Stop fooling people here, okay? You've been using these same old tricks for years. What era is this already? Still hyping yourselves up with such low-efficiency methods.

Bro, I want you to be confident. I hope you’ll boldly say something like, "I can definitely cheat to win at Baccarat." I’m willing to fly to Vietnam to meet you and pay you an amount equivalent to 10 times that of Bk8, and I even think 10 times might be too little. However, I almost believe that this possibility no longer exists, hahaha, all sorts of cases exist! There are more professional platforms for Baccarat and Blackjack; there’s no need to waste your brainpower and money on such platforms. I used to be a Baccarat player myself, and it’s like being addicted to drugs. It’s not that I’ve quit, but rather that I’m afraid of it.

It’s surprising to still see my comments from over a year ago, especially since the dispute was resolved long ago.Being able to withdraw the full bonus is an encouragement for players who are considering whether to use Sportsbet. I hadn’t mentioned Sportsbet much before, but I was aware of them from early on, probably a few months after their launch, certainly not any later. When Sportsbet first launched, they mimicked William Hill’s platform, with a sports betting interface that was identical. My friends even asked if there was any connection with William Hill, and their customer service replied that they were a subsidiary or partner of William Hill. There are several platforms that mimic William Hill, and Sportsbet is the fourth one I’ve come across. I haven’t registered on their platform until now because, when I was about to register, I heard rumors that they had started refusing to pay out players, which is why I have avoided using them. Initially, Sportsbet had a very high reputation and was highly recommended by nearly everyone. However, as their fame grew, there were rumors that they were not paying out to players. Many platforms start with a great reputation but deteriorate over time. Sportsbet is no exception; it is no longer suitable for players who can confidently win over 55% of the time and now primarily benefits players who bring profit to the platform. Sportsbet also has a private agent account model that appears identical in terms of sports betting, but I’m unsure if the actual experience is the same since I haven’t tried it. Overall, their logo and design are well done. If I’ve made any errors in my statements, please correct me as I might be mistaken.

But I don’t recommend Sportsbet

While some minor leagues are susceptible to manipulation, the idea that the NBA can be easily manipulated seems unlikely. Stake appears to favor members less concerned about fair competition, aiming to retain those willing to engage in manipulative games for greater profits. If members profit in games that the casino cannot manipulate, they may use any reason to prevent players from withdrawing funds, compensating for their own losses.

On video platforms, you might see individuals winning big prizes on Stake's slot machines, but this only conceals the tragic reality of numerous players losing everything. Behind these jackpot victories lies the financial distress of countless members. If smaller league casinos genuinely care about avoiding manipulation, they can choose to lower betting limits to minimize potential losses or even directly shut down matches susceptible to manipulation. These are issues that casinos can actively address, but Stake seems more willing to wait for more unsuspecting or intentional members to participate in these events and then, seemingly justifiably, confiscate funds, even the initial capital. This is concerning. Stake is no longer the reputable casino it once was, built on word of mouth and credibility.

Besides having a nice interface, their credibility really validated my saying: Time will prove everything

Five-Month $$$ Marathon

BC.Game is not just 100% a scam; their level of deceit is astronomically as high as 10000000000000000000%

If you ensure that all your information is clear and correct, you shouldn't typically encounter any issues. However, I was surprised to find that sketa now requires a selfie for verification. Is this an indication of disarray in their rules as they grow more powerful? I've never come across a situation requiring a selfie before, so I find this quite strange. It seems that sketa might believe they are now powerful enough to dictate their own rules

Just one glance at this platform's layout makes you want to run as far away as possible. Even if you dance for them on video, it's useless. Such scam platforms are a dime a dozen here, like cockroaches that never seem to disappear.

If you have the option and are involved in frequent and substantial financial transactions, offline casinos might be a more suitable choice. For online casinos, the selection of the platform is crucial. In most online platforms, you might find that there are no limits to how much you can lose, but winning even slightly more can bring about various issues and obstacles

Hello everyone, before using this platform, please take a look at the scam community. Their shadows are everywhere.

BC.GAME is really everywhere. Their actions have become indescribable. To let more people know. In that case, I feel like everyone can open a fraudulent gambling den. Haha

They are not the official website of Sabah Sports, but their website looks good. However, a beautiful interface does not necessarily mean it is a good platform. Time will prove whether they are good or bad.

I am curious why you do not have any Rollbit account for sale.

1. I saw your explanation, and video verification is voluntary for customers (because you hold the customer's money, so it is necessary rather than voluntary).
2. You also explained that video verification is common on many platforms? (I really can't think of a legitimate large-scale gambling platform that would require video verification, even if it's not a cryptocurrency gambling company. Only fraudulent companies would adopt such behavior. Someone on the forum is selling Stake accounts, doesn't Stake know about it? Why don't they solve the problem through video verification like you do? So far, I haven't found anyone selling Rollbit accounts.)

As a cryptocurrency gambling platform, Rollbit is a cryptocurrency platform. In the field of cryptocurrencies, KYC has always been controversial. Now, Rollbit is conducting video verification by illegal means. Does this comply with the direction of cryptocurrency development? Before undergoing video verification, I thought you were a strong platform, but now I feel very disappointed. There are legitimate companies that provide facial recognition authentication services; why not cooperate with them instead of choosing to operate privately?

This is unexpected. This is the first time I have seen such absurd KYC requirements. The whole world should know about the behavior of this platform. As a legitimate gambling company, verification should be done through legal and formal channels. However, using illegal channels for verification like this is untenable, and the amount of money involved is not significant either. Have you considered what to do if even after video verification, the money cannot be withdrawn? There are many platforms that deceive customers' funds and documents at the same time. Anyway, I find this behavior disgusting as well.

BC.Game is very famous in this scam community, their presence can be seen on every page, which is enough to illustrate the problems with this platform. I haven't been involved in cryptocurrency gambling for long, but from my personal point of view, there are too many small platforms here. Platforms like BC.Game have been around for a long time and only started advertising more after making profits, but in reality they don't have much strength. There is too much negative information about them. All the games on these platforms are provided by suppliers, and when they deceive customers, they shift the blame to the suppliers instead of taking responsibility themselves. This behavior is typical of small platforms! If this platform truly has the ability, please develop your own sports betting platform. I guess Sketa may be the only independently developed cryptocurrency sports betting platform that even offers live streaming videos; it's impossible to watch videos on most other platforms.

I only have experience with two platforms: Stake and Roobet, and they are both good. Especially Roobet because I've won $5000 multiple times and received the bonuses immediately without any issues. However, Stake had some minor issues but were quickly resolved. For me, these problems are still within an acceptable range. But I have also tried many other platforms. There was one platform that I don't want to search for its domain name anymore; it was recommended by many people on this forum. On this platform, I deposited $200-300 and won $200-300 as well. After my first withdrawal was rejected, I sought help from customer service who asked me to wager 5 times the withdrawal amount before being able to withdraw funds again. Following their instructions, I made the required wagers but my withdrawal was rejected once again and they requested KYC verification (identity verification). At that time during our conversation, customer service suddenly ended the chat window so I became very angry and frustrated. Therefore, I ultimately decided not to pursue recovering the profits or deposits obtained from them due to unpleasant interaction with their customer service team.

The above description mainly focuses on profit-related issues, but in reality, I have lost more than I have won.

You are looking for a platform similar to bet365 because bet365 has stable withdrawals, simple KYC, and instant processing. Currently, there is no other online platform worldwide that can compare to bet365, so OP can only wait for the next bet365. Even recommended cryptocurrency platforms like stake, which I think are doing well, cannot compare to bet365. This is just a fact. I understand OP's direction. But currently, there is indeed no such available platform. Of course, there are some platforms that come close to bet365; I guess OP should know about them. However, I hope OP will explore Canadian gambling companies as they may find some alternative options and another alternative would be offline gambling. Many people here oppose offline gambling but in my opinion, offline is even more reliable than bet365; I'm just speaking from personal experience though offline also has its limitations. In any case, funds are definitely much safer offline than online.

Alas, if you had lost the bet, these things might not have happened.

I disagree with your point of view, perhaps every place is different. From what I understand, offline agent gambling is usually more reliable than online gambling companies. If an agent runs away with the money, their superiors will be responsible for handling the funds. I have only heard of gamblers running away with the agent's money, never heard of agents running away with the gambler's money. Anything can happen in any situation, but I'm referring to the majority of cases. For amounts below $500,000 USD, Bet365 can still accept it, but I am still somewhat concerned about larger amounts. Withdrawals also take longer to process. Only offline accepts larger bets.