Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 125 results by darkcredit
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
https://countingdownto.com/countdown/nxecoin-launch-countdown-clock-1a9b8f48-7a8f-485c-b46d-374422af4afb
Countdown can be found here
Countdown can be found here
What the hell is this countdown for?
Relaunch and swap to NXE
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
https://countingdownto.com/countdown/nxecoin-launch-countdown-clock-1a9b8f48-7a8f-485c-b46d-374422af4afb
Countdown can be found here
Countdown can be found here
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
So the plan is to just manually swap out everyone's coins? You could just burn a large amount of the premine, fork it if you want to lower the POS interest, and everyone can just live with 3 million or so POW coins. You instead choose to take the most complicated route possible and switch to a whole new blockchain! Oh, and do it through the forum where no one will have any oversight during the swap. Wonder what you will do with all the coins that go unclaimed............
I'm only following this crap still because I foolishly mined 58k of these shitcoins early on.
Once again you take actions that show you are either incompetent or a scammer, or even more likely, an incompetent scammer!
I'm only following this crap still because I foolishly mined 58k of these shitcoins early on.
Once again you take actions that show you are either incompetent or a scammer, or even more likely, an incompetent scammer!
We could have forked to change the interest but we planned to re brand anyway so the swap to a new blockchain works out well.
It's not a complicated route
Any unclaimed coins will be destroyed
For a "shitcoin" you seem to like following and posting about it
We will contact coin-swap for listing after the swap
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
can i just leave on pool, i usualy wait for an exchange.
Yes that's the best idea for me too , don't want to play with that wallet anymore.
Yeah you can leave them til the swap tomorrow
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
Withdraw all coins to your wallet til the swap tomorrow
Yes great , but the wallet don"t synch.I got the latest version tried that:
addnode=dcxnode.ddns.net
addnode=dcxnode2.ddns.net
and that:
listen=1
server=1
daemon=1
rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=pass
maxconnections=100
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
rpcallowip=*
rpcport=8812
addnode=dcxnode.ddns.net
addnode=dcxnode2.ddns.net
and nothing , you got some more addnodes ?
try and connect directly to the main node ip
add this
addnode=179.43.126.180
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
Hi, everyone please stop mining!
We will be doing a coin swap at 1:1 ratio on a new code base.
Lowering the interest to 6% and lowering the premine to 160k
Please post here with the current DCX you hold
I'll admit my wrong the PoS does seem to be eating the PoW blocks
We will be doing a coin swap at 1:1 ratio on a new code base.
Lowering the interest to 6% and lowering the premine to 160k
Please post here with the current DCX you hold
I'll admit my wrong the PoS does seem to be eating the PoW blocks
do you want me to shutdown the pool ?
Yeah that would be great!
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
Around 9k. What type of proof of holding would you like?
Been following this since the beginning. Mining with my meager GPU collection.
Been following this since the beginning. Mining with my meager GPU collection.
We will setup a swap address, when you send you need to include your bitcointalk username in the narration
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
Hi, everyone please stop mining!
We will be doing a coin swap at 1:1 ratio on a new code base.
Lowering the interest to 6% and lowering the premine to 160k
Please post here with the current DCX you hold
I'll admit my wrong the PoS does seem to be eating the PoW blocks
We will be doing a coin swap at 1:1 ratio on a new code base.
Lowering the interest to 6% and lowering the premine to 160k
Please post here with the current DCX you hold
I'll admit my wrong the PoS does seem to be eating the PoW blocks
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
I am still waiting
Scam or Not
Scam or Not
Hi, waiting for what?
we ALL waiting for exchange
Well vote for us here
https://c-cex.com/?id=vote
We won coins-e voting but they never added us
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
I am still waiting
Scam or Not
Scam or Not
Hi, waiting for what?
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
If you look in the code you see that it will not accept PoW blocks after 83,636 PoW blocks
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
Why did you say this then:
The 5m POW will be mined without problems
POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Take a look in the code for yourself you see that the code checks if it's PoW and makes sure it doesn't pass the POW limit
all coins will be mined without problem?
PoS blocks aren't counted toward the POW limit as seen in the code
I believe your letting confustion get the best of you
Wow.
I've heard plenty. I'd say it is clearly you who are confused.
LOL Okay
Have a nice one!
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
If you look in the code you see that it will not accept PoW blocks after 83,636 PoW blocks
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
Why did you say this then:
The 5m POW will be mined without problems
POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Take a look in the code for yourself you see that the code checks if it's PoW and makes sure it doesn't pass the POW limit
all coins will be mined without problem?
PoS blocks aren't counted toward the POW limit as seen in the code
I believe your letting confustion get the best of you
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
If you look in the code you see that it will not accept PoW blocks after 83,636 PoW blocks
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy 100k of the premine
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy 100k of the premine
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
at this rate looks like we will be well below 5M coins due to staked blocks. Currently about 1.6M mined
The 5m POW will be mined without problems POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Code:
static const int LAST_POW_BLOCK = 83636; // POW
Really? PoS blocks don't count toward the 83636?
And yeah, I am also the guy who a few pages back had to correct you on the code you used to "fix" PoS. A guy who doesn't know how to code at all.
Ok, level with me, why does it seem like you have absolutely no clue what you are doing, and why should I believe you have the technical capabilities to deliver sidechains and all these pie-in-the-sky features when you are fucking up very basic stuff?
You didn't correct anyone on the PoS fix simply a file that shouldn't have been pushed to git got pushed which was fixed here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/a49819606c6b1bdbb9abb4854a4a40ee954f89ab
You simply spotted the issue before we did
You can see the PoS fix here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/4ee0fef9ed9d09b84e68bf992997d37e88e07a2a
Here's where the file accidentally was pushed https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/b31bce877b452206b17180679ea27272af1bb1e4
this guy tried to clone the idea behind bitcredits and failed. He has ZERO coding ability and no visible progress. Why do you people even waste time with these obvious scams?
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
For one we are a team not a single person
Someone needs to get facts together before starting FUD
No one tired to clone bitcredits lol
Zero coding ability? haha okay just leave the thread alone no one asked you to comment
The nvidia version of the video is better btw!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spZJrsssPA0
You are on a public forum for discussion of alternative cryptocurrency. I and anyone else can comment whenever we damn well please.
You are full of shit because your original "fix" included the line
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 83636
which you had altered from
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 15000
It was only after you released a broken client and I pointed it out to you that you changed it to
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 200
And you still haven't explained why it is a talented team of coders seems to think "PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636" which is a mindbogglingly fucktarded statement that is 100% incorrect.
Being a rude fuck doesn't get you anywhere
If you look in the code you see that it will not accept PoW blocks after 83,636 PoW blocks
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
Feel free to go ahead the source is available on github
The team doesn't care what you say we will continue our work on this project no matter what
BlockLoan is the outcome of a brainstorming session
also never heard of bitcredits til your post.
No copy-paste was done we cherry picked features we liked from other coins to create a solid base for our projects
Also taking a guess you most be the bitcredits dev
We will not be moving forward with BlockLoan we will be focusing on decentralized domains and assets
The team doesn't care what you say we will continue our work on this project no matter what
BlockLoan is the outcome of a brainstorming session
also never heard of bitcredits til your post.
No copy-paste was done we cherry picked features we liked from other coins to create a solid base for our projects
Also taking a guess you most be the bitcredits dev
We will not be moving forward with BlockLoan we will be focusing on decentralized domains and assets
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
at this rate looks like we will be well below 5M coins due to staked blocks. Currently about 1.6M mined
The 5m POW will be mined without problems POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Code:
static const int LAST_POW_BLOCK = 83636; // POW
Really? PoS blocks don't count toward the 83636?
And yeah, I am also the guy who a few pages back had to correct you on the code you used to "fix" PoS. A guy who doesn't know how to code at all.
Ok, level with me, why does it seem like you have absolutely no clue what you are doing, and why should I believe you have the technical capabilities to deliver sidechains and all these pie-in-the-sky features when you are fucking up very basic stuff?
You didn't correct anyone on the PoS fix simply a file that shouldn't have been pushed to git got pushed which was fixed here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/a49819606c6b1bdbb9abb4854a4a40ee954f89ab
You simply spotted the issue before we did
You can see the PoS fix here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/4ee0fef9ed9d09b84e68bf992997d37e88e07a2a
Here's where the file accidentally was pushed https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/b31bce877b452206b17180679ea27272af1bb1e4
this guy tried to clone the idea behind bitcredits and failed. He has ZERO coding ability and no visible progress. Why do you people even waste time with these obvious scams?
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
For one we are a team not a single person
Someone needs to get facts together before starting FUD
No one tired to clone bitcredits lol
Zero coding ability? haha okay just leave the thread alone no one asked you to comment
The nvidia version of the video is better btw!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spZJrsssPA0
Re: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE!
We need some activity here! 
New website will be active tomorrow!
New website will be active tomorrow!
Well you could've paid me to comment here but you didn't need to
I would like to know why you chose 12% interest
12% was chosen for the 12 months of the year
my wallet 50k
1 DCX = 10$ Really?
minimum exchange starting price?
1 DCX = 10$ Really?
minimum exchange starting price?
I agree the $10 is quite a goal, but the dev mentioned that he feels is very possible with time based on their development planned.
We agree 10$ is a big goal but it's fully possible with advancing features and a dedicated team.