Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 71 results by analyticnomad
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 11/09/2025, 01:45:41 UTC
Renting a docker is taking 2-3 min until is operational.
One docker is containing max 16 cards.
So having something automated for a bigger number of cards, should take 5 min until can start processing.
Renting a quantum is costing minimum 100$/minute

Wait.... you can actually rent a quantum computer?!?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 07/09/2025, 17:13:16 UTC
Hello, I would like to share something with the forum administrator via email. Does anyone know how to contact him?

Did you solve it?! Was that signal from you, srsly I was waiting for this message, @mahmood1356? I’ve stopped scanning. I think you have doubts about the bots, but follow what the others are saying.
Don’t forget me Grin 123456789432PgWu32w4fUA8qvL4WxRvHj. I’m sure you did it, and guys, we have a solver for 71, let’s help him transfer it properly

I have spent a lot of time and money on puzzles, and with the discussions I have seen in the forum, I really can't trust anyone except the forum administrator. I would like to ask the forum administrator to introduce me to a way to communicate before it's too late. Thank you.

If you really found the key, you wouldn't sit and wait and wouldn't look for the forum administrator, you would read this topic, there have been so many forum posts on how to transfer step by step, a couple of pages back, there is even a script that will create a raw signed transaction for you, so that you can send it through Mara Pool later


If you look at his old posts, I don't think someone who can't even tell the difference between puzzle 71 and 135 would be able to solve any BTC puzzle, let alone spend money on it. He published the prefix list WP released, and when someone said the list belonged to them, he denied it. He also asked something about an RTX 2070, etc. In short, every post is nonsense and inconsistent. Even if he did have the key -which I absolutely don't believe Smiley  and somehow found it by pure coincidence, he would have transferred it safely if they were capable of understanding what was written. I just see him as someone who wants attention.


I don't remember saying that I found the key to the puzzle,!! You misunderstood and that's why you created a problem for yourself! I just asked the forum administrator for a way to communicate, and I'll say it again, if I have found the key to the puzzle, it is impossible for me to quickly transfer it with these methods and the words of some people so that your robots will be happy, it is impossible for a robot to be happy this time about stealing the Puzzle 71 prize!!!


This is pretty much admitting to solving it. Why even say this?

"If you thought I would be provoked by your words and transfer it without a secure way so that you or your bots could steal it like Puzzle 69, I must say that you are completely wrong" 

I feel like you solved it and now just trying to get people off the scent to buy yourself some time to figure out how to get it off, only to come to the eventual conclusion that MARA is the best way.

And I hope it was you that found it. The guy with some far off theories that everyone dismissed, and some people even made fun of found #71? That would be ironic poetry.




Let me say it again, I'm sure he hasn't found it Smiley And which theory are you talking about? I'm curious who is dismissing it.  If you talk about the AI and the btc puzzle for 10 minutes and then ask something like, 'Could there be a connection between the cloud formations over California and the keys to the Bitcoin puzzles?', AI would start explaining a long theory just like the ones here and these kinds of people will think it's a real theory and post it here is this what you call a theory? Do you really think these have been dismissed? I seriously have no words.

Oh I get the skepticism. I'm also playing devils advocate but he went from asking a lot of questions about everything to 'I need to speak to a mod' and "If you thought I would be provoked by your words and transfer it without a secure way" pretty damn quickly.

I'm just saying he seems like a nice guy, clearly a language barrier (but thats okay), and maybe a little conspiratorial, but don't put it past him or write if off completely. #71 doesn't care how crazy or misinformed your methods are.

I understand your point, and I agree with some parts. However:

First of all, I can't say whether he's a good or bad person I don’t know him, and I don't think I ever will.  I’m aware there’s a language barrier on his side, but I also have one myself, so I’m probably the last person who would judge someone for that. English isn’t my native language either including this sentence, I rely on writing assistance for many of them.

I'm sorry, but even so, you can reach a certain level of understanding enough to comment in this thread, at least. And if someone can form sentences like, “This absolutely must be the case, you're wrong, if 71’s public key being leaked means bots are grabbing funds so fast, then why aren’t they grabbing from 135? See? You’re all wrong. Here’s an address take it and we'll see .... let’s test it, let’s see who’s right and who’s wrong,”
or things like “Look at what I wrote I’m amazing, clearly better than all of you,”  then that suggests a certain level of fluency or familiarity with the context and jargon.

So naturally, I judge them accordingly. Regardless of the language being used, statements like those unfortunately don’t give the impression of someone who’s simply a “nice guy,” but rather someone who’s trying to attract attention.

And yes, you're right just like you said, 71 doesn’t care who solves it, but whoever does will find a way to transfer the funds in time.  If they can’t, they’d start worrying, knowing someone else could solve it at any moment.  To be honest, I’d probably prefer the funds go to a charity or even be burned by sending them to a BTC burn address rather than be claimed by people acting like this.   Anyway... In this thread, instead of posts like “I can only speak with an admin, the admin must contact me immediately, this is extremely important, it might already be too late, omg the world is ending, find Satoshi for me, it's urgent” (which, I’m sorry, but I find a bit ridiculous), there are actually people asking sincere questions.   One last thing if 71 gets solved and the funds are transferred within a day or two, no matter who does it, even if it’s not someone from this forum, I'm pretty sure he’ll either come here and say “I solved it,” or stay quiet and drop subtle lines to imply he did it.

I won’t drag this out further. Good luck to all of you.


I get it, man. In general I default to 'most people are genuinely good people'. This forum is no different. I also can't judge anyone about asking stupid questions or being annoying. Trust me when I say I have been super annoying - asking people for help/clarification and everyone has always been super cool and patient about it. I also won't spam the thread about this anymore.





Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 07/09/2025, 15:54:58 UTC
Hello, I would like to share something with the forum administrator via email. Does anyone know how to contact him?

Did you solve it?! Was that signal from you, srsly I was waiting for this message, @mahmood1356? I’ve stopped scanning. I think you have doubts about the bots, but follow what the others are saying.
Don’t forget me Grin 123456789432PgWu32w4fUA8qvL4WxRvHj. I’m sure you did it, and guys, we have a solver for 71, let’s help him transfer it properly

I have spent a lot of time and money on puzzles, and with the discussions I have seen in the forum, I really can't trust anyone except the forum administrator. I would like to ask the forum administrator to introduce me to a way to communicate before it's too late. Thank you.

If you really found the key, you wouldn't sit and wait and wouldn't look for the forum administrator, you would read this topic, there have been so many forum posts on how to transfer step by step, a couple of pages back, there is even a script that will create a raw signed transaction for you, so that you can send it through Mara Pool later


If you look at his old posts, I don't think someone who can't even tell the difference between puzzle 71 and 135 would be able to solve any BTC puzzle, let alone spend money on it. He published the prefix list WP released, and when someone said the list belonged to them, he denied it. He also asked something about an RTX 2070, etc. In short, every post is nonsense and inconsistent. Even if he did have the key -which I absolutely don't believe Smiley  and somehow found it by pure coincidence, he would have transferred it safely if they were capable of understanding what was written. I just see him as someone who wants attention.


I don't remember saying that I found the key to the puzzle,!! You misunderstood and that's why you created a problem for yourself! I just asked the forum administrator for a way to communicate, and I'll say it again, if I have found the key to the puzzle, it is impossible for me to quickly transfer it with these methods and the words of some people so that your robots will be happy, it is impossible for a robot to be happy this time about stealing the Puzzle 71 prize!!!


This is pretty much admitting to solving it. Why even say this?

"If you thought I would be provoked by your words and transfer it without a secure way so that you or your bots could steal it like Puzzle 69, I must say that you are completely wrong" 

I feel like you solved it and now just trying to get people off the scent to buy yourself some time to figure out how to get it off, only to come to the eventual conclusion that MARA is the best way.

And I hope it was you that found it. The guy with some far off theories that everyone dismissed, and some people even made fun of found #71? That would be ironic poetry.




Let me say it again, I'm sure he hasn't found it Smiley And which theory are you talking about? I'm curious who is dismissing it.  If you talk about the AI and the btc puzzle for 10 minutes and then ask something like, 'Could there be a connection between the cloud formations over California and the keys to the Bitcoin puzzles?', AI would start explaining a long theory just like the ones here and these kinds of people will think it's a real theory and post it here is this what you call a theory? Do you really think these have been dismissed? I seriously have no words.

Oh I get the skepticism. I'm also playing devils advocate but he went from asking a lot of questions about everything to 'I need to speak to a mod' and "If you thought I would be provoked by your words and transfer it without a secure way" pretty damn quickly.

I'm just saying he seems like a nice guy, clearly a language barrier (but thats okay), and maybe a little conspiratorial, but don't put it past him or write if off completely. #71 doesn't care how crazy or misinformed your methods are.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 07/09/2025, 15:06:46 UTC
Hello, I would like to share something with the forum administrator via email. Does anyone know how to contact him?

Did you solve it?! Was that signal from you, srsly I was waiting for this message, @mahmood1356? I’ve stopped scanning. I think you have doubts about the bots, but follow what the others are saying.
Don’t forget me Grin 123456789432PgWu32w4fUA8qvL4WxRvHj. I’m sure you did it, and guys, we have a solver for 71, let’s help him transfer it properly

I have spent a lot of time and money on puzzles, and with the discussions I have seen in the forum, I really can't trust anyone except the forum administrator. I would like to ask the forum administrator to introduce me to a way to communicate before it's too late. Thank you.

If you really found the key, you wouldn't sit and wait and wouldn't look for the forum administrator, you would read this topic, there have been so many forum posts on how to transfer step by step, a couple of pages back, there is even a script that will create a raw signed transaction for you, so that you can send it through Mara Pool later


If you look at his old posts, I don't think someone who can't even tell the difference between puzzle 71 and 135 would be able to solve any BTC puzzle, let alone spend money on it. He published the prefix list WP released, and when someone said the list belonged to them, he denied it. He also asked something about an RTX 2070, etc. In short, every post is nonsense and inconsistent. Even if he did have the key -which I absolutely don't believe Smiley  and somehow found it by pure coincidence, he would have transferred it safely if they were capable of understanding what was written. I just see him as someone who wants attention.


I don't remember saying that I found the key to the puzzle,!! You misunderstood and that's why you created a problem for yourself! I just asked the forum administrator for a way to communicate, and I'll say it again, if I have found the key to the puzzle, it is impossible for me to quickly transfer it with these methods and the words of some people so that your robots will be happy, it is impossible for a robot to be happy this time about stealing the Puzzle 71 prize!!!


This is pretty much admitting to solving it. Why even say this?

"If you thought I would be provoked by your words and transfer it without a secure way so that you or your bots could steal it like Puzzle 69, I must say that you are completely wrong" 

I feel like you solved it and now just trying to get people off the scent to buy yourself some time to figure out how to get it off, only to come to the eventual conclusion that MARA is the best way.

And I hope it was you that found it. The guy with some far off theories that everyone dismissed, and some people even made fun of found #71? That would be ironic poetry.


Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 30/08/2025, 14:27:58 UTC
Hello, guys!
Ultra lightweight CUDACyclone is ready, speed is 1.3Gkeys/s on RTX4060.
Key feature - extremely low VRAM usage for rented gpu. Less than 500Mb VRAM on RTX4090.
It will work even if Vanity or Keyhunt doesn’t start.
And also this is a good studying sample for your education (why not)? Total 7 small files.
Link: https://github.com/Dookoo2/CUDACyclone

With Little tweaks.. prefix enthusiast like this  Grin

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/08/30/UnUdlg.gif

Are you mapping the matching positions or something? Reminds me of sudoku in a way.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 29/08/2025, 20:02:36 UTC
Hello,
I am new in this, but i have a question for everybody: The puzzle creator was fan of Freddie Mercury?
I discovered a patern that is matching a song of Freddie Mercury.

Okay? Go on....
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 22/08/2025, 17:37:18 UTC
Guess who win first
135 or 71
And  your comments, reason ?

Seems 71,  cause more people hashing 71 😅

135
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 20/08/2025, 21:38:28 UTC
Hello, guys!
Ultra lightweight CUDACyclone is ready, speed is 1.3Gkeys/s on RTX4060.
Key feature - extremely low VRAM usage for rented gpu. Less than 500Mb VRAM on RTX4090.
It will work even if Vanity or Keyhunt doesn’t start.
And also this is a good studying sample for your education (why not)? Total 7 small files.
Link: https://github.com/Dookoo2/CUDACyclone

Cool, it's a pity I won't be able to try it, I have an AMD card Sad

Why wouldn't this work with an AMD card?

because it is made for nvidia, and amd cards do not give such speed  Smiley


Ah yes, I see. I was thinking AMD processor not card.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 20/08/2025, 19:58:43 UTC
Hello, guys!
Ultra lightweight CUDACyclone is ready, speed is 1.3Gkeys/s on RTX4060.
Key feature - extremely low VRAM usage for rented gpu. Less than 500Mb VRAM on RTX4090.
It will work even if Vanity or Keyhunt doesn’t start.
And also this is a good studying sample for your education (why not)? Total 7 small files.
Link: https://github.com/Dookoo2/CUDACyclone

Cool, it's a pity I won't be able to try it, I have an AMD card Sad

Why wouldn't this work with an AMD card?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 17/08/2025, 18:38:54 UTC
How long does it take to NOT be a "newbie" anymore on this forum?
If you continue to post worthless garbage that nobody deems merit-worthy, you'll stay Newbie forever.

How about you inform yourself by reading a few of the sticky threads in Beginners & Help section. I'm certain it's explained there clearly how ranking up works and that both Activity and Merits are needed. You lack the latter.

It's no surprise that many garbage posters here have mostly zero merits. There's a reason...

Fair enough. I haven't been able to contribute much. No excuses. Play like a champion.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 15/08/2025, 22:32:47 UTC
As I said, I'm curious about computers, but I have my own code that makes it very fast. I improved the vanity. I won't need to hire anyone. Anyway, thanks for your help.
But it would be really cool if he released the code, because FixedPaul, Alberto, Benjade Jean Lucas, RC, and several colleagues did this for the community and cryptography's knowledge. But it's his right not to share it. Who knows, maybe one day we'll have the pleasure of seeing this code. And I say this as someone curious about computing.

Kowalla could present us with his code. I believe it must be the best code ever written. but he will never do that, I believe.
Guys im using BitCrack$ on vast.ai but the speed he give me is target 3079.36 MKey/s  how you guys manage to push at 4090 7 GK?  thank you

Check out my GitHub (Vanitysearch-bitcrack), 6.8/6.9 bk/s on a 4090.

I’m working on a version without prefixes and other useless stuff, plus some optimizations. It’ll hit 7.1 bk/s, and I’m planning to release it in the next few weeks


He's the man who won’t tell you where he found $50, because he’s saving the spot for tomorrow — and he’s already calculated the odds are better for him.

He would absolutely tell you where and how he found $50 but he's not going to fly you out first class and give you a piggy back ride to the spot.

People contribute in their own ways. He certainly has, along with quite a few other people on here. Honestly, its our fault for playing a game we don't completely understand. Just keep trying to learn and/or hire a dev on Upwork.

Well I do. You for hire? lol jk
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 15/08/2025, 21:17:46 UTC
But it would be really cool if he released the code, because FixedPaul, Alberto, Benjade Jean Lucas, RC, and several colleagues did this for the community and cryptography's knowledge. But it's his right not to share it. Who knows, maybe one day we'll have the pleasure of seeing this code. And I say this as someone curious about computing.

Kowalla could present us with his code. I believe it must be the best code ever written. but he will never do that, I believe.
Guys im using BitCrack$ on vast.ai but the speed he give me is target 3079.36 MKey/s  how you guys manage to push at 4090 7 GK?  thank you

Check out my GitHub (Vanitysearch-bitcrack), 6.8/6.9 bk/s on a 4090.

I’m working on a version without prefixes and other useless stuff, plus some optimizations. It’ll hit 7.1 bk/s, and I’m planning to release it in the next few weeks


He's the man who won’t tell you where he found $50, because he’s saving the spot for tomorrow — and he’s already calculated the odds are better for him.

He would absolutely tell you where and how he found $50 but he's not going to fly you out first class and give you a piggy back ride to the spot.

People contribute in their own ways. He certainly has, along with quite a few other people on here. Honestly, its our fault for playing a game we don't completely understand. Just keep trying to learn and/or hire a dev on Upwork.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 15/08/2025, 21:03:07 UTC
Kowalla could present us with his code. I believe it must be the best code ever written. but he will never do that, I believe.
Guys im using BitCrack$ on vast.ai but the speed he give me is target 3079.36 MKey/s  how you guys manage to push at 4090 7 GK?  thank you

Check out my GitHub (Vanitysearch-bitcrack), 6.8/6.9 bk/s on a 4090.

I’m working on a version without prefixes and other useless stuff, plus some optimizations. It’ll hit 7.1 bk/s, and I’m planning to release it in the next few weeks


He's the man who won’t tell you where he found $50, because he’s saving the spot for tomorrow — and he’s already calculated the odds are better for him.

He would absolutely tell you where and how he found $50 but he's not going to fly you out first class and give you a piggy back ride to the spot.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 15/08/2025, 17:51:08 UTC
How long does it take to NOT be a "newbie" anymore on this forum?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 11/08/2025, 17:09:09 UTC
these puzzles are "illegal", a "scam" or "impossible"

Yo, even if you crack the code, who’s to say you’ll even get the bag? That’s mad sus. How’s that a fair race? Straight-up scam vibes. 💯

Oh look! here's one now! jk
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 11/08/2025, 13:19:39 UTC
Hello, I'm new to this platform, and I came across this thread, It seem interesting and want to join in active participation 

Welcome. You don't have to announce that you want to join in participation, you can just participate.

Right now they're all talking about ethics in bot use for the 10,000,000th GD time. Coming up next; someone will bring up how these puzzles are "illegal", a "scam" or "impossible", and stay tuned next week for the prefix vs. deterministic iterations debate!
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 05/08/2025, 17:39:46 UTC
Cheers Grin


There's just one thing left. How do I get the WIF from puzzle 71?   Undecided

I accidentally found it when i was typing  18 random numbers, i will send you so you can be happy Grin

That’s like sneezing and solving a Rubik’s Cube mid-sneeze!  Grin

Its more like a Rubik's Cube sneezing and solving you mid-sneeze
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 04/08/2025, 02:01:46 UTC

the advantage is the ability to reach areas where random or sequential will never reach, and each base random number should be pass through transformations, that way is much more powerful

and that includes:

1) binary shifting(depending on the binary string length)
2) hex rotation(or in a binary format)
3) binary reversion
4) binary inversion

this are the 4 basic transforms that perform in nested loops and that no collision and give unique results

you cannot hit the target directly, but you can reach its transformed form

What do you mean by areas that the sequential method can never reach?

in a huge space, there are places where random never reaches....or will reach in a hundred years...

if you do tests, you will see what i am talking about

Damn. Seemed kinda cool until you said that. You lost me there buddy. Please explain.

Its not like flipping a coin, expecting close to a 50/50 EV and not accounting for it landing on its side.

lets say we search a private key of "1abcdef555"

we can go random, and at some point randomize a hex private key like "2bcdef0666"

and we do a rotation downwards

--------------------------

2bcdef0666

|
v

1abcdef555


--------------------------

so each hex char have 16 options from 0 to F

there are 16 different private keys, hitting one of them we do a 16 times rotation of each char and hit the target private key hex

so:

           1 A B C D E F 5 5 5
           ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
           2 B C D E F 0 6 6 6
           3 C D E F 0 1 7 7 7
           4 D E F 0 1 2 8 8 8
           5 E F 0 1 2 3 9 9 9
           6 F 0 1 2 3 4 A A A
           7 0 1 2 3 4 5 B B B
           8 1 2 3 4 5 6 C C C
           9 2 3 4 5 6 7 D D D - and here we hit the private key we search for
           A 3 4 5 6 7 8 E E E
           B 4 5 6 7 8 9 F F F
           C 5 6 7 8 9 A 0 0 0
           D 6 7 8 9 A B 1 1 1
           E 7 8 9 A B C 2 2 2
           F 8 9 A B C D 3 3 3
           0 9 A B C D E 4 4 4
           1 A B C D E F 5 5 5 ← back to original

so i call this a "mirror" of a private key

we can also reverse the hex and do the same

16 vertical rotations + 16 reversed vertical rotations = 32 different private keys hitting which we hit directly the private key hex

this is on vertical

its easy to understand, but how about if we do the same on a "horizontal" shift, depending on the hex length we do a shift by 1 hex char in a cycle so:

abc -> bca -> cab -> abc

this gives us another amount of mirrors (depending on the private key hex length)

so there are "vertical" and "horizontal" mirrors

but wait, how about if we reverse them and do the same? even more mirrors

oh i almost forgot...if we do a binary inversion and repeat the process this doubles the amount of "mirror" keys

do you think by doing this kind of "operations" there is a tiny chance of hitting something?

so i combined all of these in a nested loops

I did a simple python script on CPU to understand this: https://github.com/puzzleman22/Bitcoin-puzzle-transformations-CPU

also a GPU implementation: https://github.com/puzzleman22/Bitcoin-puzzle-transformations-CPU

its not so fast, because of the transformation operations that create a big divergence between threads on GPU, but it does the "thing"

you can try to use this idea on full range or on bitcoin puzzles

its not random, its not sequential, its a 3D search in the whole space, by applying full transformations

and with enough computational power this can be quite effective

in a binary format its even more accurate, cause it can hit tiny pieces

on hex format is faster, but less flexible


YOU CANNOT HIT THE PRIVATE KEY DIRECTLY, BUT YOU CAN HIT ITS "MIRRORS"


I see what you mean about rotating, vertical, horizontal, and reversing now. I'm wondering if the cost of computational speed is worth the mangling of every random key and/or did it just complicate things by the factor of whatever additional operations were added.

In the end, random is random and we're talking about quintillions of keys. I like the approach, though.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 03/08/2025, 22:39:32 UTC

the advantage is the ability to reach areas where random or sequential will never reach, and each base random number should be pass through transformations, that way is much more powerful

and that includes:

1) binary shifting(depending on the binary string length)
2) hex rotation(or in a binary format)
3) binary reversion
4) binary inversion

this are the 4 basic transforms that perform in nested loops and that no collision and give unique results

you cannot hit the target directly, but you can reach its transformed form

What do you mean by areas that the sequential method can never reach?

in a huge space, there are places where random never reaches....or will reach in a hundred years...

if you do tests, you will see what i am talking about

Damn. Seemed kinda cool until you said that. You lost me there buddy. Please explain.

Its not like flipping a coin, expecting close to a 50/50 EV and not accounting for it landing on its side.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
analyticnomad
on 19/07/2025, 16:57:31 UTC
I have been experimenting for months with popular algorithms like Kangaroo, Baybestep,.. but all have no results, need more efficient algorithms. As the last comment of author Satoshi_Rising he said all addresses belong to the same wallet, this means they have the same master key. Hope some genius will have more ideas.
 Grin
These algorithms are useless in those puzzles in which the public key has not been revealed, the first on the list with that condition is 135 and yes, without another type of approximation it is practically impossible to solve.

Then explain why 1-70 were solved without the pub key.