Search content
Sort by
Showing 19 of 19 results by Wetfinex
Re: Are Retail Investors Still Interested in Crypto — or Have We Lost Them?
Although I do not have exact statistics, I am sure that retail investors continue to buy Bitcoin. Another thing is that not all people on planet Earth have realized the fundamental value of Bitcoin.
Meanwhile, the modern financial system is currently undergoing a transformation. Some countries are forcing the creation of central bank digital currencies (CBDC), while other countries are giving the green light to centralized stablecoins (which are very similar in their properties to CBDC). In other words, a digital concentration camp is being built all over the world, censorship is being introduced, financial and information flows are being controlled.
In these conditions, Bitcoin is acquiring the role of financial instruments of freedom and independence of people. And every person who realizes this is now buying Bitcoin.
Therefore, I am sure that the number of retail investors has not decreased, but of course, such institutional investors as Michael Saylor are more loud, pompous and noticeable.
Overall, I agree with the idea that Bitcoin is now a symbol of financial freedom a kind of digital "exit from the system". But at the same time, we shouldn’t overestimate the awareness of the general public. Yes, part of the retail crowd understands this and actively buys BTC. But the majority are still on the sidelines either out of fear of losing money.Meanwhile, the modern financial system is currently undergoing a transformation. Some countries are forcing the creation of central bank digital currencies (CBDC), while other countries are giving the green light to centralized stablecoins (which are very similar in their properties to CBDC). In other words, a digital concentration camp is being built all over the world, censorship is being introduced, financial and information flows are being controlled.
In these conditions, Bitcoin is acquiring the role of financial instruments of freedom and independence of people. And every person who realizes this is now buying Bitcoin.
Therefore, I am sure that the number of retail investors has not decreased, but of course, such institutional investors as Michael Saylor are more loud, pompous and noticeable.
Another point: even if someone believes in BTC as "freedom gold", it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re actively buying right now maybe they’re just holding. Mass retail participation usually comes with something emotional and visible: a parabolic price rally, new memes, or some revolutionary app. Without that kind of trigger, even the more conscious investors tend to stay passive.
So I’d say retail is still here, just quiet. And to ignite the next wave, we’ll need a real catalyst - not just the idea of freedom.
For these retail investors, Bitcoin is “too expensive”. There is a belief among these investors that the era of popularity of the first cryptocurrency has already passed, that the price of Bitcoin is now so high that it has no growth potential. Of course, this is not true.
When these people are faced with the freezing of their own funds in bank accounts, when they understand that CBDC allows governments to fully control the daily financial behavior of citizens, they will love Bitcoin...
If we talk about the hype and excitement that accompanied the bull markets in the past, they will probably repeat themselves, but much later.
And this will mean the beginning of a bear market, because soon such retail investors (hamsters) will start to panic and sell all recently purchased Bitcoins at a price below the selling price.
Re: Has this concept changed? " Invest how much you can afford to lose"
This rule is golden, it will never change or fade. What can change is the attitude of people towards it, that is where the misrepresentation comes from. Naturally, most people will not obey it for one reason or the other. The rule has guided investors for centuries, it is the best. Our level of discipline is in test whenever we invest, most investors will fail this test. Emotion is the cause, it can't be deliberate to see fire and enter it, that is the way I see it. Desperation makes us risk what we can't afford to lose and regret has been the consequence for most.
About Michael Saylor, he must be joking, he has too many to manage and understand the game than most investors.
Risk has always been a part of investing, and the “golden rule” doesn’t always apply. But when you're the CEO of a public company making a strategic decision to allocate reserves into BTC, it's no longer about personal emotion - it's about a different kind of responsibility and risk profile. Saylor isn't saying “go all-in,” but rather challenging the old paradigm: if Bitcoin is the future of money, isn't it riskier to stay in fiat?About Michael Saylor, he must be joking, he has too many to manage and understand the game than most investors.
Re: Are Retail Investors Still Interested in Crypto — or Have We Lost Them?
Although I do not have exact statistics, I am sure that retail investors continue to buy Bitcoin. Another thing is that not all people on planet Earth have realized the fundamental value of Bitcoin.
Meanwhile, the modern financial system is currently undergoing a transformation. Some countries are forcing the creation of central bank digital currencies (CBDC), while other countries are giving the green light to centralized stablecoins (which are very similar in their properties to CBDC). In other words, a digital concentration camp is being built all over the world, censorship is being introduced, financial and information flows are being controlled.
In these conditions, Bitcoin is acquiring the role of financial instruments of freedom and independence of people. And every person who realizes this is now buying Bitcoin.
Therefore, I am sure that the number of retail investors has not decreased, but of course, such institutional investors as Michael Saylor are more loud, pompous and noticeable.
Overall, I agree with the idea that Bitcoin is now a symbol of financial freedom a kind of digital "exit from the system". But at the same time, we shouldn’t overestimate the awareness of the general public. Yes, part of the retail crowd understands this and actively buys BTC. But the majority are still on the sidelines either out of fear of losing money.Meanwhile, the modern financial system is currently undergoing a transformation. Some countries are forcing the creation of central bank digital currencies (CBDC), while other countries are giving the green light to centralized stablecoins (which are very similar in their properties to CBDC). In other words, a digital concentration camp is being built all over the world, censorship is being introduced, financial and information flows are being controlled.
In these conditions, Bitcoin is acquiring the role of financial instruments of freedom and independence of people. And every person who realizes this is now buying Bitcoin.
Therefore, I am sure that the number of retail investors has not decreased, but of course, such institutional investors as Michael Saylor are more loud, pompous and noticeable.
Another point: even if someone believes in BTC as "freedom gold", it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re actively buying right now maybe they’re just holding. Mass retail participation usually comes with something emotional and visible: a parabolic price rally, new memes, or some revolutionary app. Without that kind of trigger, even the more conscious investors tend to stay passive.
So I’d say retail is still here, just quiet. And to ignite the next wave, we’ll need a real catalyst - not just the idea of freedom.
Honestly, I doubt that Bitcoin is ready to overtake Apple just yet. Companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia are going through a tough period - revenues are declining due to inflation, supply chain issues, and more. But they still have real products, billions of users, and strong infrastructure. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is currently surging without any clear new use case mostly driven by speculation and expectations. Right now, it looks more like a store of value than something that truly replaces traditional financial systems.
A price of $152–165K isn’t just a "small step up" it would require trillions of dollars flowing into the market. So achieving that within 6–12 months seems overly optimistic.
Yes, it would be overly optimistic to believe bitcoin will surpass the capitalization of leading technology corporations like Apple, Nvidia to become the world's second largest asset in the next 6 to 12 months. But I think Bitcoin will surpass all of them and take the number 2 spot is almost certain, it's just a matter of time and it might take longer than people think.
Although bitcoin is still considered a speculative asset at this point, it is no coincidence that it is compared to gold or is referred to by many experts as digital gold. That shows its potential is huge. People are not wrong in expecting bitcoin to have the potential to surpass gold, but the mistake they make is being overly optimistic in thinking, it will happen in the next few years.
But the reality is usually more complex. Market growth depends not only on math but also on fundamental factors: technological development, mass acceptance, external economic conditions and many others. It’s important to remember that past growth rates do not guarantee future ones, especially when we’re talking about huge amounts - trillions of dollars that need to flow in to surpass Apple or Nvidia.
That said, it’s hard to deny that someday we might still overtake them.
I haven't used bitcoin to purchase anything,and I would like to purchase goods with bitcoin some day.I prefer using fiat to purchase things both physical and online because I wouldn't want to tamper on my holding.Though the main purpose of bitcoin is to purchase goods online and prevent double spending,but now it's more of a store of value than a payment method.The only reason that can make me purchase something online with bitcoin is when there's no fiat in the payment option otherwise I prefer payment with fiat then
my bitcoin for investment purpose.Outside the internet,many countries are restricted from transacting bitcoin in public,so that also be among the factors why Bitcoin isn't used as a payment method.
Holding Bitcoin as an investment does feel safer for many people, especially with its price volatility. But actually, Bitcoin’s original design as a peer-to-peer digital cash system aimed to enable exactly what you mentioned: buying goods and services without intermediaries or censorship.my bitcoin for investment purpose.Outside the internet,many countries are restricted from transacting bitcoin in public,so that also be among the factors why Bitcoin isn't used as a payment method.
While it’s true that many countries restrict Bitcoin payments publicly, there are growing solutions that make transactions faster, cheaper, and more practical for everyday use.
Using Bitcoin as a payment method doesn’t mean you have to spend all of it. You can split your holdings between investments and everyday spending. It’s more about choice and financial freedom. Also, when fiat options aren’t available or are unreliable, Bitcoin can be a real game-changer for payments. For example like in countries with unstable currencies.
So, while holding Bitcoin as a store of value is smart, don’t underestimate its potential to become a widely used currency again. We might be closer to that than it seems.
On the other hand, it’s strange that the IMF demonizes BTC so aggressively, while other assets like gold don’t cause such a reaction. If a country wants to hold part of its reserves in BTC that’s also a form of diversification. Especially considering that many countries have lost trust in the dollar as the sole reserve asset.
Maybe it’s not just about economics, but also geopolitics? Because Bitcoin is something that isn’t controlled by traditional institutions, and that scares them.
Simply because that is not the goal of IMF. IMF’s purpose is to try to provide aid to countries that needs it the most and to help them with their economic growth where possible. Bitcoin, or any other form of investments, ie. precious metals are not meant to simulate economic growth in the long term.Maybe it’s not just about economics, but also geopolitics? Because Bitcoin is something that isn’t controlled by traditional institutions, and that scares them.
If you require aids and loans, you have better priorities than to be stacking sats. Don’t act like the victim when you’re called out for it. Of course, there are no issues when developed countries like the US proposes it.
And yes, aid is important, but can’t we also think about long-term sustainability? To me, this isn’t just about “stacking sats,” it’s a strategic choice. Time will tell.
What was recently seen as a threat is now being viewed as a strategic asset. This reflects not just a policy shift, but a deeper change in thinking at the national level. If Pakistan is making this pivot, it could truly encourage other countries to reassess their stance so they don’t fall behind in the financial race of the future.
A paradigm shift is happening regarding the perception of Bitcoin by countries, I believe that with time other countries will emulate Pakistan, America, and others for strategic reserves. It started with individuals, nobody gave Bitcoin a chance when it was first created but it proved it's potentials and people started to hodl it, then came institutions and now countries. This shows that the value and price of Bitcoin will increase tremendously in the future and this is an opportunity for retail, institutions and countries to fill their bags.I have, many things, and it was a great ease for me because for some reason, but if we could do something like this then we should be making a better related focus on this if we do what we know. It's not going to be getting a great result, then we are going to be a lot better if we could just focus on spending it, not many people could focus on that. Please realize that bitcoin payments are simpler so we should definitely get a better deal out of this and not that many problems all together.
If we do that then we are going to get the results we wanted and not going to mean much all to us. We are using it as asset right now, but if we could make it more like currency then we are going to see the prices change and be better.
It’s true that many people still see Bitcoin only as an investment asset, but don’t use it as a full-fledged currency for payments. If more people start actively spending bitcoins instead of just holding them, it could really have a positive impact on adoption and price stability. It’s also true that Bitcoin payments are often simpler and faster, especially with the development of new technologies.If we do that then we are going to get the results we wanted and not going to mean much all to us. We are using it as asset right now, but if we could make it more like currency then we are going to see the prices change and be better.
A lot of Bitcoiners actually don't understand what's going on and paints IMF in a bad light. Now, El Salvador needs loans from IMF and that is the core issue. They have the rights to dictate what the country should do with the funds. It's perfectly normal for them to be able to dictate what should be done with the money and what shouldn't.
Primarily, IMF's goal is to help countries through financial aids and loans. To do so, the country themselves must be able to implement sound policy to achieve long-term and sustainable growth. Agree to the terms if you want their aid, if you don't want to agree to theirs, then there is no good reason why you should kick up a fuss when they refuse to commit to the loans.
That’s a logical point of view, and indeed if a country asks for financial aid, it should be ready to follow the conditions set by the lender. The IMF is not a charity organization, and they want to make sure the money isn’t simply "burned," but goes towards reforms and stabilization.Primarily, IMF's goal is to help countries through financial aids and loans. To do so, the country themselves must be able to implement sound policy to achieve long-term and sustainable growth. Agree to the terms if you want their aid, if you don't want to agree to theirs, then there is no good reason why you should kick up a fuss when they refuse to commit to the loans.
On the other hand, it’s strange that the IMF demonizes BTC so aggressively, while other assets like gold don’t cause such a reaction. If a country wants to hold part of its reserves in BTC that’s also a form of diversification. Especially considering that many countries have lost trust in the dollar as the sole reserve asset.
Maybe it’s not just about economics, but also geopolitics? Because Bitcoin is something that isn’t controlled by traditional institutions, and that scares them.
What was recently seen as a threat is now being viewed as a strategic asset. This reflects not just a policy shift, but a deeper change in thinking at the national level. If Pakistan is making this pivot, it could truly encourage other countries to reassess their stance so they don’t fall behind in the financial race of the future.
Bitcoin could overtake Apple’s $3T market cap in 6-12 months if its current rally continues, needing a price around $152K-$165K. This would boost crypto adoption, shake tech stock confidence, and likely trigger stricter regulations. Markets could see increased volatility as investors shift toward decentralized assets.[](https://www.banklesstimes.com/articles/2025/05/19/bitcoin-market-cap-flipped-google-can-it-flip-apple-microsoft-nvidia/)[](https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/can-crypto-market-caps-outshine-apple-or-amazon/)
Honestly, I doubt that Bitcoin is ready to overtake Apple just yet. Companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia are going through a tough period - revenues are declining due to inflation, supply chain issues, and more. But they still have real products, billions of users, and strong infrastructure. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is currently surging without any clear new use case mostly driven by speculation and expectations. Right now, it looks more like a store of value than something that truly replaces traditional financial systems.A price of $152–165K isn’t just a "small step up" it would require trillions of dollars flowing into the market. So achieving that within 6–12 months seems overly optimistic.
IMF says “stop buying crypto” and El Salvador buys 8 more BTC.
At this point, the so-called “guidance” from global institutions often feels more like pressure than support. What El Salvador is doing might seem radical to some, but it’s also a bold step toward self-determination.If their Bitcoin strategy pays off, especially in the long term, it could trigger a kind of domino effect where more nations start questioning not just IMF influence, but the whole traditional financial dependency model.
Sometimes real progress starts with doing what everyone says not to do.
Indeed. Only a large influx of capital will help drive Bitcoin all the way to $1m. With institutional investment companies buying BTC like crazy (BlackRock, Strategy), achieving said goal becomes a no-brainer. Bitcoin might get there faster than we've thought. Maybe our dreams will come true 5 years from now? Only time will tell. Current market prices would be considered a bargain if that happens. I'd expect another bear market before BTC reaches $1m. Just keep buying and don't sell no matter what. 
Yes, you're absolutely right - without massive institutional capital, BTC won’t reach $1 million on its own. But what's interesting is that growth might not be linear, it could follow a geometric progression. If, for example, every additional $100k brings in even more investors and companies, the growth could start accelerating by itself. So at first, it's a slow climb, but then the snowball effect kicks in. And at that point, numbers that seem like fantasy today could just become a matter of time. I view $USD1 with a certain level of caution. First, any stablecoin that claims to be “fiat-backed” but doesn’t provide clear and transparent information about its reserves is already a risk. Second, the association with a political figure like Trump automatically brings additional risks from regulatory pressure to reputational instability. We’ve already seen similar “hyped” initiatives launch with big promises and end either in collapse or legal trouble.
Honestly, this is a bit off-topic. If it’s a service for BTC, it belongs either in the services section or in a separate thread with a full description. This section is more about discussing altcoins, not promoting third-party platforms.
Re: Is This A Good Idea? New Bitcoin Pricing Model - Pricing In Sats
It's a very dumb idea. There is zero reason to change the naming for Bitcoin units. It would only confuse people and have zero upside. It would purely be a negative thing.
I think the idea of pricing Bitcoin in satoshis actually has some potential, maybe not right now, but in the near future. The high price of 1 BTC can be intimidating for new users, and switching to satoshis makes Bitcoin feel more accessible. It's similar to how we use cents instead of dollars—it makes it easier for people to understand and think about owning a fraction of Bitcoin. It’s not about changing Bitcoin, just making it more relatable. With the right education, this could encourage more people to get involved and benefit the overall ecosystem.
Re: Is AI going to affect the popularity of bitcoin in any way ?
Artificial intelligence can affect Bitcoin’s popularity both positively and negatively. On one hand, AI can improve network security, automate trading, and enhance market analysis, making investing more accessible and profitable. On the other hand, AI development might lead to new digital currencies or alternatives that compete with Bitcoin. Overall, AI will definitely change the crypto industry, but how much depends on how these technologies are used.
10 or 20 years from now, when bitcoin's market cap equals or surpasses the gold's market cap, we will look back and think how lucky the people who bought bitcoin when it was under $1,000,000.
The time will also come where we will not talk about buying bitcoin, but instead buying satoshis.
The time will also come where we will not talk about buying bitcoin, but instead buying satoshis.
I completely agree with you! That’s exactly how it is — over time, buying even a small fraction of a bitcoin will be seen as a very profitable investment. The price already forces us to look at satoshis rather than whole bitcoins. Patience and a long-term strategy are the keys to success in this space.
💼 Wetfinex — your key to secure and flexible OTC transactions
Wetfinex- more than just a cryptocurrency exchange
Your trusted partner in the world of digital finance
In today's world, the speed and accuracy of financial transactions are crucial.
Wetfinex offers more than just crypto exchange — we create conditions for reliable and convenient
OTC deals starting from €30,000, tailored to your schedule and business processes.
Personalized approach – we understand that every client is unique
Transparency and security – your comfort and confidence are our priorities
Flexible solutions – we adapt to your goals and workflow
For partnership inquiries:
@sup_wetfinex – Support
https://t.me/+oM6kNs6mTH8wMjZi – Channel
wetfinex.com – Website
support@wetfinex.com – Email
Your trusted partner in the world of digital finance
In today's world, the speed and accuracy of financial transactions are crucial.
Wetfinex offers more than just crypto exchange — we create conditions for reliable and convenient
OTC deals starting from €30,000, tailored to your schedule and business processes.
Personalized approach – we understand that every client is unique
Transparency and security – your comfort and confidence are our priorities
Flexible solutions – we adapt to your goals and workflow
For partnership inquiries:
@sup_wetfinex – Support
https://t.me/+oM6kNs6mTH8wMjZi – Channel
wetfinex.com – Website
support@wetfinex.com – Email