Hello,

I received your PM and replied to you but, I got the following message:

User 'JollyGood' has blocked your personal message.

Thank you

It would be enough a full kyc proving to be the account owner and comply with laws and regulations.   

Nothing more

Thank you

It obvious as you stated.

BTW, funds are already with an arbiter and we do publish bank statements at the following link where you'll also fice copy of the defamation procedure against the OP:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AcIIsoWP5mcMCApKMMPtTokkXfS9eyIz?usp=sharing

The OP is arguing that we do have control of the arbiter and we proposed him to select a new one but, the new arbiter would require the OP a kyc as well......  So he refused the proposal...

Again it is obvious he was capable to get access to an account which is not owned by him. Therefore, ten years from now, we will be at the same point.......

It would be a welcome surprise in order to close the issue.

However, in order to do so, you will have to file a formal complaint providing to authorities your full KYC.  Are you ready to do that? I hope so.

Thank you

Just for you to know.

When we launched our crowdfunding campaign, Opstart, the company licensed by Consob, requested further information about this case.

We provided all the information along with evidence and the case was dismissed.

Also, during the past 4 years, multiple times, thanks to the OP spamming, we were asked by our partners the same question and, again, after providing them with evidence, no further consequences were taken.

In conclusion, aside from a few people in this chat, which are free to express their opinion in favor of the OP, we never had someone objecting our procedures.

Thank you

Thank you for the suggestion. We have been asking the same for the past 4 years without any result.

I'll gladly do so when the real owner or her heirs will show up.

Thank you

Not exactly....

the Prosecutor receipt was obtained the moment our lawyers deposited the law suit reference number Proc: 26766/2020 against the OP.

This document is available to the OP upon request by his lawyer.

Thank you

As a matter of fact, there is a legal procedure against the OP for defamation. You could find the official docs at the following link:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AcIIsoWP5mcMCApKMMPtTokkXfS9eyIz?usp=sharing

Thank you

That's the point. He cannot follow your suggestion because, even though he had access to the account, he is not the owner......

As said, please feel free to appoint a new licensed arbitrator and I'll gladly accept it.

Thank you!

You are right! My apologies.   Link is now up to date.

Please, if you don't mind, next October remind me to update it

Thank you!!

Bank link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y9XrYsU0EmDVSUIZ0OlCrkDcnEh7X5Vf/view?usp=sharing

Legal procedure against Coinfan link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AcIIsoWP5mcMCApKMMPtTokkXfS9eyIz?usp=sharing

Sorry, but these are privileged information available to the OP only which is also allow to change the arbiter.

Thank you

It is mandatory to do a full KYC regardless the currency.  At least in Italy but, as far as I can see, even major off shore exchanges such as Binance. are requiring a full KYC now.

We are positive about this because, not only our lawyers told us wht to do but, during a routine inspection by the financial authorities, they confirmed the procedures.

I wish I could send out crypto without KYC but, I cant't.

Also, there is another problem.   I'm not positive the OP, even though he had access to the account, is the real owner.  How would you solve this problem??

This is why a qualified third party such an arbiter, could explain to the OP what he/she has to do (for us is a SHE).

Thank you

Because an Arbiter would have to comply with laws and release information to us unless, a Judge would say the Countrary.  Any of the 2 solutions would be suitable.

But don't worry, the OP cannot provide his KYC to anyone because he is not the account owner.  I wish to be wrong but, I have to assume we will stay here for another few years.......

Thank you

A simple kyc with us or with an arbiter of his choice would solve the issue.  Nothing more nothing less. 

Thank you

Once in a while it would be good to read our TOS:

11. DORMANT ACCOUNT
1. In the event that the User's account is dormant for a period of at least 12 months and Assets are available on the account, TRT will require the User to communicate the bank account details in the User's name to which the Assets are to be transferred, once converted, should they not be, into legal tender currency. If the User has not provided TRT with the destination details of the assets, which may have been converted into legal tender currency, despite TRT's reminders and after 30 days from the first notification, TRT shall arrange for the transfer of the available assets by means of the so-called "Real offer". In this case, TRT shall convert the virtual currencies into legal tender currencies independently, if necessary, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the relevant legislation, shall formalize the offer of the sums to the User through a notary public or other public official, and shall then, in the event of failure to accept the offer, deposit the amounts with another bank and notify the User of the deposit at the same time. In cases where this solution is difficult to apply, TRT will seek alternative solutions to establish contact with the User and transfer the sums to the latter. All costs related to these activities are borne by the User.

https://www.therocktrading.com/en/pages/terms-and-conditions

We habe been trying to contact the account owner without success and, of course, an anonymous claim on a private chat is not a valid request..

Thank you!

I'll be more than happy to do so as soon as the OP will comply with AML requests and proving she is the owner of the account.

In order to solve it, I'm even propose her to come to Italy at our expenses and close the issue in front of a notary.

I know she is not going to accept it because he cannot comply but a try is worth it.....

Exactly the contrary. The case has not been dismissed and you may verify by yourselves.