Search content
Sort by
Showing 14 of 14 results by bag holder
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
Any good news Decred? I'm still hope it will get pump or rate back again to 0.02 like last big pump. Still hold some decred coin. 
Btw will it reach rate 0.05 or more? Like DASH or ETH coin? I hope for that rate because supply is just 5m btw.
Btw will it reach rate 0.05 or more? Like DASH or ETH coin? I hope for that rate because supply is just 5m btw.
yep all coins is growing up, decred is goind down 0,009 atm, just freez my dep on this shit. Best to by ripple or som.
Woh... it will down to 0.009 and more? rip...
Just hope dev or someone for pump again.
Buying the dips is more profitable than buying the highs, 0.009 might be a good dip to buy.
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
Me, too. Keep in Wallet carefully.
I suggest you to withdraw coins from exchange and lock them in Proof-of-Stake mining
Nice to have some free coins, while you waiting for the rise.
https://docs.decred.org/mining/proof-of-stake/
Can we PoS ourselves?
As in solo PoS mining? Yes, but you will need 100% uptime on your wallet or you risk missing votes / being rewarded.
Otherwise, you can use staking pools. Good list with pool stats at the bottom of the page: https://dcrstats.com/
And if you don't want to handle staking yourself, there's the Evolution pool, which handles buying and staking tickets for you: https://evolution.dcrstats.com/en
POS algo has been hacked! it's called stake-grinding and you all are screwed!! :-D Meni Rosenfeld where art thou? lols i call bullshit on DCR/DECEND
I read about how stake-grinding applies to bitcoin. How does it apply to POS coins, and especially how does it apply to decred?
Re: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Hybrid PoW/PoS | btcsuite Devs | Tons of New Features | Go
How come Decred devs have chosen such an UNdemocratic mining algorithm for the POW part?
I know that blake is a near perfect cryptographic algo, but that is not my point!!
ASICs will come (fpga are heavily used already for this algo).
I know that blake is a near perfect cryptographic algo, but that is not my point!!
ASICs will come (fpga are heavily used already for this algo).
How long do you estimate it will take to develop ASICs for blake? It took years before they were developed for litecoin, and litecoin has been in the top 10 for years. It used to be the number two coin so its ASIC developers were guaranteed a good ROI. Decred has a lower market cap so ASIC developers aren't guaranteed a good ROI if they develop blake ASICs for it.
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Huobi itself shows trades a few seconds ago.
https://www.huobi.com/market/cny_btc
Bitcoinity says the last trade was 9 hours ago.
https://bitcoinity.org/markets/huobi/CNY
There might be a glitch in the API that bitcoinwisdom and bitcoinity use to get the latest trading data from huobi.
Re: [ANN] Wrapper. I2P Market. Zerocoin Source and Fourier Protocol
this is starting to look as if the dev's just abandoned the project the second they got access to the funds.
it was scam since the beginning (copy/past answers), and he will appear again with new scam c-cex ico in near future.When I asked the dev if he would produce a short video introducing himself he refused. C-cex recommends that's the minimum a dev should do to prove he's legit. I wouldn't recommend investing in any c-cex ICO whose dev won't prove who he is. C-cex itself says it has hosted so many scam ICOs that it can't vouch for any ICO dev.
If this coin's dev starts a new scam c-cex ICO he won't prove who he is.
The c-cex ICO rules recommend that coin developers provide Proof of Developer, Coinsource Trust Index rating, or a short video where coin developers introduce themselves. C-cex also states it can't vouch for coin developers because of scams and other negative events.
Will the wrapper devs be providing Proof of Developer, Trust Index rating, or a short video introducing themselves?
https://c-cex.com/?id=ico
Will the wrapper devs be providing Proof of Developer, Trust Index rating, or a short video introducing themselves?
https://c-cex.com/?id=ico
Quote
ICO rules
9 Due to recent scams and other negative events, C-CEX can no longer vouch for coin developers. There is no way to verify a developer's identity or to prosecute an individual or team that abandons the projects or otherwise does not adhere to the stated ICO/coin terms without having a substantial legal infrastructure which we can not provide.
10 If the coin developers can not provide a POD (Proof of Developer) or Coinsource Trust Index rating, C-CEX will recommend the provision of a short video where coin developers introduce themselves and their coin and explain the basic concepts behind the coin and why they believe it can be successful.
9 Due to recent scams and other negative events, C-CEX can no longer vouch for coin developers. There is no way to verify a developer's identity or to prosecute an individual or team that abandons the projects or otherwise does not adhere to the stated ICO/coin terms without having a substantial legal infrastructure which we can not provide.
10 If the coin developers can not provide a POD (Proof of Developer) or Coinsource Trust Index rating, C-CEX will recommend the provision of a short video where coin developers introduce themselves and their coin and explain the basic concepts behind the coin and why they believe it can be successful.
We are working in getting an interview going where we answer questions and let people know a bit more about the developer team since this seems to be very important for investors.
Is there any update on your work to produce a short video introducing yourselves and your coin?
You will make more from your ICO if you produce that video because few investors trust anonymous devs.
We made contact with a crypto related podcast and if everything goes well we should be on soon. We won't be launching a video and it was never stated anywhere we would do it.
Re: [ANN] LubeCoin | Transfer money without friction ++ VERY HIGH BLOCK REWARD ++
That HAS to be a mistake. Certainly lots of Lube there.
If the block reward is 698976 coins that gives 26391097940000 blocks, not taking into account the emission curve. Is there a simple explanation of the emission curve without having to use that emission calculator link in the OP?
So block reward is 698976 coins.
Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers
Wouldn't it be easier to just check it yourself, raither than asking for proof?
Yes, the blockshain hasn't moved in the last 2+ hours. It seems that a bad transaction was included that halted the chain.
Solution is being worked on as we speak.
If you make the claim, you have to show proof. This is how the internet works Yes, the blockshain hasn't moved in the last 2+ hours. It seems that a bad transaction was included that halted the chain.
Solution is being worked on as we speak.
so much fud going on in this topic.But I know you are smarter than him and you are also a regular, so you know that he is not someone who is well informed or quick to respond. So questioning him instead of checking is almost as useless as his original less then helpfull statement.
Or maybe I'm just cranky today, ignore me.
Well this is the last block the explorer shows. I don't have a lisk wallet running, so I can't tell if that explorer's out of sync or if the blockchain's frozen.
https://explorer.lisk.io/
| Id | Timestamp | Sender | Recipient | Amount (LSK) | Fee (LSK) |
| 3855404834847633275 | 2017/01/08 14:05:14 | Poloniex | 13927031237693716380L | 309.13168302 | 0.1 |
I looked at the CEX.IO website and couldn't find any doge or namecoin markets. Are you sure it was CEX.IO that sent the email? The only CEX.IO markets I could find were for bitcoin, ethereum, and litecoin, but I have never registered on it so I might have missed some.
Yes it was from them. There was a time when I mined on ghash.io (owned by cex.io) and you could sell merged mined coins like doge and namecoin directly on the exchange. Haven't visited in years; but, still receive emails.
Thanks, I checked on the internet archive and found historical webpage snapshots showing the old dogecoin and namecoin markets.
The stats for ghash.io at btc.com say it didn't mine a block in November, and only got four in October. There's a chart showing it was a massive pool in 2014, but has tailed off to insignificant now. Ghash/cex.io could be getting so desparate for money that it's raiding members old wallets.
https://btc.com/stats/pool/GHash.IO
I looked at the CEX.IO website and couldn't find any doge or namecoin markets. Are you sure it was CEX.IO that sent the email? The only CEX.IO markets I could find were for bitcoin, ethereum, and litecoin, but I have never registered on it so I might have missed some.
25000/day * $0.000216 = $5.30/day for DOGE
Why not say we no longer want to support these two coins. It is the intention of CEX.IO to confiscate all funds unless you remove them immediately to avoid losses. Even my bank is more friendly.
My bank isn't, it would have charged me $25 for the email telling me about the $5.30/day charge.
I hope CEX.IO doesn't establish a precedent that other exchanges start following. Most of us forget about coins on exchanges and only log in if they get pumped. It was bad enough logging in and finding your coins stolen in a hack, but now the exchange might have confiscated them all with outrageous fees.
Re: [ANN][ICO Running] Wrapper. I2P Market. Zerocoin Source and Fourier Protocol
The c-cex ICO rules recommend that coin developers provide Proof of Developer, Coinsource Trust Index rating, or a short video where coin developers introduce themselves. C-cex also states it can't vouch for coin developers because of scams and other negative events.
Will the wrapper devs be providing Proof of Developer, Trust Index rating, or a short video introducing themselves?
https://c-cex.com/?id=ico
Will the wrapper devs be providing Proof of Developer, Trust Index rating, or a short video introducing themselves?
https://c-cex.com/?id=ico
Quote
ICO rules
9 Due to recent scams and other negative events, C-CEX can no longer vouch for coin developers. There is no way to verify a developer's identity or to prosecute an individual or team that abandons the projects or otherwise does not adhere to the stated ICO/coin terms without having a substantial legal infrastructure which we can not provide.
10 If the coin developers can not provide a POD (Proof of Developer) or Coinsource Trust Index rating, C-CEX will recommend the provision of a short video where coin developers introduce themselves and their coin and explain the basic concepts behind the coin and why they believe it can be successful.
9 Due to recent scams and other negative events, C-CEX can no longer vouch for coin developers. There is no way to verify a developer's identity or to prosecute an individual or team that abandons the projects or otherwise does not adhere to the stated ICO/coin terms without having a substantial legal infrastructure which we can not provide.
10 If the coin developers can not provide a POD (Proof of Developer) or Coinsource Trust Index rating, C-CEX will recommend the provision of a short video where coin developers introduce themselves and their coin and explain the basic concepts behind the coin and why they believe it can be successful.
We are working in getting an interview going where we answer questions and let people know a bit more about the developer team since this seems to be very important for investors.
Is there any update on your work to produce a short video introducing yourselves and your coin?
You will make more from your ICO if you produce that video because few investors trust anonymous devs.
Re: [ANN][ICO Running] Wrapper. I2P Market. Zerocoin Source and Fourier Protocol
The c-cex ICO rules recommend that coin developers provide Proof of Developer, Coinsource Trust Index rating, or a short video where coin developers introduce themselves. C-cex also states it can't vouch for coin developers because of scams and other negative events.
Will the wrapper devs be providing Proof of Developer, Trust Index rating, or a short video introducing themselves?
https://c-cex.com/?id=ico
Will the wrapper devs be providing Proof of Developer, Trust Index rating, or a short video introducing themselves?
https://c-cex.com/?id=ico
Quote
ICO rules
9 Due to recent scams and other negative events, C-CEX can no longer vouch for coin developers. There is no way to verify a developer's identity or to prosecute an individual or team that abandons the projects or otherwise does not adhere to the stated ICO/coin terms without having a substantial legal infrastructure which we can not provide.
10 If the coin developers can not provide a POD (Proof of Developer) or Coinsource Trust Index rating, C-CEX will recommend the provision of a short video where coin developers introduce themselves and their coin and explain the basic concepts behind the coin and why they believe it can be successful.
9 Due to recent scams and other negative events, C-CEX can no longer vouch for coin developers. There is no way to verify a developer's identity or to prosecute an individual or team that abandons the projects or otherwise does not adhere to the stated ICO/coin terms without having a substantial legal infrastructure which we can not provide.
10 If the coin developers can not provide a POD (Proof of Developer) or Coinsource Trust Index rating, C-CEX will recommend the provision of a short video where coin developers introduce themselves and their coin and explain the basic concepts behind the coin and why they believe it can be successful.
What i guess isnt the question,but who is stoppling trying to block bitcoin.Companies like paypal,visa and mastercard has a lot to loose if bitcoin gets everywhere,they will loose their costumers very fast,a huge part of them not all,as the oldest may not dropp them.Soo they are in a buble trying to keep and make bitcoin unknow to the most,but well the buble is getting bigger,soo the way to fight is attack saying its is a good thing to black market and many others things,rumors to make bitcoin not grow.
Why cannot visa or paypal integrate bitcoin into their payment system? Bitcoin is just another kind of money. It can be used cheaply by the credit companies.
They could but they would lose their fees they get from the payment channels they use at the moment. There is always some kind of charge for using them even if it's hidden. If you buy an item on ebay that's priced in a different currency to your country's they charge for the currency conversion. They couldn't do that if they integrated bitcoin into their payment system.