yea... been hoping for some traction since the ICO but things looking worse than ever now

Amazing how the shameless scammers use their sock-puppets to pump this trash Bankera/Spectrcoin scam which made millions for its owner from the scam Bankera ICO and left investors out of pocket.

Sock-puppet imbecile weriu has been added to my IGNORE list too because fools like him can write all they like I am not interested in reading their pathetic lies

My sincerest apologies to any sock-puppets that did not list below or did not add to my IGNORE list, if you exist I will add you 


alpey
Bankera
Bankera_ICO
EA001
henke1
huup
jamolo
Jfdalhus
JimmySlander
john_jones
JohnnyBTC197
jubeis_coffee
macinino
Milky86
Mokka223
Platonicus
Scroogge
SP!
SpectroCoin_support
ToWS
weriu

There is not much money in Africa, but there are quite enough users to show excellent indicators of community growth. The only question is how such a partnership will increase prices in such a market? I have doubt that such news will give investors a positive buy this project.

of course nothing will complain, they get what they are supposed to get. I don't even think that their payments every week, so lucky for those who join in it. Bankera is one project that will grow in the future.

Dev has no plan to spend from raise money on marketing or paid listing on big exchange so this is big problem which keeping away big investors from this project. I don't think we will see good performance in near future maybe it could take few years it would survive.

They didn't promise with us it will get listed on big exchanges so they don't care about the value of this token. We must realize this is not a perfect timing to push on these exchanges this won't help this to bounce back better wait until they release any working product.

If you think you understand the crypto world, you're very likely mistaken. The best you can do is position yourself so that you get the most reward for risk that you're taking, and making sure you don't run into a risk of ruin event. In general, when you're evaluating crypto, make sure you understand the asymmetry of risk/return and position your portfolio accordingly.

I think this is just the start we need, few big companies here and there, joining the crypto world, and if it's successful, then more and more well reputed company will come ahead and launch their own crypto currency. So overall it's good news. Can't wait the day when Amazon, Facebook, Twitter etc join

Hey, guys.

What blockchain do you consider as the most powerful? No, imagine you're launching ICO So, what blockchain would you choose, taking into account the amalgamn of relevant criteria such as scalability, type of mining, user friendly smart contracts or not (to create them), security, functionality etc.

Let's think about it

Not anything from development point of view but yeah NEM was mentioned in the conference of petro (Venezuela crypto), but the Petro is based on ETH. I am sure the government fully dont understand the difference between ETH and NEM. But yeah it can be fomo.
https://twitter.com/cryptoTonyNEM/status/966058100816953344

Now there are a lot of analytical articles about the fact that NEM will become a real competitor for ETH. I think that makes sense. In a few years NEM will become a very strong platform if the project will also develop rapidly and sign contracts with well-known companies.

I think the ramifications of NEM somehow stepping in and telling Maduro et al, "No, you may not use our block chain!" would be pretty sweeping, and probably more of a detriment to whatever good in the world cryptocurrencies can accomplish than the "good" of prohibiting a "bad person" from doing something crazy with a cryptocoin. Just imagine that NEM got taken over by bad people (Maybe Maduro himself launches a coup and takes over the NEM foundation or something), and decided that no "good" organizations could ever build anything on NEM. Then what?

I think it's honestly better to keep it open sourced and decentralized, and see who uses the technology. I've heard of at least 7 or 8 tokens launching on the NEM block chain, so it won't be long before Petro becomes just one of many others.

Apparently Bankera is under investigation by the Lithuanian central bank. Bankera is soon to be a NEM token. Does that make them bad too?

I never said the hack was the fault of XEM/NEM code.  Please learn to comprehend written words before accusing me of not understanding what is like the 20th or 30th exchange hack I've been through.

What are the straight facts regarding exactly what problem XEM solves?  Do you even know what problem XEM is a solution in search of?

ETH is shit too.  I don't care if XEM is slightly less shitty and useless than VitalikToken; that doesn't answer my question in a responsive way because it's just a deflection.

You can't defend the XEM core devs' *RESPONSE TO* the hack because it was obviously hand-waving and self-congratulatory to an appalling degree.

Have fun being the shittoken for Maduro's Socialist Paradise.  Venezuala and XEM are prefect complements; they deserve each other just like degeneracy and AIDS.  

$85 per coin

Theoretically, the valuation of the Petro is supposed to be $6b, with 100mil coins = $60 per coin

I'm guessing the market keeps rising until the end of February, and with a coin backed by oil, the Petro will rise too.