good luck with your scam

get your money back for those English lessons...

just one more person trying to make a buck off everyone else's work... good luck with your "PoS" coin...

so you are offering fake tokens (testnet) for real info? is that right?

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/ethereum-transactionfees.html#3m

that chart means your token is worthless.... lol. you can't facilitate micro-transactions on a network where the average cost per transaction right now (lowest point this year) is 37 cents! 3 transactions cost a dollar!!!! ha!!! maybe if you had it on a better network like expanse...
unless eth tanks this will be worthless as a token on the eth network.

I don't log on here often... ideas don't make anything valuable...

you are creating a lot of heat? what are you doing to dissipate it? what you are describing sounds like a heat issue... just when everything is ok... runs for like 10 min then drops off... usually it's heat

am i the only one mining on the newest version?

all please update to newest version?

if all with wallet just use one core to generate, you may be surprised! lol

for global marketing to matter, you need China and India!!!

It will mint a new single coin that comes from nowhere. It's a 0. Transaction coin
It has a transaction fee of .001 and you have to have one to mint it...
It is how you make untraceable transactions

what are you trying to mine on (cpu) ? the windows miner only works on newer i7...

So is your quote! LOL (server DOWN!)

Remember, your server only matters so much!  Network hardware is more important!  Most providers throttle connections, some lock IPs and ports AUTOMATICALLY if certain number of connections reached in to short of time, as part of DDoS protection...

all they have to do to stop it is say the bonus will continue until all are equally able to login, instead of date related.... this would also stop the mad stampede of people trying to get on their server at once...

as more time passes it will get worse, numbers wise, not better... :LOL:

ico with separate addresses... lol
no way for anyone to verify fund totals for ico....
no software, no anything? try gofundme...
cause not gonna get anything but noobish btc... anyone send 1 or 2 satoshis???

Also, where will the Vericoin COME FROM in a swap? and where will the Verium go?

Are the devs going to swap it from the ICO funds?

... I see the swap function is built into the wallet... but without other chain connected, how will it convert/send on the other chain?

Is there any way to tell where a transaction comes from?

Not until the real network is started... wait for the announcement... hopefully countdown for all... LOL
as well... never DEMAND, always REQUEST

Dear Sir or ma'am? Sorry to inform you but I seem to have locked up the chain at least the viable one that connects to bittrex. Sorry for the inconvenience but it doesn't seem like the chain can actually carry the extra transaction data.

-Doesntmatter

2015-12-15 11:58:59 GUI: QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_1_client_method
2015-12-15 11:58:59 GUI: QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_2_client_method
2015-12-15 11:58:59 GUI: QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_1_server_method
2015-12-15 11:58:59 GUI: QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_2_server_method
2015-12-15 11:58:59 GUI: QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSL_select_next_proto
2015-12-15 11:58:59 GUI: QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSL_CTX_set_next_proto_select_cb
2015-12-15 11:58:59 GUI: QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSL_get0_next_proto_negotiated
2015-12-15 11:59:00 receive version message: /Section32:0.30.19.1/: version 70014, blocks=266996, us=73.153.116.122:8877, peer=1, blockchain=Bitcredit
2015-12-15 11:59:00 Added time data, samples 2, offset -1439 (-23 minutes)
2015-12-15 11:59:00 Misbehaving: 188.193.111.112:49710 (0 -> 1)
2015-12-15 11:59:00 ProcessMessage(version, 132 bytes) FAILED peer=1
2015-12-15 11:59:01 GUI: PaymentServer::LoadRootCAs : Loaded  48  root certificates
2015-12-15 11:59:01 GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
2015-12-15 11:59:01 GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
2015-12-15 11:59:01 GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
2015-12-15 11:59:01 GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
2015-12-15 11:59:01 GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
2015-12-15 11:59:01 GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
2015-12-15 11:59:01 GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile

my log is quickly becoming gigs of nothing but  GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
my windows 10 machine does not make outgoing connection after this...
socket recv error An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine.  (10053)
but no connection is attempted outside the program...

how was my warning fud??? if you can't put a bunch of different chains together on the network and have the network conform to the best one, then it's not a chain... AND YOU HAVE NO CONSENSUS!!!
bittrex is blocked...
and if you can't sell something, or get ANYTHING of VALUE for it, where is this "real value"?
paying for something doesn't give it value...

"height" : 256476,
"hash" : "000eb1b4c5c8404c7d7ac23383f96331d65af8c4a531342e0b7c450b291e8ac2",
"branchlen" : 182,
"status" : "headers-only"
},
{
"height" : 256473,
"hash" : "00036fb1a173dd8a5c140b5cf452e3fa2973b67554ed338ee9e28b7ecf437b60",
"branchlen" : 179,
"status" : "headers-only"
},
{
"height" : 256439,
"hash" : "000111c8f341afb7beceb9433ac77f0d4e93ed410b248dbbc86d4a3b233ba3d7",
"branchlen" : 145,
"status" : "headers-only"
},
{
"height" : 256404,
"hash" : "000d7dae16d634b08f7c73538a30e8940e65ebf7f080c80c35645cd17bc45d72",
"branchlen" : 110,
"status" : "headers-only"

anyone else noticing the fractured chain???  the main part of consensus has been torn out why?

there... i fixed it... see block at https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/block.dws?232603.htm
better?