#PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION
Forum Username: Zamoh
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1930413
Telegram Username : @lisenkovich
Participated Campaigns: Twitter campaign
BSC Wallet : 0xe10ef28057c2DDAcdd1Bf5da09da9d6F30c617c1

#PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION
Forum Username: Zamoh
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1930413
Telegram Username : @lisenkovich
Participated Campaigns: Content campaign
BEP-20 Wallet : 0xe10ef28057c2DDAcdd1Bf5da09da9d6F30c617c1

I think that a huge number of newbies will suffer greatly from such actions.

So if any of the fanatics read this post, think about it) The main thing to remember is that greed is bad.

The most obvious is marketing. Technically, they are very close (at least in my opinion of the delitant), it's just a matter of marketing. For some reason I am convinced that this is the main reason. I don’t think that anyone will be able to surpass the other.

I sincerely hope that Ethereum can no longer be saved and it is doomed. I really want to believe it. I am simply infuriated by the cost of the fees for the transaction, it is ten times more than in competitors.Or even more... 

How do you imagine the mechanism of making money in the game? Who should pay you for what you play, developers? Or, along the way, with the installation of the game, install the miner and make a pool for mining bitcoin and other coins?

I am still quite conservative in my opinion and consider nft-games to be complete nonsense. And I don't know yet which of the big game development companies decided to create a product on the blockchain. Can you name at least one?

Well, judging by the growth dynamics, for some reason I am sure that we should see about $ 500, this is all fortune telling on the coffee grounds, of course. But now I own a very small amount and for myself I decided that below $ 350 for 1 coin, I definitely will not sell. If I lose everything, then it should be so.
Disclaimer: My belief is not supported by any facts or upcoming news or anything else, I am based purely on intuition.

For some reason I am 100% sure that this is a fake. I think that all this hype around NFT games is another blowing up bubble. And a fairly large number of financiers agree with my opinion, so I think that a large company (which is definitely Ubisoft) is unlikely to get involved in outright fraud and the "pyramid". At least I want to believe it.
All NFT fans won't like my point of view, but I don't care.

Finally, I found a topic where I can vent my anger. The cost of fees on the network is simply not adequate, even if it takes from 6 to 12 dollars to carry out an Ethereum transaction - this is still a lot, but bearable. But if we are talking about transferring tokens to ERC-20, the fees are 40-70 dollars, I'm sorry, but this is not normal. This is the height of stupidity... Obviously, now a huge number of users and developers have moved to BSC. I understand them and sincerely hope that in the next couple of months I will be able to completely end my relationship with the Ethereum network.
For me, Ethereum is a turned page of history, the speed of transactions and transaction fees are no longer a competitor, and this was the most important thing in this network.

Have you worked with the Ethereum network for the last half year - a year? Have you seen the cost of the commission? Can you name projects on the ERC20 that are successful and were built in the last half of the year?
I can confidently say that the bsc network has already bypassed the Ethereum network. For one simple reason - it is much more profitable and faster.

I don’t know why everyone writes about Solana, about Polygon - it’s not competitive at all and cannot be a competitor. The obvious is the fact that BSC has replaced Ethereum. It seemed to me obvious and there could no longer be any disputes, but no .. it turns out that this is not obvious to everyone.

---

It is worth pointing out that I am not a fan of BSC.

To be honest, I think the last 5 posts might find something interesting for themselves. All projects are actually useless, a project for verifying a cryptocurrency, nft games, all this is actually nonsense and no one needs it. No scam will go through verification, and an honest project also has nothing to waste time on this. Attempts to turn computer games into a means of monetization, or to conclude some kind of unique game elements are also super stupid. Manufacturability and innovation, unfortunately, do not matter in the market. Only marketing is important, the idea is not as important as the way the idea is presented. This is a bad conclusion, but unfortunately it is reality. Sorry Satoshi, we f*cked it all up.

---

Returning to the main question of the topic:
Is it worth investing in young projects? - Of course you need to, but you need to approach this issue wisely. Is it worth investing in CheckDot - I would not recommend it. But everyone has their own head on their shoulders

Since you cannot just go and register with a major exchange, this is a very long and complicated procedure. Again, large exchanges place high demands on potential clients. And not every young project can meet these requirements. Therefore, the key to success is still the company's ambitions.

By the way, it is listing on large exchanges that weeds out weak projects, because if a company cannot enter a large exchange for a long time, this inevitably leads to the death of the company.

P.S. For some reason it seems to me that you were wrong with the topic  

Fortunately, I had enough reason not to go into this and not even look in his direction)

To each his own. Unfortunately for my wallet, such coins turn me off.

Maybe that's why I'm not fabulously rich, but such coins upset me and I basically don't want to participate in this kind of circus.

Week 3: 25/11 - 01/12

Twitter Profile Link: https://twitter.com/lisenkovichalex
Tweet:
1. https://twitter.com/lisenkovichalex/status/1465263911775711236
2.
3.
Retweet:
1. https://twitter.com/catena_x/status/1464999030803648517
2.
3.

It's a pity that my past message was deleted. It seems not pleasant to read when a person, instead of investing in cryptocurrency, advises to invest in yourself, in education. Well, nothing, to each his own. What the market is now turning into makes you seriously think about investing in cryptocurrency. I would strongly discourage doing this. The market is now very hot and it is not known when it will start to cool down, but that this will happen is obvious. If you have unnecessary $ 10k, spend it better for charity, if you don't want to invest in yourself. Or wait a couple of years and then buy some kind of cryptocurrency.

I will probably answer in a slightly veiled way, but whoever wants to understand. Now the time has come when it’s too late to do anything, now we need to soberly assess the situation and sell what we have, I believe that it is impossible to buy now, it was necessary to buy in 2018-2020. Yes, everyone writes this idea, but few people put the necessary meaning. During this year, there should not be a single order to buy cryptocurrency, you need to gradually sell what you have. This is the correct work with HYIP.

I will not mention the name of the project, for reasons of the fact that there are still it fans. But there was a truly good technical project, its own blockchain, a virtual machine, but unfortunately no one understood marketing. And now, after 4 years, having gone through terrible years of calm in the cryptocurrency world, the project team left the project for the community (like community-driven), and they switched to something else. As a result, a really good idea and a technological team without good marketing could not break into the world.
This little background tells only that the main marketing in the world is now and this applies not only to cryptocurrencies.
This little prehistory says only that the most important thing in the world right now is marketing and this applies not only to cryptocurrencies.

In my opinion, just the hype that is being created around PolkaDot testifies to a good marketing team. Here, rather, the reverse side, Polkadot is much worse technically and also because of the huge hype around him, there is mistrust in him, which cannot be said about BSC. In my opinion, for a normally sane person, the choice is obvious.

I am not a BSC adherent, but objectively there is nothing better at the moment. Polkadot? - Definitely not, Ethereum? - especially not, now there is no worthy competitor.

I sincerely wish both of them a downfall. What was conceived as something great and innovative is turned into a circus. What the best minds in the field of encryption, security, programming have worked on is now falling apart before our eyes. Perhaps to clarify my point of view more clearly, I will draw a small analogy. This is very similar to how a person was given fire, and a person began to use it not for cooking, gaining the comfort of life, but uses fire, burning hectares of forest, burning people, cities, everything that can burn. This is a process of self-destruction, it is very painful to look at all this from the outside. That is why I began my post with the words with which I began...