Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 84 results by gen. specific
Post
Topic
Board Collectibles
Re: [ANN] CHASING CASASCIUS : Limited Print Book with + Casascius Gold Bar Raffle
by
gen. specific
on 25/06/2016, 02:44:52 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Collectibles
Re: [ANN] CHASING CASASCIUS : Limited Print Book with + Casascius Gold Bar Raffle
by
gen. specific
on 18/06/2016, 02:49:44 UTC
Looking forward to the sequel.  GETTING NASTY. (kidding)   Cheesy

This could be a whole franchise!
Post
Topic
Board Collectibles
Re: Chasing Casascius
by
gen. specific
on 17/06/2016, 16:35:38 UTC

Chasing yourself now, Casascius?  Wink

Surreal, much.  Grin

I hope Mike wins the bar Grin
Poetry in motion, right there.  Grin

That would be ironic

Maybe I'll put in multiple orders to increase my chances of getting the bar, damn how are you guys doing the group buy going to handle that!

I don't see a problem with the draw and group buy?

If the books are serial numbered then will the draw speak for it self. If the draw is order based, then will the group buy organizer just make a local draw between the buyers. If you trust the group buyer with your bitcoins, then surely can you also trust him to make a fair draw. You can even have a trusted 3rd party to do the draw, but that would hardly be necessary with Mitchell or MJ as organizers.

I think it is by book number, maybe it didn't specify

Also something about a provably fair seed

but either way I think this will be pretty simple
Post
Topic
Board Collectibles
Re: Chasing Casascius
by
gen. specific
on 17/06/2016, 15:55:44 UTC

Chasing yourself now, Casascius?  Wink

Surreal, much.  Grin

I hope Mike wins the bar Grin
Poetry in motion, right there.  Grin

That would be ironic

Maybe I'll put in multiple orders to increase my chances of getting the bar, damn how are you guys doing the group buy going to handle that!
Post
Topic
Board Collectibles
Re: Chasing Casascius
by
gen. specific
on 17/06/2016, 02:52:28 UTC
I was just shown this...  Shocked

http://chasingcasascius.com


I will buy one of your best coins if you can do a package deal with her included.
What rating should we give her MS69  Cheesy

Looks like the book owners are put into a raffle for that Casascius gold bar after the halving, so that's close right?

In for 1
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
by
gen. specific
on 21/05/2014, 07:28:07 UTC

I love this line of thinking.  I would also love to see the ability to pay for prescriptions and even medical bills in CureCoins.  In the original announcement thread we had a lot of discussion along these lines.

I have no idea how to initiate things like this but I do believe this is the right direction.  Can you imagine if Walgreen accepted CureCoins in their pharmacy?   Grin  Maybe a little discount on the price of the drugs because CureCoins may have helped create them and there should be lower transaction fees compared to credit card processors.

right.

it is foreseeable that alternate cryptos will be a liquid and viable form of acceptance with the proliferation of any cryptocurrency (such as bitcoin)

decentralized exchanges will allow for the point of sale exchange into any crypto
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
by
gen. specific
on 21/05/2014, 07:02:48 UTC
clever

just not clear on why people would hold curecoin

for the previously purely altruistic protein folders, there is only incentive to sell

buying curecoin doesn't support protein folding or scientific research except in a stretch of the imagination that a higher priced curecoin helps donations (more selling)


please explain why this won't be worth 2 satoshis in a month
if it's worth only 2 satoshi nobody would fold because they wouldn't recoup their electricity costs

so yes, people have to buy the coin to support folding

In all honesty some of us will probably fold no matter what the value of the coin.  I'm not particularly concerned about whether I recover the cost of my hardware or my electricity.  Crypto was a gamble for me and I simply despise mining due to the wasted resources so if I make money great!  If I don't, I can live with it.  At least the work done to earn the coins meant something.

Edit:  Regarding the original question of explain why this won't be worth 2 satoshis in a month.  Nobody can say what the value of any coin will be in a month.  There are a lot of people that will argue otherwise but it is simply an opinion.

fair points but the proper incentive will improve the hash rates for protein folding.

I am here to entertain a cognitive discussion on how to improve incentive, not an abstract "free market, altruism" cop out

CureCoin is a POW / POS hybrid so theoretically the POS component should help the value because people will want to hold the coin in order for minting to work.  The counter argument could be that holding a coin also destroys it because if there is no circulation nobody will want to use it for anything assuming there is something to use it for in the first place.
 


Well, as far as I'm aware there are no uses anyways. There needs to be businesses that revolve around CureCoin. Something unique that this coin brings and makes people buy into it as a result. Protein folding is awesome, sure, but it's not going to get people to buy the coin.

my first thought was the organizations that benefit from protein folding

begin transacting in curecoin

get grants paid in curecoin


this indirectly moves a lot of capital into the curecoin network
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
by
gen. specific
on 21/05/2014, 07:02:08 UTC
clever

just not clear on why people would hold curecoin

for the previously purely altruistic protein folders, there is only incentive to sell

buying curecoin doesn't support protein folding or scientific research except in a stretch of the imagination that a higher priced curecoin helps donations (more selling)


please explain why this won't be worth 2 satoshis in a month
if it's worth only 2 satoshi nobody would fold because they wouldn't recoup their electricity costs

so yes, people have to buy the coin to support folding

In all honesty some of us will probably fold no matter what the value of the coin.  I'm not particularly concerned about whether I recover the cost of my hardware or my electricity.  Crypto was a gamble for me and I simply despise mining due to the wasted resources so if I make money great!  If I don't, I can live with it.  At least the work done to earn the coins meant something.

Edit:  Regarding the original question of explain why this won't be worth 2 satoshis in a month.  Nobody can say what the value of any coin will be in a month.  There are a lot of people that will argue otherwise but it is simply an opinion.

fair points but the proper incentive will improve the hash rates for protein folding.

I am here to entertain a cognitive discussion on how to improve incentive, not an abstract "free market, altruism" cop out

CureCoin is a POW / POS hybrid so theoretically the POS component should help the value because people will want to hold the coin in order for minting to work.  The counter argument could be that holding a coin also destroys it because if there is no circulation nobody will want to use it for anything assuming there is something to use it for in the first place.
 


thanks

That counter argument has not been demonstrated in any cryptocurrency yet, even in low float cryptos that have very few full units, the infinite divisibility is a feature
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
by
gen. specific
on 21/05/2014, 06:52:36 UTC
clever

just not clear on why people would hold curecoin

for the previously purely altruistic protein folders, there is only incentive to sell

buying curecoin doesn't support protein folding or scientific research except in a stretch of the imagination that a higher priced curecoin helps donations (more selling)


please explain why this won't be worth 2 satoshis in a month
if it's worth only 2 satoshi nobody would fold because they wouldn't recoup their electricity costs

so yes, people have to buy the coin to support folding

In all honesty some of us will probably fold no matter what the value of the coin.  I'm not particularly concerned about whether I recover the cost of my hardware or my electricity.  Crypto was a gamble for me and I simply despise mining due to the wasted resources so if I make money great!  If I don't, I can live with it.  At least the work done to earn the coins meant something.

Edit:  Regarding the original question of explain why this won't be worth 2 satoshis in a month.  Nobody can say what the value of any coin will be in a month.  There are a lot of people that will argue otherwise but it is simply an opinion.

fair points but the proper incentive will improve the hash rates for protein folding.

I am here to entertain a cognitive discussion on how to improve incentive, not an abstract "free market, altruism" cop out
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
by
gen. specific
on 21/05/2014, 06:50:18 UTC
clever

just not clear on why people would hold curecoin

for the previously purely altruistic protein folders, there is only incentive to sell

buying curecoin doesn't support protein folding or scientific research except in a stretch of the imagination that a higher priced curecoin helps donations (more selling)


please explain why this won't be worth 2 satoshis in a month
if it's worth only 2 satoshi nobody would fold because they wouldn't recoup their electricity costs

so yes, people have to buy the coin to support folding

they would have to, but why would they

as with all coins, miners are dumping the coin on exchanges, and now we have new protein folders dumping coins

it is not uncommon to see a coin's price fall out of sync with base costs

so I get the concept behind curecoin, but what supports the price ?


some coins have price support by requiring coins to be held for ongoing perks, essentially removing coins from circulation. other coins have other forms of utility


here we have some kind of merge mining protein folding, a somewhat interesting distribution method for coins between cpu/gpu and sha256 asics, but nothing that makes it seem stable

so now altruism has been further thinned out between protein folding AND supporting the currency (so that others can cash out). When I was reading the OP I was looking for that "AHA!" moment to see how the protein folders contribute to the curecoin price, just like how the curecoin financial incentive contributes to more hash rate for the protein folding... to create a feedback loop. But this doesn't exist.

just off the top of my head, maybe to contribute to protein folding cpu/gpu holders need to own X amount of curecoin. In turn they'll get the folding points or whatever as well as more curecoin. Obviously this idea isn't refined, and flawed because cpu/gpu holders are the least likely to be able to have value to exchange for the coin, compared to the expensive ASIC owners.. but the concept is that the extra perk of the coin requires removing some of the coin from circulation, improving scarcity and price and WORTH.



Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
by
gen. specific
on 21/05/2014, 06:34:46 UTC
clever

just not clear on why people would hold curecoin

for the previously purely altruistic protein folders, there is only incentive to sell

buying curecoin doesn't support protein folding or scientific research except in a stretch of the imagination that a higher priced curecoin helps donations (more selling)


please explain why this won't be worth 2 satoshis in a month
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [HAVELOCK] SCRYPT 10 GH/s hosted scrypt mining project by CRYPTX - IPO 7 MAY
by
gen. specific
on 07/05/2014, 13:23:47 UTC
THE DIFFICULTY INCREASE PROJECTS NEGLECT REALITY


they are projecting average 8% difficulty increases over time. when really 25% increases will be the norm as the ASICs roll out

caveat emptor.  their chart forecasting 8% increases in difficulty is MAYBE based on previous data for scrypt coins, this is because of lack of innovation in GPU mining efficiency. But look at bitcoin's difficulty chart for the past year, average 25% which I think is fair for scrypt asic too as all companies are aiming to roll out scrypt hardware at similar intervals
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)
by
gen. specific
on 02/05/2014, 04:34:09 UTC
will zerocoin accumulators be opt-in OR will everyone already be an accumulator?


drkcoin is doing a masternode concept only available to 1000+ drkcoins, those people will act as the mixers, and they get paid similar to miners
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)
by
gen. specific
on 02/05/2014, 04:18:40 UTC
Can we just start calling it ANC  like "ankh" (an egyptian glyph)


Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: PRE [ANN] CureCoin development continues....
by
gen. specific
on 01/05/2014, 03:56:51 UTC
amateur hour
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)
by
gen. specific
on 07/04/2014, 02:35:15 UTC
I also thought about a Kickstarter clone that would allow everyone to raise Anoncoin funds for all kind of projects. If someone can help, please contact me in pm!

Make something to streamline political donations

anybody that believes in anything will find utility in this, since popular opinion can turn against you in coming years, or a government may become vilified in the future, a bigger risk if you do any international backing

A long long long list of private citizens and companies that became part of a witch hunt after one of those events happened
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)
by
gen. specific
on 07/04/2014, 01:40:38 UTC
@gostrol  again we appreciate your initiative though so let us know if you are interested in doing more designs with our input
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)
by
gen. specific
on 07/04/2014, 01:39:41 UTC

Do you think different marketing quality is the only reason for the significant difference in coin market cap between Darkcoin and Anoncoin,     $ 2,649,719 vs. $ 615,943 ?

Could be when looking at Google Trends. Darkcoin interest continues to rise while the searches for Anoncoin are looking similar to the ANC chart, both getting closer and closer to the all time low.



Poor people who invest their money in the Darkcoin are unaware and uninformed.
The developer of Darkcoin created this currency in the sole purpose of personal enrichment (4500 first blocks with reward 500 DRK mined in less than 32 first hours). Today (some weeks later), reward is 19 DRK. Check their blockchain if you have any doubt!
Anoncoin was created by developers fascinated by the freedom and anonymity!
A debate on the Darkcoin not place here and it will be my last post about this monkey money.

omg premine stigma oh noes.  darkcoin is implementing anonymity technologies with somewhat active development, and people will find utility in that until something with more utility comes out
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)
by
gen. specific
on 06/04/2014, 22:34:19 UTC
would just like to mention that I disagree with this logo direction

I'm still thinking something simple like along the lines of an edge directed node (ripple logo) , or myriad coin's logo

something that appears simple and friendly, instead of a fringe movement

zerocoin's logo is decent too btw
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)
by
gen. specific
on 05/04/2014, 13:01:29 UTC
lots of questions on this thread that go unanswered

The lack of information is currently a detriment to this coin, and the relevant information changes every few weeks

so I'll try to answer a few things, I am not affiliated with Anoncoin, just been having my team research it for the last few months:

The Zerocoin "bloat" problem has been solved. First of all, it isn't that large of an addition to block sizes, and second of all, they get deleted or pruned from the blockchain after X confirmations. This completely mitigates any problems that were imagined with zerocoin blockchain size.

Regarding I2P - not really sure. I know a lot more about TOR than I do I2P. I do not think you need your own I2P client running to use Anoncoin in I2P


As someone who is only interested in anonymous digital currency transactions, and not investing, I have to agree that it is hard to find critical/basic information about this coin. Ultimately, this lack of information will stop people from using it. Most of this info can be found in several online forums, but it would be best if this could be added to the official website. For example (and yes, I know the answers to most of these questions):

-what is the time for generating new blocks?
-how many blocks were pre-mined, and what happened to the corresponding anc?
-why is the block reward schedule so odd? (4.2 to 7 to 5 ANC)
-what exactly does I2P do for anonymity (most people naively think that transactions can't be tracked....)
-Do you use scrypt? or SHA-256?

In addition, I think that it would be great to show a graph of the expected number of coins as a function of time, as well as the expected block reward as a function of time.


-what exactly does I2P do for anonymity (most people naively think that transactions can't be tracked....)

you can look at what nodes are on the network. you can correlate time and frequency that you see certain IP addresses

IP addresses can be masked, thats all