Search content
Sort by

Showing 11 of 11 results by cida
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: CryptoDredge 0.5.0: ‎NVIDIA GPU Miner (Windows)
by
cida
on 28/06/2018, 13:27:51 UTC
7x5x 1070, 75%PL, +190core, -500mem

Lyra2z is giving 10.88MH, while the second best is at 10.27MH
BUT, power drain is insanely grew up to 620W, while the second best is nailed at 480W.  Huh

--- EDIT ---
I mistakenly reported 7x but it was 5x  Tongue
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] zFastminer-v2.3.3 Most Powerful And Profitable Zcoin Miner On Poolside!
by
cida
on 31/05/2018, 10:30:28 UTC
All the answers are in the first post!!!

Zcoin (lyra2z) only on MiningPoolHub only (as of now). Minimum 2x Nvidia 1060 GPUs required.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] zFastminer - Fastest Zcoin XZC miner (on poolside) for nVidia Pascal GPUs
by
cida
on 11/04/2018, 13:25:30 UTC
Dear cida ,
We are sorry to hear that, Did you overclocked the cards? if so please try to run without OC and see if it helps.
If not, you can try this version that we think may solve the problem and please report back.

zFastminer-V2285
https://file.fm/f/pdt2g5dc
Please update the .bat file:
zFastminer-V2285 -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://europe.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581 -u USERNAME.NewWORKERNAME -p x -q

We got Rigs with 1070/1070TI/1080Ti with win10 and latest NVIDIA drivers and we are testing on them before release,
we did not encountered this problem with our 1070 rig.

Best Regards,
zFastminer team.



Thanks for your quick response.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] zFastminer - Fastest Zcoin XZC miner (on poolside) for nVidia Pascal GPUs
by
cida
on 10/04/2018, 09:14:25 UTC
Not working for me too.

4x 1070 - Win 10 1709 - Nvidia driver 391.35
command line:
zFastminer-v228.exe -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://europe.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581 -u ***.**** -p x -q

Always abort after few moments with following output:
Code:
*** zFastminer V2.2.8: Lyra2Z miner for nVidia Pascal GPUs - Optimized for MiningPoolHub.com ***

Please consider making a donation to the following addresses:
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)
BTC donation address: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze (djm34)

This miner is optimized for Mining Rigs with more then 3 GPU's minimum
Thanks for supporting this project!

[2018-04-10 11:11:30] Starting on stratum+tcp://europe.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581
[2018-04-10 11:11:30] 4 miner threads started, using 'lyra2z' algorithm.
[2018-04-10 11:11:31] GPU #2: Intensity Calculated Based on 15 SM (streaming multiprocessor)
Cuda error in func 'scanhash_lyra2Z' at line 93 : unspecified launch failure.
[2018-04-10 11:11:31] GPU #1: Intensity Calculated Based on 15 SM (streaming multiprocessor)
Cuda error in func 'scanhash_lyra2Z' at line 93 : unspecified launch failure.
[2018-04-10 11:11:31] GPU #3: Intensity Calculated Based on 15 SM (streaming multiprocessor)

Hope this can help you.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Open Source XPM (Primecoin) GPU Miner & Pool xpmforall.org
by
cida
on 29/03/2018, 18:48:24 UTC
Hi, I have a problem with the GTX1060.
I have 2 R9 390 and 3 GTX 1060. The 2 R9 have all "Sher accepted", the gtx 1060 have continually "Invalid Share".

the Nvidia configuration file is this:
# Pool websites:
#   http://xpmforall.org
#   http://coinsforall.io

server = "xpmforall.org";
port = "6666";

# Your XPM payout address
address = "My addrss";

# You can give this machine a custom name
# Computer name is used as default
#name = "Nvidia";

# Platform:
#  "amd": AMD GCN cards
#  "amd legacy": AMD HD5xxx & HD6xxx cards
#  "nvidia": NVidia Maxwell cards
platform = "nvidia";

# GPU crash handling (properly untested feature):
# 0 - do nothing
# 1 - close miner application
# 2 - reboot system (need superuser rights)
onCrash = "0";

# - Valid cpuload range: 0 to 4
# - More than 2 does not make sense
# - You can use 0 for really slow CPUs
cpuload = "0";

# Target Cunningham chain length, default = 10
target = "10";

# Sieve size in stripes (1 stripe = 16384 bits), recommended 420 for AMD, 210 for NVidia
# Big sieve size gives more candidates with less prime probability
sieveSize = "420";

# Weave depth (primes number count using by sieve), recommended 40960 for AMD, 65536 for NVidia
# Big weave depth increases prime probability, but sieve generate less candidates
weaveDepth = "65536";

# Sieve layers number, optimal value is target*2, default = 20
width = "20";

# Sieve window size. Recommended values:
# AMD GPUs: 4096
# NVidia GeForce 750Ti: 8188
# Other NVidia Maxwell GPUs: 12284
windowSize = "12284";

# - The following settings have one entry per GPU
# - If you have more than 4 just add more entries or leave it as is to use defaults
# - All entries must be separated by commas and set between double quotes

# 0 = don't use device
# 1 = use device
devices =        ["1", "1", "1", "1", "1"];

# Primorial 13 is optimal
sieveprimorial = ["13", "13", "13", "13", "13"];

# sieves per round value, default = 5
sievePerRound = ["5", "5", "5", "5", "5"];

# -1 means don't change
corefreq =       ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
memfreq =        ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
powertune =      ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
fanspeed =       ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];


If I put "sieveSize = "210";", the program closes automatically.

Why my GTX have all these "invalid shares" Huh??



Same for me with a GTX 1070 Ti
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.7.9, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner
by
cida
on 12/01/2018, 19:29:09 UTC
Thank you, but the result is again the same, with both masks.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.7.9, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner
by
cida
on 12/01/2018, 16:54:55 UTC
You're right, it's not an OS issue, it's a user issue. The OS is only doing what the user configured it to do.

The answer is not clear to me, could you elaborate, please.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.7.9, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner
by
cida
on 12/01/2018, 16:22:16 UTC
I want to use only 1 thread per physical core on both the CPUs, but I'm not able to do it.

Use the tool I've posted a few posts above (msg27696971) to identify physical cores, and then use the appropriate affinity mask.

Do not underestimate the correct affinity setting, some algos (like lyra2*) are spread between all cores if thread count < core count, e.g. u have 4 cores but wanna use 2 threads, than u may get all 4 cores 50% utilized, and that is not what you usually want :-)

...

Thank you for you suggestion.
Here is the output of enum tool from AMD
Code:
C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\enum>enum -more
Local APIC Id= 0
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x0
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 1
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x0
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 2
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x1
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 3
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x1
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 4
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x2
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 5
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x2
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 6
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x3
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 7
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x3
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 8
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x4
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 9
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x4
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 10
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x5
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 11
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x5
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 12
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x6
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 13
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x6
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 14
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x7
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 15
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x7
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 16
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x8
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 17
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x8
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 18
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x9
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 19
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0x9
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 20
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xa
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 21
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xa
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 22
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xb
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 23
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xb
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 24
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xc
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 25
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xc
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 26
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xd
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 27
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xd
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 28
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xe
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 29
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xe
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 30
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xf
nCoreId = 0x0
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Local APIC Id= 31
nApicIdCoreIdSize= 0
HTT = 0x1
nLogicalProcessorCount = 0x10
CmpLegacy = 0x0
nNC = 0x0
nMNC = 0x1
nProcId = 0xf
nCoreId = 0x1
nCPUCoresperProcessor = 0x1
nThreadsperCPUCore = 0x10

Physical Processor ID 0 has 2 cores
as logical processors 0 1
Physical Processor ID 1 has 2 cores
as logical processors 2 3
Physical Processor ID 2 has 2 cores
as logical processors 4 5
Physical Processor ID 3 has 2 cores
as logical processors 6 7
Physical Processor ID 4 has 2 cores
as logical processors 8 9
Physical Processor ID 5 has 2 cores
as logical processors 10 11
Physical Processor ID 6 has 2 cores
as logical processors 12 13
Physical Processor ID 7 has 2 cores
as logical processors 14 15
Physical Processor ID 8 has 2 cores
as logical processors 16 17
Physical Processor ID 9 has 2 cores
as logical processors 18 19
Physical Processor ID 10 has 2 cores
as logical processors 20 21
Physical Processor ID 11 has 2 cores
as logical processors 22 23
Physical Processor ID 12 has 2 cores
as logical processors 24 25
Physical Processor ID 13 has 2 cores
as logical processors 26 27
Physical Processor ID 14 has 2 cores
as logical processors 28 29
Physical Processor ID 15 has 2 cores
as logical processors 30 31

Number of active logical processors: 32
Number of active physical processors: 16
Number of cores per processor: 1
Number of threads per processor core: 16

I'm assuming that using an affinity mask like 0xAAAAAAAA or 0x55555555 it will use only odd or even logical processors of the 32 available. Am I wrong?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.7.9, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner
by
cida
on 12/01/2018, 15:36:33 UTC
Cpuminer can only use cores it can see. If it won't use the second package it's because it can't see it.
That's an OS issue.


 Huh
HWMonitor (and many other softwares) can see the second CPU, so IMHO it's not an OS issue.
If you want to further investigate the issue, I can do testing for you.
Thank you again.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.7.9, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner
by
cida
on 12/01/2018, 08:34:56 UTC
CPU affinity is not working as expected (by me Smiley) on dual Xeon E5-2460v3 on Windows 2012 R2
I want to use only 1 thread per physical core on both the CPUs, but I'm not able to do it.

I'm testing v3.7.9 with the following cmd line:
cpuminer-aes-avx2 -a lbry -t 16 --cpu-affinity 0xAAAAAAAA  [...]

I'd like to spread the threads over the 16 available physical cores, but I'm only able to saturate 16 logical processor of the first CPU:
http://i68.tinypic.com/saupo5.png

No matter what I set in the affinity option, I always obtain the same result.
If I start cpuminer with "-t 1" I get 526 kH/s per CPU, when I start it with "-t 16" I obtain only 249 kH/s per CPU.

On a single CPU system with 8 cores and 16 logical cpu, I'm able to obtain exactly what I want with affinity.


Like the pevious guy you're creating a problem where there is none. Use the default affinity and don't make assumptions.
If you want to see which physical cores are working look at their temperature.

If you have a problem after that post debug output.

I already tried to use default affinity and I got the same result.
I'll check temperature and I'll report the result.

But if my assumption is wrong, why single thread has double rate x CPU than multi-threads?
Beside that, thank you for your great piece of software and for your attention.
--- EDIT ---
My assumption is confirmed by HWMonitor
http://i68.tinypic.com/4jt2xv.png http://i68.tinypic.com/rvixom.png

--- EDIT2 ---
Here's the output with debug enabled
Code:
C:\Program Files\cpumin>cpuminer-aes-avx2 -a lbry -t 16 -D -o stratum+tcp://xxxx -u xxxx -p xxxx

         **********  cpuminer-opt 3.7.9  ***********
     A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs
     with AES_NI and AVX2 and SHA extensions.
     BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT

CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz.
SW built on Jan  8 2018 with GCC 5.3.1.
CPU features: SSE2 AES AVX AVX2.
SW features: SSE2 AES AVX AVX2.
Algo features: SSE2 AVX AVX2 SHA.
Start mining with AVX2.

[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 13 to cpu 13 (mask 2000)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xxxx
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 14 to cpu 14 (mask 4000)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2 (mask 4)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3 (mask 8)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4 (mask 10)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5 (mask 20)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 6 to cpu 6 (mask 40)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 7 to cpu 7 (mask 80)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] 16 miner threads started, using 'lbry' algorithm.
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 8 to cpu 8 (mask 100)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 9 to cpu 9 (mask 200)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 15 to cpu 15 (mask 8000)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 10 to cpu 10 (mask 400)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 11 to cpu 11 (mask 800)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Binding thread 12 to cpu 12 (mask 1000)
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Stratum session id: deadbeefcafebabe8681430000000000
[2018-01-12 10:31:44] Stratum difficulty set to 256
[2018-01-12 10:31:47] stratum extranonce subscribe timed out
[2018-01-12 10:31:47] DEBUG: job_id='34b9' extranonce2=00000000 ntime=1f24d637
[2018-01-12 10:31:47] xxxx asks job 13497 for block 303984
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #6: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #7: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #14: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #1: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #0: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #15: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #9: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #8: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #13: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #12: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #3: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #2: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #5: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #4: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #11: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:48] CPU #10: 131.07 kH, 158.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] DEBUG: job_id='34ba' extranonce2=00000000 ntime=1f24d637
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] lbry block 303985, diff 427620.506
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #0: 707.05 kH, 243.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #6: 706.87 kH, 243.22 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #5: 706.71 kH, 243.17 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #10: 706.25 kH, 244.32 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #7: 706.67 kH, 243.15 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #8: 705.90 kH, 242.89 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #4: 706.64 kH, 243.14 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #13: 706.68 kH, 243.16 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #1: 707.15 kH, 243.32 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #3: 704.80 kH, 242.51 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #2: 704.64 kH, 242.45 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #11: 706.47 kH, 243.08 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #14: 706.79 kH, 243.19 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #12: 706.55 kH, 243.11 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #9: 706.03 kH, 242.93 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:31:51] CPU #15: 706.02 kH, 242.93 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:46] DEBUG: job_id='34bb' extranonce2=00000000 ntime=1f24d637
[2018-01-12 10:32:46] xxxx asks job 13499 for block 303985
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #2: 14.55 MH, 249.27 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #8: 14.57 MH, 249.31 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #1: 14.60 MH, 249.55 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #11: 14.59 MH, 249.31 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #15: 14.58 MH, 249.16 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #12: 14.59 MH, 249.28 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #3: 14.55 MH, 248.66 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #14: 14.59 MH, 249.36 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #13: 14.59 MH, 249.32 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #5: 14.59 MH, 249.33 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #7: 14.59 MH, 249.32 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #6: 14.59 MH, 249.39 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #4: 14.59 MH, 249.24 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #9: 14.58 MH, 248.30 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #0: 14.60 MH, 248.52 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:32:50] CPU #10: 14.66 MH, 249.45 kH/s
[2018-01-12 10:33:42] DEBUG: job_id='34bc' extranonce2=00000000 ntime=1f24d637
[2018-01-12 10:33:42] xxxx asks job 13500 for block 303985
...
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.7.9, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner
by
cida
on 11/01/2018, 20:01:31 UTC
CPU affinity is not working as expected (by me Smiley) on dual Xeon E5-2460v3 on Windows 2012 R2
I want to use only 1 thread per physical core on both the CPUs, but I'm not able to do it.

I'm testing v3.7.9 with the following cmd line:
cpuminer-aes-avx2 -a lbry -t 16 --cpu-affinity 0xAAAAAAAA  [...]

I'd like to spread the threads over the 16 available physical cores, but I'm only able to saturate 16 logical processor of the first CPU:
http://i68.tinypic.com/saupo5.png

No matter what I set in the affinity option, I always obtain the same result.
If I start cpuminer with "-t 1" I get 526 kH/s per CPU, when I start it with "-t 16" I obtain only 249 kH/s per CPU.

On a single CPU system with 8 cores and 16 logical cpu, I'm able to obtain exactly what I want with affinity.