https://whois.eurid.eu/en/search/?domain=swcpoker.eu
What's this mean lol?


I don't see the same thing for nitro (the other .eu website I could think of). Did you guys get screwed over by Brexit? What a way to end 2020 lmao

I mean, technically the guy isn't lying.
He says:
- "This pdf will tell you, that there is no way of making easy money" (Referring to the pdf itself)
- "I will give you a once in a lifetime opportunity to learn something"

Obviously if you are dumb enough to buy the pdf, you will definitely learn something alright 

I'm also curious about withdrawal fees- does it depend on the size of the mempool as well? These past few days it's been quite high (50+ sat/byte) but it's come back down to 15 sat atm so I was wondering if we can choose an even lower tx fee.

Actually from what csmiami said above, withdrawal txs are already paying ~15 sats/byte but us users are still paying higher so I guess that's what he's asking about.

Same, for the low stakes they got rid of the 100 chip turbo rebuy which almost always managed to cover the guarantee and at first they made up that they had a special event for the weekend to replace it but seems it's permanently gone and there aren't any other tournaments in that time slot.

I asked around in the lobby chat and at least got a response there from @twitch instead of the silent treatment here, though he only said it's on hiatus. Also according to some regs, rebuys are broken but the 500 and 1000 chip rebuys still run (but draw in a smaller crowd than the 100 chip!), not to mention a few rebuys in the quarantine series so idk about that.

Points from first to last is literally the best way to encourage sitting out. In this case they would be actively be rewarded for sitting out straight from the beginning, in contrast to the fixed 10 place structure where they would have to fight for points when they decide to finally play.

10 places are still given points in my proposed structure- if you had 0 points, you would have 0 points in either structure. And scoring points would give a player with no points an even bigger boost than currently.

And what does everyone think about a more top heavy points structure 15-12-10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1? Helps the guys in the midfield separate from each other if they manage to get a more than decent finish. Also helps with reducing ties, makes comebacks possible right until the last round, and missing out on one or two games won't hurt you that much if you think you can finish ITM a few times.

Swapping action between finalists could be allowed and would decrease variance. Would be easy and safe too since the prize is centralised with efialtis already.

You're right, money isn't the main point of this series. I've been following and observing this from the sidelines since the beginning but a few factors led me to not participate, the main one being that I live in Australia and didn't really want to wake up 3am in the morning to play. That's not anybody's fault (it's one of the disadvantages of living here) but I reckon that would outweigh a large portion of the fun I'm sure I would have.

When I was asking about the consolation tournament, I was planning to do an all-nighter just once. I hope you can understand how being told I'd have to play in the series as well to enter sounds dissuading. I'd simply rather play at a time I'm normally awake; the rake is indeed insignificant but reminds me that I could just play any regular tournament.

Even if I didn't mind waking up early, I can't possibly join in late now as I wouldn't forgive myself for not giving myself the best chances to win by playing from the start. Best wishes to your tournament and I hope there'll be a more favourable opportunity to play poker with you guys in the future.

And I'm assuming I'd still have to pay the 200 championship fee? So realistically speaking I'd be paying 9% rake across a series game and the consolation game so I'd be better off playing any regular tournament on SwC, unless I could choose to donate the 200 to the consolation one's prize pool instead. I'll likely pass on this one thanks, but I could be persuaded by a decent guaranteed prize. 

Will users who haven't participated in this series yet like me be allowed to join in on this one, or will they have to play in at least either one of the last 2 tournaments first?

I know I'm beating a dead horse but there's absolutely no reason why you shouldn't just put it back in right now. I looked back to every Turbo Rebuy 3k I entered to (sample size 10) and it has been very popular: 8/10 times the prize pool was 4500+ chips and only once did it not reach the guaranteed prize pool, at a total buyin of 2800.

So you guys are missing out on the rake it directly makes from the tournament, as well as the indirect rake from encouraging users to stay on Swcpoker - there are no other NLH tournaments at the 10:00 pm GMT timeslot on Wednesday, only an 11-game tournament and a satty. Ask yourself this: what's the main game your player base plays, and who are you prioritising? But you don't even have to choose one over the other because multi-tabling is a thing! Even if there was a special NLH tournament at this time slot, the Turbo Rebuy could and should still go on. They can't "compete" with one another if you're worried about not getting enough entries into special tournaments, since it would only draw in more players. The only exception to this would be if it was an exact copy, with the same blinds and structure but higher buyin (200-250) like I have suggested before you could do on the weekends.

At least today (Tuesday) there was a NLH tournament at 10pm, though it was 100x the buyin of the Turbo Rebuy. How many 100 chip buyin players from the Turbo Rebuy do you think have a large enough bankroll to buy into that?

I don't get it guys, this has got to be one of the easiest business decisions out there.

One more thing: tournament 42493856 vs tournament 42500874. Both are Turbo NLH non-guarantee events, but one is 240+10(4% fee) and the other is 235+15(6% fee)?? Puzzling how identical tournaments have different amounts of rake, especially since on your rake table it says non-gtd events are raked 5% or less.

Fair enough, but could you point out which tourn was the replacement? The Saturday Special started 2 hrs before the 3k turbo rebuy's usual time (and it's not a rebuy) and the Nightly Rebuy started 5 hours later. If you're going to replace a regular weekday tournament, I'm all for playing at a higher stake and potentially deeper field on the weekend, but at least have it at around the same time and game type! You could just double the buyin to 200 and keep it in the same spot.

Can I also ask, is there any reason why the turbo rebuy 3k GTD doesn't take place on the weekend?

Yeah SwC_Poker, now that it's even rarer to hit the BBJ, is there any chance it can be added to 10/20 and even 5/10?
You could always pay just 20% of the actual jackpot for winners in these rooms since the stakes are lower- proportionally it would still be a jackpot.

CG: coronabola ; FH: coronabola ; Coin: BTC

I only received 0.0035 instead of 0.007 as my bonus despite betting 0.025 BTC.

Username : cancerbolaaa

Bet Id : 16,499,290,258
Bet Id : 16,499,206,140
Bet Id : 16,498,964,306
Bet Id : 16,499,195,339
Bet Id : 16,499,225,898
Bet Id : 16,498,985,296
Bet Id : 16,498,908,428
Bet Id : 16,499,422,249
Bet Id : 16,498,898,288
Bet Id : 16,498,998,028
Bet Id : 16,498,893,555
Bet Id : 16,498,939,541
Bet Id : 16,498,961,407
Bet Id : 16,499,232,169
Bet Id : 16,499,021,707
Bet Id : 16,498,942,384
Bet Id : 16,499,026,527
Bet Id : 16,498,918,236
Bet Id : 16,498,936,602
Bet Id : 16,498,879,974
Bet Id : 16,498,979,066
Bet Id : 16,498,930,705
Bet Id : 16,498,911,762
Bet Id : 16,498,925,914
Bet Id : 16,499,015,585

I'll fix up the format in just a sec. Variance is a bitch...