Faucci and Brixx, and most of the guys he brings into the briefings are great.  The science community seems to agree that Fauci is one of if not the most qualified person in the world when it comes to infectious diseases.  Pence also does a great job.

I watch a decent chunk of most of the briefings though, and when Trump is off script or taking questions, it's just a shit show.  He regularly contradicts the experts about things they're experts in and just says the most mind blowingly stupid things - it's like he's torn between the corona hoaxers and science so he just bounces back and forth so that in the end he'll be able to claim victory no matter what.  But yeah, it does seem to be working - but everything is so weird right now it's tough to figure out what the country is actually feeling.

Can jollygood prove his accusations? No he cannot and he is frigid as hell threatening me to report me for ban if I pm him, he won't have any bit of logic in his accusations just as no proof, just as I see people like you agreeing with him without any bit of proof like writting whats true and what not by your own beliefs, that's bullshit right away.
I haven't endorsed anything how is it logical to be tagged as alt account when I been using this account for double the time he been on the forum? I'm not claiming anything he is.

Anyway, not my thread, just thought I'd point out I agree with OP about how Jollygood is abusing the trust system here, the same as all the default trust guys do.

There's no investor that left me red trust. If you think Loyce was an investor you are wrong.

Find me all the posts and flags of all the investors who I apparently stole millions from. You can't.
So Loyce said he lost $700 investment (which he didn't, he never put any money in, he got tokens and sold them for below value which he admitted), is that enough to then say it's proof of me scamming millions?
Hardly. They're all idiots if they think that.

I don't trust Lauda either, he left me negative trust to point out pocketrocketscasino was an alt of mine.....which if you see in my trust I already added that so people would know! Since I lost access to the account and the site name changed. I don't see how that can be untrustworthy. He's another idiot.

All the default trust group that left -ve trust on my profile were never players or investors in my site either. Whole forum is a cesspit

If a DT1 user doesn't post for a couple of days around the start of the month then they miss out on being in the group that are randomly selected for DT1. If they aren't selected for DT1 then they would be DT2 under a few different circumstances so their trust feedbacks would still be visible. (Any feedback is visible if you know where to look)

~snip

Paid back? Or simply counted as income?

Pretty sure it is counted as income.

Still sucks however.

Brad

No, not liking some one's opinion is not valid reason for excluding them. You are supposed to include and exclude people based on whether you think their use of the trust system is valid or not. I don't remember saying death threats were acceptable, but please feel free to quote me.

So in summary, you don't like his opinion?

Can you explain the difference. I mean your poo poohing seems worse?

FYI, I was not advocating for death threats to be allowed on the borad, rather the reply was based on the minimal effect of the death threat you mentioned in the OP ( i.e A newbie with an personal text containing death threat ) on anyone around here. I didn't knew it was offensive and would land me up with being on your exclusion list.

Old people with 5 different types of cancer?  I don't think I'd call that early!!!!  

The person that has cached the threads is the issue which is a secondary point to bring up should a thread like the 2 mentioned be cached and available for any one to see.

Both threads are certainly wrong.  So is saving a wrong thread in a cache wrong?

I would say yes it is.  But I am just a guy typing on my keyboard in New Jersey .

Actually it is about Lauda, because his criticism of Lauda was the impetus behind your peanut hunting expedition. It is all ways the same group of people with big red floppy shoes coming after anyone who does anything but wash the balls of The Clown Pope. This tactic designed to silence criticism is demonstrated by all the same users, over, and over, and over again. Still no one can tell me the imminent threat Hacker1001101001 poses to the community that warrants this kind of continual and endless prostate exam.

There isn't any feature to report a personal text on the forum to be a threat and I don't think it should be reportable as it is a users personal advertising space.

I don't even think it is that serious of an threat though, rather just an move out of spite.

I'm still trying to wrap my head around the thermometer shortage - did people not have thermometers at all before this? Or is there some reason to hoard them? It's not like these things are consumable or break easily.

You might be able to find some on Amazon that are... marketed somewhat specifically but still work well for general purposes:

https://www.amazon.com/Digital-Basal-Body-Thermometer-Temperature/dp/B07ZRL44D1