Which aspect excites you the most?

On a separate note, it is significant that all the hit and run comments have been unable to respond over the past week. Clearly, Tratok is on the right path as the community, support and adoption grow daily. We understand that there is jealousy from those who look ridiculous after failing to meet their own commitments, but we recommend they learn from us and improve their own projects, rather than simply try to sabotage.

Several of the second tier to start with. We are using our resources foremost on platform refinement and B2B partnerships. The sad fact is that majority of exchanges are massively faking their volumes and userbase and therefore it makes no sense spending six-figure sums simply for bragging rights to list on some exchanges. It adds no value.

It is far better to increase holders via free promotion, airdrops and rewarding users. This way people actually use the product as intended and it creates real value. We are always against speculation, it hurts the industry.

To summarize, most others in the niche want to simply capitalize on cryptomania. They simply try to replace traditional currencies, with no plan to ensure widespread adoption. E.g. like the hundreds of Facebook clones that spawned when social media platforms were starting.

Following extensive feasibility studies by high profile industry experts, Tratok solves dozens of existing industry problems and is more than just a token. It is an ecosystem. If you have 30 minutes to spare, I encourage you to watch this and actually understand that we are completely different from the others. From how we started and got funded to what our intentions are. Tratok is here to give, not to take. To actually make the world better:

https://tratok.com/how-does-tratok-dismantle-the-current-sector-and-build-a-better-ecosystem/

This is arguably the most sensible comment on this thread. Prices should be determined by real-world use and application and not this speculative "when moon" nonsense. I couldn't agree more.

Worryingly enough, there are many people who do not understand that 10,000% gains for some of these "projects" with no application was not just unsustainable but also clearly manipulated. This is one of the biggest hindrances to the industry, that nobody has the patience to let something real actually develop, they just unreasonably expect to all be millionaires tomorrow, even though I bet you 99.9% of them cannot even tell you about the projects they back.

We believe it is disgusting that people are complaining to us in the dozens about the forum admins deleting their honest comments and feedback while they allow people who based on their post history clearly have a conflict of interest to post fake accusations about investors losing money in our alleged ICO. We understand that people may be disappointed about their failed investments in this sector when they have been duped by fraudulent ICO's from other projects but that is not our fault. They should not let their foolishness hinder an actual legitimate global disruptor.

We never conducted an ICO.... Tratok is privately funded and airdropped. Tratok LTD has never released tokens onto any exchange. It is a gift to the world, a project privately funded, months ahead of schedule. As a so-called open forum to promote blockchain technology, why do you actually hinder those who wish to make a real change with it and who are only giving to the community, not taking?

We could be cruel and point out for example, due to our advisors who work in the biggest banks in the GCC that MENA Coin (people who so openly do hit and run comments here without ever responding) due to ABER (A project from the two biggest central banks in the MENA regions) is doomed to fail. However, we never do things like that. Firstly, we are professional, unlike their representatives who falsely labelled people before taking a minute to read (something that is actually working against them in Dubai and Saudi Arabia). In addition,  we are focused on giving Tratok to the world at our own expense. So why do the admins allow such unfair practices here? Perhaps they bought into a tourism ICO and hate the fact that a blockchain company that is privately funded and giving to the public will hurt their interests? Is that what is happening?

Can I ask which aspect looks very weak? We always value constructive feedback as we want Tratok to be as successful as possible for the benefit of everyone.
Without an ICO, the product is already funded and demo released seven months early and lead by a team of fortune 500 executives (I have not seen another team where more than 60% of those involved have actual experience creating billion dollar revenue streams or introducing new products to new markets e.g. the smart credit card). In addition to a growing community and strong B2B developments, I believe we are actually in a stronger position that many of the others.

Let's consider two scenarios:

A.) Party A has raised millions in public funds, had 90% of shareholder value disappear, has no product, no ability to progress, are undergoing investigations and has upset and let down a lot of people. This is 99.9% of the industry.
B.) Party B is a registered entity which has given every token in circulation away for Free, launched seven months early, is realizing increased participation and adoption and has a clearly defined plan that is constantly being meet ahead of schedule. This is Tratok Ltd and a few others.

Bias aside, I think in every single case, nobody with a neutral point of view would pick A over B.

Tratok has smashed through its milestones and is embarrassing the others who have sat idle because it is quite the opposite of weak. It is strong. All the experts who said it couldn't be done have gone silent on LinkedIn.

This is what happens when you have social events like airdrops and to ensure widespread distribution. Tratok Ltd does not take, it gives things away which I believe is a major contributor to growth, goodwill and support from the public. Such support has helped us launch our demo seven months ahead of schedule. However caution is correct, I had seen comments showing support from people who clearly did not take the time to read about the project. Such behaviour is harmful to the community and all projects.


Business partners are doing their final stages of onboarding, a product has been released seven months ahead of schedule and already gone through one thorough round of beta testing and user experience refinement.  

Hello Saydia. As of the time of writing this, there are over 670,000 words of information on the project including weekly updates, milestones, team information and legal information. This is without including the almost daily updates via social media and the press and hours of AV presentations available on the websites and Tratok Ltd's different web properties. Compared with the industry this is a wealth of information. However, I understand that with so much information, one can simply decide to not make an effort to read as they find themselves overwhelmed. This is a problem our team encounters with certain community members that do not care about the actual value of disruptive capability of use cases but simply only care about "when moon?!". As a project that hopes to change the way people travel, we are interested in those who actually understand the technology rather than those who simply wish to speculate and expect unreasonable returns.

Regarding the ICO, had you taken 5 minutes to read this thread of the website, you would have seen there was no ICO as well as the reasoning behind this approach and the extensive and expensive feasibility studies conducted by a leading bank, two tourism boards and four sector economists that made us take this approach. However, instead of making this effort, you simply decided to comment that the project has "scant information". You are entitled to your opinion, as everyone is, but I do encourage you to actually read into the project and asses the impact it can have.

Correct.

I believe you either have not taken the time to read into the project and its principles or are mistaking this thread for that of another project. Since there was no ICO and the project was entirely funded by the founders and delivered a working product seven months ahead of schedule, I am confused as to how you can label a project who actually wishes to use blockchain to address existing problems in the sector a "super scam for stupid investors".

In the first place, no investors have ever been sought after and the project was entirely privately funded. All tokens in circulation were airdropped for FREE to the public and inspection of the disclosed wallets on the block explorer can confirm this fact. You are entitled to your opinion which claims that the investors (who are only Tratok Ltd have been scammed) but I believe many will be puzzled by your conclusion.

With no investors aside from the founders, I'm sure many reading your comment are puzzled as to how and why a registered company would scam itself.

This is a great chance for those who believe in the real disruptive power of blockchain to actually promote a project that has delivered products and results over promises, without taking public funds via an ICO. You can easily help spread awareness of a useful blockchain project and get a hold of this already listed coin in the process for free.

Do not miss out!

Can one project with the ambitious goal of fixing the injustices and problems of the $7.6 trillion travel and tourism industry really make a difference? Tratok vows to make travel accessible for all and bring the world closer together. Find out how below and be a vital part of re-empowering key stakeholders.

https://tratok.com/how-does-tratok-dismantle-the-current-sector-and-build-a-better-ecosystem/

In line with Tratok’s 2019 vision for widespread adoption, our team is glad to launch the project’s largest public awareness campaign yet. Help us connect the world and be rewarded.

Click HERE to participate

Tratok's Goals for 2019

At Tratok, we like to be fully transparent and inform everyone supporting our project about our milestones, goals and ambitions. Despite our already ambitious roadmaps, the team has constantly found itself ahead of schedule and takes pride in pushing the limits and boundaries. We are delighted to be one of only a handful of non-ICO funded startups that has delivered a product and use cases which fixes problems and can benefit the world. This is what distinguishes Tratok Ltd from the thousands of embarrassments to the industry that thus far have only delivered empty promises.

Below, we present to the public our roadmap and goals for the year ahead. As always, we will do our best to continue to deliver over and beyond what is expected and go the extra mile at every opportunity. Thank you all for your support.

For those testing the prototype, please post issues encountered or features requested at the official repository, it makes it easier for the developers if everything is in one place:

https://github.com/TratokToken/smart-contracts/issues

Apologies, I did not see the original question. To clarify, every venue or service provider has their own cancellation policy (as is their right). Some declare a full refund policy, others a partial refund (e.g. charged the first night) and others zero refund policy. This behaviour is unlikely to change.

What Tratok can address is the time and cost efficiency of these refunds. For example, Booking.com may declare a policy of full refund on certain deals. However, once payment is made, should you ask for a refund it often takes more than 30 days to be "processed" and often significant portions of it get siphoned away in fees. This is quite frankly unacceptable given that with today's technology such delays and fees are not necessary. So yes for properties with a clearly marked full refund policy there will be an INSTANT (few seconds to a few minutes) refund for the full amount (minus the gas fee).

As you can imagine for bookings of a few hundred dollars or more, this is much more convenient than waiting for a month or more, especially for those who need access to their money.

The team is asking all of those with buy offers to be sensible before the beta goes from select testing to public availability on Monday. There are a number of reasons for this:

1.) We wish to water down the certain elements of the community that simply believe in only speculation and not the disruptive benefits of the technology. I.e. The "when moon" crowd who simply refuse to read anything and are simply more distracting than beneficial. These elements are a significant problem in the industry and the less of them holding Tratok, the better.

2.) Tratok holders have pushed the price from 20 to 160 in a bear market, and this is not good for the project before launch. While we appreciate your support given that the launch is seven months early, Tratok is intended for widespread adoption and we do not wish to price out the market.

The team could force your hand by simply releasing more tokens onto the market and control the price, but this is unethical and something we will not do. Instead, we ask that you let project progress and real values determine the market price and avoid pumping artificially.

The Tratok Team is delighted to announce that our Beta Platform has commenced testing by selected Tratok holders seven months ahead of schedule. In the very near future, the Beta shall be opened to the public to ensure widespread adoption and use by blockchain enthusiasts and backers of the real application of such disruptive technology. Until then the team would like to provide you with an update from our Project Custodian:


NO ICO, Full Transparency, Gain In A Bear Market? Why does Tratok Perform while others have failed?

Watch this space and as always, we would like to thank the community for its support.

The winners of Tratok's competition have been announced. Check to see if you were among them:

https://tratok.com/we-have-a-winner-the-results-of-tratok-ltds-competition-are-in/