That's like saying, if you have suspicions of someone being dangerous don't warn people about him/her until you're sure. That's ridiculous, there's no harm in warning people that this may be a scam since a lot of people with bitcoin will invest in nearly anything. Look at ponzi schemes for example.

Site loads for me. Personally, I wouldn't invest in any dice site after dice.ninja, DiceBitco.in etc. Risks are far greater than rewards.

Personally i've never experienced it on bit dice....but if this was planned or a robery, reddice, dogedice etc would all be the same issues
I'm sure it's nothing to worry about. Just wait up on alex

Why have you got a red trust on me, tell everyone so we can all laugh at your idiocy.

AND AGAIN, If I am using an escrow how am I scamming?

best strategy, im using it too 

if its a lazy, why would he bother working on the suggestions made by his players?

It's kind of like a slower less fun version of moneypot.com, which I guess is where the idea came from. But the design is nicer I think.

Well done, doog, as always.

Those new gambling sites should all hire you to test for bugs lol.

anyway to work around the lag mate ?

Very true. But I keep seeing the ideas "Why do you want to hide your IP if you are not doing something bad? Why do you want to use a mixer if you are not doing something bad? Why don't you want to do ID verification on exchange if you are not doing something bad?". It seems to me that a large proportion of people are having this kind of ideas.

Dogedigital is preparing a lawsuit against me and the owners of this site. I want this to be publicly known so I may defend myself in a court of law.

I am involved in this site as I provided the code for the platform and was a consultation. I have no affiliation with the owners of the site nor do I own any equality.

The code/domains of fastbluff was also sold to dogedigital per this auction, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=791279 with no mention of exclusive rights to the codebase.

He is holding my online reputation as an extortion pawn, but I will not let him do that as I am outing the lawsuit myself. I have advised him to file an injunction against this site if he has believed I have not held up my contract, to block the site from operating if not legally from my actions.

No lawyers have been involved yet. I can say that my lawyer is in contact with me and is ready to handle the lawsuit when available from Dogedigital's lawyers. We are now waiting...

Nice detective work. I didn't pay close attention, but am happy to believe that you made sure everything checks out.

The whale investor effectively has 3949 BTC in the bankroll. He keeps most of it under his own control, but risks as if he had the whole amount invested. If a whale player comes along and wins a bunch, the whale investor quickly loses his whole deposit. That's why he gets the lion's share of the profits.

You can go back through the old "JD Investor" thread and see us discussing exactly this situation. I ended up not allowing investors to use leverage like this, because I was concerned it would allow rich investors to dominate the bankroll without taking on the accompanying counterparty risk. When the small investors figure out they're getting a poor deal, they'll either pull out, or increase their leverage too (I was imagining that would be a feature available to all, not just those with >100 BTC) - neither of which is good for them.

As for whether it's silly, I guess the site is happy, because they can say "we have the biggest max profit of any BTC dice site", and I expect the whale investor is happy, because he's getting most of the profits. The only people who might not be happy are the smaller investors. But I guess the site can do without those anyway?

Hi.

I'm not defending the site, I'm arguing against the clueless posts people keep making. Maybe the site is a scam, but not for the reasons people are coming up with. If anyone has any evidence of foul play, I'm more than happy to hear it - in fact PM me just before going public so I can try to get my coins out.

When someone says "this site is a scam because [invalid argument]" and I debunk their invalid argument, that's not me defending the site, it's me debunking their invalid argument.

And no, I'm in no way connected with it. There's 20 BTC in the bankroll, and it's hardly growing. If I was trying to promote the site, I'd be a bit better at it that that!