Search content
Sort by

Showing 11 of 11 results by fred9999
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 10/05/2020, 01:27:26 UTC
Hello Gumbi

"We should see a new high next week which could be as soon Monday with a decline thereafter into the week of the 18th(TP) which should be a panic cycle to the downside. a lot of these moves will be determined by the reversal system, so as long as the Dow does not elect its next bullish reversal at 24765,
the market should decline into the the week of the 18th.
The 2nd quarter is a turning point so we either have to make new lows or close below the 1st quarterly close. The intraday low may occur in May, with June being the lowest monthly closing."

Thanks for the update. Will be watching those numbers.

Any word on a time frame for when the major slingshot move up might occur and if it might be connected to the potential low created following the 2nd quarter turning point?

Fred
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 08/05/2020, 04:52:16 UTC


 The week of the 27th was a low on a closing basis, we should now rally into the week of the 11th which is also a directional change so we can make a intraday high and then turn down.. week of the 18th is a panic cycle. There is no panic cycle this month, but we do have a Turning point in June.

Directional changes usually indicate a change in direction but can also be a fast one way move.
[/quote]

Hello Gumby

I am not very fluent in Armstrongese. What I'm getting from the above is that Armstrong is saying the most likely scenario is we
go up into next week and then turn down. (as stated). Can you clarify "week of 18th is a panic cycle. There is no panic cycle this month,
but we do have a Turning point in June"

So the week of 18th is a panic cycle week but the month of May is not a panic cycle month??




Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 18/04/2020, 21:49:17 UTC

As I said before some people weren't naive enough to invest using his short term advice and some were and some of those people apparently
suffered significant losses. Many, many other "gurus" out there who exaggerate their abilities, not just Armstrong.
I can't disagree with some of what you have repeatedly said. Still think his views can be worth discussing based mostly on his
longer term projections. Have been sort of following him since the mid nineties when he was calling for 10k on the Dow which seemed ludicrous at the time
but I take it all with a big grain of salt and I don't pay for any of his services/reports (anymore). Learned that lesson a few years back after 2 or 3 of his "reports".
Thanks for the above link. Is that your next target to be harassed out of existence?  Grin
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 18/04/2020, 19:39:40 UTC
Hello out there.

Anybody subscribed to the private blog want to discuss/share MA's views on
whether the markets have already bottomed (March 23) and/or when a slingshot
might potentially occur? Does he expect a double bottom?

Fred
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 29/03/2020, 04:13:08 UTC
Hello AC

Have a sincere question for you. You say that you have purchased all or many of the MA reports and I assume were/are subscribing to
the his private blog etc. I also assume you took the time to study and test out the validity of his trading advice, as any
intelligent investor would before risking their hard earned money.

My question to you is at what point and on what evidence did you gain enough confidence in MA's trading advice where you
decided to go ahead and risk and then lose enough money so that it has left you so pissed off?

Fred
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 26/03/2020, 01:19:21 UTC
One of the haters says he agrees with the views of Armstrong.

"Broken clock....besides who doesn't share the same views as his?"
Caymen Jack on March 19
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 24/03/2020, 17:34:30 UTC
I agree with Urex. There are extremes on both sides.

AC has made many points that probably can't be denied. Your points are extremely well
documented on this thread over and over and anyone reading through here can't miss
them. Give it a break and get a life. As you say the war is won, so move on already.

The people who weren't drawn in hook, line and sinker by what MA is selling and didn't
get burned might want to have a forum here where they can freely discuss what they
think might be of value without being harassed be people who are unable to come to terms
and accept their own failings.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 21/03/2020, 17:22:38 UTC

"And YOU MARTY (posting as over45 here)"

Come on, if MA was actually writing these posts we all know they would be only semi coherent and
written with syntax quality at a grade 2 level.
Over45"s posts are clear and easy to understand. There you go, proof positive its not MA. lol

Sorry Traxo, the preceding has no corroborating quote sources and might even be full of baseless claims
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 20/03/2020, 00:34:33 UTC
Fred another newbie joins the charlatan hahaha

I think you might need some new coke bottle glasses(might as well get a new pocket protector while you are at it).

Did you read what I said? Did it sound like I was promoting his products to you?

Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 19/03/2020, 22:58:30 UTC
Sounds like the mainstream media with their fake news. Maybe they will try to impeach you. lol
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
fred9999
on 19/03/2020, 22:21:51 UTC
Hello

How times have changed versus 4 years ago. Back then if you came on this site and were at all critical of MA you got
lambasted by the MA fanboys of that time. (I know because I got jumped on and called several different things)
Now if you point out anything positive about MA you get lambasted by those that bought into every aspect of his service
and got burned. I don't think most of MA's haters are here to help save others but more likely on here because both their
pocketbooks and their egos took a big hit, They assumed that his shorter term investing advice was worthy of risking their
money and bought in big time. Time and price they shouted. What are you too dumb to understand, they said? They were
right, I couldn't make enough sense of it that I was going risk my money on it. I am very glad common sense kicked in.

BTW where are you guys now? TPTB need war(ego maniac), AltcoinUK, Stoat and others. Shouldn't you be on here bragging about all
of your successes? Suspect some of those people are the haters now posting under a new handle.

Having said all that, I believe, as I did then, that you ignore MA's longer term views at your own peril. He has been very right on
many of his long term big ticket projections. Nobody can reasonably dismiss his timing on this recent market collapse. For sure he
underestimated the depth of the decline but he nailed the timing. My understanding is that he is now calling for the bottom
to be April 17th. We will see how that plays out.

Its too bad that chest beating seems to predominate on here instead of more useful discussion. I think Bradfromearth nailed it in
his Mar 17 post.  Be clever enough to determine what is of value to you from what is being offered and use that to your advantage and
discard the rest. That is the trick in my opinion and what separates success from failure.
MA is a very good resource if you are a long term investor but not so good (at least in my view) if you are a trader.
I know that many on both sides would disagree with that. So be it.
Over the years I bought 2 or 3 of his reports and signed up to his $15 service for a year or so (quit when he stopped allowing access to the private blog)
until it became clear to me that neither was really helping me much. I still read his blog almost everyday and that along with updates from others seems to suffice
for the time being.

One other thing, I was somewhat surprised to discover that two different "significant" fund managers that I was speaking to recently pay a fair bit of
attention to what MA has to say. They didn't use his advice verbatim but they definitely respected what his forecasts had to say.

Regards
Fred