Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 97 results by butany
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
Honesty is the foundation for human being, but you didn't .I was sad
somebody want his partners to get more cheap coins.obviously,seem no a scam,but a manipulation fo the price.
Buy or sell is decided by yourself. Don't complain on others.
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
December 2, 2014 - Development Updates
1.) The testnet version will be posted Wednesday, December 3 at 10:00 am CST give or take a few hours plus or minus.
Very important to set expectations. The Wallet will be able to Send/Receive BTC and any testnet Counterparty token.
2.) We have received the okay to post the Security Review quote,
"After an audit of TilePay's codebase, no back-doors were identified by Bitcoinsultants that would lead to information leakage. Proper care was taken when making use of cryptographic algorithms, which ensures a secure environment for storing and using bitcoin."
3.) Press Releases are being prepared for mainnet.
4.) Tilecoind protocol in progress.
Please do not contact Ignite for any project updates. We respond and post updates via this forum at the moment.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
1.) The testnet version will be posted Wednesday, December 3 at 10:00 am CST give or take a few hours plus or minus.
Very important to set expectations. The Wallet will be able to Send/Receive BTC and any testnet Counterparty token.
2.) We have received the okay to post the Security Review quote,
"After an audit of TilePay's codebase, no back-doors were identified by Bitcoinsultants that would lead to information leakage. Proper care was taken when making use of cryptographic algorithms, which ensures a secure environment for storing and using bitcoin."
3.) Press Releases are being prepared for mainnet.
4.) Tilecoind protocol in progress.
Please do not contact Ignite for any project updates. We respond and post updates via this forum at the moment.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
Very very great! Tilecoind protocol will become the first and basic IoT protocol in cryptocurrencies.
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
has anyone actually got to test the tilecoin wallet on testnet successfully? dev seems to have went quiet again?
hmm not looking too good. trying to sell but doesent seem to be much buy support at the moment
Shit fudder!!! Welcome back!
Do you remember me? .....Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
We have two meetings this Thursday that might help with more funding. VC and Angels.
As you all know, we are on a shoe string budget that will provide many features that 90% of wallets do not have at this time, cross-tokens.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
As you all know, we are on a shoe string budget that will provide many features that 90% of wallets do not have at this time, cross-tokens.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
hmm i get the feeling you are going to ask for more ICO payments to be released from bter before wallet release. not a good sign.
nice guessing. but do some research about dev and the partner and use your brain to think if the whole package of ICO is enough for this project.
Yes. The whole package of ICO is far away for this big long-term project. Maybe asic-8tile is a boss as xnova.
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
More good news today！
so what?everybody can hire this company and everybody can pay it .and everybody can launch the coin .so what is the value of the currency you guys craze for? I will buy more!Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
jl777 is one of the most well known and praised developers. he has written huge amounts of code for bitcoindark and the supernet. i really dont know how he is a scammer? ive been making huge profits on supernet and have been payed all my dividends and assets. if you think its a scam, learn how to code, then read his code, realize its legit, then come back and correct yourself.
Please stop discuss supernet in this thread. Supernet is shit and scam!
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
ive noticed Jean-Luc Picard - a developer of NXT is following the TilePay bitbucket/code repository
perhaps tilecoin/tilepay is the newest addition to NXTventure and the SUPERnet? perhaps this is the joint development/partnerships ASIC-8Tile speaks of in his last update
perhaps tilecoin/tilepay is the newest addition to NXTventure and the SUPERnet? perhaps this is the joint development/partnerships ASIC-8Tile speaks of in his last update
We all know SUPERnet is scam. Jl777 is scammer. SUPERnet is shit!
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
Hi altcoinUK,
I posted a rough draft of the 3D printed "prototype" enclosure from our "Industrial Designer". This may look like an amateur attempt for what should be a professional enclosure for the IoT devices. This is not the case. This validates dimensions and usability/weather proofing techniques that need to be thought of at the very beginning.
When producing a final product, many stages of validation occur to reduce the final cost of output for a particular product that is manufactured.
It is absolutely necessary to produce a "prototype" prior to actually committing to manufacturing of the physical enclosure. Reduces risk and iterations that incur NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) cost.
On another specific note, we have a pcb that validates each IoT device on a mesh network using hardware that has cryptographically signed information.
Here is the "rough" draft board design.
What this does, is provide a more difficult way of attacking a mesh network versus attacking multiple sensors within the network with a chip signing mechanism.
You had asked about the time aspect of validation. If based on btc, there is a 10 minute delay...
When the Smart Contracts and Micro transactions functionalities are combined, this enables very fast data verification and validation with minimal bitcoin blockchain bloat.
If you have received quotes from other people in regards to time, I do not think they have asked you what type of IoT device that would exist in the mesh network to be able to respond accurately to your question.
In the case of our chip, it takes between 10-20 milliseconds to produce a signature that can be authenticated. Depending on the number of devices and their specific roles within the mesh network, this can vary considerably. We are working on datasheets that will accurately identify potential bottlenecks that pertain to the different type of devices and their roles in a mesh network for the IoT.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
I posted a rough draft of the 3D printed "prototype" enclosure from our "Industrial Designer". This may look like an amateur attempt for what should be a professional enclosure for the IoT devices. This is not the case. This validates dimensions and usability/weather proofing techniques that need to be thought of at the very beginning.
When producing a final product, many stages of validation occur to reduce the final cost of output for a particular product that is manufactured.
It is absolutely necessary to produce a "prototype" prior to actually committing to manufacturing of the physical enclosure. Reduces risk and iterations that incur NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) cost.
On another specific note, we have a pcb that validates each IoT device on a mesh network using hardware that has cryptographically signed information.
Here is the "rough" draft board design.
What this does, is provide a more difficult way of attacking a mesh network versus attacking multiple sensors within the network with a chip signing mechanism.
You had asked about the time aspect of validation. If based on btc, there is a 10 minute delay...
When the Smart Contracts and Micro transactions functionalities are combined, this enables very fast data verification and validation with minimal bitcoin blockchain bloat.
If you have received quotes from other people in regards to time, I do not think they have asked you what type of IoT device that would exist in the mesh network to be able to respond accurately to your question.
In the case of our chip, it takes between 10-20 milliseconds to produce a signature that can be authenticated. Depending on the number of devices and their specific roles within the mesh network, this can vary considerably. We are working on datasheets that will accurately identify potential bottlenecks that pertain to the different type of devices and their roles in a mesh network for the IoT.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
Thanks for replying and sorry for not noticing your post earlier. As I said, I have been interested in your tech from day one, just the level of innovation put me off. However, I can see you work hard and that's one of the most important ingredients of success, and your professional attitude makes me more and more interested in your project.
As for this board, if I see correctly you use Eagle CAD like most hobbyists do. If I invest in your coin and if it required at all, I am happy to get you a few Altium Designer licenses so you will have the proper tool to get the job done.
I assume you will use Atmel security chips to perform the cryptography function - not too many other alternatives for dedicated crypto devices. Here is a friendly advice with the best intention: be very careful with Atmel. I invested last year in a start-up here in the UK. The boys designed their solution around the previous Atmel Zigbee chip which is based on the ATMega1284, and then Atmel suddenly discontinued the product. Atmel is notorious to do that. So obviously you do what you want, but I would avoid Atmel, especially that their crypto chips are low sellers and they could discontinue them at any time.
Anyway, that issue about Atmel is actually academic because the whole device doesn't make sense (or at least from your description I misunderstood what it does), and to show my good faith, to save you $ 100,000 and from an entirely wrong direction I say this: your approach to handle the mesh network nodes with your custom hardware is completely wrong and unnecessary. What you aim to achieve the industry typically handles with Zigbee modules which make custom designs like yours is completely obsolete. Why do you invent the wheel when the members of Zigbee Allience invested over 1 billion US$ to address low power radio communication and mesh network topology issues? The Zigbee protocol and Zigbee devices are perfectly capable to handle everything what you try to achieve. You see, I just saved your coin from a completely wrong direction and tons of headaches :-))) and I did it in a good faith.
Anyway, thanks for your civil and professional reply, I will read more about what you try to achieve and if everything adds up I will be happy to throw some money into this as well, just like I am interested in all IoT, M2M, smart contract, AI, etc. novel ideas.
As you can read it, my last post and suggestions about the hardware has more substance, constructivism and brought more to the table (regardless the DEVs take on board my suggestions or not) than the combined effort of the clueless Chinamen brigade had brought to the table up to date.
I suggest you go back to the BitBay thread. Oh wait ... even the BitBay community - that hypes the price desperately - disowns you and ask you to leave the thread - that says a lot about you.
Or perhaps, you a BitBay boy and you are worry that my suggestions to the DEV makes this process better, they will have a better hardware and therefore they could be more competitive?
Shit! We wouldn't buy any of your Gadgetcoin! Please go out from this thread. We really don't want see you again! You're a slimy, pukey piece of shit!
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
Hi altcoinUK,
I posted a rough draft of the 3D printed "prototype" enclosure from our "Industrial Designer". This may look like an amateur attempt for what should be a professional enclosure for the IoT devices. This is not the case. This validates dimensions and usability/weather proofing techniques that need to be thought of at the very beginning.
When producing a final product, many stages of validation occur to reduce the final cost of output for a particular product that is manufactured.
It is absolutely necessary to produce a "prototype" prior to actually committing to manufacturing of the physical enclosure. Reduces risk and iterations that incur NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) cost.
On another specific note, we have a pcb that validates each IoT device on a mesh network using hardware that has cryptographically signed information.
Here is the "rough" draft board design.
What this does, is provide a more difficult way of attacking a mesh network versus attacking multiple sensors within the network with a chip signing mechanism.
You had asked about the time aspect of validation. If based on btc, there is a 10 minute delay...
When the Smart Contracts and Micro transactions functionalities are combined, this enables very fast data verification and validation with minimal bitcoin blockchain bloat.
If you have received quotes from other people in regards to time, I do not think they have asked you what type of IoT device that would exist in the mesh network to be able to respond accurately to your question.
In the case of our chip, it takes between 10-20 milliseconds to produce a signature that can be authenticated. Depending on the number of devices and their specific roles within the mesh network, this can vary considerably. We are working on datasheets that will accurately identify potential bottlenecks that pertain to the different type of devices and their roles in a mesh network for the IoT.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
I posted a rough draft of the 3D printed "prototype" enclosure from our "Industrial Designer". This may look like an amateur attempt for what should be a professional enclosure for the IoT devices. This is not the case. This validates dimensions and usability/weather proofing techniques that need to be thought of at the very beginning.
When producing a final product, many stages of validation occur to reduce the final cost of output for a particular product that is manufactured.
It is absolutely necessary to produce a "prototype" prior to actually committing to manufacturing of the physical enclosure. Reduces risk and iterations that incur NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) cost.
On another specific note, we have a pcb that validates each IoT device on a mesh network using hardware that has cryptographically signed information.
Here is the "rough" draft board design.
What this does, is provide a more difficult way of attacking a mesh network versus attacking multiple sensors within the network with a chip signing mechanism.
You had asked about the time aspect of validation. If based on btc, there is a 10 minute delay...
When the Smart Contracts and Micro transactions functionalities are combined, this enables very fast data verification and validation with minimal bitcoin blockchain bloat.
If you have received quotes from other people in regards to time, I do not think they have asked you what type of IoT device that would exist in the mesh network to be able to respond accurately to your question.
In the case of our chip, it takes between 10-20 milliseconds to produce a signature that can be authenticated. Depending on the number of devices and their specific roles within the mesh network, this can vary considerably. We are working on datasheets that will accurately identify potential bottlenecks that pertain to the different type of devices and their roles in a mesh network for the IoT.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
Thanks for replying and sorry for not noticing your post earlier. As I said, I have been interested in your tech from day one, just the level of innovation put me off. However, I can see you work hard and that's one of the most important ingredients of success, and your professional attitude makes me more and more interested in your project.
As for this board, if I see correctly you use Eagle CAD like most hobbyists do. If I invest in your coin and if it required at all, I am happy to get you a few Altium Designer licenses so you will have the proper tool to get the job done.
I assume you will use Atmel security chips to perform the cryptography function - not too many other alternatives for dedicated crypto devices. Here is a friendly advice with the best intention: be very careful with Atmel. I invested last year in a start-up here in the UK. The boys designed their solution around the previous Atmel Zigbee chip which is based on the ATMega1284, and then Atmel suddenly discontinued the product. Atmel is notorious to do that. So obviously you do what you want, but I would avoid Atmel, especially that their crypto chips are low sellers and they could discontinue them at any time.
Anyway, that issue about Atmel is actually academic because the whole device doesn't make sense (or at least from your description I misunderstood what it does), and to show my good faith, to save you $ 100,000 and from an entirely wrong direction I say this: your approach to handle the mesh network nodes with your custom hardware is completely wrong and unnecessary. What you aim to achieve the industry typically handles with Zigbee modules which make custom designs like yours is completely obsolete. Why do you invent the wheel when the members of Zigbee Allience invested over 1 billion US$ to address low power radio communication and mesh network topology issues? The Zigbee protocol and Zigbee devices are perfectly capable to handle everything what you try to achieve. You see, I just saved your coin from a completely wrong direction and tons of headaches :-))) and I did it in a good faith.
Anyway, thanks for your civil and professional reply, I will read more about what you try to achieve and if everything adds up I will be happy to throw some money into this as well, just like I am interested in all IoT, M2M, smart contract, AI, etc. novel ideas.
Shit! We wouldn't buy any of your Gadgetcoin! Please go out from this thread. We really don't want see you again! You're a slimy, pukey piece of shit!
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
@altcoinUK You are an angel 
?
?No. The shit want to sell Gadgetcoin to you.
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
ASIC-8Tile report this twerp AltcoinUK, his attempts to get cheap coins are obvious. mods will give him a nice 2week ban.
and while your at it, a self moderated thread would be nice.
and while your at it, a self moderated thread would be nice.
Relax, I fully understand you want to push this scam ... but here is how this works boy: you scam investors and then we point out your scam, and then you need to take back your scam to China.
Shit! Shut up! Go away from here like a ball right now! Go to your Gadgetcoin!
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
congrats tilecoin we have our first fudder! must mean were going places
Let see then.
TileCoin has collected money and pulled out this ICO scam by claiming that their decentralized application engine uses Counterparty.
Then the Counterparty dev has clearly confirmed here, in this thread, that it's indeed not the case and Counterparty has nothing to do with TileCoin.
And then the desperate supporters of this scam scream FUD, FUD ... FUD when someone points out the above facts.
You are not the sharpest knife in the drawer, are you?
Shit! Shut up! Go away from here like a ball right now!
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
where have i seen that exact wallet before? im quite sure cannapay uses that one, have you just modified someone elses code?
You guy please investigate before making conclusion.
This is your shit cannapay:
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
November 9, 2014 - Marketing Update
1.) The branding style guide has been produced.
Here is a sneak peak of the Tile-based branding.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
1.) The branding style guide has been produced.
Here is a sneak peak of the Tile-based branding.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
Excellent!
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
once again, to me this is no lose investment, cuz dev is guarantee everything, if you guys can read and think.
just like ghostcoin, mantiscoin, xuro. dev guaranteed everything, how did that turn out?
sometimes verbal guarantee from a complete stranger is not enough.
i told you read first and think then.
dev got 180 btc from bter, and will get the rest after deliver all features promised.
more than that, dev will give us high level peer/security review.
if he can't bter will manage to refund.
this is sure no lose gambling very rare in crypto land.
are you intentionally FUD here? or you can't read?
bter will not refund the btc he already has.
no im not here to fud, nor am i fudding. i have supported the coin alot throughout the weeks. and i am invested.
id just like a bit more transparancy and i think other investors would agree.
Now you are not investor. I have bought all your 200k XTC @bter @1095. Total 2.2BTC. If you donn't admit this, you will be a shit!!!
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
lol suchkney was the guy who fucked up Mantiscoin if you guys remember it. He fudded about the premine being moved and the price dumped to like 500 satoshi. if you guys listen to him, and panic sell, then you definitily deserve to lose your ass.
PS: the dev is not XTCCoinDev
PS: the dev is not XTCCoinDev
and was i correct about mantiscoin? the premine had moved and it was a scam. did i pick the scam? yes.
i wouldnt say i "fucked it up" .. id more say i revealed the scam.
@butany.. my sells are there, please commit. and ill have no reason to be in these forums anymore. please check PM
I will info you after my BTC arrive bter. Very soon.
No. It's not his.
my sell is sitting @1099 could you please commit
My btc arrive @bter. Please set @1095, I can buy all your 200k XTC. Wait you 20min.
We finish the trade now. I buy your all 200k XTC now. Please get out from here. No fund again here.
you brought your own coins. not mine.
Fuck. Shit! Scam!FUD!
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
lol suchkney was the guy who fucked up Mantiscoin if you guys remember it. He fudded about the premine being moved and the price dumped to like 500 satoshi. if you guys listen to him, and panic sell, then you definitily deserve to lose your ass.
PS: the dev is not XTCCoinDev
PS: the dev is not XTCCoinDev
and was i correct about mantiscoin? the premine had moved and it was a scam. did i pick the scam? yes.
i wouldnt say i "fucked it up" .. id more say i revealed the scam.
@butany.. my sells are there, please commit. and ill have no reason to be in these forums anymore. please check PM
I will info you after my BTC arrive bter. Very soon.
No. It's not his.
my sell is sitting @1099 could you please commit
My btc arrive @bter. Please set @1095, I can buy all your 200k XTC. Wait you 20min.
We finish the trade now. I have bought your all 200k XTC . Please get out from here. No FUD again here.
Re: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp
lol suchkney was the guy who fucked up Mantiscoin if you guys remember it. He fudded about the premine being moved and the price dumped to like 500 satoshi. if you guys listen to him, and panic sell, then you definitily deserve to lose your ass.
PS: the dev is not XTCCoinDev
PS: the dev is not XTCCoinDev
and was i correct about mantiscoin? the premine had moved and it was a scam. did i pick the scam? yes.
i wouldnt say i "fucked it up" .. id more say i revealed the scam.
@butany.. my sells are there, please commit. and ill have no reason to be in these forums anymore. please check PM
I will info you after my BTC arrive bter. Very soon.
No. It's not his.
my sell is sitting @1099 could you please commit
My btc arrive @bter. Please set @1095, I can buy all your 200k XTC. Wait you 20min.