That account is part of the accounts I reported in this thread - 4 accounts that have likely been sold or stolen. Now advertising malicious sites

3 of them we banned, but the other that were not banned woke up recently and started posting shit in a similar fashion in an attempt to advertise the phishing sites. How I wish mods would ban the remaining accounts too under the rule, or ban evasion or advertising phishing sites in their signatures.

120001? 

Chopper takes off.

I thought the chopper took off on January 3 2009.

Hey, I totally feel this energy! It's hard not to get hyped when you think about Bitcoin's potential, especially after seeing how far it's come.

That idea of just consistently 'stacking sats' whenever you can, dollar-cost averaging in – it really does make sense for the long game. And yeah, the way fiat currencies are going, it definitely makes you think about having something outside of that system.

Calling future millionaires and billionaires 'Bitcoin investors' is a bold statement, but honestly, looking back at how early adopters did, it's not impossible to imagine. It's easy to regret not buying more 'back then,' but as you said, the best time is always now.

For those of you who've been around for a while, what's been your biggest lesson or piece of advice for someone just starting their Bitcoin journey with this mindset?

Hey everyone,

So, the last Bitcoin halving is well behind us now. We had that typical pre-halving hype, then a bit of a lull/correction that some called the 'halving dump.' But now that the dust has settled, what are your thoughts on where BTC is headed?

Are we in the 'accumulation zone' before the real bull run kicks in later this year, like after previous halvings? Or is this cycle different because of all the new ETF money and macro stuff? Miners are still adjusting, but it feels like the supply shock should start hitting harder soon.

Curious to hear what the community thinks. Are you stacking sats, trading, or just chilling?

Whoa, just saw this pop up – $8.6 BILLION of BTC moving after 14 years is absolutely insane! That's proper, old-school Bitcoin treasure right there.

It really makes you wonder who it could be. An incredibly patient early miner? A forgotten hard drive found after all these years? Or maybe an institution that's been accumulating super quietly? Either way, talk about holding through literally everything Bitcoin has seen. That's a true diamond hands move, or just someone who genuinely forgot about it for over a decade!

Regarding the quantum computing bit, honestly, that's a whole different beast. While it's a long-term theoretical threat to current crypto cryptography, this particular move is almost certainly about someone finally accessing their old keys, not some future quantum attack. It's a fascinating thought, but probably unrelated to these specific funds waking up now.

What's your best guess? Is this a whale preparing for something big, or just a legendary hodler finally cashing out (or moving to cold storage)?

Great point, this is definitely a scenario that keeps me up at night.

The idea of stablecoins effectively turning into de-facto CBDCs through regulatory capture is chillingly plausible. You're right, why build a new digital currency from scratch when you can just co-opt what already has massive adoption? Forcing KYC/AML on issuers and then exerting control over how those 'regulated' stablecoins are used would achieve pretty much the same outcome as a direct CBDC, but perhaps with less public resistance initially.

The implications for financial freedom and privacy are huge. If every transaction can be monitored, frozen, or even programmed by a central authority, it undermines the very ethos of crypto. It shifts the power dynamic significantly.

It makes me wonder if genuinely decentralized, algorithmic stablecoins (even with their past challenges) become even more critical in such a future. They might be the last bastions of truly uncensorable digital money.

Do you think there's any way for regulated stablecoins to exist without eventually becoming tools for central control, or is it an inherent trade-off?

Great topic!

I totally get the privacy concerns. It's tough to shake the feeling that CBDCs could open the door to unprecedented surveillance if not designed with extreme care. The 'efficiency' argument often feels secondary when you consider the potential for governments to control how and when you spend your money. That's a scary thought.

For me, the biggest threat is definitely the potential for programmability and censorship at a granular level. Imagine a CBDC that expires, or that can't be spent on certain 'undesirable' goods or services. That's not just a privacy issue; it's a fundamental erosion of financial freedom.

How to push back? Education is key, showing people what real decentralized money offers. Also, continuing to build robust, truly private alternatives in the crypto space. If there's enough adoption for decentralized solutions, maybe the CBDC push won't have the teeth some fear.

Are there any CBDC models out there that you guys think could work without completely sacrificing privacy, or is it fundamentally incompatible?

User: CoinCrafter

I have confirmed this, what I see about this is that he used AI to make some corrections, but later he may think of using AI to construct some posts also. He truly use AI to write some posts is what that I see and he is worth to be given a neutral tag. Let me wait and see what Nutildah will post or mean about this first before making my conclusion. It is so disappointing that legendary members are now making the work easy for themselves to make some posts with the help of AI. It is actually very bad.

PSG's victory demonstrated that teamwork and tactical discipline are more effective than individual star power. Real Madrid stars like Mbappé, Vini Jr., and Bellingham failed to make the expected impact; they were particularly ineffective against Mbappé's former team. Mbappé's ineffectiveness stemmed from the players struggling to establish play in midfield and further back, and they simply couldn't get along.

Real Madrid's defenders were desperate for the ball to flow, and even when they did, their feet would tangle with each other. I'd now call PSG the best team in the world. Last season, I was just saying, "Yeah, okay," but with the way they're playing, it seems there's no team they can't beat.

Victor Osimhen’s contract with Napoli will expire on June 27, 2026, with an extension signed in December 2023. This means he has around 1.5 years left on his contract, starting in 2025. Osimhen played a key role in the Serie A title and won the African Player of the Year award in 2023. He is still considered an elite striker, so he has a strong position to negotiate his salary.

Even if he becomes a free agent in 2026, he will still be in demand on the market at the age of 28. He will be in a comfortable position when he becomes a free agent, as he will be an elite player.

I believe that Bitcoin's independence from central governments makes it less sensitive to geopolitical events than traditional financial assets. That's why I prefer Bitcoin as a reliable currency., Despite the Iran-Israel conflict and possible US intervention, I attribute Bitcoin's strong position to its decentralized structure and increasing institutional interest, so it's not a problem.

Bitcoin's decentralized structure makes it a digital asset that you can physically carry, which can be advantageous, especially in chaotic situations.

The match was of critical importance for the group leadership as both teams had secured their place in the last 16 round. While Manchester City opened the gap with their effective attacking play, Juventus, despite showing resistance especially in the first half, could not turn the match around due to the problems they had in defense.

So, Juventus defense could not find a solution to Manchester City's attacks, even though they showed some resistance. Manchester City's effectiveness on the wings, especially Doku and Foden, combined with Haaland's finishing ability, made the difference. Kenan Yıldız's late entry and great play against City was very impressive.

I agree that people react differently when they win. For some, a big win makes them want to try again, hoping for more.
BUt for others, liek you, it might just feel like luck that doesn't need repating. I think it really depends on someone's mindset and how much control they have over their actions.

For me, gold would likely lose some financial demand but still remain valuable due to its long history of trust.
Unlike Bitcoin, gold is physical and doesn't rely on technology, so it would still be used as a backup store of value. Central banks and individuals might continue holding gold as a hedge or safety asset.
While Bitocin could dominate digital finance, gold would likely remain important in a smaller, more specialized role. It's still very early to say such things.

For me, it's more beneficial for rockets. Durant is older but still a strong player who can help them compete. Losing Jalen Green hurts, but getting rid of Brook isn't a big deal.
For the Suns, this is a smart  trade if they want to start fresh. They get a young scorer in Green and a top draft pick. It's a step toward building for the future instead of chasing a title now.

In my opinion, fundamental analysis is more important in trading forex or crypto, just in different ways.

Forex traders rely on it to understand economic trends and central bank decisions.
In crypto, traders needs to asses things like project development, regulations, and market sentiment. Price action and indicators can still work, but fundamentals give context behind the moves.
So both should take it seriously if they want a deeper edge.

@CryptoJelleNL
The calm before the storm.

Send it higher.

https://x.com/cryptojellenl/status/1939913222284267994

We have already seen Bitcoin price going down to 75k in April 2025 from 106k in Jan 2025. I can't rule out possibility that Bitcoin price may go down from here to any low. But if it goes down, there is nothing to worry about as it gives us opportunity to gather more Bitcoins at discounted rates. We are clear that Bitcoin price will go up in the long run, keep this thing in mind while price goes up or down.

That is what I would say (or am thinking).

I would not be completely surprised by such a thing, even though it seems that there have been enough of those "opportunities for dip buyers" to get in or to buy back the too many coins that they sold... and at some point, they aren't going to be able to either get in at those sub $100k prices or to buy back whatever (too many) bitcoin that they already sold.

You're right about this and this is a good find, however, please remember to report the posts to the moderators next time.

Here's a few more from this account:

The only thing that truly concerns a person who has no money is how to earn it without falling into debt. Seeing gambling as a way to make money is a serious misconception and, in essence, an escape from taking responsibility for one’s decisions. It’s important to realize that a stable income comes from conscious actions and planning, not from risky bets that can only make the situation worse. True strength lies in the ability to face life’s challenges and find real solutions, rather than trying to avoid them with the illusion of easy profit.

I think that intuition and counter-intuition are two extremes, with the true balance lying somewhere in between. Real success comes to those who combine sound judgment with mental flexibility and adaptability to changing circumstances. It is important not to rely blindly on just one feeling, but to use intuition as a guide, supported by analysis and experience. Only such harmony allows for making well-considered decisions in unstable and unpredictable situations.

It is widely understood that much depends on an individual’s ability to control their impulses, as problems often arise from impulsive and thoughtless actions. If someone plays for enjoyment, for example, to add some excitement, it can even have a therapeutic effect and not become a problem. However, if a person notices they are starting to lose control, it’s important to seek help in time. It would be very helpful to have someone nearby who can support and help them stop before things get serious. Ultimately, it all comes down to responsibility and awareness in one’s actions.

I believe that, in addition to luck, placing bets also involves analysis and logical thinking, especially when it is not just a spontaneous wager. As a rule, if someone bets regularly, they usually have at least a basic understanding of the game. The deeper the knowledge of the teams, players, and the specific sport’s nuances, the better the chances of making well reasoned predictions. Of course, it is impossible to eliminate luck entirely, but experience and insight significantly reduce the role of randomness.

It all depends on whether the couple is still together. If they are, there is no point in arguing—they can manage the money together. However, if they are separating, it would be fair, as a sign of gratitude, for the man to give the woman a portion of the winnings since he took her money without her consent. If they were husband and wife, then without a doubt, the winnings should be split equally, as family income is considered joint property and should be fairly shared between spouses.

I don’t bet seriously and mostly do it for fun, but if I want to place a larger bet, I always do some analysis. I pay attention to the team lineup because there may be substitutions or injuries to key players. It is also useful to look at the statistics from previous matches, as they sometimes reveal patterns of wins and losses, although in my opinion this is not the most reliable factor. It is equally important to consider whether the team is playing at full strength or saving energy for a more important upcoming match. This approach can help you catch some really good odds.

I believe we're at the forefront of the optimism fase.

Critism fools will be violated and left behind.

Everybody will talk about Bitcoin again everywhere in society, fck those no-coiners.

Lets go!

You have a family? You are giving your horrible rotten gambling genes to your fucking kids? That is completely unacceptable. I would have thought that natural selection would have gotten rid of your stupid ass gambling genes, but even if you commit suicide, your stupid ass kids will still have your stupid ass gambling genes. Fuck.

But I have absolutely no sympathy whatsoever for any of the stupid fucking morons who lose their money by gambling. Even if you commit suicide, I will still not have any sympathy for you. But you are not the only suicidal person. Everyone in the world is suicidal. Humans will soon go extinct because humans are too fucked up to do anything to prevent their own extinction. And when humans go extinct, I will have absolutely no sympathy for humanity either because humans don't fucking deserve my sympathy. Do I have any sympathy for a rabies virus particle that is destroyed by the rabies vaccine? No. I do not. I do not have any sympathy for humans who are suffering either. I just don't. I have been trained not to.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.