Charity for hope and clarity....... =) thanks can't wait to see this new coin try and make it up the ladder.

Hi Sir / Ma'am, was wondering if you could check these links out, thanks.
here are the links:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3091206.msg31894850#msg31894850
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2853929.msg29281252#msg29281252

Hi Sir / Ma'am, was wondering if you could check these links out, thanks.
here are the links:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3091206.msg31894850#msg31894850
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2853929.msg29281252#msg29281252

Hi Sir / Ma'am, was wondering if you could check these links out, thanks.
here are the links:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3091206.msg31894850#msg31894850
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2853929.msg29281252#msg29281252

Hi Sir / Ma'am, was wondering if you could check these links out, thanks.
here are the links:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3091206.msg31894850#msg31894850
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2853929.msg29281252#msg29281252

Depends on several factors such price of the coins and the price charts for each coin. The frequent value that is often lessened from the value when the price drops or the frequent value that is added when the price increases. These are just several factors that would give you an idea of what coin to invest in, and what coin to buy the most.

here read my topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3091206.msg31894850#msg31894850

Hi Sir / Ma'am, was wondering if you could check this link out, mainly I want you to review this not for the merit but for your opinions, and the merit would be just a bonus, thanks.
here are the links:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3091206.msg31894850#msg31894850
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2853929.msg29281252#msg29281252

This is not a very complicated question. FIATS, gold, other form of currencies, and every coin that make up the cryptocurrencies including the BTC, is nothing more than the result of a global consensus in terms of what and where each of these things got the value they have from. The only difference would be when were each of these "items" introduced, because the older it got that global consensus from the time of its onset, it means it is already implanted in the thoughts of many generations, just like gold. For the BTC which is new, compared to the rest, it is also safe to say that part of its value comes from a global consensus, because if the world, as a whole deem it as something that has no value, then by that moment no one would be interested in it whatsoever. Who would buy something that no one is interested with because it has no value? So the answer to your question would be, the same thing that gave value to the btc which is global consensus. Imagine if the entire world decided to ban btc, with not a single country, nation, or government in the planet that acts as a sanctuary for btc, meaning, every nation comes to a global consensus that the btc is banned. By that time, and if it happens, the bitcoin would be illegal, and die out eventually. In the reality we are living in at the moment, the btc is both illegal and legal in a global context, and if we put specific nations under a microscope, you would be able to see that the global context comes from specific nations who either has the btc banned or not. It is as simple as that. The factors leading to a global consensus to ban the btc are the things you should ask. Like, a sudden collapse of the entire crypto realm, related to a cyber attack, wherein each coin holder losses all their coins. Something like that.

If you try and notice it in molecular perspectives, like the things they do against crypto that go unnoticed, and are not often reported in news, and some of these things, well, a person would be become aware about by seeing it here in this very community as a post, and sometimes with internet web links to a tabloid page kind of news site. There already is a conflict between banks and the crypto, it has began, and years ago I should say.

If a group of people who are involved with the crypto domain are serious about legalizing crypto in their Country, many ways exist. One would be passing a petition to the Courts, which is addressed to the Law makers, like Congress and the Senate. This petition would indicate several reasons that ascertain the benefits that not only a single person could gain from it but also the Government and the nation as a whole, and one of which is tax. It could contain the depth explanation of how it could influence some of the red statistics in a particular country, taking and bringing this numbers into the green zone of statistics, for example employment rates, poverty, technological literacy and many more. If the Governments and units involved with the legalization fail to see the reasons, and benefits, then perhaps most of the posts for this topic are true, about politicians and governments.

For anything and everything, specially if it is something that involves innovation or a technological breakthrough, whether it is on its early phases or higher phases that involve complexities and sophistications that make it better compared to how it was from its early stages, there would always be room for speculation. It is one from several elements that allow something to change into something better.

I am about more than a month old in this community, and have yet to become a member, I still need 4 more merits. But putting that aside, does any of the sr and higher ranked members have any experience with hackers? and what happens in most of these hacking cases? do they, the "hackers" really hack your computer and your pay pal? I would like to hear more about what and how they hack

If the BTC is not properly regulated in a particular place, in relation to not being properly taxed, it can allow the oligarchy and anarchist to arise, which renders the Government somewhat stagnant. Can you imagine if a government is stagnant? It could not do anything but please the oligarchs? thus, whether a bitcoin player likes it or not, it should be properly regulated and taxed, because oligarchs specially the fat and greedy ones, kill many potentials of a country, and it is true that government being a unit is necessary for progress and development.

Hi, was wondering if i could ask some of your time to have a look at the following topics. I apologize for taking some of your time. here are the links https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3091206.msg31894850#msg31894850 and the other one is https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2853929.msg29281252#msg29281252  Thank you Sir / Ma'am

Like looking at the aspect of BTC's legality, which is often attributed to location or place, in short, in a global context it is both legal and illegal, and in specific place it could be solely legal or illegal. This is the same thing for your query, on a global context it is both thriving and banned, depending on a the place. It will never be banned, not unless the entire Governments that constitute every single nation on the planet, unite and vote together to totally ban the bitcoin. But until that International consensus from all governments it would be impossible to ban or kill the bitcoin, although it might be banned in some nations, not all nations would. so that would depend on a global consensus from all governments, a single government could, but that doesn't mean it  is the case for every single nation.

It is highly likely the case, that some people involved with crimes concerning FIATs, also see the potential of the BTC being used in crimes. A perfect example is in the UK were a hacker infiltrated the central network for the Health Department, and due to this infiltration, the system could not be used for several hours to a day, and the hacker was asking for 300BTC.

Hi Sir / Ma'am, was wondering if you could check this link out, mainly I want you to review this not for the merit but for your opinions, and the merit would be just a bonus, thanks. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3091206.msg31894850#msg31894850

Noticed how a person interested about the BTC including those already involved with the BTC, find almost every information about it via the internet, news websites, and online community organizations such as this? Why is it that it is very rare, or almost astronomical to see any station considered as "mainstream media" talk about the BTC and other forms of digital coins/currencies?

  Power and Influence would be one, as it is indeed true that most who are materialistic and live with the principles of greed view that having money is already power, and the influence comes from the ability to manipulate and control the flow of money, but truth be told, money is not the true source of power and influence, those who believe that it is are superficial beings whose neural circuitry are so narrow, limited even, and they tend to ignore the fact that intelligence is the source of ideas and innovations which are more important and life changing than anything.
 
  Considering the premises that are included in the latter statements, one who truly understands the entirety of the cryptocurrency, the BTC, and the technology behind it, not forgetting the principles that it has which provide more solutions to problems often encountered when dealing with other form of currency, including FIATs, would know that BTC is a great idea, an invention that has the potential, to innovate and make the lives of people better. Despite the existence of several laws concerning the media, and one of which is a law that obliges or imposes a strict mandate on these mediums of information, to set a particular air time, in terms of informing the public about things that are beneficial to the public, some of these would involve health, Government Issues, employment, entrepreneurship, work, or simply, ways on how a person can earn, with or without someone paying them to do so. Is it not true? that the BTC is something that can be considered as beneficial and even positively life changing, that it would allow a person to earn money, in order to have means of attaining the essential needs, vital for living and surviving, and it is true that the modern reality we have, money is required for certain elements such as health, education, food and shelter, including entertainment and luxury.

   In terms of the legality of BTC and the cryptocurrencies, in a global context it could be considered both illegal but at the same time illegal, because certain nations ban it while others do not, thus the question of legality is nothing more than an issue of and on regulation. In my country, the BTC is not legal because certain banks allow transactions involving the BTC, but the media is still failing to uphold their part by not letting the public know about it.
So if a person, who is involved with the BTC and BTC is legal in his or her country but has a media community that does not talk about it, then something is wrong, and the media can play a big role not only in increasing the literacy of the population when it comes to making a living by getting involved with BTC and other forms of cryptocurrency, but also help in making the BTC and other cryptocurrency, accepted. Let us face it, it would be a step further from getting it banned or illegal.

   Despite all of the latter, why is it still the case for the media? and we go back to the first factors mentioned, power and influence. Imagine if most members of the population have huge volumes of money they earned from BTC, and most banks would not have control over it, because they should not and should just mind their own business (every person has all the right in the world to make his or her life better and if it is from something legal then it is justified), the media and banks would lose their grips on the flow and control of money, and would have a decrease in the influence they have. If the banks are not involved, then it would be the sole agenda of the media, because they to rely on money for power and influence. Truth be told. What are your thoughts about this?

Good thing in my Country it is not banned. The cryptocurrency which includes the BTC can be considered as a knowledge and technology at the same time. It is also governed by evolution even though it is not part of the natural ecosystem. So eventually, in the lone run, it will have an effect on many aspects of the society itself. The nations who do not have it banned at present, are very fortunate, as the members of their population who are interested in it would start learning it, the secrets it holds, and the science behind it, which would be an advantage for that nation. If that time comes, and the BTC becomes Globally accepted, then the nations who have it banned at present, would decide to "unbanned" it, and by then it would be too late for them. Because their population needs to learn it. Think of it this way, if we can classify the BTC industry for particular nations, in relation to being a 3rd world, 2nd world, or 1st world countries, it would be the same thing for the BTC. While most nations who at present do not have the BTC banned in their countries, by the time it becomes globally accepted, these countries would be classified as 1st world countries when it comes to BTC. For those who have it banned at present and decide to "unbanned" it in the future they would start off as 3rd world or even 4th world countries when it comes to BTC. Similar to what happened in my Country, the Government failed to accept Science, and failed to give a bigger budget to the Department of Science and Technology, and so now, instead of making the necessary equipments we need, or our nation needs, we buy it from other countries. The sole reason why we remain a 3rd World. It is not even the people who are the politicians who suffer from these, even though they are the people making decisions and allocating budgets, it is the population who suffers. Thus, for the BTC, early acceptance would be very beneficial in the long run.