This is a nice Youtube tutorial on a good mouse autoclicker for Windiows PC.

https://youtu.be/BwB65SpH3-I

On a PC, this is a good mouse auto clicker tutorial: https://youtu.be/BwB65SpH3-I

Hi!

I am a developer at GitHub.
Let us fight together against Curse Of Rank-Size Distribution!

https://minexmr2.com/#mission

Add a GitHub star if you are excited, share on your social media.

https://github.com/minexmr2/minexmr2

As all of you must know, Crypto notion is not defined as some transactions infrastructure based on a cryptography.
Cryptography is just a first historical-appeared technology to guarantee all the transactions in Crypto are IRREVERSIBLE.
Yes, there is only one property of Crypto notion that is necessary and sufficient to call an entity the Crypto:

IRREVERSIBLE TRANSACTIONS.

All other properties are just derivatives from that most fundamental property. For example, to be yourself
your own bank, in other words, to hold full responsibility yourself if you got scammed, newbies.

But let us return to irreversible transactions. Indeed, historically, irreversible transactions
are implemented by running the same special cryptography algorithms by all the Crypto coin participants simultaneously.

Here is coming decentralization. Participants running cryptographic software are not organized in a some hierarchical
relation but rather form an [ONE RANK peer-to-peer](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-to-peer) network.
All the participants are interchangeable, no one is emphasized.

But ONE RANK networks are pretty rarely found in real nature. All the laws of physics, chemistry, biology, sociology
lead to [RANK-SIZE distribution](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank–size_distribution) in any use-case, where
an innocent mind expects [UNIFORM distribution](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_uniform_distribution).

And, RANK-SIZE distribution is the CURSE of all the Crypto world since its creation by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2009.

First of all, there is still no one well working meanwhile perfectly decentralized exchange.
Several centralized exchanges, if they were distributed uniformly by popularity between end-users, might form
a good approximation of a whole decentralized exchange. It were the case, if each end-user selects a centralized
exchange for every next currency conversion RANDOMLY.

But in real life, popularity of centralized exchanges has the cursed RANK-SIZE distribution, furthermore in its worst case:
Almost all the people (90% by money flow) use the f@cking BINANCE.

I am Florida Haunted from [Bitcointalk 2014](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=341464)
and I had already seen the end of RANK-SIZE distribution: [MT-GOX](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mt._Gox).

Crypto people, you are all under the severe CURSE of RANK-SIZE distribution where as few as just 1-3 TOP participants serve the whole industry.
Consequently, if they got scammed or ruined by state regulators, the whole industry will be devastated.

Mining industry is as well deep hard under the CURSE of RANK-SIZE distribution. Given any coin, [TOP 3](https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero)
mining pools are occupying some 70% of network hashrate.
Despite the fact there is decentralized [p2pool](https://github.com/SChernykh/p2pool) software for some coins,
it does not change the game.

The reason is simple: p2pool IS NOT a mining pool but rather a composite of software to be built, deployed,
connected to each other, running, upgraded, maintained on the responsibility basis of every end-user participant (the miner).

The CURSE of RANK-SIZE distribution is one of the reasons I have made [minexmr2.com](https://minexmr2.com),
first open-source Monero mining pool using decentralized p2pool as a hashrate-liquidity provider for frequent payouts.

I do recommend all the miners to use p2pool directly if they have resources and time to deploy and maintain the node.
[Gupax](https://github.com/hinto-janai/gupax) may help a lot as it automates many routines. In coins other than Monero,
corresponding implementations of p2pool or even gupax also exist, I believe.

But p2pool is not a mining pool, as it was mentioned above, it is a piece of software interacting with other pieces of software
you must build, run, maintain for your own responsibility.

[Minexmr2.com](https://minexmr2.com) from the other hand, is just exactly a classic vanilla mining pool, you can switch to INSTANTLY.
And hereby I ask every person reading this, a person that has no resources to establish his own p2pool instance,
AND connected to [TOP 3](https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero) mining pools by hashrate, to switch to minexmr2.com.

For coins other than Monero, one can adopt the pool's open source from
[GitHub](https://github.com/minexmr2/minexmr2)/[GitLab](https://gitlab.com/minexmr/minexmr2)
to the coin of his choice.

Please do not switch to minexmr2.com if you are already connected to a pool outside [TOP 3](https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero).
You do already vote for UNIFORM distribution instead of RANK-SIZE one.

Minexmr2.com is a full-fledged pool with hashrate charts, payment history, pending balance, etc. It makes automatic payouts with
typical p2pool frequency (some 2-3 times a hour), if pending balance is above 0.01XMR.
Tell that to your friends and share on your special media.

You may RANDONLY select ANY pool outside [TOP 3](https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero). Just do that to fight RANK-SIZE distribution together.

And of course, abandon the f@cking BINANCE exchange right now! Select any random exchange from
[kycnot.me](https://kycnot.me) or [trocador.app](https://trocador.app).

Together we make RANK-SIZE distribution UNIFORM and rescue the Crypto world!!!

Apr 17 2023:

minexmr2.com has been upgraded to the latest p2pool v3.2 and monerod v0.18.2.2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/12pijvq/minexmr2com_has_been_upgraded_to_the_latest/

Apr 12 2023: minexmr2.com now shows total payouts to the miners, to ensure that pool is functioning properly.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/12hh69z/minexmr2com_now_shows_total_payouts_to_the_miners/

⚡ Mar 12 2023: Successfully migrated to p2pool v3.1 and monerod v0.18.2.0 and ready for Mar 18 2023 p2pool (not monero) hard fork.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/11pck51/minexmr2com_updated_to_p2pool_v31_monerod_v01820/?sort=new

Feb 03 2023: minexmr2.com is now full-fledged!

Wow wow wow! Don't forget to press F5 or Ctrl+F5 in your browser.

minexmr2.com is now full-fledged!

P2Pool hashrate charts & miner's last 10 payouts to show in web-UI have been implemented and deployed to minexmr2.com site with miner's hashrate charts. Remember, the pool supports only automatic difficulty that is coming from p2pool and starts from some 4000K. Minimum possible difficulty is set to 50000. That steps are made to avoid server's overloading by misconfigured miner rigs. Minimum total miner's hashrate (per each unique XMR address) is recommended to have at least 50KH/s.

Today, minexmr2.com has all the base features of a full-fledged Monero mining pool:

It shows approx. estimation of payout frequency (typically some 2 times per hour).

It shows P2Pool 24h hashrate charts that reflects the actual frequency of a miner being paid by minexmr2.com pool, because it has effective hashrate of P2Pool.

It shows Miner's proper 24h hashrate charts that reflects the actual payment amount of a miner to be sent (each time above 0.01XMR threshold).

It shows Miner's proper last payout (amount and UTC time) as well as latest 10 payouts sent.

It shows many other parameters like minexmr2.com pool local hashrate, P2Pool local hashrate (these two parameters should be nearly equal to each other if P2Pool instance functions properly), Miner's 24h mean hashrate, pending balance, etc.

Enjoy! And share this great news in your social media. Tell to all your friends. Have a nice Friday!

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/10sc6lk/minexmr2com_is_now_fullfledged/?sort=new

Just press F5 or Ctrl+F5 in your browser.

Miner's hashrate charts were long awaited, and now they are here at [minexmr2.com](https://minexmr2.com).

P2pool Local hashrate is a control parameter to compare to pool's hashrate itself. If connection to p2pool inside is alive, both parameters are nearly the same.

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/10jgf4d/miners_hashrate_charts_p2pool_local_hashrate/

Jan 09 2022: minexmr2.com pool has been fixed against strange reddit-discussed issue.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/107gg2e/a_strange_issue_minexmr2com_has_encountered_this/

Jan 03 2022: https://minexmr2.com server has implemented miner's hashrate recording for last N days. Pool web-ui shows miner's 24h-averaged hashrate and miner's last payout (amount @ time).

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/1024q2r/minexmr2com_shows_miners_last_payout_time_and/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

Some reddit discussion links:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/y7w0hy/how_to_make_decentralized_p2pool_a_top_1_mining/
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/ydctmy/where_hashrate_of_monerohash_vaultpro_is_coming/

Note, pool's site & GitHub/GitLab texts about 51% attack have been completely fixed (removed) after discussion.

If you have questions on pool minexmr2.com, and how it uses p2pool inside, feel free to ask them!

Hi!

In Monero community it is an important idea to decentralize mining by using own p2pool instance by every single miner.
Meanwhile, it is quite difficult to build, deploy and maintain such an instance for a non-advanced Monero user.

Hereby, I officially introduce brand new Monero mining pool that uses its own p2pool instance as a hashrate-liquidity provider.
******************
https://minexmr2.com
******************
The pool is completely open source, of course. It's name is devoted to legendary departed pool minexmr.com. But I am NOT affiliated in any way with minexmr.com's owner. I am completely separated person.

Digit "2" in minexmr2 means "p2pool" as well as "2" means next, 2nd generation of minexmr pool.

I made a really old-school Monero mining pool without any registration, cheating cookies, personal data collection, etc.
When you mine with minexmr2.com, all your hashrate is redirected to internal p2pool instance,
thus all minexmr2.com hashrate is actually accounted to p2pool hashrate.

Pool minexmr2.com processes all the PPLNS billing and eliminates p2pool's dust payments, aggregating them to 0.01XMR chunks to be paid to you.

Also minexmr2.com pool can be easily up-scaled on a dozen of servers, using haproxy as a request scheduler.

Source code mirrors of the pool:
https://github.com/minexmr2/minexmr2
https://gitlab.com/minexmr/minexmr2

Just try to mine (all the instructions there):
******************
https://minexmr2.com
******************

I've just written more:
--
Guys most of you think in too generalized manner, you attempt to predict too far future, you almost admit defeat in front of ASICs... It is a bad way methodologically.

We are living in the current iteration. There is a week passed after last hard fork to cn/r. First, it must be said, there is no FPGA or quick understanding how to program FPGA against cn/r. Technically it is possible in few hours or days. But we observe low hashrate still, week passed. So they CAN'T do that quickly at least.

Thus, fight against ASICs/FPGA is POSSIBLE. Furthermore, cn/r is quite simple algo with very basic levels of virtualization and randomization. Read my comment above, what if we introduce HARD levels of virtualization and randomization? There is physics: ASICs/FPGA can't be MUCH more profitable than CPU or GPU, if quite perfect mining algo is designed.

Today, let's focus on tasks how to add strong virtualization and randomization to the algo. RandomX with memory scratch-pad reduced from 4Gb to 256Mb (to support even Raspberry Pi) is good level of virtualization.

To add randomization we may consider external oracles like ones in Ethereum contracts or long hashes (sha512, etc) applied to concatenated transactions of last 100 blocks for example. Let's think in this direction.

Fundamental physics is on our side: if mining algo has sufficient levels of virtualization and randomization, ASIC/FPGA manufacturers MUST implement Intel-like CPU! Let them compete with Intel directly!
--
https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/316#issuecomment-472815812

Hueristic, dEBRUYNE, Fluffypony!

WAKE UP!

According to:
https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero

XMR Network hashrate = 504.79 MH/s
All Known Pools hashrate = 311.13 MH/s

The Relative Unknown Origin hashrate = Unknown Origin hashrate / Known Origin hashrate = 62%,
when it equals to 100%, it is 51% ATTACK!!!

Just 2 days ago the Relative Unknown Origin hashrate was 30%:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg49139862#msg49139862

Just 1 month ago, the Relative Unknown Origin hashrate was 5-10%.

SOS. SOS. SOS.

Monero is the only 100% trustless anonymous currency. It relies on Cryptonote algo that has nearly 20 years of scientific research published in peer-reviewed mathematical journals. Cryptonote is stable, mature technology and all its weakness have been studied very well. Furthermore, Monero is designed from the scratch to be anonymous by default, so end-user can violate anonymity only if he wants to do that apparently. To violate anonymity, end-user can either use payment-ids to make his payments publically available, or stealth sub-addresses to make his payments transparent for his payment's counterpart only. So Monero even being anonymous by default is 100% ready to public and legal business solutions too.

The nearest competitor of Monero is ZCash. But ZCash is trojan by nature: its zk-snarks algo relies on so called "initial blockchain secret key" or "Zcash trusted setup" that must be fired off by developers. See how they did it:
"
For this particular hard fork upgrade, it’ll have to go through a new trusted setup, and if someone is able to compromise the “randomness” input into the system by developers, they’ll theoretically be able to exploit the system, possibly printing themselves as much zcash (currently valued at $316 per token) as they’ve ever dreamed of.
"
https://www.coindesk.com/devs-destruction-inside-zcashs-second-crypto-ceremony

Do you trust in ZCash developers? I don't trust them as well as in Monero devs, Bitcoin devs, etc: I prefer 100% complete trust-less solutions, and Monero is the only such a solution relies on mathematics only.

Speaking about other anonymous competitors is completely unserious: Dash? You must trust in Dash masternode each time you send "anonymous" payment.

I was observing Monero and its development by my own eyes for a long time since 2014. Monero is the direct Bitcoin replacement because it fixes all the Bitcoin drawbacks:
- Monero has no pre-mine and insta-mine like Bitcoin has when Satoshi mined it alone.
- Monero has adaptive block size so we found very "wild" and "terrifying" when Bitcoin splitted down to Bitcoin Cash that is splitted to Bitcoin Cash ABC & Bitcoin Cash SV just because of block size limitations. Stupid people: all the Bitcoin Cash variants are 100% scam coins.
- Monero has the Community that proved it can develop the source code even without its famous leader Riccardo Spagni aka Fluffypony: the amazing Bulletproofs algo that reduced transaction fees from typical 0.01XMR to <0.0005XMR has been implemented and released after Fluffypony has switched to the Tari project (Ethereum-like ecosystem on top of Monero blockchain - https://www.tari.com).
- Monero community has strong anti-ASIC politics and tweak mining algo twice a year to be 100% ASIC-resistant forever. Furthermore, in the last months Monero officially fights against virus-mining too: for example, mining pool's source code detect "low-difficulty shares with multiple connections"-like behavior and rejects such suspicious connections to a pool.

Summarize that, among large and well-studied cryptocurrencies, Monero is The Only Anonymous and one among the most advanced top-level cryptos.

And just to extend the Hueristic answer (I joint to it completely), note that Monero is almost the only crypto who has been scheduled a regular hard-fork (2 times per year) with anti-ASIC mining algo modification. Anti-ASIC fights against bot-nets too, because most bot-nets were created before first anti-ASIC modification took place, i.e. their creators din't know about future modifications and their bot-nets can't work now.

Of course, new bot-nets come to the scene periodically, but they encounter several number of brand new difficulties:
1. end-users and anti-viruses know about malware mining and can detect this type of activity
2. it is significantly more complicated to create bot-nets with update mechanism
3. our community fights against bot-net officially, particularly, the pool software can detect bot-net low difficulty share traffic and block it

How to estimate a percentage of bot-nets in the whole Monero hashrate? An obvious approach is to compare hashrate before and after 2nd algo modification on hardfork cn/1 to cn/2 - wtih the same one appeared on hardfork cn/0 to cn/1 when most ASIC had been rejected by network:

- on hardfork cn/0 to cn/1 hashrate changed from ~1Ghs to ~600Mhs (we killed all the ASICs)
- on hardfork cn/1 to cn/2 hashrate changed from ~600Mhs to ~500Mhs (we killed almost all the bot-nets)

today's hashrate is ~430MHs

so, there were no ASICs on hardfork cn/1 to cn/2 hashrate,
bot-nets' hashrate UPPER estimate is (600-500)/500 ~ 20%

but, after recent exchange dump from 1XMR = $110 to $60, hashrate dim is (500-430)/500 ~ 14%
Bot-nets never stop the mining because they are always profitable, this variations in hashrate are due to end-users' movements

so, real MEAN estimate of bot-nets' hashrate is 20%-14% = 6% now

I consider this 6% can be neglected.

Monero is the only coin today with completely trust-less privacy and anonymity, unlike ZCash-family coins based on zk-snark algorithm that depends on initial secret key generation trust.

Also Monero is the only coin today with long-known and well-studied Cryptonight algorithm, published and discussed in peer-reviewed scientific journals since year 2000.

Other coins attract users by either sparkling but unverified new ideas like ZCash/zk-snark or just hard PR management like Dash.

There are many areas of human activity to get spontaneous risks, like smart contracts, internet of things, etc. So may coins like ETH, IOTA, etc. offer you a chance to get risks.

But, privacy and anonymity is other completely different area. If you want to stay anonymous and private, you apparently don't want to get risks. That's why Monero is the only reasonable private and anonymous coin.

First I need to emphasize one more time, real world business is not possible without private transactions. You can prove it easily by taking a glance to the banks, merchants, etc and how they work in details. Today, virtually all the money transfers in the real world are private. Of course, you can easily discuss the Quality of that privacy and find it very poor. But you can't contradict the notion of the privacy itself being used in real world money transfers:

- When you pay by the paper bank notes or metal coins for a Big Mac in McDonalds, your transfer is private because nobody asks your citizen ID.
- When you pay by credit card for a car in Mercedes store, your transfer is private for all the world except store workers and bank workers that must keep your transaction the secret, unless special defined law conditions will be violated.
- Even huge merchants like Amazon don't upload their detailed transaction history to a public domain, they just need to generate reports to the narrow social institutes like tax department, club of shareholders, etc. Note Donald Trump hasn't declared his tax payments at all and he become the US president easily.
- And so on.

OPPOSITE TO THE REAL MONEY WORLD, MOST CRYPTOCURRENCY BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES ARE NOT PRIVATE, BUT RATHER COMPLETELY TRANSPARENT! COMPLETELY!

How do you think, could most blockchain technologies be applied to transfer money in the real world?! Of course, No! They could be used for thousands of things, EXCEPT the money transfers! There are more and more people begin to undersand that real business aspect, for example:
https://themarketmogul.com/monero-cryptocurrency/

Monero, from the other hand, is THE ONLY cryptocurrency among large ones, that has BLOCKCHAIN COMPLETELY PRIVATE WITHOUT A BIT OF TRANSPARENCY. Other 'privacy' coins are just compromises that built around notion of privacy.

Even ZCash & zk-snark algorithm that relies on initial trust to generate genesis blockchain parameters that hide the rest of blockchain, it is the compromise. In other words, in ZCash you must trust the developers whether they generated initial parameters secretly, didn't say them to the side person, and burnt them out forever. Also ZCash is not private by default like Monero, and if you transfer money between ZCash's stealth and public addresses, you lost the anonymity quickly. That vulnerabilities of ZCash were discussed on the Internet widely and you'll google them easily. I don't even speak about other Monero "competitors" like Dash, because Dash is nothing more than a children sandbox, in terms of strict privacy. They just have famous PR team.

So you can see, Monero is the only transfer system that offers perfect privacy without you need to trust to anybody.

"...If you can transfer funds, files, etc and all the info is burnt ounce accepted..."

- I answer: side chains, lightning networks, etc. NEED YOU MUST TRUST to the side agents, so the quality of the privacy achieved is not greater than quality of bank workers that say they keep you money secrets.

Furthermore, in terms of side chains, assets trade, smart contracts, etc., Monero introduces Tari:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/8lgvw4/introducing_tari_a_decentralised_assets_protocol/


I hope, you, read my post, will see the transparent blockchains in the very, very different light that ever before.