Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 165 results by amoredore
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 23/08/2019, 18:48:30 UTC
We've had 6 updates on web client this month. Devs are doing good work, keep it up.

I like that Myodov's series of two posts as well. You can find the first part there as well. https://www.reddit.com/r/universa/comments/ctf73i/latest_codebase_updates_up_to_3114_telegram/

Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 12/08/2019, 20:03:32 UTC
Have seen some updates from Malta. Nt news but nice they are publishing https://maltablockchainsummit.com/news/watch-a-crypto-summer-is-coming-alexander-borodich/

Although there are so many good news but no relief for this token it loosing its grip in the market and price is going down and down from long time. I hope soon they will establish big partnerships and bring more use case for this platform to make it really useful.

Markets tend to be irrational sometimes. Sooner or later discrepancies disappear.

More partnerships means the platform is going stronger. However, we can't expect that to happen very soon. In the meantime, the dev team should revive the glimmer of this project by active marketing and other promotional campaigns. Declining of price is a usual scenario for relatively an old project, 2 years in crypto is considered to be an old-timer already as there are so many projects which has a lifetime of at least 2 weeks to 2 months only.

Yes, you said it right. It takes a long time, we should not expect it to happen immediately . But I would question if they really should boost their marketing now. As I know, Universa is not focused on people like you and me much. They are mostly B2B/B2G platform and B2C is somewhere in the background. So I don't know if it's reasonable to spend money on this kind of marketing just now. But in the future they should, after they earn enough profit from businesses.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 29/06/2019, 16:43:22 UTC
AB just got into chat and said that we'll hear the update in 30 days.

Everyone assumes that it's HODL. What else can it be?
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 10/06/2019, 20:36:04 UTC

Great deal! Hope will have some more news soon!

Maybe today's eve will be great for Universa and we will have some more partnership!

Cointelegraph is also publishing it https://cointelegraph.com/news/russian-region-yugra-to-launch-blockchain-enabled-tourism-platform
I think it is the beginning of a big story.

Looks like we will have a hot summer and hot autumn also.

It is the last chance to buy at a low price. Take your chance. Hurry up!
However, it all depends on the personal decisions of each if it does have the capital to buy, I think it is better to take the opportunity because if not possible it will regret later

Yes, everything goes on smooth and steady with Universa. We just need a bit of patience, they focus on really big players so it's understandable why it takes time. For those who never bought, now would be a perfect entry.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 02/06/2019, 21:38:08 UTC
Oh, thanks, I can see it now. I more listened to it than watched so didn't notice. Yep, looks like hodl, definitely not car keys lol
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 02/06/2019, 19:31:26 UTC
Great interview with AB https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWaeHXtrYqE
The ending is especially cool. AB seems to be 100% sure about his project. Such a level of confidence encourages to keep buying more and more!

"Universa, Universa and then Universa." Good line, that's great when the founder is so sure of the success of his own project. I like how AB is calm and confident. He understands that Universa will take over the world someday.

Yep, he knows that Universa will be a big thing. The ending is superb. Suggest watching it every time when you doubt your investment Grin

Very good one. Liked it very much! I think we will hear some surprise from Malta in some time.

Do you think about HODL as me? I liked it during the interviews in Alexander's hands.

Where did you see it? I don't see any HODL in his hands in the interview.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 02/05/2019, 20:50:15 UTC
Markets are the ultimate gauge for the health of any project and Universa is a sick, old and dying man.

Do you really believe this? Then why did Bitcoin and Ethereum lost their value? Did they become worse off? No, their technologies got better. Still, their price decreased a lot. It follows that markets do a poor job accessing an asset. Also, we saw many useless bitcoin forks that had huge gains. Again, that disprove the reasonability of your statement.
Markets often overvalue and undervalue.

But I believe that sooner or later markets will probably access an asset more or less reasonably. But looking at today values doesn't tell a thing about the real health of the project.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 02/05/2019, 15:59:03 UTC
Some good news today from devs: https://medium.com/universablockchain/april-changes-in-the-client-code-f1590d16f69b
They are really cool made a great deal.

ICANN taking away a domain name is not entirely possible, Not unless your domain is associate with scams or spreading viruses and malware they can suspend your domain anytime.

Maybe what happen here is their domain registrar from New Zealand sold their domain to other customers that why i always stick to the known registrar when it comes to domain.
The domain register can’t just sell the domain to other clients. Universa net in USA had sue universa blockchain for infringement. You can read the law suits on the net, it’s not the first time lawsuit has been brought forward in connection to universa or Alexander Borodich. The effect of this can be seen on the price and the partnerships that had been made almost made 2 years ago don’t exist today . Everyone including John Mcafee went on theirs own way. Stuck here with this useless tokens.

Not their fault that the court decided to take away their domain. Universa registered it earlier but since it was in the US and the company is also of US origin, the decision was made not in their favor. But who cares if that didn't affect the project in any negative way. On the contrary, it turned out to be beneficial for the project because they no longer depend on ICANN.

No problem at all with it. Did blockchain start malfunction because of that? No. Did it impact it in any negative way? No. Moreover, it only improved - no more dependencies on third parties. So what on earth is a problem then? There is none. The only negative is that price hurt but since that's not caused by any real problems but rather by market inadequate valuation, I couldn't care less. It will bounce back.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 30/03/2019, 20:09:31 UTC
Although they have changed from .io to .com, the site still goes through to a .io page when clicking on "join the revolution".

Im not here to cause fud but is it not worrying that a company that talks about being so superior when it comes to tech, cannot migrate their website in a timely manner. I say this from someone who has a limited proficiency in coding but who understands and has been around coders. It should not take this long to get the website fully loaded onto the new domain, the fact that the link goes through to the old website is shoddy imo, they could of at least put up a page explaining the situation.

Surely they knew this was either going to happen or had a chance of happening, why was it not arranged to move the site over as soon as the court ruling was in place?



The site is working: https://universablockchain.com
Looks like a lot of problems behind the scene. Zero progress. Ceo has disappeared since the community asked him AMA 😂 No partnerships. Just NDA . The market speaks for itself. The only problem is there isn’t enough buyers if there was enough buyers people will dump including me before it’s too late .

I've seen him a few days ago in the chats so obviously, he didn't disappear.
>The only problem is there isn’t enough buyers if there was enough buyers people will dump including me before it’s too late . Place your sell order at Cobinhood I will buy  Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 14/03/2019, 15:48:44 UTC
I have just watched the mysterious 100K competitive project, no, TIM is really not the one going to make it... Pure scam, no happening, suspended twitter account, few empty bullshits... And the nick prizrak is a nice pseudonym (it means a "spectre" in english). Against these "projects" looks universa much more trustfully and huge.

I think there are more trustful competitors.

“fool and his money are soon parted”

Universa 20k is bs, anyone can claim that number if it’s done with most of the nodes that are being owned by universa itself. Look at credits they have more then 100k tps. Look at partnerships they got long list with great brands. Still people don’t trust them and here you shill universa like it’s the best. At least if they were some proof that blockchain works will be fine but so, far swap is still done manually though universa has a smart contract LOL
No news or updates for few months. Is there anyone running nodes beside universa? It’s a joke. Say goodbye to your investment. The market says it all and in few weeks it will be half price then what’s today. Unless they come with proof of working product and real partnerships.

What do you mean the swap done manually? It's done automatically. If you tried to do a swap you will see for yourself that it gets through pretty quick. And no, there are node owners beside them. No updates for a few months? Two updates in the last two days. I wonder why someone would claim such things without even trying to understand what's really going on. See you the next two weeks just to see that your prediction about the market was wrong as well.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 27/02/2019, 19:18:16 UTC
I'll entertain this. The same day i made an argument is the same day (about 1 hour after my comment) a piece of news released. So therefore i changed my message about the lack of news, and ultimately deleted on new information from the team. Yes, when presented with new factual information, I'll change my attitude when warranted, and admit i was incorrect, in this case it was about the lack of information/progress from the team. And note, this was during 3-4 months of drought and lack of anything.

So Unviersa Team, what are you going to try to attack with next? Pretty impressed by the amount of puppet accounts tbh. I didn't really want to remark about the volume of UTNP, but, shills from the team attack investors/supporters that reveal the true nature of the project, in order to protect the motherland and those millions in ICO funds.
Greetings. I want to express my gratitude for the analysis of the activities of the Universa team. It gives the meaning of reading this thread. If there were no such people, then there would be no point to come here.

Analytics is really good in some areas and a little wake in others. But it does not gives right to offend people whom he doesn't know nothing about.
You are right that no one has the right to insult other people. But, unfortunately, not everyone has the patience to be correct when their expectations are not met.

In investing the patience is everything. When I invested in crypto, I knew that was gonna be here for a very long time. Still believe in it. But sometimes the charts let me down but I don't check them as often these days. We should stay positive.

Patience and the right choice. Quite often no matter how long you wait you will lose your investment. I don't imply that Universa is one of such investments, it's a big part of my own portfolio. Just saying that you need more than just waiting.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 05/02/2019, 17:45:46 UTC


This is exactly the problem with...





the problem is with you...

You kept silent for 2+ years... and now started trolling here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=223715;sa=showPosts

What for? How much?

I kept quiet because I made the mistake that Universa could make progress. Over this time, I noticed more and more how bad Universa is doing.... hence why I started to speak.

You can call it trolling, I call it "emergency intervention", as it clear you are useless at communication and bringing good vibes. Anyways are you a part of Universa? if I was AB I would have sacked you a long time ago.

I don't mean only Universa.

You kept silence in bitcointalk form 2016... and then ... boom you are here some days ago...

With all no respect to people in community, to project, to no one.

I am not form team, I can like something Universa doing and can can be disappointed in something. It is my business.

I really hate when people trolling others asking question all we have discussed millions of times. You even did not notice the news here ))

And please do not reply, I said everything I wanted. I am not interesting in discussion with you. Have a nice day.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 04/02/2019, 22:31:54 UTC


This is exactly the problem with...





the problem is with you...

You kept silent for 2+ years... and now started trolling here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=223715;sa=showPosts

What for? How much?
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 04/02/2019, 22:25:41 UTC


You are funny 😆



And you are the funniest one here ))

Appear from nowhere, hove no discussions with community and start trolling.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1371552;sa=showPosts

Do you really believe that anyone will listen to you?

Please read first all we have discussed here and than try to convince us in your point of view (if you are not a troll of course).

I like this community, I can be not agree with everything the team is doing but I hate people trolling others with no respect.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 29/01/2019, 21:33:09 UTC
A day of long reads today  Smiley

I want to share my view also.

There are two kind of people pretending the community supporters but only trying to realize their wishes.

The first one are interesting in trading only. They are trying to convince the team to create news and to spend all the money for marketing because they would like to earn money by trading. They are not interesting in product or technology. They are not interesting in real business and how to make it.

They are not interesting in product or technology. They are not interesting in real business and how to make it.

Maybe it is not bad but there is no future for this strategy. No future for project, no future for token holders.

Another group is always coming from nowhere and asking the same questions while having answers for them. They do not listen for no one and behave very rude. I think but cannot prove they are paid for it or for advertisement. Just making money.

The only thing they are trying to do is to pay attention to themselves. They really do not respect the community. Let’s ignore them. It is the best way not to hear rowdyism here.


Your analysis is correct for the Telegram Group and not here, assumptions are assumptions, especially coming from all these Universa Shill/puppet accounts that are active admins themselves. It's really hard to take any conversation serious coming from a promoter, admin, dev, or person within Universa, defending Universa itself. It calls into question the entire project, is there really no real community member here willing to refute other community members arguments? It just goes to show, that community members like myself and others are in the minority, and the team themselves are trying to silence critical judgements.

Obviously everyone wants to depict the situation how they want, but there are underlying facts to what's been stated and they have not been addressed. The admins and myself played a dance, nothing came of it because they just don't know any of the information either.

At the end of the day, if a project or business doesn't want to answer to investors and token holder, then they ultimately should of never taken the route of public funding and issuing a cryptocurrency. Obviously, there are very few of you who understand cryptocurrency or even what Universa is and the situation we are in.

Most of the shills (outside of admins like you) here didn't even invest in Universa, and don't own any significant amount of UTNP/UTN. I'm not trying to undermine their opinions, but they are a lot less invested and incentivized to take action and discuss some major major faults with this entire project. Coupled with all that, we are left with scraps of information, adding fuel to the already burning fire.


Your argument is pretty pathetic in the end, sorry to say. 28+ Million funded into Universa, never forget how much money was actually raised. Shitcoins have been more successful in every area Universa is trying to tackle, on 1/10 of the budget. That says a lot. Lets not also forget all the terrible judgements that have come out of this team only 1 year into this project, from supporting scamcoins to everything development has done. Yes 1 whole year, and we are worse off in every regard (not just markets) than when the project launched. Not a single action has been taken outside of some barbie-party PR partnerships and a couple updates to their mainnet (which functions and appears exactly how it was a year ago). Despite what any admin will refute me with, they are going to talk about really trivial shit, stuff that has no real significance on this project. I have no doubt, AB wakes up every morning in misery because of his failing project.

I hope i add to his misery, so he can find some competent fucking individuals to take command and help him. Unless all those funds have evaporated, which i woulden't be at all surprised if Universa is broke. Ofc this is unfounded claim, but the way the team has been behaving depicts a deeper and more pathetic state than i could ever imagine or explain here.

Is it the way you promote your service?

I looked in your profile. You just join the topics all over the bitcointalk and criticize everything.

What is your tactics? Asking teams to pay you? Or do you think someone can take you as an advisor if you are so critical everywhere?

I can't trust a person with such behavior. And all your word have no sense after seeing the same in all topics.

Look 4-5 years into my profile, you'll find the same messages. I call out shitcoins, for the benefit of the community, out of my passion for this space. Giving people perspective into cryptocurrency, and giving critical judgement to all the whores in this space, it's easy to collect Millions and Millions in funding, but it's hard to answer tough questions. Incompetency plagues crypto and most projects. I like how people want to point out a signature and attack someone personally because they are giving critical-hard judgement. "Offense is the best form of defense" - Napoleon.

It's funny to me really, because i did the same thing with Ethereum back in 2014, and yes i did invest into that project then. But, of course it's easy to make quick judgements, conjectures and false conclusions to fit one's world-view.

Unfortunately, i'm invested into Universa and unfortunately i have to be highly critical of the project, spending my time to bring-to-light the bullshit. While you and the team are not happy i'm here, there are others who've invested into Universa and want accountability and transparency. 28+ Million in funding for this crypto and look where we are today. Amazing.


Edit: My goal and objective is quite simple: get the community talking, and to take action/give critical judgement to the Universa team. Giving a message to the core team, that their current method of doing business, growing this crypto and communicating to us is a massive failure. Never settle for a bullshit answer/response, because we'll never get anywhere.
I'm wasting my time dealing with shills.

In fact I am not really interested in discussion with you because all you do is not for community it is for yourself.

If you remember eth you know it took them 2 years just to show the first version. Universa is less then 2 years now and we have Mainnet, contractes, support and so on. And all this in very hard year for crypto.

You continue attracting attention to yourself but this topic not about you. I respect the community and will ask you questions in your topic if will have time for it.

Good luck.


Absolutely hopeless. You are clouded by ignorance and conjectures, without even reading my statements.

I'm truly done wasting my time here

The same about you. Really sorry about your poor attempts.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 29/01/2019, 20:40:33 UTC
A day of long reads today  Smiley

I want to share my view also.

There are two kind of people pretending the community supporters but only trying to realize their wishes.

The first one are interesting in trading only. They are trying to convince the team to create news and to spend all the money for marketing because they would like to earn money by trading. They are not interesting in product or technology. They are not interesting in real business and how to make it.

They are not interesting in product or technology. They are not interesting in real business and how to make it.

Maybe it is not bad but there is no future for this strategy. No future for project, no future for token holders.

Another group is always coming from nowhere and asking the same questions while having answers for them. They do not listen for no one and behave very rude. I think but cannot prove they are paid for it or for advertisement. Just making money.

The only thing they are trying to do is to pay attention to themselves. They really do not respect the community. Let’s ignore them. It is the best way not to hear rowdyism here.


Your analysis is correct for the Telegram Group and not here, assumptions are assumptions, especially coming from all these Universa Shill/puppet accounts that are active admins themselves. It's really hard to take any conversation serious coming from a promoter, admin, dev, or person within Universa, defending Universa itself. It calls into question the entire project, is there really no real community member here willing to refute other community members arguments? It just goes to show, that community members like myself and others are in the minority, and the team themselves are trying to silence critical judgements.

Obviously everyone wants to depict the situation how they want, but there are underlying facts to what's been stated and they have not been addressed. The admins and myself played a dance, nothing came of it because they just don't know any of the information either.

At the end of the day, if a project or business doesn't want to answer to investors and token holder, then they ultimately should of never taken the route of public funding and issuing a cryptocurrency. Obviously, there are very few of you who understand cryptocurrency or even what Universa is and the situation we are in.

Most of the shills (outside of admins like you) here didn't even invest in Universa, and don't own any significant amount of UTNP/UTN. I'm not trying to undermine their opinions, but they are a lot less invested and incentivized to take action and discuss some major major faults with this entire project. Coupled with all that, we are left with scraps of information, adding fuel to the already burning fire.


Your argument is pretty pathetic in the end, sorry to say. 28+ Million funded into Universa, never forget how much money was actually raised. Shitcoins have been more successful in every area Universa is trying to tackle, on 1/10 of the budget. That says a lot. Lets not also forget all the terrible judgements that have come out of this team only 1 year into this project, from supporting scamcoins to everything development has done. Yes 1 whole year, and we are worse off in every regard (not just markets) than when the project launched. Not a single action has been taken outside of some barbie-party PR partnerships and a couple updates to their mainnet (which functions and appears exactly how it was a year ago). Despite what any admin will refute me with, they are going to talk about really trivial shit, stuff that has no real significance on this project. I have no doubt, AB wakes up every morning in misery because of his failing project.

I hope i add to his misery, so he can find some competent fucking individuals to take command and help him. Unless all those funds have evaporated, which i woulden't be at all surprised if Universa is broke. Ofc this is unfounded claim, but the way the team has been behaving depicts a deeper and more pathetic state than i could ever imagine or explain here.

Is it the way you promote your service?

I looked in your profile. You just join the topics all over the bitcointalk and criticize everything.

What is your tactics? Asking teams to pay you? Or do you think someone can take you as an advisor if you are so critical everywhere?

I can't trust a person with such behavior. And all your word have no sense after seeing the same in all topics.

Look 4-5 years into my profile, you'll find the same messages. I call out shitcoins, for the benefit of the community, out of my passion for this space. Giving people perspective into cryptocurrency, and giving critical judgement to all the whores in this space, it's easy to collect Millions and Millions in funding, but it's hard to answer tough questions. Incompetency plagues crypto and most projects. I like how people want to point out a signature and attack someone personally because they are giving critical-hard judgement. "Offense is the best form of defense" - Napoleon.

It's funny to me really, because i did the same thing with Ethereum back in 2014, and yes i did invest into that project then. But, of course it's easy to make quick judgements, conjectures and false conclusions to fit one's world-view.

Unfortunately, i'm invested into Universa and unfortunately i have to be highly critical of the project, spending my time to bring-to-light the bullshit. While you and the team are not happy i'm here, there are others who've invested into Universa and want accountability and transparency. 28+ Million in funding for this crypto and look where we are today. Amazing.


Edit: My goal and objective is quite simple: get the community talking, and to take action/give critical judgement to the Universa team. Giving a message to the core team, that their current method of doing business, growing this crypto and communicating to us is a massive failure. Never settle for a bullshit answer/response, because we'll never get anywhere.
I'm wasting my time dealing with shills.

In fact I am not really interested in discussion with you because all you do is not for community it is for yourself.

If you remember eth you know it took them 2 years just to show the first version. Universa is less then 2 years now and we have Mainnet, contractes, support and so on. And all this in very hard year for crypto.

You continue attracting attention to yourself but this topic not about you. I respect the community and will ask you questions in your topic if will have time for it.

Good luck.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 29/01/2019, 19:47:46 UTC
A day of long reads today  Smiley

I want to share my view also.

There are two kind of people pretending the community supporters but only trying to realize their wishes.

The first one are interesting in trading only. They are trying to convince the team to create news and to spend all the money for marketing because they would like to earn money by trading. They are not interesting in product or technology. They are not interesting in real business and how to make it.

They are not interesting in product or technology. They are not interesting in real business and how to make it.

Maybe it is not bad but there is no future for this strategy. No future for project, no future for token holders.

Another group is always coming from nowhere and asking the same questions while having answers for them. They do not listen for no one and behave very rude. I think but cannot prove they are paid for it or for advertisement. Just making money.

The only thing they are trying to do is to pay attention to themselves. They really do not respect the community. Let’s ignore them. It is the best way not to hear rowdyism here.


Your analysis is correct for the Telegram Group and not here, assumptions are assumptions, especially coming from all these Universa Shill/puppet accounts that are active admins themselves. It's really hard to take any conversation serious coming from a promoter, admin, dev, or person within Universa, defending Universa itself. It calls into question the entire project, is there really no real community member here willing to refute other community members arguments? It just goes to show, that community members like myself and others are in the minority, and the team themselves are trying to silence critical judgements.

Obviously everyone wants to depict the situation how they want, but there are underlying facts to what's been stated and they have not been addressed. The admins and myself played a dance, nothing came of it because they just don't know any of the information either.

At the end of the day, if a project or business doesn't want to answer to investors and token holder, then they ultimately should of never taken the route of public funding and issuing a cryptocurrency. Obviously, there are very few of you who understand cryptocurrency or even what Universa is and the situation we are in.

Most of the shills (outside of admins like you) here didn't even invest in Universa, and don't own any significant amount of UTNP/UTN. I'm not trying to undermine their opinions, but they are a lot less invested and incentivized to take action and discuss some major major faults with this entire project. Coupled with all that, we are left with scraps of information, adding fuel to the already burning fire.


Your argument is pretty pathetic in the end, sorry to say. 28+ Million funded into Universa, never forget how much money was actually raised. Shitcoins have been more successful in every area Universa is trying to tackle, on 1/10 of the budget. That says a lot. Lets not also forget all the terrible judgements that have come out of this team only 1 year into this project, from supporting scamcoins to everything development has done. Yes 1 whole year, and we are worse off in every regard (not just markets) than when the project launched. Not a single action has been taken outside of some barbie-party PR partnerships and a couple updates to their mainnet (which functions and appears exactly how it was a year ago). Despite what any admin will refute me with, they are going to talk about really trivial shit, stuff that has no real significance on this project. I have no doubt, AB wakes up every morning in misery because of his failing project.

I hope i add to his misery, so he can find some competent fucking individuals to take command and help him. Unless all those funds have evaporated, which i woulden't be at all surprised if Universa is broke. Ofc this is unfounded claim, but the way the team has been behaving depicts a deeper and more pathetic state than i could ever imagine or explain here.

Is it the way you promote your service?

I looked in your profile. You just join the topics all over the bitcointalk and criticize everything.

What is your tactics? Asking teams to pay you? Or do you think someone can take you as an advisor if you are so critical everywhere?

I can't trust a person with such behavior. And all your word have no sense after seeing the same in all topics.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 29/01/2019, 19:07:35 UTC
A day of long reads today  Smiley

I want to share my view also.

There are two kind of people pretending the community supporters but only trying to realize their wishes.

The first one are interesting in trading only. They are trying to convince the team to create news and to spend all the money for marketing because they would like to earn money by trading. They are not interesting in product or technology. They are not interesting in real business and how to make it.

They are not interesting in product or technology. They are not interesting in real business and how to make it.

Maybe it is not bad but there is no future for this strategy. No future for project, no future for token holders.

Another group is always coming from nowhere and asking the same questions while having answers for them. They do not listen for no one and behave very rude. I think but cannot prove they are paid for it or for advertisement. Just making money.

The only thing they are trying to do is to pay attention to themselves. They really do not respect the community. Let’s ignore them. It is the best way not to hear rowdyism here.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 27/01/2019, 19:01:13 UTC
Three forecasts for the crypto market by Universa CEO Alexander Borodich. What we should expect from the regulators, and how the blockchain will be used in 2019.

Read more:
https://www.crypto-news.in/guest-stories/glance-future-3-forecasts-cryptocurrency-market/

Never heard of blockchain voting in Japan. Good read, thanks for sharing.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] UNIVERSA | Blockchain Protocol for Business
by
amoredore
on 17/01/2019, 20:00:55 UTC

They didn't even make this guide

"This has been made in collaboration with our community and the lovely people behind https://blockchainstories.com"

Useless team behind Universa, they talk and talk, but results are non-existent. You won't find much competent talent outside a couple of devs

Your thoughts seem to be rather interesting, indeed.
What are 'existent results' from your point of view? You do not count Mainnet, swap option, smart contracts, hypertokens, etc., do you?
Needless to say, the team members are the ones who have been always helping users on Telegram, Facebook, email, and many other social networks. Do you still claim we they useless? That would be a quite queer thing to say.

Let's outline the facts briefly:

- Mainnet was launched in April 2018, fine. Great, huge success.

- Swap Option was made available in August-Sep 2018, sure, very long overdue, by this point many already become disheartened over Universas lack of progress. Guess what though, those UTN you swapped for have no real use atm, swap to UTNP and save yourself the hassle.

- Hypertokens, utterly useless. Lets examine what we know, to this day Universa has a 14k volume across all markets, a pitiful sum, feels like i'm back in 2013. How does volume come into play? It's the only metric from the outside anyone has to gauge adoption of Universa, and if adoption is not there, the use of Hypertokens (ie a stablecoin and pairs) is utterly useless.

- Userinterface is in misery, with 2-3 access points to go into the wallet, and do various of tasks.

- UTN is useless, does not function anywhere outside of the system designed for it, we are still trading ERC-20 Tokens, which has more use than anything the Universa team has created. UTNP gets more TXs than everything on UTN's chain. Why? Simple, the team designed a system that requires a full-fledged integration into an exchange and outside sources. Thus, listing UTN on any exchange, becomes a very difficult and obscure task.

- Transacting UTN is a very cumbersome, un-friendly and virtually unusable. When is the last time you gave someone a file (containing 100 USD), and they had to upload it to redeem it? Never, again useless system.

- Team continues to explain to the community about B2B, their essential focus, we've only seen 1 deal made in more than a year, and that happened recently with some internet provider in Tunisia. Sure, great, but only a momentary brief candle light.

- Team continues to argue against marketing, even updating simple information, such as removing "ICO Has Ended From website, and even here." How long does this task take? Not even 3 minutes, especially here on Bitcointalk. Obviously "their priorities are elsewhere," and time is so "limited," and 3 minutes of their time definitely can't be diverted, because they are working so diligently on the benefit of the project. They can't even edit and update their own information, the only thing that's keeping this project alive, community members.

- Team defends scams and doesn't want to acknowledge scams that occurred on their chain, in case of SmartGold and Quick (?). Scams occurred on UTN blockchain as "smart contracts." both have no activity for over half a year now, and yes they will censor you for bringing this up. One Russian who i never saw speak in the telegram channel, was amendment about censoring me immediately. Red flag.

- Team is desperate to bring us new information, by giving us not updates about their project, but updates about the most useless pieces of information. Case-in-point, their latest tweet. https://twitter.com/Universa_News

- Team doesn't want to market their project anywhere, team has no focus or priority to bring on other teams to develop smart contracts. They expect people to stumble apon their project, and create for it. That process only works, if your blockchain is visible in the first place, leading me back to volume of the coin. The only 2 projects that made contracts, where the 2 scamcoins above, run by Russians ironically.

- Universa the interest from community members, twitter followers have declined by 300, telegram users by 1k (over the past 5 months).



The Positives:

- AB (the CEO), is trying to make something of the project, but has nothing to show for all his hard work
- Core developer team understands, and is highly capable
- Project has potential of being a very successful blockchain
- Team understands crypto to an extent, attempting to shy away from hype-trains (which also negatively impacts their prospects)
- Admin team is active, the last tree branch for everyone who's involed. If they stopped talking, then this project would of died a long time ago





Lets go in deeper, the admins.

- Team of admins is good, they consistently answer the same question about UTNP-UTN Swap, because the core team's inability to update all other information elsewhere. Thus, viewing their Telegram, 90% of all interactions are about the swap. Very talented.
- Team of responders are always active, but these are the lowest level jobs, re-regurgitating information that has been available for months now. I don't necessarily blame them, because the majority of crypto users are brain-dead. But also, there's a severe lack of information anywhere outside of their Telegram group.




Again, if anyone is curious, just look at Universa's volume, the ultimate meter for any crypto's performance. There's a lot of other miscellaneous pieces of information, a lot of more detail that can go into these points, but i really not going to spend time pointing information that the team takes and throws in the trash can, or is reluctant to even understand or acknowledge.




I don't know about the rest but I didn't lose hope in the project and still believe in it. I think most of the negative comes from the price and low volumes. I think this year it will be improved. They don't want to market undeveloped product. Seems wise from my point of view. Plus, this new partnership should give some boost to the volume. I think it's too early too judge about the overall progress of the project after just one year. Many things were done but that was just one year. Patient ones will reap the rewards.

Me neither. This bear market even strengthened my belief that this project is bound to succeed. I see many remarks from tk808 that it's all useless but I'd rather say that almost nobody uses it. Those are different things. Tech works great. We have 20k+ tx. Now AB is working his up to get more partnerships. We got quite plenty of those but all we need now is some patience until they are fully implemented. After it, the project will fly.