Perhaps instead of writing a post you could have done a Google search instead. There are many ticketing providers on several altcoin chains that use NFT technology, and these ticketing companies offer countless advantages over traditional centralized systems.  A further Google search could have yielded in information how the current ticketing systems are pretty much scams and hurt both event hosts and visitors.

This question can't be answered in general. However, what you can conclude in general is that capitalism has ruined universities. They have become a degree printing subsystem within the whole corrupt system that we live in. In most universities, the standards are lowered to retain and pass the largest amount of students possible. This is especially true of private universities. To make matters worse, the same kind of degree between two universities is often incomparable. One university is very difficult and will produce a good workforce, the other will produce quacks who don't know anything and are lazy. Additionally, there are many degrees and programs that are useless and should not exist at all.

If you study something productive, useful or difficult then the degree is worth it. If you study something subjective and useless, it is not worth anything.

Even though the first vote on these bills been has, the last update on this situation is that they will vote again and that those republicans that voted no will vote yes. We will find out in a couple days at the latest if this is true. They are really good laws compared to the garbage that democrats usually want to pass.

This will be interesting to observe, but in any case increased stablecoin liquidity will have positive price pressure on Bitcoin as well.

You sir, deserve to be wholly rekt, like many altcoiners that came before you. 

The amount is too little for it to be worthwhile to spend $100 per week and you will need 2.5 months to complete this. Just go with the second option.

You are mistaken, don't write these lies. There are plenty of uses for NFTs and there are many real products using this technology. Just because you don't know about them, that does not mean that they don't exist.

Again, you are writing lies. This may be true of art NFTs, but is not true of NFTs.

He's wrong. The problem is that practically 90% or more products that have been build, L1, L2 and L3 chains that have been released are scams. We do not need new altcoins, we do not need new layers, none of that matters. He also invested in many of these legal scams and now he whines about the wrong problems being solved. The layer and technology narrative is just another trendy thing that they managed to sell to altcoiners that believe that shitcoins like ETH will save the world. We need fewer projects, fewer chains, fewer nonsense.

To argue further for participation in the airdrops, some of the airdrops in the past were really really good. It doesn't matter if you are a senior member here or somewhere else, or you had a fair amount of crypto it would have been a mistake not to participate in those. The problem with this model these days is that it is overused and most projects are scams that pretend to be legitimate. The chances of hitting a good airdrop these days are very low, it is like gambling.

The risk exists but it will continue to shrink as time passes. The real power lies not with the government but with money and networks of the super rich companies and institutions. As more get involved with Bitcoin, these interests will not allow subsequent governments to turn its back on Bitcoin even if they wanted to.

Great law with only great points. A tax exemption on spending crypto is a must and a great thing that will encourage more legitimate use on taxable goods and services. Further, there is no reason why crypto donations should not be tax exempt like other donations are.

Thanks guys. A few projects were legitimate and they have a strong natural backing behind it. DOGE comes to mind and PEPE, but most memecoins were created to artificially create a narrative that didn't exist. Both DOGE and PEPE were very famous memes before their token was created, and they captured its own audience naturally.

Realistically your chances are probably better playing with your life savings in a casino than to HODL a memecoin.

There are several different kinds of risks involved here. From market performance as an investment vehicle to individual hacks to attacks on the Bitcoin protocol too. It is not as simple as how you portray it.

Glad you learned something! You just need to think about it yourself and you will get there. If you needed also the website to interact with the smart contract, how is it any way decentralized? Just because something runs on the blockchian that does not make it decentralized. In the case of a DEX, you at the very least must be able to craft manual transactions for interacting with the smart contract. If not, then it is not decentralized.

Legally it may cause problems if you share it from your identity, but anonymously you could do it. There is no money to be gained from sharing these tools for free and very few people would use or need it. I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of tools in ETH, but they don't care so much about decentralization.

It is not so simple. Even if you do it anonymously, it has to be hosted somewhere. You could lose the domain and access to the hosting service provider. So they have means to shut it down or at least to make it very hard for you to operate if they want to.

Absolutely not! The market does not need new memes. New memes are only created to make the founders and insiders rich. All these models are a weak attempt to legitimize this scam tactic.

This is incorrect, almost all IEOs are scams too. What they prevent is from the founders from running away quickly with the money, but those types of scams are more rare these days. The real scam is making a stupid project that nobody needs, printing tokens and then doing very little and letting the project die. Almost all altcoins are scams.

I don't know who wants to risk their hard earned money in this casino anymore. Most altcoins are scams and they will never get anywhere.

This is a very dumb thinking sequence because your ending is already what we have today, using fiat currency.

They already are censoring certain jurisdictions, so why wouldn't they if such laws come to place? Sure the DEX isn't censored on chain it is only the website, but very few people could use a DEX like Uniswap without the website.

They can and they already do this. They just can't know your addresses in advance, but as soon as they know an address is yours they will freeze it.

Algorithmic stablecoins are garbage.

I agree partially but you can't have such an absolute view on the matter. I don't think my grandma would be ever able to learn how to safely use and hold Bitcoin, but she can have some exposure in an ETF without an issue. Really, self custody is not for everyone and we should not try to force it. We should just encourage it where appropriate.

In this case you don't properly understand how a decentralized exchange works. The smart contracts are decentralized, the website is not and it is a centralized user interface to the smart contracts. If you know how to interact with the smart contracts yourself, you don't need to use the website. Obviously it is much harder to use it this way, but this proves that they can't prevent you from accessing their services. Anyhow, in practical terms this is a pointless argument. Just change the VPN server that you are using to a compatible jurisdiction and this "regulatory block" is bypassed even more easily.

That is why this is never going to happen.

There is nothing to believe, and I understand that you have responded to my reply without actually reading the sources that I have linked. If you do a small search, you will realize that BTC is less volatile than many currencies of the world.

This is not true and I can demonstrate it with a simple example. If you live in a rural area somewhere, you are forced to use the currency that everyone else uses. Neither do you have the ability to get another currency like the USD, nor do you have the option to use it as nobody where you live accepts it. You are also wrong with your statement that local currencies are very stable, they are not. They have a strong devaluation trend each year, some less and others more but they all do.