Search content
Sort by

Showing 19 of 19 results by divinesnail01
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup [now in HD!]
by
divinesnail01
on 22/04/2014, 03:32:59 UTC
@gamersglory, want to get rid of your doorstops?

Good point. I want to get rid of my running-like-a-demon doorstop for cheap.

Take a look: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=524358.msg5814070#msg5814070

Heavily modified and works a treat. If anyone is interested, throw me an offer.
What did you do with the internals?

Oh, I put a heatsink on each chip, and I have the oscillators and resistors to bump the speed up even higher. I just don't have the skills to do the soldering.

Anyone interested?

sent you a PM
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 19/04/2014, 05:29:28 UTC
Really short version:  The more you can isolate these on the network the happier they'll be...

[snip]

Longer version:  I didn't think the Android issue would apply to me...
The issue with Android is using IP addresses after the DHCP lease expires, not traffic. See ”DHCP client ignores lease time”: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=11236.

So, a good solution is to put the Android devices on a separate logical network. If the primary network is 192.168.1.x then create a second network such as 192.168.2.x (both with a net mask of 255.255.255.0). Unfortunately that means two routers.

Is this what you did with the second router?

And that was exactly some of my reasoning for not worrying about the Androids:  Though on the same logical network, the Android device addresses were assigned in a different part of the address space than the addresses I was using for the cubes and the proxies; I have my DHCP leases set for 7 days; my DHCP server pings the address as it's being assigned to be sure that there isn't a "squatter" on the address before offering it.  It's pretty difficult for a lease to expire and create an address conflict under those circumstances.  Further, I saw the same behavior with the proxies in my DHCP space as I did with them assigned statically outside of the DHCP pool.

I haven't spent the time, and probably won't, to dive deeper into what's going on on the network, but I can say with some confidence that it's not an issue of IP address conflicts, unless the android devices are "making up" addresses to use elsewhere in the address space, and managing to do that without causing other devices to squawk about an address conflict.  Ultimately, however, that turns into a Quixotic discussion - there definitely IS something about having cubes on the same network with other devices, likely Androids, and the solution is the same regardless of the root cause: get them isolated from each other.

My solution has been to create a completely separate physical network.  I've used different IP addressing for that network, but since they aren't interconnected, it really doesn't matter.  It's a little bit of an extreme solution, but very effective.



A follow up seems in order.

Since moving the cubes and proxy machines to a separate network, I have had no / none / zero / not any of the communication problems I was seeing, and it has been 13 days.
Whatever the reason (I'm still not buying the IP address conflict theory, but I'm not going to go back and run a network sniffer to prove it) these little monsters really like being on their own network.

Perhaps that will help someone else who may struggle.

'snail
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup [now in HD!]
by
divinesnail01
on 17/04/2014, 19:10:23 UTC
Hello everyone

Has anyone tried this power supply?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817182072&ignorebbr=1

Showing 64 amps available on a single 12v rail.

they're out of the usual cx750m corsair unit.

'snail
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [850 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff
by
divinesnail01
on 16/04/2014, 01:47:40 UTC
...With a total of 28 shares for an unconfirmed total of 0.00000065 BTC.    I'm averaging between 12.915 to 10.500 Mhash/s.

Does this seem correct?  Less than 1 penny for all the resources I've loaned?

Don't take this as a criticism, but "all the resources [you've] loaned", even at the high estimate of 12.9Mh/s, comes out to less than 1/10,000 of a percent of the total shares input to the current pool hashrate, which is currently clocking over 1.3 Terrahashes/sec.

And the last 24 hours has been a GOOD pool day, that's about twice the payout (since we've found twice as many blocks) that you would normally expect to see in a statistically average day.  As OrganOfCorti said, if you're mining on GPU or CPU, the current difficulty and mining rate of the global BTC pool is so much larger than your capacity to mine on that hardware that it's not efficient.

Then you wont take this as a criticism when I say, nowhere on your website does it say, "reg CPU users will need to run their computer for a total of FIVE YEARS to generate 1 bitcoin".   I'm confident you DEPEND on the thousands and thousands of us "workers" who are under educated and dumb enough to run our computers for 24 hours to yield the lack of result while you keep everything we generate and have no choice to abandon because you won't payout less than 1 bitcoin.   Now I understand why information is pretty scarce.  It's clearly a deliberate intent to defraud.





Really?

I wrote a nice response to your first post, taking some time to do a little research as I did.  Several others replied to you as I was writing that, and then you came in with this gem.  I deleted my "nice" response.

I'm an IT worker; we talk sometimes about users who "substitute belligerence for brilliance."  I don't think I've ever said this directly to anyone before, but I think you just gave the textbook demonstration of that principle.  You found some software, fired it up, and figured you were going to see magic hit your bank account, with no research?  And then, when other try to point out some shortcomings in your plan, you react in this way; blaming others for your lack of understanding.

Wow.

You've got enough there to do some semi-useful Litecoin mining.  Google can be your friend, and I wish you luck with your future interpersonal interactions.

'Snail.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup [now in HD!]
by
divinesnail01
on 16/04/2014, 01:25:42 UTC
One of my cubes has shut down - I happened to be sitting right by it and heard the relay click.  Red light and bottom pwr light are dark, fan twitches but does not spin.  I've swapped in a power supply that has been running two other cubes, and I get the same symtpoms.

I opened it up and checked the board - I see no evidence of overheat.  I shorted the two power relay leads and all the lights come one, but with no fan I'm not inclined to run it for more than a few seconds that way.

Is it possible that the fan is just bad?  I don't have a similar one to swap in tonight.
While preparing to order a fan, does anyone know what RPM the stock fans run at?  I see another post about a 2900 rpm 90mm fan, but I'd rather not have that noise level.  I guess more importantly, does anyone know what RPM the device wants to see?

Other thoughts about what could cause this?
Try swapping fans between the two Cubes to determine if it is the fan.
I think I saw in a previous post that the fans were variable speed, search back in this thread (I have no idea how to do that, help anyone?). They have there conductors, one is a tachometer (speed) signal so the Cube can control the speed with the feedback.

My guess is that the fan failed, the controller no longer saw a speed signal and shut down the mining power relay.

You would want to get a fan with a tachometer (three wire connector) and either a ball bearings or fluid (rifle) bearing for lower noise and longer life. The fan size is 120mm by 25mm.



I found one of these http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835119032 in my "scrounge" bin.  It seems to work well.  A couple of things to note, however:  it will only mount with the airflow reversed from stock (not necessarily a bad thing) and the aluminum case is enough thicker than the plastic fans that you must be really careful in placement to get it to go in.
The cube came right up, though, so I'm happy.

Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup [now in HD!]
by
divinesnail01
on 15/04/2014, 03:38:14 UTC
One of my cubes has shut down - I happened to be sitting right by it and heard the relay click.  Red light and bottom pwr light are dark, fan twitches but does not spin.  I've swapped in a power supply that has been running two other cubes, and I get the same symtpoms.

I opened it up and checked the board - I see no evidence of overheat.  I shorted the two power relay leads and all the lights come one, but with no fan I'm not inclined to run it for more than a few seconds that way.

Is it possible that the fan is just bad?  I don't have a similar one to swap in tonight.
While preparing to order a fan, does anyone know what RPM the stock fans run at?  I see another post about a 2900 rpm 90mm fan, but I'd rather not have that noise level.  I guess more importantly, does anyone know what RPM the device wants to see?

Other thoughts about what could cause this?

Thanks in advance

'snail
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 05/04/2014, 17:25:06 UTC
Really short version:  The more you can isolate these on the network the happier they'll be...

[snip]

Longer version:  I didn't think the Android issue would apply to me...
The issue with Android is using IP addresses after the DHCP lease expires, not traffic. See ”DHCP client ignores lease time”: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=11236.

So, a good solution is to put the Android devices on a separate logical network. If the primary network is 192.168.1.x then create a second network such as 192.168.2.x (both with a net mask of 255.255.255.0). Unfortunately that means two routers.

Is this what you did with the second router?

And that was exactly some of my reasoning for not worrying about the Androids:  Though on the same logical network, the Android device addresses were assigned in a different part of the address space than the addresses I was using for the cubes and the proxies; I have my DHCP leases set for 7 days; my DHCP server pings the address as it's being assigned to be sure that there isn't a "squatter" on the address before offering it.  It's pretty difficult for a lease to expire and create an address conflict under those circumstances.  Further, I saw the same behavior with the proxies in my DHCP space as I did with them assigned statically outside of the DHCP pool.

I haven't spent the time, and probably won't, to dive deeper into what's going on on the network, but I can say with some confidence that it's not an issue of IP address conflicts, unless the android devices are "making up" addresses to use elsewhere in the address space, and managing to do that without causing other devices to squawk about an address conflict.  Ultimately, however, that turns into a Quixotic discussion - there definitely IS something about having cubes on the same network with other devices, likely Androids, and the solution is the same regardless of the root cause: get them isolated from each other.

My solution has been to create a completely separate physical network.  I've used different IP addressing for that network, but since they aren't interconnected, it really doesn't matter.  It's a little bit of an extreme solution, but very effective.

Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 05/04/2014, 02:14:39 UTC
I'm going slightly nuts here, and would appreciate some additional assistance.

I'm running 3 cubes - 3rd one arrived about a week ago.  2 of them usually run at 38 (high clock) and one of them runs at 30 (low clock) because I don't like how the power leads heat up on that power supply, and I haven't bought a new one yet.

Last Thursday, I was showing 100GH/s at my pool - less than I expected, but reasonable.

Since then, I'm seeing what I consider to be really odd behavior in my proxy(ies).  Specifically, they will run with the usual scrolling display for 10 - 15 seconds, and then stop.  About 45 seconds later they'll start scrolling again.

I've tried Linux (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and 12.04 LTS) on virtual machines on 2 different hosts.  I've actually lost count of how many iterations of linux machines I've tried.  I've tried Windows XP, Windows 7, and Windows 8 on three different machines - all of which have had the cubes running at 38-39 GH/s each in the past.  I've tried multi-homing the Linux virtual machines - one interface "outside" on the public internet, and the second interface "inside" for the cubes to connect to so as to bypass any congestion that my firewall might be adding.

I've been wanting to blame my ISP (Comcast business - no love lost there), so tonight I built an Ubuntu 12.04 LTS machine on an Amazon EC2 cloud instance, and it is doing the very same thing - running for 10 -15 seconds, and then pausing.  Here's the strange part - the proxy running on the local machine and the proxy running on the EC2 pause and restart at exactly the same time.

Say what!!!???!!!

So I'm officially stumped.

Tonight I'm down to about 13GH/s on the two "faster" cubes, and and about 12 on the slower one.  That's (almost?) not worth feeding electricity to.

I would be immensely appreciative of someone who has some experience with multiple cubes helping me to walk back through this.  I can't believe that it's connectivity issues with the pool - I'd be hearing about it in the forums, right?

Actually - let's explore that for a moment - anyone else here running multiple cubes through Comcast that can say "yea" or "nay" to connectivity issues to Slush?

Thanks in advance;

'snail

A follow up, and perhaps some help for someone else:

Really short version:  The more you can isolate these on the network the happier they'll be.

Short version:  There might actually be something to that "get the Androids off the network".  Running for 2 days now at above full rated speeds, just in time for the Slush pool to have a pretty good run of luck.  I'm currently showing 106GH/s on the pool - my theoretical maximum for 2 at 38 and one at 30.

Longer version:  I didn't think the Android issue would apply to me, as I don't use the wireless access point as my router, and the cubes and the wireless access point (and thus the Android machines) are on different network switches.  I was watching my network traffic and my bandwidth utilization, both of which were quite low, and so assumed that the problem MUST be the proxy talking to the pool.
Under the heading of "can always learn something new" however, I decided to test the theory, but knew that it would be easier to cut fingers off than to get all the Android devices off my network. 
So....   I took another older consumer level router that I wasn't using anymore, and connected it to my cable modem as a peer to my primary firewall (I have a pretty good internet connection that gives me some flexibility that not everyone would have).  I moved a "hardware" machine and the cubes to that network, set my IP addresses, and started mining.  The improvement was startling.  Almost immediately into the 35 range for the two faster ones, and over the next hour, tickling 39.  The slower one showed similar performance.  I then put a connection from unused network ports on my virtual hosts, and started 2 virtual machines up.  Set the cubes to the virtual machines for the proxy, shut down the "hardware" machine and let them run.  We're coming up on 48 hours since the last time I restarted the cubes for an IP address change, and the numbers are great.  I don't see them rotating between proxies, and so could probably get away with just one VM, but the 2nd one doesn't cost me anything.

Time to upgrade this poor power supply that came with the 3rd cube, and then add a 4th.  Don't tell my wife.  Smiley

As a side note:  The "proxy in the cloud" on the Amazon EC2 actually worked pretty well once I got the cubes isolated.  I'm getting a little bit better numbers with the local machines, but if I didn't have these hosts running 24/7/365 already anyway, I'd seriously consider getting the free Amazon account for a year, and letting them pay the electricity for the proxy.

Thanks for the help, and happy mining.

'snail
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 02/04/2014, 04:23:35 UTC
I'm going slightly nuts here, and would appreciate some additional assistance.

I'm running 3 cubes - 3rd one arrived about a week ago.  2 of them usually run at 38 (high clock) and one of them runs at 30 (low clock) because I don't like how the power leads heat up on that power supply, and I haven't bought a new one yet.

Last Thursday, I was showing 100GH/s at my pool - less than I expected, but reasonable.

Since then, I'm seeing what I consider to be really odd behavior in my proxy(ies).  Specifically, they will run with the usual scrolling display for 10 - 15 seconds, and then stop.  About 45 seconds later they'll start scrolling again.

I've tried Linux (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and 12.04 LTS) on virtual machines on 2 different hosts.  I've actually lost count of how many iterations of linux machines I've tried.  I've tried Windows XP, Windows 7, and Windows 8 on three different machines - all of which have had the cubes running at 38-39 GH/s each in the past.  I've tried multi-homing the Linux virtual machines - one interface "outside" on the public internet, and the second interface "inside" for the cubes to connect to so as to bypass any congestion that my firewall might be adding.

I've been wanting to blame my ISP (Comcast business - no love lost there), so tonight I built an Ubuntu 12.04 LTS machine on an Amazon EC2 cloud instance, and it is doing the very same thing - running for 10 -15 seconds, and then pausing.  Here's the strange part - the proxy running on the local machine and the proxy running on the EC2 pause and restart at exactly the same time.

Say what!!!???!!!

So I'm officially stumped.

Tonight I'm down to about 13GH/s on the two "faster" cubes, and and about 12 on the slower one.  That's (almost?) not worth feeding electricity to.

I would be immensely appreciative of someone who has some experience with multiple cubes helping me to walk back through this.  I can't believe that it's connectivity issues with the pool - I'd be hearing about it in the forums, right?

Actually - let's explore that for a moment - anyone else here running multiple cubes through Comcast that can say "yea" or "nay" to connectivity issues to Slush?

Thanks in advance;

'snail
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 08/03/2014, 14:13:31 UTC
Ok, seeing some weirdness here, and could use some help.  I keep feeling like I'm missing something obvious.

I have 2 cubes.  They occasionally reboot themselves.  What's odd, is that both of them do it within a minute or so of each other.  They'll run for hours at a time, and then stop sending things to the proxies, followed by reboot.

I've tried them both to the same proxy, I've tried them to two proxies on the same machine, I've tried them to different physical machines, and I've tried them to different virtual machines.  I've tried one power supply, and I've tried 2.  I've tried them on a separate network switch (2 cubes and the proxy on the same switch, with an "uplink" to my main network switch), and I've tried them on the main network switch.  Same thing in all cases; run for a while, and then both of them reboot withing a minute or so of each other.

This "feels" like a communication issue, but I haven't found it yet.  I'm not running a consumer router, but rather an open source PC based router / firewall, so I don't think it's a throughput issue to the internet.  I've just tripled the speed of my internet drop, and it's "business class" as opposed to residential (no caps, no blocked ports).

It's starting to affect my earnings a little, as when they happen to be rebooting at the end of a block, the pool I use penalizes me fairly heavily.

In short, I'm a little stumped.  That's actually a little embarrassing, as I'm a network admin / IT manager for a small company, and I'm supposed to be the guy that solves these sorts of issues.

Thoughts?  Any and all help greatly appreciated.

'snail

If you're not on a home router, it might be something to do with IP leasing and things like that timing out. Maybe something changes temporarily, enough that the cubes think the proxy is down and restarts.

Partway through writing a response about how that couldn't be the reason, I decided it would be faster to simply set the proxies to static IP addresses to prove that it wouldn't change anything.

Huh.  Look at that .

They've run over 7 hours straight with no reboots.  Granted that was overnight, and the reboots seemed more frequent in the afternoon evening hours, but this is somewhat encouraging.

Stay tuned; let's see if they go a day without reboots.

What's odd about this is that I have my DHCP server set up for 7 day leases.  What I understand of the lease renewal says there's no way the clients (proxy machines) are chatting with the DHCP server as often as I've been seeing the reboots...

More to learn I guess, and a chance to affirm my theory that learning new things keeps an aging brain young(er).


Thanks for the idea.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 07/03/2014, 02:03:12 UTC
Ok, seeing some weirdness here, and could use some help.  I keep feeling like I'm missing something obvious.

I have 2 cubes.  They occasionally reboot themselves.  What's odd, is that both of them do it within a minute or so of each other.  They'll run for hours at a time, and then stop sending things to the proxies, followed by reboot.

I've tried them both to the same proxy, I've tried them to two proxies on the same machine, I've tried them to different physical machines, and I've tried them to different virtual machines.  I've tried one power supply, and I've tried 2.  I've tried them on a separate network switch (2 cubes and the proxy on the same switch, with an "uplink" to my main network switch), and I've tried them on the main network switch.  Same thing in all cases; run for a while, and then both of them reboot withing a minute or so of each other.

This "feels" like a communication issue, but I haven't found it yet.  I'm not running a consumer router, but rather an open source PC based router / firewall, so I don't think it's a throughput issue to the internet.  I've just tripled the speed of my internet drop, and it's "business class" as opposed to residential (no caps, no blocked ports).

It's starting to affect my earnings a little, as when they happen to be rebooting at the end of a block, the pool I use penalizes me fairly heavily.

In short, I'm a little stumped.  That's actually a little embarrassing, as I'm a network admin / IT manager for a small company, and I'm supposed to be the guy that solves these sorts of issues.

Thoughts?  Any and all help greatly appreciated.

'snail
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [850 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff
by
divinesnail01
on 26/02/2014, 23:38:14 UTC
... I kind of like the roller coaster myself. Brings out the good and bad in everyone like a Bitcoin mining soap opera. Over time it's all the same IMHO. There's no magic pool or else everyone would be there.

+1
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [850 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff
by
divinesnail01
on 25/02/2014, 03:28:21 UTC
I hate the fact that Bitcoins are about to drop below $500.

I can't wait for it to go below $100


I'd be interested in why you say that.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 25/02/2014, 03:21:48 UTC
well it hasn't been 10 cube's started before time goes back to 0 after 2m13s

still inactive.

i have restarted the proxy while leaving the cube up, and vice versa. have also restarted both simultaneously. proxy is receiving jobs, i think the cube is having an issue connecting to the computer running the proxy now.


including cube config below. i'm pretty sure i have all the info correct

http://i.imgur.com/2fBIYAC.png
http://i.imgur.com/JpmKS9I.png
http://i.imgur.com/2S3bzEP.png

It looks like you have the cube pointing to .17 for the pool, but your PC is at .2.  That's not going to work.

The pool on the cube should be set to the same as the IPV4 address on the PC running the proxy software.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 17/02/2014, 17:42:42 UTC
I dunno, sounded right to me so I went with it... I'd love to just run one proxy though as it will simplify things... Maybe it's splitting hairs and only a small improvement?

I can only speak to my personal 1st hand experience. I run 1 instance of slush's proxy, pointed to BTCGuild, and all 3 cubes show as independent workers. Also, all 3 cubes can handle the same difficulty so whatever the OP of that page was referring to about difficulties is a moot point for me. I believe the latest version of slush's proxy has a flag for propagating difficulties so if that's of need to you (like you run cubes and other hardware that's not as powerful), you might want to test that. But if you are cube-only, you should be fine with just one instance of proxy running.

This. Run ONE instance of the stratum proxy. It will identify individual clients and treat them as such. Even if you have different hash rates, set them all at the same difficulty.
That doesn't fit with my experience, and I switched back last night just to be sure before I said anything.

I'm running 2 cubes, and if I point them both at the same instance of the proxy, both run consistently in the 36 range, with my pool reporting a combined of almost 72.  If I point them at two different instances of the proxy, on the same PC, one runs consistently at about 38.8 and the other at about 38.2, with my pool reporting just over 76.  It's a small difference, and I can't say I've been particularly scientific about my testing, but nevertheless it seems to be easily replicated.

YMMV, but I'm a fan of 2 copies of the proxy.

'snail
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 12/02/2014, 23:41:57 UTC
Perhaps this can help someone else.

(snip)

Additionally, I found a Dell Latitude X1 in my "I don't use these but don't want to throw them out" stuff.  It's running 2 copies of the slush proxy (one per cube) on 13 watts when the screen is blanked.  It's running Windows XP, and peaking at about 70% utilization on the cpu.

(snip)

'snail

I've been doing some experimentation, and I've found that when I run my proxies on a Dell T3400 (core2 quad, 8GB ram) I get about 10% better hash rates than when I run on the X1 laptop.  The difference in power consumption is probably significant; next time I have the cubes down for any reason I'll put a watt meter on it and see.

'snail
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 12/02/2014, 03:25:45 UTC
Hey I am having Major trouble connecting to my cube. It powers on fine, all lights power on, the network light even blinks. but even after pressing the reset button and setting my subnet to 192.169.1.x i can't connect to it. advanced ip scanner shows no new devices. when i tried yesterday it showed a device @ 192.168.1.255 after resetting but i couldn't get any web interface on any port, it just timed out.

 My network works with two routers and a switch due to a weird network config in  my student housing so do you guys think it would be possible to connect it with a crosscable to my pc to try and connect to the interface or something like that.

The cube should reset to 192.168.1.254:8000 after resetting it right??? it doesn't seem to do that.

I tried everything in the guides I even turned off my android wifi devices.

I have checked the physical integrity of the cube, everything is dandy.

Got any ideas or suggestions?

Thanks!

Probably just a typo - but I notice in one place you're talking about 169 as the third octet in your IP setup, and in another your're talking about 168 (which would be the correct one).

192.168.xxx.255 is generally a broadcast address, not a device.

A crossover cable between your pc and the cube is a good idea, as long as the IP address on the pc is set to 192.168.1.xxx (something other than 254).

'snail

Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 10/02/2014, 03:19:23 UTC
My cube just stopped hashing for no apparent reason. All settings are the same and usually a restart would've solved it but it's been weeks now that it's inactive.

It started a few days before I moved from my place and continues to be inactive in my new current location.

Can you please help me put it back to work. BTC tips to show appreciation for solutions that work.

Thanks for sharing the knowledge everybody.

GUYS, CAN SOMEBODY PLEASE HELP?

Perhaps, but more information is needed.
Screen shot of the cube config?
What are you using for your proxy?  What is the IP setup on that machine?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive ASICMiner Cube Setup
by
divinesnail01
on 09/02/2014, 01:27:23 UTC
Perhaps this can help someone else.

I followed this guide when I got my first cube, and found it easy to set up.  (I actually read the entire thread!)
I did one thing differently, however, and rather than the recommended Corsair PSU, I tried to save a few bucks by buying this one instead: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817171084  (Cooler Master 700w)

On the spec sheet, it looks like it should work - 55 amps on the 12 volt rail.

It runs one cube, at high clock speed, and seems to do it pretty well.

My 2nd cube arrived today.

Short version:  That Cooler Master power supply will not even start up 2 cubes at high speed, and with both cubes at low speed they will start up and run for for about three minutes, before the psu shuts down.

I found a Corsair CX750m at a local store.  I've been running both, at high clock speed, for a couple hours now.

In short, don't try to cheap out like I did.  Pay the extra $10 or so for the Corsair.  It seems worth it.

Additionally, I found a Dell Latitude X1 in my "I don't use these but don't want to throw them out" stuff.  It's running 2 copies of the slush proxy (one per cube) on 13 watts when the screen is blanked.  It's running Windows XP, and peaking at about 70% utilization on the cpu.

If I find any issues with either of these setups, I'll post more information.

In the meantime, however, my thanks to all who have participated in this thread and contributed to the information that makes it so easy to get one running.

'snail