Кто знает у epayments еще дейсвует анонимность?

I almost literally laughed out loud at this.

Actmyname is doing a superlative job busting you account-buying apes and though I can't read what looks to be Russian, I trust that actmyname is on the money in his accusation (and TheUltraElite as well).  So, having said that, I hope they don't mind that I followed suit and used that archived page as a reference for my own negative feedback, which you can confirm receipt of at your leisure, sir.

Stop trying to buy accounts.  It may not be against the rules of bitcointalk, but you just found out that it isn't acceptable to a number of people here.  Nothing good comes of it, and it's a lazy, deceitful way of gaining access to rank, merit, trust, and/or reputation that you did not earn.

You can actually return the previous trust to yourself without having him to do it.I'll tell how,

Go to your profile ->Trust ->Trust Settings and inside the Trust list just add this text .BAMM your trust-list will be returned to you again.Thank me later. 

Assume that the merit transaction leads to an A->B linkage (sender gains receiver's history). Not the other way around. After all, if users like peloso can send 50 merit to several accounts that don't have negative trust (myself included) then we can't exactly rely on this kind of circumstantial evidence to indicate a full connection.

Как все знают, каждый человек стремится к счастью. У каждого свое виденье счастья, для кого то оно в деньгах, для кого то в детях, много мнений по этому поводу... Но все же, счастье кроется внутри человека или снаружи?