Search content
Sort by

Showing 12 of 12 results by cradge
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - SweepStakeCoin | Fast Fun Secure
by
cradge
on 28/08/2017, 11:24:52 UTC
Where can i download the Win wallet, on the following url  https://github.com/chainworksindustries/sweepstakecoin/ it isn't available anymore..

I think you can use the old wallet.

You can find it here on the old ANN thread :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1903427
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable
by
cradge
on 18/08/2017, 00:16:15 UTC
@crys

I appreciate the level of qa you want for the miner guys,
But here's just a heads up, signatum only have pow until 100k blocks then it will go pos. As of writing its already almost on half of it.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: 1080Ti Specific - Best mining option
by
cradge
on 14/08/2017, 06:44:25 UTC
Btw: you guys using CWI miner? the interface is, like, MUCH WOW, VERY SEXY.
I think you have to PM them to get in, but they say it will go open beta soon as well Smiley
Also, it hashes JUST as well (i think better), then SP mod, and its FREE, and dosent violate GPL lol
https://spee.ch/b/cwi.PNG

Forget that... if you are mining SiGT than go with ccminer 2.2 new release.

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

for 1080TI at 70% TDP i am getting 51 Mh/s +100 core clock -50mem clock.

makesure to get x64 version for 1080ti and x86 for gtx 1070s etc... weirdly the x86(32 bit version works the best)

Set the intensity to 26.5 and see the magic happens  Smiley

Note: you can do that by adding -i 26.5 at your bat file
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable
by
cradge
on 11/08/2017, 08:42:53 UTC
@crys

can you let us set the difficulty manually? while you try to fix you're automatic difficulty algorith.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable
by
cradge
on 11/08/2017, 02:02:31 UTC
11 hours running,
I have not encountered any issue yet.
I also noticed that this miner is more efficient compared to other miner software out there.

  • tdp 85%
  • coreclock 130
  • memory -502
  • temp at 61c
  • fan at 68%

Screenshot:
http://i.imgur.com/BJE4QKI.png

                     _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
CPU:0.62%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [10:30:22]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 14325.5            | Block:      31600 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 232.528                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      2.5 | Shares: 1511.25 | Rej: 1.08002% | Speed:  162.14M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 473.5   | Rej: 6    | Speed:   53.08MH/s|
1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 525     | Rej: 7.5  | Speed:   54.35MH/s|
2.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 512.75  | Rej: 3    | Speed:   54.49MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:59C | F:66% | P:238W | I: 24.0 | Core:1932Mhz |
1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:61C | F:68% | P:228W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
2.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:65C | F:72% | P:222W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[10:26:25]Share: 3aa75b9e              | [02:45:50][GPU1]:Invalid nonce
[10:26:30]Mean netDiff: 18032.2        | [03:50:17][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:26:40]Mean netDiff: 17903.9        | )
[10:27:05]Share: e19d06a6              | [06:35:11][GPU0]:Invalid nonce
[10:27:10]Mean netDiff: 17822.9        | [07:14:05][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:27:40]Mean netDiff: 17752.4        | )
[10:28:20]Mean netDiff: 17690.9        | [08:44:51][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:29:30]Mean netDiff: 17534.8        | )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:-----    | Conn:0d 11:16:23 | Latency:287ms

update, after some tweaks miner can get 55 to 57 mh/s for an 1080 ti

  • tdp 88%
  • coreclock 135
  • memory -502
  • temp at 65c
  • fan at 72%
  • intensity 26.5
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable
by
cradge
on 10/08/2017, 22:28:27 UTC
This CWigm miner is showing more hashrate on software but less on the pool and fluctuate a lot. Sp5 is getting me more coins per hour on pool.nm.
Switched back. Dont trust this miner calculations anymore.

Can you show us youre tests done? i.e screenshots, data, test procedure before you arrived to this conclusion?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable
by
cradge
on 10/08/2017, 02:26:58 UTC
11 hours running,
I have not encountered any issue yet.
I also noticed that this miner is more efficient compared to other miner software out there.

  • tdp 85%
  • coreclock 130
  • memory -502
  • temp at 61c
  • fan at 68%

Screenshot:
http://i.imgur.com/BJE4QKI.png

                     _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
CPU:0.62%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [10:30:22]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 14325.5            | Block:      31600 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 232.528                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      2.5 | Shares: 1511.25 | Rej: 1.08002% | Speed:  162.14M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 473.5   | Rej: 6    | Speed:   53.08MH/s|
1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 525     | Rej: 7.5  | Speed:   54.35MH/s|
2.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 512.75  | Rej: 3    | Speed:   54.49MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:59C | F:66% | P:238W | I: 24.0 | Core:1932Mhz |
1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:61C | F:68% | P:228W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
2.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:65C | F:72% | P:222W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[10:26:25]Share: 3aa75b9e              | [02:45:50][GPU1]:Invalid nonce
[10:26:30]Mean netDiff: 18032.2        | [03:50:17][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:26:40]Mean netDiff: 17903.9        | )
[10:27:05]Share: e19d06a6              | [06:35:11][GPU0]:Invalid nonce
[10:27:10]Mean netDiff: 17822.9        | [07:14:05][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:27:40]Mean netDiff: 17752.4        | )
[10:28:20]Mean netDiff: 17690.9        | [08:44:51][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:29:30]Mean netDiff: 17534.8        | )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:-----    | Conn:0d 11:16:23 | Latency:287ms
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: 1080Ti Specific - Best mining option
by
cradge
on 09/08/2017, 03:34:40 UTC
I'n my part, I do not go with the most profitable coin.
I go with the coin with the most potential with less difficulty then HODL its coin. At this time its best to avoid signatum and mine other coin.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - Cryptopia
by
cradge
on 08/08/2017, 11:15:35 UTC
I bet some of the weak hands got shaved off
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: 1080Ti Specific - Best mining option
by
cradge
on 07/08/2017, 14:10:00 UTC
Just started following this post last night.... Switched over to SIGT.

Starting to think I missed the SIGT boat... Using CCMiner-Skunk 2.2 with 8x 1080ti's (2 rigs) I am only getting around 130Mh/s on each rig.  

Looking at my stats on Yiimp I am getting about half of what "What to mine" has me listed at on that hash rate.  

From what I see I am basically making what I would with the rigs pointed toward Zec?

better late than never.
if you want you can also buy the coin directly instead.

one of the reason you get lesser coin is because as time passes, more and more miners are adding to the hash rate, increasing the difficulty. in example you just added to the total hash rate just now.

another thing is if I understand correctly, you are only getting 16.25mh/s per 1080 ti card? if yes, there's a problem on your setup as I'm getting 50mh/s per 1080 ti card of mine.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - Cryptopia
by
cradge
on 07/08/2017, 13:23:51 UTC
Hello everyone, this was my post yesterday.

I've been trying to mine this coin for a few days and it just keeps crashing my rig. I have 6 GTX 1070s and I've tried the given ccminer and the palgin ccminer...both crash after 20 minutes or so.

It is not the hardware as ethereum mines fine for days, overclocked or on stock.

I tried mining it on stock and on OC settings and it crashed the same way.



Recommendations posted were to increase virtual memory & to lower my intensity.

I expanded my virtual memory and lowered the intensity to 17...but I'm getting the same results.

Any other suggestions? Thanks

have you tried to lower the tdp to 80 first then have the oc on core clock reset to 0.
If it have become stable, you can increase the core clock oc from there little by little to find the sweet spot.

you can also add this to your .bat file --cpu-priority=3 -i 25

if you guys think this helps, ofcourse I won't refuse youre signatum donation  Wink
BBc3Em17xcEj84fCYfxwQQ61BcipRH9eNA
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - Cryptopia
by
cradge
on 06/08/2017, 03:31:48 UTC
while lurking on reddit I stumbled on the link below saying we should avoid suprnova with proportional payment type as it is paying less?

https://www.reddit.com/r/EtherMining/comments/6roz7s/psa_avoid_suprnova_pools/