... IMO, he didnt want his law degree studies (and eventual qualification), to be over-shadowed by what happened at Neo-Bee.   

...
Several guys I buy Bitcoin from all have different transactions speeds in which I receive a confirm.

The first two guys use the "default fee" while the third and preferred guy to buy from uses a slightly higher fee.

The difference? Up to an HOUR for the first 2 and 1-2 MINUTES for the preferred.
...

enlighten me gentlemen, is the war over? I keep reading that core developers demand peace, but I disagree. We must continue until we annihilate the "big blocks" camp, there is no room for compromise.
...

The vitriol on both sides has been escalating; There isn't a gif on Earth to do it justice.

what a day. Just heard a rumour that Blockstream may be having their next tranche of funding cancelled, and then I almost die laughing at brg444 on his knees begging chinese minors to stay with core...

And I mean BEGGING...
[...]

There would be no war if people weren't selfish and following their own agenda

You are stating assumptions as facts and assumption is the mother of all fuckups. You do not know whether it is fake or real and therefore ignore serious risks involved.

wumpus is the only guy who matters ... and he'll never quit, don't even think he rages, just codes like a commando

... it may seem like that but we are in the process of a cleansing and some trash is leaving, so you might be confused by the trashy bankster trolls currently infesting us like a bad case of SSD or lice

I'd like to know a lot more about how the NYTimes journalist, Nathaniel Popper who wrote the Digital Gold fiction, was able to time the release of his Hearn hit piece exactly for R3C's benefit at the washington hearing?

Also the tenor of Popper's article is way overstating Hearn's importance to bitcoin, historically and recently and he is almost certain to know he is doing this after his research into the specific area of personalities involved in bitcoin for his Digital Gold book. So he has proved to be a nasty little propaganda tool who should be watched closely ... as closely as he spies on us I guess.

haha tears and snot?!

[...]
he has a fundamentally self-destructive ego and sociopathic tendencies ... that would likely overcome any legal threats taking him into mutually assured destruction situations (e.g. hard-fork) ... i.e. he will blow up R3C without any thought of the cost to himself when the time comes.

They are precisely not like him in that they have personalities that actually prefer to avoid attention/conflict and write code (use technology)

Hearn will be like a ticking time-bomb waiting to go off at R3C ... he's bitcoin's biggest asset right now. Can you imagine that arrogant little snipe not getting his way inside a corporate IT project, just waiting to slip the knife in or totally blow-up the project in a PR nightmare intended to destroy its credibility??

Who's Bill? You mean Bill Gates?

Core
Effective 1.75-2MB Block capacity
[...]

The amount of my contributions are irrelevant nor would I disclose my contributions; not to you nor anyone else at this moment.

I'm not an authority; I'm just someone who's trying to help Bitcoin and certainly not someone who was bought off by banks and backstabbed everyone. Stop defending him, he does not deserve it.

What are you talking about? This has nothing to do with the system. The system is unharmed and the maths behind it are impenetrable (in the todays world). This is about the sheep of this world and the corrupt media. Most of the media quickly picked up on this as the ultimate truth even though Hearns words have no meaning anymore and are backed by nothing but bias and rage (due to the failure of his project). I'm quite annoyed and tired of this constant nonsense. These people need to be shamed for all eternity.

Mainstream presstitutes are just property of the financial oligopoly. Do I need to tell why banks can't leave bitcoin alone?!