Search content
Sort by

Showing 8 of 8 results by Vvaanniieell
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: PROPOSAL FOR NAIJA (NIGERIA LB) SUB-BOARDS CREATION
by
Vvaanniieell
on 08/11/2023, 07:56:37 UTC
    • To minimize spams: Since there is no local moderator at the moment, the child board will separate the trash, spamming and unrefined posts from the main board.

    I think it would be much more beneficial for you to ask for a local moderator. You have several very active members who, if they are ready to accept responsibility, should perhaps apply for local mod positions.
    Merit source applications to reward quality posts more are okay, but spam removal is perhaps more important for maintaining the forum. In the end, it will be easier for you to discuss if your board is spam-free.

    Indeed what you've said is true but getting a moderator isn't going to really solve this immediate problem. As much as spam removal is very important, everybody are allowed to express themselves, especially newbies who are inquisitive and looking forward to seeking and gaining more knowledge. Like the old saying that no knowledge is wasted, it is important for them to learn about every single information posted on the forum.

    But it would be more appropriate if these informations and posts are sorted in their adequate folders so people would have a particular direction to which they wish to aquire knowledge about Bitcoin or the forum.

    Creating Sub-Boards I believe would help cub this issue. And again, there's no doubt that the population of Nigerians in the board is increasing every single day and everyone would also wish to be actively participating on the Board, Hence the Congestion, if the Sub-Boards are not added and a moderator is only added in the picture, it would deprive everyone the privilege of actively participating the way they really want to.

    I'm not saying there's no need for a moderator, it's good to have a moderator to moderate the activities of the forum, but in my own opinion I believe the creation of the Sub-Boards would be more effective.[/list]
    Post
    Topic
    Board Nigeria (Naija)
    Re: In Meta: We Don Ask 2 Create Sub-Boards
    by
    Vvaanniieell
    on 08/11/2023, 07:36:31 UTC
    Me I still be new member for the forum, no be like new new member sha, I been don join the forum a long time ago but I forget my log in details so I no fit access the account again, na e make open new account.

    As I come join this our Naija Board, e sweet me to see the progress wey una don make and honestly e dey sweet me for body to dey here. I appreciate all the effort una don put to promote and carry ourself along, e only show say we get love fr ourselves. Una don try. Me personally go put mouth for the Sub-Board and throw my own contribution to ensure say me too I support in any small way wey me I go fit.

    Once again una well done.
    Post
    Topic
    Board Reputation
    Re: AI Spam Report Reference Thread
    by
    Vvaanniieell
    on 08/11/2023, 07:03:48 UTC
    "I apologize for the confusion", where have I heard this phrase? Right the same apologetic idiot we call AI uses such phrases all the time. I don't know how these things go usually, I'm not the type to report such things, but this one is worthy.
    https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5473275.msg63122253#msg63122253

    AIs where designed and programmed by humans, so if eventually AIs are found using same context or terminological phrases as humans, does that suppose that the context was AI generated?
    I suppose note.

    Before going ahead to make reports I advice you thoroughly make your investigations and not just handpicking phrases and Automatically assuming the whole context was AI generated.

    You should actually be reported as well for false accusations and claims.
    Post
    Topic
    Board Bitcoin Discussion
    Re: Flow (FLOW) Launches on HotsCoin: Exploring a Scalable and Innovative Blockchain
    by
    Vvaanniieell
    on 08/11/2023, 06:19:40 UTC
    On November 8, Flow (FLOW) was officially listed on HotsCoin. Flow is a fast, decentralized, and developer-friendly blockchain aimed at providing the foundation for the next generation of games, applications, and digital assets. Flow's unique multi-role architecture allows for scalability without the need for sharding while maintaining developer-friendliness and adhering to an ACID-compliant environment. Flow is currently available for trading on HotsCoin.

    https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeF8jB61rdeBq34yyDiesQrZM1L8u87Mj8bB35NrVACB2/%E6%96%B0%E5%B8%81%E4%B8%8A%E7%BA%BF%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%874.jpg

    HotsCoin takes note of the following token information for Flow:
    - Circulating Supply: 1,036,200,000 FLOW
    - Total Supply: 1,463,365,667.942 FLOW
    - Circulating Market Cap: $631,231,053.654
    - Fully Diluted Market Cap: $891,451,314.86

    Key Events for Flow on HotsCoin:
    - May 10, 2022: Flow launched a $725 million ecosystem fund.
    - October 10, 2020: Flow completed an $18 million public funding round.

    Product Technology:

    HotsCoin highlights two notable features of Flow's technical architecture:
    1. Multi-Node Architecture: Flow's multi-node architecture divides various execution steps of the blockchain into different roles, including compute nodes, consensus nodes, verification nodes, and collection nodes. This division of labor enhances decentralization, allowing more nodes to participate in consensus, but it still faces some centralization concerns.
    2. Resource-Oriented Programming: Flow uses its in-house programming language, Cadence, which supports resource-oriented programming, making asset control more secure and better meeting the requirements of on-chain assets.

    Operational Ecosystem for Flow:

    The Flow ecosystem encompasses a variety of projects, including NFTs, DeFi, and gaming. However, NFT projects tied to sports IPs like NBA Top Shot dominate the ecosystem, accounting for a significant portion of Flow's transaction volume. While gaming and DeFi projects exist within the Flow ecosystem, their transaction volumes are relatively smaller and require further expansion.

    Token Economy for Flow:

    Flow's token, FLOW, is used to pay for on-chain transaction fees, incentivize nodes, and can be staked for storage space. The token was issued at the end of 2020 with an initial supply of 1.25 billion, using a low inflation model. Currently, approximately 72% of FLOW is in circulation.

    Flow's Team and Funding:

    Dapper Labs, the company behind Flow, was founded in 2018 and gained recognition with the CryptoKitties project before launching the Flow blockchain. The company has completed multiple funding rounds, raising a total of $6 billion. Investors include a16z, Union Square Ventures, Venrock, and Coatue.

    Strengths and Challenges for Flow:

    Flow's strengths lie in its technical innovation, a track record of successful NFT projects, and a solid foundation. However, it still faces challenges related to ecosystem diversity and heavy reliance on a few NFT projects for revenue.

    In Summary:

    Flow is a blockchain with scalability and innovation, aiming to support the next generation of applications and digital assets. While it has achieved significant success in the NFT space, it needs to expand its ecosystem and reduce its revenue dependence for broader success. The company's technical innovation and continuous experience with NFT projects will be a strong support for Flow's success.

    HotsCoin will continue to monitor the project's ecosystem. (Report written on November 2023) Please note that the information in this report is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice. Before investing, it is essential to thoroughly understand the project and its associated risks and, if necessary, seek professional advice.

    While I don't have access to much information about this project, I can provide some general insights on the potential risks involved with projects like Flow. It's important to note that these risks can vary and are not specific to Flow without further analysis. Here are some common risks associated with blockchain projects:

    1. Market Volatility: The cryptocurrency market can be highly volatile, which means the value of tokens like FLOW can experience significant fluctuations. This volatility can affect the overall market cap and investor sentiment.

    2. Regulatory Uncertainty: The regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology is still evolving in many jurisdictions. Regulatory changes or actions could impact the project's operations, token utility, or legal compliance.

    3. Technological Risks: Blockchain technology is complex, and there can be risks associated with security vulnerabilities, consensus mechanisms, or scalability limitations. Projects need to address these risks to ensure the stability and robustness of their platform.

    4. Competition: The blockchain space is highly competitive, with numerous projects vying for market share and attention. Flow would need to differentiate itself and continually innovate to stay ahead of the competition.

    5. Adoption and Network Effects: The success of blockchain projects often relies on widespread adoption. Flow would need to attract developers, users, and businesses to build on its platform and create network effects necessary for sustained growth.

    6. Ecosystem Expansion: Flow's success relies on expanding its ecosystem beyond the NFT space. This expansion may require strategic partnerships, developer support, and attracting a diverse range of projects to the platform.

    7. Tokenomics and Governance: The design and implementation of a project's tokenomics and governance models are crucial for its long-term viability. Ensuring fair distribution, effective governance, and proper token utility are essential considerations.

    It's important to conduct thorough research and analysis, including reviewing project documentation, team credentials, partnerships, and market trends, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the risks specific to Flow.
    Post
    Topic
    Board Bitcoin Discussion
    Re: Time to roll-back Ordinals?
    by
    Vvaanniieell
    on 08/11/2023, 01:07:57 UTC
    Regarding the current situation, it's important to note that the block size of Bitcoin is actually limited to 1MB, not 4MB. However, the implementation of SegWit allows for more transaction capacity by separating some of the transaction data. This has helped alleviate some congestion on the network.
    I thought this stood true:
    Quote
    A 300-byte transaction is 300 bytes on-disk and over-the-wire. Segwit just counts those bytes differently toward the maximum block size of 4M weight units.
    If not, someone would have to correct the bitcoin wiki itself here:
    https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weight_units#Misconceptions

    I apologize for the confusion. You are correct that the maximum block size in terms of weight units is close to 4MB. While the maximum block size on-disk and over-the-wire can be almost 4MB, this size is rarely reached in practice.

    The actual size of a block can vary depending on the number and format of the transactions included in it. If the block contains a large number of small, simple transactions, the block size will be smaller. On the other hand, if the block contains complex transactions with many inputs and outputs, the block size will be larger.

    It's important to note that the Bitcoin network has a block size limit to ensure the stability and security of the blockchain. This limit helps prevent spam transactions and ensures that blocks can be propagated and validated by the network efficiently.

    The block size debate in the Bitcoin community has revolved around finding the right balance between scalability and decentralization. Increasing the block size too much could lead to centralization concerns, while keeping it too small could limit the number of transactions the network can handle.

    Overall, the actual size of a block will depend on the specific transactions included within it, and the block size limit is a critical factor in maintaining the functionality and security of the Bitcoin network.
    Post
    Topic
    Board Bitcoin Discussion
    Re: Time to roll-back Ordinals?
    by
    Vvaanniieell
    on 08/11/2023, 00:48:27 UTC
    You can not roll back the Bitcoin blockchain and if Bitcoin community do this, Bitcoin blockchain will no longer be considered as better than Ethereum blockchain or many shit coin blockchains.

    Each mining pools, nodes can have their settings to exclude transactions from Ordinals but if they want to do it. Miners get benefit from more expensive transaction fee, higher fee rate because they confirm transactions and get transaction fees.

    Reason to roll back the Bitcoin blockchain?
    It does not make sense because a Bitcoin block includes many transactions and transactions for Ordinals, BRC20 tokens are one of many in a block.

    You're correct that the Bitcoin blockchain cannot be rolled back, as it operates on a principle of immutability. Rolling back the blockchain would undermine the trust and integrity of the network.

    In terms of addressing the congestion caused by ORDI transactions, it is indeed possible for mining pools and individual nodes to implement settings that exclude or prioritize certain transactions. This can be done to mitigate the impact of ORDI on the network and prioritize other transactions.
    Post
    Topic
    Board Bitcoin Discussion
    Re: Time to roll-back Ordinals?
    by
    Vvaanniieell
    on 08/11/2023, 00:38:26 UTC
    Currently as we speak, bitcoin's blockchain is clogged by transactions because ORDI a shitcoin related to so called "inscriptions" creating NFT like things on-chain for bitcoin.

    Are we to forget how the blocksize wars took place circa 2015 because some developers thought everything above 1MB for blocks was too much decentralization? Bitcoin lost many developers and fans due to this debacle and was set back quite a bit. We now have 4MB blocks with SegWit and a literal shitcoin riding on-chain and clogging our blocks.

    This trash being inscribed on chain is going to be worthless tokens in just a few months. I can't fathom that we're standing idly by watching this all unfold. Please let's all agree that it's time to end ordinals.

    I have totally agree with you, from the onset I've always believed that ORDI was/is a total trash.

    Ending this so called shitcoin would be for the best of the chain
    Post
    Topic
    Board Bitcoin Discussion
    Re: How do you cope with those around you not believing in you for choosing Bitcoin?
    by
    Vvaanniieell
    on 07/11/2023, 22:58:44 UTC
    Pretty much self explanatory.  How do you do it?

    Here is my way.  I mostly pushed away and pulled out of relationships with people who seem to stand against my beliefs.  Instead of convincing them I just moved on.  I found that a lot of those who do not believe in my choice of investment and think I will fail are the same people who never listen.  Know it alls who rather put you down and disregard your feelings with no logical reasoning.  Sometimes it feels like they envy you or some thing.

    I believe this is a healthy way of handling your environment.  Keep negativity outside your bubble.  Only keep close to you people who give you the ambition and optimism to continue.  Not sure how many of you believe in this.  But manifesting negativity has always brought negative outcome in my life.  Surrounding myself by positive thoughts and positive people has brought a strong source of light all the time.

    I completely agree with you, investing in Bitcoin is a choice everyone should make for themselves and not having another person making the choice for you or forcing you into it.

    I can only tell you about Bitcoin and show you the benefits you stand to gain by investing in it but then the choice is still entirely yours, so if you don't see the vision like I do then I'll push no further and leave you to what you believe in. No hard feelings.