Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 22,268 results by Vod
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Could AI Be the Next Threat to Bitcoin’s Decentralization?
by
Vod
on 29/05/2025, 21:01:11 UTC
The only threat but which bitcoin developers do not see as threat for now is quantum computing which is predicted to be able to reveal bitcoin private key from the public key.
That's weird, if quantum computing starts revealing bitcoin private key it might cause a big problem to crypto industry in general because a lot of people will lose their coins when their private keys get compromised from the public key. Bitcoin developers should swing into actions and proffer ways to stop this from happening in the future. Seems we will be needing more cyber security in the near future if at all we still need to maintain privacy

That quote is almost two months old; in the tech world he posted as a teenager and is now in old age...

There are two threats to crypto - one it created itself (AI) and the other I've been warning about for years.

Traditional computing, the kind AI uses, relies on bits that be on or off.  (Initial designs contemplated 10 phase bits to mimic base 10 but it was too complicated for the time).  Quantum computing relies on qubits that can be multiple values at once.  A Bitcoin private key is 256 bits - 1 or 0.   Theoretically, a 256 qubit com could crack a bitcoin private key in one try.  But Atom Computing's system has 1,180 qubits and the financial system still exists - because qubit noise requires error correction, and if you understand RAID, it means more space for the same information.   If we ever discover how to control quantum fluctuations (like we can control 100,000,000 degree plasma) then existing systems are already more than enough.

The US government has a plan to upgrade all systems to quantum proof by 2035.   HA!   I can search projections that say 10k years to 100-200 years to a couple years away - based on when they were written.  A recent article stated how the technology has been more effective than they expected.   

Further Reading:  Roughly a quarter of Bitcoin sits in older wallet formats that might be more vulnerable to quantum attacks.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Could AI Be the Next Threat to Bitcoin’s Decentralization?
by
Vod
on 29/05/2025, 16:47:30 UTC
AI is not only a threat to bitcoin's decentralization, but the entire crypto industry.  Not because it will invent a backdoor or crack the encryption, but by taking advantage of software and hardware flaws.

Zero day exploits have become common thanks to education and communication.    AI is superior in both - it just needs to be given a goal.    The bitcoin core is relatively bug free since thousands of eyes have reviewed it, but it also relies on outside libraries that may change, and runs on operating systems that may use custom RAID software to store data, etc.   Each minute change in any of these steps could be manipulated to produce an error in a way that upstream resources accept as valid, and boom - the AI can now access the private keys of any address that has ever used the blockchain stored on that corporate server running Windows 2025 Server on a HPE server with an octopus controller that has a zero day flaw.  (again, just an example)

This is not rocket science - anyone can do this if they have the time and programming knowledge to review every interaction with every connected device each time any driver changes.   AI can just do this faster, 24 hours a day, and without making mistakes.  (General LLM models make mistakes, custom models much less so).

I think someone in the world with AI skills would have interest in owning more bitcoin, so this is probably already being done.  The only thing stopping them from completing this goal right now would be all the proprietary data protected by modern encryption. 
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: JollyGood
by
Vod
on 28/05/2025, 21:34:39 UTC
I've never met a theif who admits to being one.

How long have you need here, monthsSmiley

Many thieves give themselves away after the crime has happened.  In fact, that's how the most serious cases (murder, rape, etc) get themselves caught.   The criminal brags about it, or they make conflicting statements, or they say something that can easily be proven untrue.  It's harder to detect in written form since the author has time to phrase his words and can look up past details, but if you are stupid enough and greedy enough you will eventually fuck yourself.

In this case, I think he's just a troll and FMC has the right idea - we should ignore these anonymous bozos by default, as they cannot hurt anyone.   Anxiety and stress come from judging other people who have entirely different morals than you do.    How much would you care if a person who believed the earth was flat called you an idiot?   Prob not much.
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: JollyGood
by
Vod
on 28/05/2025, 05:31:27 UTC
Careful OP - Free Market Capitalist may be trying to trick you...   Tongue
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Can a Country Work Without the Leaders Just Using Bitcoin and Code?
by
Vod
on 28/05/2025, 00:47:49 UTC
How would restrictions like driver's licenses work?   Will we vote to spend money on an organization to police us, or just trust everyone will do the correct thing?
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: OgNasty turns on Theymos (Update May 11, 2025)
by
Vod
on 27/05/2025, 20:55:30 UTC
If you've got solid evidence of wrongdoing and can do something about it, please go ahead and do it if only to get this monkey off your back.

OgNasty has provided conflicting accounts of his actions so until he submits his sworn defence statement we don't know exactly what crime he has committed.   Embezzlement?   Theft?   Fraud?   He claims to be in finance so he is probably calculating his least probable crime. 

One of the first hypocritical PMs I got from bozo:
I guess the difference is that I do what I feel is right regardless of how it may effect me, and you appear to be having your true opinions silenced out of fear. So forgive me if I take your criticisms with a grain of salt.

If you have any PMs from his alt "Rmcdermott927", take a new look now that you know who he is.  He negative trusted me by default then wanted me to explain to him what I did.   Grin

I’m not taking anyone’s side unconditionally.  You messaged me with no links and no proof and then expected me to read though days worth of babbling.

OK, was not aware of that, sorry.  I thought you knew what had happened last night.

The moderators have already removed all the proof.  But he is now calling me a self-admitted pedophile because I sent him that link when he was pretending to be my friend..   Undecided

I'd like to know what I can do to make you trust me just enough to turn your negative to a neutral in time.   It was six months ago, and Theymos does want forgiveness and peace...

I don’t know what the facts of the situation really are.  I also don’t care enough to read through weeks worth of back and forth banter.   So if you could lay out clearly what happened and how exactly OG doxxed you.  Also some proof of when you sent him that link, because I don’t see a date.

OgNasty escrowed several deals with his alt Rmcdermott927, just like Quickseller did.





Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: OgNasty turns on Theymos (Lastest contradiction: May 14, 2025)
by
Vod
on 27/05/2025, 02:25:45 UTC
Here are more versions of what happened with the forked coins.

So the stolen are the forked coins?

Nope. Those were sent to theymos too. Except the ones that were valueless and theymos didn’t want sent back, which are still sitting at the address because it isn’t worth my time to deal with.

How come are we now only hearing about this theft? Because that is alot of coins.

That’s because it didn’t happen. Anyone can look up the address and see that I sent the full 500 BTC back. If you look the address up on various block explorers you can see where I also sent the forked coins as requested. I wouldn’t have received positive trust from theymos had I mishandled the treasury funds.

EDIT: The address is public where I held the funds: 1Eog8UqRFLufC71rBLt2nYgfUDskgxAyVF

You can see below 500 BTC was received on 3/22/2013 and I sent 500 BTC to the new multi-sig treasury address on 5/25/2019.
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/1Eog8UqRFLufC71rBLt2nYgfUDskgxAyVF

So the bold part explains why Theymos recently stopped trusting OG - he keeps contradicting himself.  He seems anxious to want to hold Theymos responsible for something - hopefully he can figure out what that is.  :/
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: "I am Satoshi Nakamoto's son" scam
by
Vod
on 27/05/2025, 00:10:30 UTC
Aren't we all Satoshi's children?

That is a great observation.  Smiley    I'm Satoshi's legendary boob licking son! 

I doubt anyone will fall for that amount.   Ask for $3 and you will get 10,000 more victims. 
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Dates with Flags
by
Vod
on 26/05/2025, 21:12:36 UTC
If you read that wrong, it was intentional.  Smiley

I just noticed I have four inactive flags:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=30747;page=iflags
None of them have dates attached - should the reader assume the flag is made about the same time as the topic referenced?
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: No longer pursuing Epochtalk
by
Vod
on 26/05/2025, 01:10:13 UTC
As for the failure to provide a new forum, I think the gravity of the failure to produce an updated forum and the financial costs involved will probably be discussed for years.

Hopefully it will end with "After an investigation, Theymos was cleared of any wrong doing".  His ignoring the situation is not helping, and could lead to a criminal investigation. 
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Looking for new clients
by
Vod
on 26/05/2025, 00:23:14 UTC
Is this a good platform to find clients?

This is one of the best platforms to find clients.  Smiley

So many people are doing so, the competition is high.   You need to develop a free "feature" first to show how good you are.   

Of course if you don't want to remain anonymous, you could post any degrees or certifications you have.
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: [AI Search Engine] Bitcointalk
by
Vod
on 25/05/2025, 22:31:51 UTC
Is this project dead?  I did four searches, the last one for "bitcoin price".   All of them returned:
❌ No relevant content found.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: How can one achieve Alternative method of Dispute Resolution in our society?
by
Vod
on 24/05/2025, 20:57:27 UTC
It's so unfortunate that nowadays people no longer settle common issues amicably without seeing the Law court as their plan "B" .

It's quite sad.

OK - what would you do?  Someone repeatedly spreads lies about you and stops you from making any money online for years, as well as destroys a number of your family relationships.   Then, when you have the proof this person has been criminally fraudulent they suddenly ignore you and refuse to take any responsibility.

I am curious - how would you handle this without the Law court?
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Looking for signature rates over time
by
Vod
on 24/05/2025, 02:46:57 UTC
Wow - thx muchly guys.  Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Looking for signature rates over time
by
Vod
on 24/05/2025, 01:56:01 UTC
Hey Campaign Managers - this is for you!

I'm looking for any historical signature rates.  If you ran a campaign, or participated in one, I'd appreciate if you could list the month/year and how many BTC you were getting per post.  You can PM if you want privacy.  I want to compare it to historical traffic to see if a Bitcointalk signature might be a cost effective way to advertise my new service. 
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Developing projects with AI
by
Vod
on 22/05/2025, 21:11:23 UTC
This is just a style convention thing, not an error. But ChatGPT has the same problem... My guess is that for simple functions like this, LLMs pick up patterns from older codebases, and since many legacy projects used Hungarian notation, that is what DeepSeek or GPT will use. If, in your prompt, you explicitly specify something along the lines of "always follow Microsoft's C# guidelines", it will not make these types of mistakes.

If the AI is converting code from one language to another, it may use the style of either language unless you are explicit.

NameExampleWhere Used
camelCaseuserNameJS variables/functions, Java
PascalCaseUserNameClasses, React Components
snake_caseuser_namePython, Ruby, SQL
SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASEUSER_NAMEConstants, ENV vars
kebab-caseuser-nameURLs, CSS class names
Hungarian NotationstrUserNameOlder C/C++/VB code
StudlyCapsuSeRnAmEMemes, jokes, passwords
dot.notationuser.nameConfigs, object keys

* AI generated - I'm not going to take the time to format to BBCode.
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Developing projects with AI
by
Vod
on 22/05/2025, 02:44:12 UTC
I tried DeepSeek to design a simple video conversion program in C#. I gave it some instructions and it generated code in less than a minute. Unfortunately, it was full of errors. For example, it generated code in Visual Studio 2019, even though the latest version is Visual Studio 2019. The code was based on .NET Framework 4.7.2, even though the latest version is .NET Framework 9.

Is that an error, or are you able to fix it by specifying the versions you want it to use?   Since you use VS 2019 instead of 2022, maybe it assumed the older framework was appropriate?

I switched over to chatgpt last night, and I have hope it can repair the damage DS caused.   If not, I'll restart it with chatgpt, and have high hopes (again) I can finish it quickly.
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Developing projects with AI
by
Vod
on 21/05/2025, 01:56:25 UTC
Deepseek is absolute trash for coding. It keeps hallucinating faulty code and removing parts of code randomly. ChatGPT is far better (although it sometimes removes parts of your code for no reason as well).

I officially agree with you.  I'm going with a chatGPT subscription, not because DS is always busy, but exactly what you described.
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Request a new Defination for Merit Sources every 3 Month !
by
Vod
on 20/05/2025, 22:18:41 UTC
It's best if sources try to exhaust their source allocations, even if it means giving posts higher amounts than is typical. If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire.
I can't say I completely agree with theymos here, but I get the reasoning behind it. If all Merit sources would do this, the amount of Merit created each month would be equivalent to the total of all Merit sources.

I was overflowing with sMerit - over 1,000.  I decided to trust Theymos and do what he suggested.  He removed me as a source.  :/
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Satoshi appeared in my mirror - now I make Bitcoin memes with AI
by
Vod
on 19/05/2025, 22:12:09 UTC
Are you earning off these page views?  A lot of advertising on them.