7ARnxN5pGX Transactions : Couple of honderd thousand, a few more than 4 :)
According to your magic it shouldn't be a problem to calculate the private key for this address. I'll give you 5 hours instead of 5 minutes. Let's see who we can call unknowing then..
ahh , and I forgot, are you remember "SILK ROAD", and FBI action? this algo has been used for taking private key.
Please stop spreading misinformation. No FBI, NSA, l33t haxor, or whatever organisation hase ever seized bitcoins by using an algorithm to calculate the private key involved.
About security, only then yours BTC are safe where/when: 1. Your public addres has no output transactions 2. If your public address has no more output transactions than 4.
you ask me why step 2?
for example: if and only if you have more transactions output that n , example : 40 (as outputs - 40 x r,s,z)
you can try implement algorithm - superpositional linear equation - and you need to find only 4 transactions in the same level bit to recalculate private key.
Just to be clear: there are a lot of addresses where the public key is known, that's kind of the idea of a public key. Furthermore there are plenty of those with even thousands of signed transactions. So was for any of those addresses/public key the private key ever calculated? Plain simple: No.
Take the public key, SHA256 it, RIPEMD-160 it, then add 0x00 to the start. Call this pubhash_prefix. SHA256 this twice, take the first 4 bytes, and then append these 4 bytes to pubhash_prefix. Convert to base58 and you have your address.
The same thing as described by o_e_l_e_o, this time in python code:
Code:
bin = binascii.unhexlify(public_key)
#Step 1: Create hash of public key: hash_of_public_key = hashlib.sha256(bin).digest()
#Step 2: Calculate RIPEMD-160 of the public key: r = hashlib.new('ripemd160') r.update(hash_of_public_key) r.hexdigest()
I do not remember how it works, but maybe Bitcoin Core is not synced, therefore newly created transactions were not transmitted. The question is at which stage of synchronisation it is. And will it publish transactions when become synchronised?
The transfer won't be submitted to the network until the local client is up to date. Up to this point, the transaction is shown in the local wallet but not in the global network / mempool. So yes it will transmit the transaction after becoming fully synchronized if all inputs needed for the transaction are unspent.
Post
Topic
BoardDevelopment & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin Core wallet spends BTC 0.07!! USD 4000!! to make two small dust sendings
Your new transactions haven't been broadcast yet, that's why your transaction don't show up in any blockexplorer. The fact your balance is going down is likely caused by syncing of new blocks in which past transactions were found spending.
If you do:
Code:
bitcoin-cli getblockcount
What is the height reported?
Post
Topic
BoardDevelopment & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin Core wallet spends BTC 0.07!! USD 4000!! to make two small dust sendings
I assumed it was good protocol to anonymize the actual data. Please advice, is sharing this ok?
You should never share date that will reveal private keys/wif's. Doing so will cause you to loose BTC.
I can't advice on what you want to share or not, that's up to you. Sharing a transaction-id will not cause you any harm, however it will give away privacy since things around that transaction can then be linked back to your user accoun on this forum.
What you could try yourself is looking up these txid's from your logs:
And paste those values in a block explorer. Do you seen any results? Expected is that your ledger account starting with 1N should be funded in the outputs of that transaction with 0.00026658 BTC and 0.00097500 BTC.
Post
Topic
BoardDevelopment & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin Core wallet spends BTC 0.07!! USD 4000!! to make two small dust sendings
I then first make one small test sending to my safe Ledger wallet address (legacy wallet) of 0.0001 bitcoin, where transaction fees are to be withdrawn from amount.
First of all, there is a difference between your original post where you claim to have send 0.0001 versus the logs:
Code:
Nettobeløp: -0.00100000 BTC
But anyway, based on the logs you posted the two outgoing transactios have a rather small fee attached to them. So fees are not the problem for your "missing BTC". If anything they might be the reason for your transactions still bot being confirmed, so not showing up as received on your ledger address.
Might I have been hacked somehow (im on a pretty new MacBook Pro)
Really hard to say based on what you shared this far. Any reason you edited the address and transaction-id from your logs you later posted. The problem for "disapearing" BTC is not in the transactions from your log.
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Technical Support
Merits4 from 3 users
Re: strange bitcoin addresses, algorithms and bruteforce
1-how many addresses are there with this characteristic?
I took a look at all p2ph addresses (so the one starting with a '1'. I found over 1.5 million addresses with the characteristics you described which have been funded at least once: