Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 897 results by bl4kjaguar
Las Vegas Casino Strategy Investment Fund -- Strategy at baccaratforcash.com
About the Investment Fund:
The site owner claims that his strategy can earn up to 20% per day; that is better than any trading system! Since the site owner promises to use his own money to demonstrate the strategy in person, I will travel to Las Vegas to do so. I will pay for his course only once I have seen the success with my own eyes. This strategy could win BIG and I perceive the risk to be small. The site has been around for 6 years and so far I have not found any complaints.
About me:
I love to trade Peer-to-Peer and I have thousands of satisfied customers--see my page on LocalBitcoins; although I have some bad debts on this forum (I am working on it), I am obviously a reliable individual. I will determine the odds of success before risking any of your hard-earned money, and I am very well-qualified to ensure the success of this venture.
Returns on Investment:
Once I learn the strategy, anyone who invested at least $250 will have that information disclosed to them (by phone or email). This means that you save $1,250 on tuition costs.
My plan is to issue colored coins for every $1 invested; I will return 50% of the profits from this strategy to investors at the end of each day. Returns are paid as daily dividends until all shares are bought back.
Payout Structure:
Up to $5,000 Pledged or Funded: 'A' Shares are bought back at $3 per share OR three times the bitcoin amount, whichever is greater.
Over $5,000 Pledged or Funded: 'B' Shares are bought back at $2 per share OR two times the bitcoin amount, whichever is greater.
If $5,000 is funded, $2,500 must be spent on tuition; that leaves $2,500 in "working capital" earning 20% each day; shareholders receive half of the profits, so $250 is estimated to be repaid each day (assuming that the strategy will always net a profit by the end of the day). If for some reason the strategy fails to return a profit on any day, the fund will be liquidated to make investors whole again and buy back the shares as much as possible.
If you would like to pledge funds, please express your interest here or in private message; I will launch the IPO as soon as $5,000 is pledged. Thanks for reading; Happy trading!
The site owner claims that his strategy can earn up to 20% per day; that is better than any trading system! Since the site owner promises to use his own money to demonstrate the strategy in person, I will travel to Las Vegas to do so. I will pay for his course only once I have seen the success with my own eyes. This strategy could win BIG and I perceive the risk to be small. The site has been around for 6 years and so far I have not found any complaints.
About me:
I love to trade Peer-to-Peer and I have thousands of satisfied customers--see my page on LocalBitcoins; although I have some bad debts on this forum (I am working on it), I am obviously a reliable individual. I will determine the odds of success before risking any of your hard-earned money, and I am very well-qualified to ensure the success of this venture.
Returns on Investment:
Once I learn the strategy, anyone who invested at least $250 will have that information disclosed to them (by phone or email). This means that you save $1,250 on tuition costs.
My plan is to issue colored coins for every $1 invested; I will return 50% of the profits from this strategy to investors at the end of each day. Returns are paid as daily dividends until all shares are bought back.
Payout Structure:
Up to $5,000 Pledged or Funded: 'A' Shares are bought back at $3 per share OR three times the bitcoin amount, whichever is greater.
Over $5,000 Pledged or Funded: 'B' Shares are bought back at $2 per share OR two times the bitcoin amount, whichever is greater.
If $5,000 is funded, $2,500 must be spent on tuition; that leaves $2,500 in "working capital" earning 20% each day; shareholders receive half of the profits, so $250 is estimated to be repaid each day (assuming that the strategy will always net a profit by the end of the day). If for some reason the strategy fails to return a profit on any day, the fund will be liquidated to make investors whole again and buy back the shares as much as possible.
If you would like to pledge funds, please express your interest here or in private message; I will launch the IPO as soon as $5,000 is pledged. Thanks for reading; Happy trading!
The right to own guns in America is a direct violation of the U.N. international gun ban treaty.
You will soon see the U.N. ban all guns all over the USA. No one in America will be able to own guns.
You will soon see the U.N. ban all guns all over the USA. No one in America will be able to own guns.
U.N. gun ban law will trump the U.S. Constitution law. No one in the USA will be able to own guns, those who disobey will most likely be kill or be sent to re-education camps.
Legal filing has been accepted in District Court to end the "wheel of conspiracy" and reclaim Second Amendment rights nationwide:
http://www.tpath.org/sappa.html
I have no problem with people being "confused victims", as long as they keep their intolerant beliefs to themselves. Once they start to display their intolerance of things due to their religious beliefs, that's when we have problems. Therefore, BADecker is a "bad guy"(And a pretty dumb one at that, in fact the absolute stupidest man I've ever met online so far is BADecker).
God never limits your investigation into all facets of the Truth.
BADecker calls my God the Devil; however, he is no better-informed than anyone else who has not thoroughly read even a chapter of the Phoenix Journals and concludes (in ignorance) that the Journals were NOT produced by God's messenger "GCH".
Since neither parties offer any backing to their claims, their claims can be dismissed.
I have provided this thread with many resources, but I cannot do the reading for the student.
He ("God") went forth and has prepared safe passage and a place for each of you who would come within His shelter. The choice is individual for force is not of God and you have free-will for all choices.
What if he starts questioning your actions instead of your faith and shows you videos projected on a cloud of you touching yourself while sniffing a pair of dirty panties? Do you think he would believe that was ok or would he send you to hell?
I believe the reasoning is such that, as long as you weren't hurting anyone and had lived as a 'good' person, his religious laws about not masturbating etc. wouldn't apply because, as had been understood by him [
], he'd done a pretty shitty job in making it clear what 'He' wanted and who he was. 'He' isn't exactly unambiguous when it comes to 'Holy' texts'n'shit(tm).The understanding of your actions is for YOU to learn from.
For example, if you reject this information that I am about to present, it is good to ask yourself: WHY?
This is the most unambiguously prescriptive text ever written on this subject; it is obviously coming from God, so that makes it one of the most important things you will ever read.
If God's written understanding is not important enough for you to read through, then it is good to ask yourself: WHY?
PHOENIX OPERATOR-OWNER MANUAL
Again, you have nothing to lose by gaining TRUTH and insightbut you do have everything to lose in the physical and soul realms by remaining ignorant at the hands of the deceivers who would hide Truth from your eyes and ears.
An analysis of the content of the Bible indicates that the source has been corrupted. I agree with this quote:
There is no proof that the Bible is an "impossible" book; there is far more evidence that the content has changed, some of this evidence is referenced in the audio called FIRST CHRISTIANS. I agree with this quote:
This isn't to say that the God of the Bible is the God of the universe.
The Bible, while not as full of evidence for the existence of God, is full of evidence that shows that it is an impossible book.
The way it was written,
the period of time it took,
the traditions of the Jews (Hebrews) regarding it,
the facts of life that it expresses,
the fulfilled prophesies,
the fact that it may be the the book with the widest distribution worldwide ever,
the fact that its popularity is beyond any other,
all show that it is impossible for it to have come into existence.
So, why and how could an impossible-to-exist book ever have come into existence without God moving it into being?
No, proof is not "in the eye of the beholder."
Proof is proof. If I believe that some evidence constitutes proof for something but you don't believe the same, then neither one of us can be certain if proof is "in the eye of the beholder."
Fortunately, proof is not "in the eye of the beholder." Our opinion is irrelevant. All we need to do is look to the logical rules of sound inference to determine whether the evidence actually constitutes proof. Specifically, we look to these rules and ask the question, "Is it logical that our conclusion necessarily follows from the evidence?"
The answer is either that it does or doesn't. There is no middle ground. The evidence you keep referencing is not proof for God, and that won't change no matter how hard you try to convince yourselef.
I do think most of the bible should be seen as a story, and I think verses from the bible are irrelevant when it comes to a genuine investigation of if there is a higher power or not. The bible is just a book that has gone through many, many revisions over the years at the whims of kings and other leaders throughout history. It has little to do with if there is genuine evidence of a higher spiritual force behind the universe or not.
There is no proof that the Bible is an "impossible" book; there is far more evidence that the content has changed, some of this evidence is referenced in the audio called FIRST CHRISTIANS. I agree with this quote:
This isn't to say that the God of the Bible is the God of the universe.
The Bible, while not as full of evidence for the existence of God, is full of evidence that shows that it is an impossible book.
The way it was written,
the period of time it took,
the traditions of the Jews (Hebrews) regarding it,
the facts of life that it expresses,
the fulfilled prophesies,
the fact that it may be the the book with the widest distribution worldwide ever,
the fact that its popularity is beyond any other,
all show that it is impossible for it to have come into existence.
So, why and how could an impossible-to-exist book ever have come into existence without God moving it into being?
No, proof is not "in the eye of the beholder."
Proof is proof. If I believe that some evidence constitutes proof for something but you don't believe the same, then neither one of us can be certain if proof is "in the eye of the beholder."
Fortunately, proof is not "in the eye of the beholder." Our opinion is irrelevant. All we need to do is look to the logical rules of sound inference to determine whether the evidence actually constitutes proof. Specifically, we look to these rules and ask the question, "Is it logical that our conclusion necessarily follows from the evidence?"
The answer is either that it does or doesn't. There is no middle ground. The evidence you keep referencing is not proof for God, and that won't change no matter how hard you try to convince yourselef.
Hi BADecker,
I have found only compelling explanations of mysteries and history in Phoenix Journals, and you even agree with me in saying "Have I in these quotes accused you of pointing to a false teaching? I don't see it." so I will continue to use the Journals as a guide. I have to mention here again that a wrathful (Jealous) God is not compatible with a loving God, because wrath is not compatible with love. In Exodus 34:14, it says that God's name is Jealous, not Love. I cannot even consider your argument from "Biblical" authority before this contradiction is resolved; actually, I am not going to consider any arguments from authority because Hatonn, who is my reference, "always can back up statements with facts", and he has done so in explaining the Biblical writings, and exposing those who wrote them! Why don't you spend some time reading Hatonn's commentary; how exactly is it that you can label Hatonn a liar?
According to the OT Bible, God's very name is Jealous; this means that YHWH is totally jealous, in other words he is jealous all the time.
This is you denying that God is jealous all the time:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10892562#msg10892562
I have found only compelling explanations of mysteries and history in Phoenix Journals, and you even agree with me in saying "Have I in these quotes accused you of pointing to a false teaching? I don't see it." so I will continue to use the Journals as a guide. I have to mention here again that a wrathful (Jealous) God is not compatible with a loving God, because wrath is not compatible with love. In Exodus 34:14, it says that God's name is Jealous, not Love. I cannot even consider your argument from "Biblical" authority before this contradiction is resolved; actually, I am not going to consider any arguments from authority because Hatonn, who is my reference, "always can back up statements with facts", and he has done so in explaining the Biblical writings, and exposing those who wrote them! Why don't you spend some time reading Hatonn's commentary; how exactly is it that you can label Hatonn a liar?
According to the OT Bible, God's very name is Jealous; this means that YHWH is totally jealous, in other words he is jealous all the time.
This is you denying that God is jealous all the time:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10892562#msg10892562
You are right that the Bible does not make some distinctions and is missing a lot of neeeed commentary; in my opinion this makes the Bible unclear. I point you to Phoenix Journals for a comprehensive text that discloses truth and news/history in literal/rational language of discourse and teaching suitable for this day and age.
Edit: By the way, I still disagree with you about a "jealous/wrathful God"; God is love, and you have called my God the Devil without even so much as pointing out where God's messenger is telling you to do evil.
Edit: By the way, I still disagree with you about a "jealous/wrathful God"; God is love, and you have called my God the Devil without even so much as pointing out where God's messenger is telling you to do evil.
I like to rationally evaluate the likely origin of texts. I have some experience with reading inspired writings, so I will not hold back with what I understand to be the truth in this thread.
I can disagree with BADecker for the reason that the Bible lacks internal consistency; that makes that book invalid.
You can evaluate inspired writings by reading them entirely and evaluating their consistency; some writings have a better degree of consistency than others. The below papers are discussing the content-source problem and are helpful for understanding the problems involved in the evaluation of inspired writings and Scripture:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg11150396#msg11150396
I can disagree with BADecker for the reason that the Bible lacks internal consistency; that makes that book invalid.
Good day to everyone; I am bumping this thread because I have posted a lot of truth here.
For some reason, the joint and BADecker have yet to respond to my posts.
I will not stop posting the truth about man and God in this thread; it is too important!
I am making this post so that others may also share TRUTH in this thread.
For some reason, the joint and BADecker have yet to respond to my posts.
I will not stop posting the truth about man and God in this thread; it is too important!
Those of you who hold back that which you know to be TRUTH, do a disservice to your fellow man. In your state of fear or false allegiance, you are simply among the many controlled puppets actually working FOR the "elite". Surely a few moments of quiet reflection would counsel the folly of such a path!
I say, here and now, that the ONLY way to regain ANY true freedom is to speak out and turn this mess around. Call upon God for assistance and protection AND YOU WILL HAVE IT! If you dwell upon fear, it will consume your life and, moreover, expedite the death of your physical body.
Dwell upon that which you know to be true, and share your unique knowledge with the world. Many wait until they are literally on their deathbed to speak out, for in their final moments they finally feel that they haven't anything left to lose.
Speak out NOW and do something TRULY meaningful with your life!
ONE PERSON CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!
I say, here and now, that the ONLY way to regain ANY true freedom is to speak out and turn this mess around. Call upon God for assistance and protection AND YOU WILL HAVE IT! If you dwell upon fear, it will consume your life and, moreover, expedite the death of your physical body.
Dwell upon that which you know to be true, and share your unique knowledge with the world. Many wait until they are literally on their deathbed to speak out, for in their final moments they finally feel that they haven't anything left to lose.
Speak out NOW and do something TRULY meaningful with your life!
ONE PERSON CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!
The joint,
You may wish to read my latest posts and references to better understand the form of the proof.
All atheists are humanists; also, the Eisenbeiss case strongly supports survival, which humanists reject, so I conclude that all atheists are mistaken.
Further, we now know that life is more than just complicated chemistry and this also undermines humanism.
You may wish to read my latest posts and references to better understand the form of the proof.
All atheists are humanists; also, the Eisenbeiss case strongly supports survival, which humanists reject, so I conclude that all atheists are mistaken.
Further, we now know that life is more than just complicated chemistry and this also undermines humanism.
BADecker,
I advise you not to call my GOD the devil until you know EXACTLY what is going on.
God's messenger Hatonn delivers a message that is both literal and rational; this is what a spiritual teaching should look like.
By the way, I still disagree with you about a "jealous/wrathful God"; God is love, and you have called my God the Devil without even so much as pointing out where God's messenger is telling you to do evil.
I advise you not to call my GOD the devil until you know EXACTLY what is going on.
God's messenger Hatonn delivers a message that is both literal and rational; this is what a spiritual teaching should look like.
By the way, I still disagree with you about a "jealous/wrathful God"; God is love, and you have called my God the Devil without even so much as pointing out where God's messenger is telling you to do evil.
I am making this post so that others may also share TRUTH in this thread.
You can evaluate inspired writings by reading them entirely and evaluating their consistency; some writings have a better degree of consistency than others. The below papers are discussing the content-source problem and are helpful for understanding the problems involved in the evaluation of inspired writings and Scripture:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg11150396#msg11150396
Hi QuestionAuthority:
You use armchair skepticism, but you never bothered to experiment with the plate... The point is this:
One's own experience cannot be reduced to neural signals; consciousness is irreducible; kindly reference again Nagel's arguments and the latest research in mind science:
http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/03/thomas-nagel-and-the-anathema-of-questioning-materialism
http://www.noetic.org/library/book-reviews/irreducible-mind/
Also, on that second link you will find mention of the word hypnosis. I have made a post about that subject here. Please keep in mind that Knowledge that is not your own is dangerous, more dangerous than ignorance.
You use armchair skepticism, but you never bothered to experiment with the plate... The point is this:
One's own experience cannot be reduced to neural signals; consciousness is irreducible; kindly reference again Nagel's arguments and the latest research in mind science:
http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/03/thomas-nagel-and-the-anathema-of-questioning-materialism
http://www.noetic.org/library/book-reviews/irreducible-mind/
Also, on that second link you will find mention of the word hypnosis. I have made a post about that subject here. Please keep in mind that Knowledge that is not your own is dangerous, more dangerous than ignorance.
Finally, to demonstrate just how necessary philosophy is, keep in mind that science is wholly incapable of exploring, verifying, or concluding upon its own assumptions. The assumption of a Positivistic Universe is fundamentally required for scientific exploration, and yet 1) there is not a shred of evidence that such a Universe exists, and 2) the assumption itself is empirically unfalsifiable.
But if the assumption is empirically unfalsifiable (i.e. It's unscientific), why does science permit its use? The answer is simple: science yields to Philosophy to justify the Positivistic Universe assumption by deferring to the rules and limitations of sound inference via inductive reasoning.
Again, philosophical explanations > empirical explanations 100% of the time.
But if the assumption is empirically unfalsifiable (i.e. It's unscientific), why does science permit its use? The answer is simple: science yields to Philosophy to justify the Positivistic Universe assumption by deferring to the rules and limitations of sound inference via inductive reasoning.
Again, philosophical explanations > empirical explanations 100% of the time.
One product of the Positivistic Universe is the Computational Theory of the Mind (CTM) in which the mind was reduced to being the byproduct of a highly sophisticated, biological computerthe brain.
Irreducible Mind skillfully argues that CTM is empirically false and provides detailed documentation of what CTM cannot explain. For example, CTM never addresses how consciousness could arise from the brain, and anomalous experiences suggest otherwise. CTM cant even account for some of our everyday experiences, such as volition, or free will. CTM is a theory that reflects its origins rather than the richness of human experience.
http://www.noetic.org/library/book-reviews/irreducible-mind/
There is no way to use "placebo" as an explanation with plants.
One could, subconsciously, be providing better care to them.
Furthermore, one's own experience cannot be reduced to neural signals; consciousness is irreducible
Quote from: Merriam-Webster. "Solipsism." 2015. Web. 04 May 2015. link=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/solipsism
: a theory holding that the self can know nothing but its own modifications and that the self is the only existent thing; also : extreme egocentrism
Quote from: Axel Cleeremans. The Radical Plasticity Thesis: How the Brain Learns to Be Conscious. _Frontiers in Psychology_ 2 (2011). 10-11. Web. 30 Mar. 2015.
In other words, such a network is unable to distinguish between a veridical perception and an hallucination. Doing so would require the existence of another, independent network, whose task it is to learn to associate specific input patterns with specific patterns of activity of the first networks hidden units. That system would then be able to identify cases where the latter exists in the absence of the former, and hence, to learn to distinguish between cases of veridical perception and cases of hallucination. Such internal monitoring is viewed here as constitutive of conscious experience: A mental state is a conscious mental state when the system that possesses this mental state is (at least non-conceptually) sensitive to its existence. Thus, and unlike what is assumed to be case in HOT Theory, meta-representations can be both subpersonal and non-conceptual.
This fits with what I and Hatonn and Chopra have been saying about finding god within you and about metabiological evolution; a shift in the consciousness of consciousness.
For your reference, Deepak Chopra's The Way of the Wizard:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyMfuTzSDLw
Re: Looking for a $500 PayPal my cash card, have BTC, escrow thru LBC
Just use someone's ad on LBC; like this guy:
https://localbitcoins.com/ad/164731/
I appreciate a tip. Thanks!
https://localbitcoins.com/ad/164731/
I appreciate a tip. Thanks!
Precisely how the pla[cebo]s work should not be of as much concern to you as what they can do for you.
Quote from: UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute link=http://www.placebo.ucla.edu
One of the most puzzling facts of medicine is the placebo effect: namely, that a substantial proportion of patients report feeling better after receiving a "sugar pill," or some other treatment with no known benefit for their illness. Between 30 - 60% of patients with illnesses ranging from arthritis to depression report a substantial improvement in their symptoms after receiving a placebo. It is not clear that placebo can "cure" any illness, but the power of the placebo effect in improving symptoms and reducing suffering is impressive.
You use armchair skepticism, but you never bothered to experiment with the plate...
There is no way to use "placebo" as an explanation with plants.
Furthermore, one's own experience cannot be reduced to neural signals; consciousness is irreducible; kindly reference again Nagel's arguments and the latest research in mind science:
http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/03/thomas-nagel-and-the-anathema-of-questioning-materialism
http://www.noetic.org/library/book-reviews/irreducible-mind/
It has been two months since this post:
God is love. In my opinion, The love energy "purple plate" is physical evidence of God.
Science has proven that by projecting love or positive energy to a plant, the plant will flourish. The plate energy will also do the same thing to plants. Burns, cuts, aches and pains involve a sudden change to the normal vibration rate of tissue. The theory is that the energy around the plates helps to accelerate the healing and thus return the injured area to its normal rate of vibration.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/esp_ciencia_universalenergy09.htm
Precisely how the plates work should not be of as much concern to you as what they can do for you. There are so many mini-miracles the plates accomplish (some of which youll discover for yourself) its difficult to detail all of them.
The effect that I notice most is that healing is noticeably accelerated.
This healing device is effective and since the forum's God thread also needs healing, I recommend researching and purchasing plates for yourself and your family. You can find the plates on Amazon.
God is love. In my opinion, The love energy "purple plate" is physical evidence of God.
Science has proven that by projecting love or positive energy to a plant, the plant will flourish. The plate energy will also do the same thing to plants. Burns, cuts, aches and pains involve a sudden change to the normal vibration rate of tissue. The theory is that the energy around the plates helps to accelerate the healing and thus return the injured area to its normal rate of vibration.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/esp_ciencia_universalenergy09.htm
Precisely how the plates work should not be of as much concern to you as what they can do for you. There are so many mini-miracles the plates accomplish (some of which youll discover for yourself) its difficult to detail all of them.
The effect that I notice most is that healing is noticeably accelerated.
This healing device is effective and since the forum's God thread also needs healing, I recommend researching and purchasing plates for yourself and your family. You can find the plates on Amazon.
STOP honoring evil
If you want to know GOD
You have a good chance of proving to yourself that God exists if you get married.
YES, You stand a good chance of proving to yourself that God exists if you get married!
Here is a guide!
http://marriagemissions.com/navigating-stages-of-marriage-marriage-message-255-2/
Pascal would suggest to you to get married so that you might become a Christian. LOVE is real, and anyone can prove that to themselves as well!
Search this text for 'wager' for a better understanding of Pascal's wager:
http://library.atgti.az/categories/philosophy/R.Sorensen%20-%20A%20Brief%20History%20of%20the%20Paradox.pdf
This site is for grieving parents, victims of spiritual and emotional trauma, and others struggling to understand this spiritual journey we call life.
If you want to know GOD
You have a good chance of proving to yourself that God exists if you get married.
YES, You stand a good chance of proving to yourself that God exists if you get married!
Here is a guide!
http://marriagemissions.com/navigating-stages-of-marriage-marriage-message-255-2/
Pascal would suggest to you to get married so that you might become a Christian. LOVE is real, and anyone can prove that to themselves as well!
Search this text for 'wager' for a better understanding of Pascal's wager:
http://library.atgti.az/categories/philosophy/R.Sorensen%20-%20A%20Brief%20History%20of%20the%20Paradox.pdf
This site is for grieving parents, victims of spiritual and emotional trauma, and others struggling to understand this spiritual journey we call life.
The only realistic answer to the question, 'What is God?,' is that 'God' is only an idea representing whatever people want it to mean. 'God,' as a concept, has so many different meanings to so many different people throughout history that it is really useless to talk about the idea of a God until empirical evidence for such a Supreme Being or Consciousness can be discovered.
Someone claiming to be an inter-dimensional galactic commander is already clearly suffering from a delusional mind state.
How would you KNOW? I see that you have used an ad-hominem instead of responding to the content.
I suggest you reference Journal 21, Chapter 3 and Journal 31, Chapter 13; I propose the straightforward idea that God has come to speak with you and I through these Journals.
My proposal is modest; if this thread would but read, the truth about man and god would be known.
HATONN LIES
Readers, I and my secretary are continually called liars and bigots and every other bad name you can conjure. How so? Because I bring you that which is offered about your globe?? I don't have to go forth into the "universe" to find invisible stories to lay on you--if these be LIES--WHOSE LIES ARE THEY?? I AM BUT AN INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER!! SO BE IT.
Readers, I and my secretary are continually called liars and bigots and every other bad name you can conjure. How so? Because I bring you that which is offered about your globe?? I don't have to go forth into the "universe" to find invisible stories to lay on you--if these be LIES--WHOSE LIES ARE THEY?? I AM BUT AN INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER!! SO BE IT.
A rehash of other's opinion and interpretations is worthless. This is precisely why I give none of my scribe's opinions and always can back up statements with facts.
Excellent opportunity to get our material forth, however, for controversy of evil with truth is excellent for Aton does not often become faint at heart!
Excellent opportunity to get our material forth, however, for controversy of evil with truth is excellent for Aton does not often become faint at heart!
Why do you send correspondence and messages to me (and you did so), unless you want a response? Further, did you expect me to sit and feed you back the lies simply because you assume "THIS RECEIVER" TO BE UNINFORMED AND PLAYING THE SAME OLD GAME OF "DUPE THE PUBLIC"?
Someone claiming to be an inter-dimensional galactic commander is already clearly suffering from a delusional mind state.
How would you KNOW? I see that you have used an ad-hominem instead of responding to the content.
Cryptodevil, please consider Nagel's assertion that materialismthe idea that everything can be explained (eventually) in terms of physicsactually fails to do just that. Nagel always backs up his assertions; how about you?
Nagel insists that we know some things to exist even if materialism omits or ignores or is oblivious to them . . . It doesnt explain, for example, why the world exists at all, or how life arose from nonlife. Closer to home, it doesnt plausibly explain the fundamental beliefs we rely on as we go about our everyday business: the truth of our subjective experience, our ability to reason, our capacity to recognize that some acts are virtuous and others arent. These failures, Nagel says, arent just temporary gaps in our knowledge, waiting to be filled in by new discoveries in science. On its own terms, materialism cannot account for brute facts. Brute facts are irreducible, and materialism, which operates by breaking things down to their physical components, stands useless before them. There is little or no possibility, he writes, that these facts depend on nothing but the laws of physics.
1) If our brains are only a high-tech computer-like lump of tissue which produces our mind and personality, why does it bother to create illusions at the time of death?
Even color is a hallucination: it is begotten, in part, of the collapse of the probability waves of light quanta.
NDEs correspond with the "quirky" principles found in physics.
The transcendent nature of minds in NDEs corresponds with physics,
So where is YOUR non-god explanation for the afterlife?
There is no afterlife. It was made up by people who don't understand or are scared of death.
so what you believe if there is no afterlife? on me afterlife is there.
Where is your evidence for an afterlife? I don't think NDEs would count as the person is not even dead yet - therefore they are still a product of life and not afterlife. Just like people wou take drugs and hallucinate are still alive but still seeing weird things.
http://www.aeces.info/Top40/top40-main.shtml
http://www.near-death.com/evidence.html#a39
NDEs do count as evidence; NDEs are different from hallucinations;
There is no reason to believe that NDEs are the result of psychiatric pathology or brain dysfunction.
People have been clinically dead for several days.
NDEs change people unlike hallucinations and dreams
NDEs cannot be explained by brain chemistry alone.