That purchase came with some good news as well.  More information coming next week...

It's been over a week and it's been rejected twice as far as I can tell. The message I see when I follow it to blockchain is
"Transaction rejected by our node.
Reason: Transaction was previously accepted but has been pruned from our database"

However, in coinomi it is still greyed out waiting for confirmation. I'd like to find some way to cancel it and send it again with the correct transaction fee.
It seems like it has been cancelled on blockchain.info but it isn't cancelled in coinomi.

Hey there!

Withdrawals are usually instant; it may be that yours was caught for a manual review. Would you mind submitting a support ticket on the website? A member of our support team would be happy to take a look for you.

Thanks so much!
Jenny

Nothing is sure but if you want to act in your life, you need to take decision based on what you have.
Until now, Cognitive is not a scam while most of mining company are.

I choose to trust Cognitive long ago and until now, I didn't lose anything which is great and I will probably make a good profit in the coming months.
From experience, I think that mining Bitcoins is too risky compared to the reward. Cognitive will be my last investment in mining.

That is a big problem. It seems that all mining company are scams. It is a miracle that Cognitive is not.
Cognitive may be soon the only alive mining company that isn't a scam. The price per share will definitely skyrocket.

2.) The "missing div" period was a result of very bad luck. Right now we don't have any way to prove this, but its what happened.

Much harder to steal if someone else is taking care of monies.

I don't think you were addressing me, possibly just generalizing, But nothing about this is surprising to me. I feel like I've been playing wack-a-mole with many people's outrageously positive hopes and dreams. I figured it would start to click for others when near none of any pointed questions ever get answered.

Who killed critical thinking?

This is only two data points, but you guys can do the remaining math yourself.  +/- 50% is not unusual when using smaller pools.  If things are orders of magnitude off (like the missing divs), that is when we have a problem.

Using my previously invented "instantaneous annualized return", at a share price of 0.04 we are currently making 4.745%.  Obviously, this will jump massively when the cointerra hardware arrives.

EDIT:  also, we see a "low week" followed by a "high week" followed by a "low week" - the obvious explanation is payouts happen every few days, and the high week had more paid out, possibly including some divs from the prior week, and the low week had btc still in the pool waiting to be paid out.  this is why more data is needed and there is insufficient evidence for lower-than-expected results at this time.  Also, I am assuming 2% pool fee above, it could also be 3 or 5%.

Quit feeding the troll, people.  A religious zealot is someone who believes for poor reasons.  A religious zealot will use whatever facts he can to support his presuppositions, and when the facts fail, resort to ad hominem attacks.

Sometimes zealots are right, and sometimes they are wrong.  Even a broken clock is right twice a day.  This troll was right that not everything was perfect with Garr, and mistakes were made, but he's been proven wrong that the intent was malicious.  There is no reason to believe it was in garr's best interest to pay 32BTC just to "further the scam".  FIMB was not a scam, it was just a failure.  COG is not a scam, and when the hardware arrives, it has the potential to be very successful.  But despite this new evidence, some people aren't looking at the evidence, and some people will never be convinced.  Those people should be ignored.

Nobody should forget what happened in the past, but they should consider all the evidence.  Garr is obviously making an effort here and we should continue to encourage him to improve, hire the help he needs, etc.

(Disclosure:  I own about 1.7% of COG by shares)

This is not over for cognitive. Garrett can be replaced.