Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 26 results by Tpf0505
he cant do them closed source,
when he cloned his shit coin from ltc/btc
he had to agree the licence which request
that the application hast to stay open source
when he cloned his shit coin from ltc/btc
he had to agree the licence which request
that the application hast to stay open source
full agree,
I did only describe the current view at chain fork
rofl .. what a lucky shot ..
even his official block explorer is on his chain "cough"
but 2k blocks ahead from all other pools ? .. and lol
his block explorer shows fake data .. 99-100 peers
.. how can that happend when all other pools and user are 2k blocks behind on there own chain ?
damn.
lol easy shit man ^^
even his official block explorer is on his chain "cough"
but 2k blocks ahead from all other pools ? .. and lol
his block explorer shows fake data .. 99-100 peers
.. how can that happend when all other pools and user are 2k blocks behind on there own chain ?
damn.
lol easy shit man ^^
chain forked at height 1324010
they changed the rediff algo on this block in their private githubrepo to lower diff (and to lockout private pools)
Re: [ANN]AIB-Advanced Internet Blockchains || https://www.aib.one
you should additionaly think about increasing protocol version and bann old version on given timestamp/blockheight to keep away old wallets with wrong chain-info.
(as requested my AIB-address AZn9oGK5vhaZ8twAiWeuXZqq8ToWLgyXUn )
(as requested my AIB-address AZn9oGK5vhaZ8twAiWeuXZqq8ToWLgyXUn )
Re: [ANN]AIB-Advanced Internet Blockchains || https://www.aib.one
as there is no reorg limit the client is flipping between two chains (reorgs >100k blocks) if connected to nodes of wrong chain.
dev has to update checkpoint-data in code to lock on correct chain.
dev has to update checkpoint-data in code to lock on correct chain.
Code:
diff --git a/src/chainparams.cpp b/src/chainparams.cpp
index 9815ca0..56860e1 100644
--- a/src/chainparams.cpp
+++ b/src/chainparams.cpp
@@ -277,9 +277,14 @@ public:
( 1154619, uint256S("0xb3df98957ccfeb9da0eb5ef929cf929ae9a6bf1917f79578688b55c25cf6b67d"))
( 1213390, uint256S("0x098ed783d5cf8428215686ddef1a88ba372d58b28f3f571a437f15bbaae59d55"))
( 1216820, uint256S("0xe69b85a94471d42b254be77062f65edba84f3a5972a1d2a4bb8b14e1526cef52"))
- ( 1224490, uint256S("c20d8dab92dc16854d6cddefe9ce7905aa18b0ad949cc7848dc7008338641c4c")),
- 1513895220, // * UNIX timestamp of last checkpoint block
- 1283706, // * total number of transactions between genesis and last checkpoint
+ ( 1224490, uint256S("0xc20d8dab92dc16854d6cddefe9ce7905aa18b0ad949cc7848dc7008338641c4c"))
+ ( 2192860, uint256S("0x0916d22a70d1b934a31934a2ea1482604c594bf3a1a9e58a73a627fde91dfebd"))
+ ( 2210000, uint256S("0x4f58bae8c6f572e7821bd2d3e6c66f2f82dce048b31302ef44f8ca8fd9ac139f"))
+ ( 2260000, uint256S("0xd04a48d6324eaf14e86c9de975eccf32449d6d6a3beb595868fdd273af1d9502"))
+ ( 2300000, uint256S("0x98bdbd3a6fa9d9daa714b3197506e905f0802866ef1bd8c669aba20ec19dfc1c"))
+ ( 2358115, uint256S("0x2eb558ba005a7f3ff2cbcb2ce3a1dc1384c824f9ac401aa4c3fa1c9ebe19f44e")),
+ 1591084557, // * UNIX timestamp of last checkpoint block
+ 2475276, // * total number of transactions between genesis and last checkpoint
// (the tx=... number in the SetBestChain debug.log lines)
1440.0 // * estimated number of transactions per day after checkpoint
};
index 9815ca0..56860e1 100644
--- a/src/chainparams.cpp
+++ b/src/chainparams.cpp
@@ -277,9 +277,14 @@ public:
( 1154619, uint256S("0xb3df98957ccfeb9da0eb5ef929cf929ae9a6bf1917f79578688b55c25cf6b67d"))
( 1213390, uint256S("0x098ed783d5cf8428215686ddef1a88ba372d58b28f3f571a437f15bbaae59d55"))
( 1216820, uint256S("0xe69b85a94471d42b254be77062f65edba84f3a5972a1d2a4bb8b14e1526cef52"))
- ( 1224490, uint256S("c20d8dab92dc16854d6cddefe9ce7905aa18b0ad949cc7848dc7008338641c4c")),
- 1513895220, // * UNIX timestamp of last checkpoint block
- 1283706, // * total number of transactions between genesis and last checkpoint
+ ( 1224490, uint256S("0xc20d8dab92dc16854d6cddefe9ce7905aa18b0ad949cc7848dc7008338641c4c"))
+ ( 2192860, uint256S("0x0916d22a70d1b934a31934a2ea1482604c594bf3a1a9e58a73a627fde91dfebd"))
+ ( 2210000, uint256S("0x4f58bae8c6f572e7821bd2d3e6c66f2f82dce048b31302ef44f8ca8fd9ac139f"))
+ ( 2260000, uint256S("0xd04a48d6324eaf14e86c9de975eccf32449d6d6a3beb595868fdd273af1d9502"))
+ ( 2300000, uint256S("0x98bdbd3a6fa9d9daa714b3197506e905f0802866ef1bd8c669aba20ec19dfc1c"))
+ ( 2358115, uint256S("0x2eb558ba005a7f3ff2cbcb2ce3a1dc1384c824f9ac401aa4c3fa1c9ebe19f44e")),
+ 1591084557, // * UNIX timestamp of last checkpoint block
+ 2475276, // * total number of transactions between genesis and last checkpoint
// (the tx=... number in the SetBestChain debug.log lines)
1440.0 // * estimated number of transactions per day after checkpoint
};
Re: [ANN] STONE - A Rock-Solid, Feature Rich Cryptocurrency Ecosystem
Official 2.1.1.2 Release
THIS RELEASE IS A MANDATORY UPGRADE. IF YOU DO NOT UPGRADE YOU WILL NOT BE ON THE CORRECT CHAIN STARTING AT BLOCK 420420
This release includes all of the previous changes from the experimental 2.1.1.1 release, plus a protocol version number update, and logic to disconnect all lower protocol clients starting at block 420420. Also included are official windows setup installers, instead of just zip files.
https://github.com/stonecoinproject/Stonecoin/releases/tag/v2.1.1.2
THIS RELEASE IS A MANDATORY UPGRADE. IF YOU DO NOT UPGRADE YOU WILL NOT BE ON THE CORRECT CHAIN STARTING AT BLOCK 420420
This release includes all of the previous changes from the experimental 2.1.1.1 release, plus a protocol version number update, and logic to disconnect all lower protocol clients starting at block 420420. Also included are official windows setup installers, instead of just zip files.
https://github.com/stonecoinproject/Stonecoin/releases/tag/v2.1.1.2
Release is binary only, source is on v2.1.0.1.
please update source files too.
Re: [ANN] 🎲 AZART 🎲 | Algo X17 | PoW+Masternodes | L-PoW | Governance | Funding
Azart 0.13.1.5 (old blockchain)
https://github.com/azartpay/azart/releases/tag/0.13.1.5
Everybody update their wallets.
https://github.com/azartpay/azart/releases/tag/0.13.1.5
Everybody update their wallets.
release is binary only, source code points to old version
you should update source too to get more nodes updated
Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | POW+MN/POS | 0.10.7.0 - New Self Moderated Thread
rpc-getblocktemplate calls CreateNewBlock()
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/rpcmining.cpp#L517)
in CreateNewBlock() after MN-startblock it calls FillBlockPayee()
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/miner.cpp#L360)
where FillTreasuryPayee() is called
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/masternode-payments.cpp#L304)
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/rpcmining.cpp#L517)
in CreateNewBlock() after MN-startblock it calls FillBlockPayee()
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/miner.cpp#L360)
where FillTreasuryPayee() is called
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/masternode-payments.cpp#L304)
Two possibilities
Some people are using the new code to generate a lot of rewards for the foundation
(to create panic)
Unknown bugs have emerged as a result of mining along with the old chain during the upgrade
getblocktemplate reports wrong scaled values and wallet doesn't check max value for treasury
Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | POW+MN/POS | 0.10.7.0 - New Self Moderated Thread
rpc-getblocktemplate calls CreateNewBlock()
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/rpcmining.cpp#L517)
in CreateNewBlock() after MN-startblock it calls FillBlockPayee()
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/miner.cpp#L360)
where FillTreasuryPayee() is called
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/masternode-payments.cpp#L304)
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/rpcmining.cpp#L517)
in CreateNewBlock() after MN-startblock it calls FillBlockPayee()
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/miner.cpp#L360)
where FillTreasuryPayee() is called
(https://github.com/quark-project/quark/blob/f813e83ee229d9dce9f798051f96ca73f36d91f5/src/masternode-payments.cpp#L304)
Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | POW+MN/POS | 0.10.7.0 - New Self Moderated Thread
it's not an attack - it's the result of broken values from getblocktemplate
"payee": "QVvYypXoiRXcJpJpRVkftKEjMkXbd6UKJv",
"payee_amount": 10639123200,
"masternode_payments": true,
"payee": "QVvYypXoiRXcJpJpRVkftKEjMkXbd6UKJv",
"payee_amount": 10639123200,
"masternode_payments": true,
Re: [ANN] [XJO] Joulecoin | SHA256 | First SHA256 data coin | Major upgrade 0.10.4.2
Anyone having issues to deposit joulecoins on Cryptopia? It seems like they are in another blockchain. Cryptopia blockchain is ahead but that blockchain is not the same we can find here:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xjo/
It seems like they are using another version of the coin maybe?
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xjo/
It seems like they are using another version of the coin maybe?
from coininfo on cryptopia they are using an old wallet version (0.9.2.5).
the possible chainsplit occured 2 weeks ago.
I've sent them a supportticket, but currently no further actions have been done.
so if you are missing your coins, open a ticket too
Re: CannabisCoin [CANN][X11][Official] Developments & Discussions
Me too. From yobit to cryptopia 9075.94345644 CANN --> CPw6ic4tTm6TkrD2ZCmrtjQMZZJqLfjQrC
2018-06-07 17:39:45
9075.94345644 CANN
44c7d7968e47a66a5d3b5cf3693c93d510b0bc703b07fd616aed385951c6bcc2
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cann/address.dws?CPw6ic4tTm6TkrD2ZCmrtjQMZZJqLfjQrC.htm
Another block explorer showa that transaction is successful
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Cannabiscoin/CPw6ic4tTm6TkrD2ZCmrtjQMZZJqLfjQrC/
2018-06-07 17:39:45
9075.94345644 CANN
44c7d7968e47a66a5d3b5cf3693c93d510b0bc703b07fd616aed385951c6bcc2
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cann/address.dws?CPw6ic4tTm6TkrD2ZCmrtjQMZZJqLfjQrC.htm
Another block explorer showa that transaction is successful
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Cannabiscoin/CPw6ic4tTm6TkrD2ZCmrtjQMZZJqLfjQrC/
the latest coin-update to v8.8 results in a chainfork.
as yobit is really slow in updates, they sent your coins to the old chain.
(the prohashing explorer is on the old chain too - see version info on there page - version 80,701 , means v8.7.1)
Re: [$XVG] VERGE [POW][MultiAlgo][BLACKHOLE][Entire Line of TOR/i2P Resources]
is this hard-fork chaos seriuos?
revoking an "announced" hardfork (the block "2040000" ) 8 hours before it happened leads to this mess
exchanges are now on completly different chains, as there was not enough time to get wallets updated to a decent version
revoking an "announced" hardfork (the block "2040000" ) 8 hours before it happened leads to this mess
exchanges are now on completly different chains, as there was not enough time to get wallets updated to a decent version
Today I lost another 19 GAME in game.poolto.be pool. The admin updated the new wallet and all of my coins (confirmed & unconfirmed too) are lost (or stolen)! I mining more than 3 years but never happened this situation like these two 2 mining pools.
I'm very dissapointed in this Gamecredits coins and the amateurish admin of mastermining.net & poolto.be!
Very well Guys now you lost some new and old user too!
I'm very dissapointed in this Gamecredits coins and the amateurish admin of mastermining.net & poolto.be!
Very well Guys now you lost some new and old user too!
it's not the pool-admins fault to solve an unresolveable problem of this communication-disaster.
announcing a hard fork after 24h of releasing a git-commit (not a tested version) is a to short to react.
now the pools have to decide:
- follow the old chain with currently a working exchange on it (but loosing all new created coins after forking block if chainswitch is done)
or
- update to new chain with no working exchange and loose all new created coins after forking block instantly
there is no good solution for pool-operators
Re: [ANN][BWK] BULWARK | NO ICO | Masternodes | Accelerated PoW | Seesaw PoS/MN
dev should keep an eye on current network issue
mining is not possible, the change of MN-payment has lead to some trouble on block 83699.
currently the are no valid masternodes available to create the next block
from wallet-log:
2018-03-07 08:01:55 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect masternode to pay
mining is not possible, the change of MN-payment has lead to some trouble on block 83699.
currently the are no valid masternodes available to create the next block
from wallet-log:
2018-03-07 08:01:55 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect masternode to pay
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][FlexFee™][SegWit] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
I repeat my questions one more time. How the autoexchange works on Zpool? Why SYS instead of BTC and LANA instead of LTC? And where is my funds?
If you specify a BTC wallet as your username, then your password needs to be c=BTC. If you use an LTC wallet, then your password needs to be c=LTC. If your wallet does not match what you specify in your password, then you end up with nothing.
Very interesting. And what is the way for pool to know with this command-line (-o stratum+tcp://.mine.zpool.ca: -u BTCwallet -p c=BTC) what coin I want to make. Different altcoins use same algo.
the pool choose the coin to work on, you can only change the algo.
the walletaddress and coin-selection in command line defines the coin for payout, the pool does autoconvert from coins found to your selected payout-coin.
walletaddress and payout-coin must match or you will get nothing
I send the onixcoin in the mobile wallet to the yobit website and the wallet can not be received on the onixcoin from the yobit wallet，always in process
onixcoin-wallet on yobit is set to maintenance mode, you have to wait for coming back online to receive your coins