The account I'm selling has no negative trust.

There still a few who buy negative accounts but very cheap.

Thanks for bumping my thread with your generic post. And in return you get payment from your signature campaign.  Who got hacked? Who got loss?

Still selling price now at 0.03 btc

No address was staked on the account.

Still selling my senior member account. Pm me your offer.

no staked address available.

Still Selling.

WTS Senior Member
300+ activity
Posts  Quality: fair
Not hacked, no signature campaign, no loans, no scams, no staked address, no negative feedback

Price: 0.03 btc

Great for Bitmixer Campaign

Price is is still negotiable.

Hero Member
Activity: 500+
Posts Quality: Fair
No loans, not banned, no signature campaign, not hacked, no negative trust.
Price: 0.09 btc


Senior Member
Activity: 300+
Posts Quality: Fair
No loans, not banned, no signature campaign, not hacked, no negative trust.
Price: 0.05 btc

Price is negotiable
Good for Bitmixer Campaign

Bump for today!

Still selling bhw accounts 50% discount.

You still need but don't bother replying. Are you just increasing your post?

Check your pm.

1.
Rank: Elite Member
Has 1500 posts
500+ likes received/ points
Price: 0.15 btc
Registered: 2009

2.
Rank: Regular Member
Has 500 posts
Has 500 likes received
Registered 2010
Price:0.05 btc

3.
Rank: Regular Member
Has 300 posts
Has 100 likes received
Registered: 2008
Price:0.04 btc

Accounts can posts on marketplace.

I accept escrow and offers

three refunded. 

if they were a scam would they have given my btc back???

I'm hanging on to one 

[/quote]

But why would you want to finance their operation?  They don't appear to be offering interest on this loan.  They don't appear to be offering equity in the company, or profit sharing, or anything.  Forget about believing in their business plan for a moment, why would you or I or anyone else want to give them an interest free loan?
[/quote]

 a good point, but isn't that what kickstarter is?  We all help the company get to the point of launch in exchange for a thanks and a shot at their product for a discount  once it releases...  I got a hefty discount.  I do see your point about me buying 4 of them though.  It wasn't to support them, just to give one to the girlfriend, the younger brother and an extra one to sell-

fyi.  given all the commotion lately and site closing- I've asked for 3 refunds.  I'm hanging onto one order 'just in case'.

will keep you all updated on the 3 btc refunds.

What am I "gonna do" indeed- as you put it so eloquently.  However at least you are honest in that I was right you were coming here from the VR community to try to disparage it.  Also you're comments about trying to damage a new company's reputation to 'take a dollar from them' belies your underlying motives and I highly suspect you're from a rival company, possibly Infiniteye, who's design is similar but only 720p.  So while your welcome to continue the smear campaign in front of us who've ordered the V, I will say this-

When Oculus started, they were simply a kickstarter campaign out of a garage- no product, nothing, zip, zilch, and just an idea and a promise.   -They raised over a million bucks.  Where were you back then crying that 'they have no product!' or 'it's bullshit' or an impossible idea?  So, they were merely an idea and a ski mask and cell phone.  But yet you won't extend the same to another company pushing 4K limits with an idea due in a year?  It's obviously a campaign no doubt, but your hypocrisy smells a bit to me like excrement.  

It's why I'm saying you work for a rival company.  You can't stand to see a competitor come out and get funded by people eager to see the technology be release -again in a year.  sheesh-

So to sum up, maybe you aren't aware (you are) that the LG G3 has already been released in QHD.  Now if I strap two of those puppies onto a 3D printed frame which I made in my 3D printer at home in my garage (even more than Oculus did to start!), and connected them via Splashtop or other to my GPUs- and then said 'wow this is great' and formed a company, hired some developers, and started a kickstarter campaign to pursue, you'd cry too wouldn't you?  You can't extend the same courtesy to another company because you believe only that Oculus has the right to do that!  But that's not correct- anyone is free to start a campaign based on an idea.  Not just Oculus nor their fanboys protecting the legend of they started in a garage.  Anyone can start in a garage with an idea.  If people back it, it can be pushed forward.

So, jealousy I think.  You just don't want anyone to beat your company to the task.

Horizon could easily be working with QHD prototype screens from an LG G3 and waiting for the panels to arrive next year to up the resolution a bit- which is pretty similar to what they've hinted at.  But good luck convincing others that QHD phones don't exist too and that you couldn't strap them to your head with a couple of cheap fresnels!

nope, no hype here. -just stating I bought them.

But it is interesting to me, I don't think you're a regular reader of these forums, and that's ok-  the reason being that the bitcoin community has been far more willing to take chances on startup companies, specifically mining ones like KNCminer, Alpha Technology and many many others, whose product images didn't even exist in the beginning when they offered pre-orders, or at best were copies of 4U servers pulled directly from the web(can i get an amen?).  The point is, the render means little to nothing for many of these startups as they're just trying to get the thing under development and functioning.  The pretty design can come as it further down the road for all many of us care.  Just build us a 4K HMD and f*ck the renders.

So, it seems you're obviously coming from a different perspective, likely the HMD VR crowd who in gengeral wants to see a finished and pretty render to place in the news..   Or maybe you didn't read in their response on reddit that their site was only up for the past 3 days and google indexed them the first day resulting in an unfinished website and tons of pre-orders?

Unlike the VR community, people here are throwing money(bitcoins and cryptos) at these miner companies with little or nothing more than an announcement from them that they are developing a miner. Sometimes they win, other times they don't.  But without that, there wouldn't have been a KNC, Butterfly labs (good riddance), Alpha Tech, etc... etc... etc....

So that's what's *great* about the crypto community, unlike the VR gaming one.  

Wow, just wow.  It' amazing that you just registered here on the forums in order to post that comment as it's your first and you just registered today. So wow, you must work for Oculus then?

Or maybe you're the nigerian prince?

If you had done your research you'd know that Samsung is releasing a 4K smartphone 5.5" handset in Q1 2015 which is smaller than the 7" one Horizon VR is releasing.  There are numerous news reports about it.  Just google a little.

The 4K smartphone race is heating up for 2015 with several big names slated to release their offerings, so is it any wonder someone has secured a screen provider to supply those same screens?  Duh....

Anyway, I figured there'd be opposition, and you've proved me right.  Some of us will be gaming on 4K long before the Oculus consumer version hits in 1080p. 


Good luck convincing people with your obvious "I signed up just to post garbage about about a rival company, and no one will notice!".

first post... sheesh